2 research outputs found

    COMPARATIVE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF RENAL SIZE AND ITS CORRELATION WITH AGE, GENDER, AND BODY MASS INDEX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS IN SULAIMANI REGION

    Get PDF
    Background: The renal size of a population is a very useful diagnostic parameter in the practice of medicine. Since the renal size is affected by various factors, it is necessary to first determine the normal value. Objective:The aim of this study is to provide an estimation of renal size in normal subjects in Sulaimani Teaching Hospital, and to study its relation with age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) using ultrasonography. Therefore, this provides a standard data for our locality as we are deficient of them. Method:A cross sectional descriptive study was conducted in Sulaimani Teaching Hospital during the period of June 2013 to February 2014. 450 random volunteer person were included in the study aging between 18 - 96 years, without any known renal diseases.The total sample of the study were 450 person. 239 person (53%) were females, while 211 person (47%) were males. The mean of the right renal size in males was 76553.9947 mm3, while the mean of the left renal size was 94493.9mm3. In females, the mean of the right renal size was 68324.0292mm3, while the mean of the left renal size was 84150.43264mm3. Mean renal size for the right kidney was 72210.9842 mm3,While the mean renal size for the left kidney was 89031.0296 mm3. Results:There was a positive correlation between the size of the right and left kidney, with the left kidney size which is larger. There was also a positive correlation between renal size and age, as renal size increased with age till the 5th decade of life. While the male renal size was greater than the female renal size with the same age group, there was a positive correlation between renal size and body mass index (BMI)

    Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; alarming variables for postoperative bleeding

    No full text
    Objectives: To evaluate factors contributing to bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ways of managing this complication, as bleeding is a serious sequela that requires prompt management. Patients and methods: The demographic and procedural data of 200 patients, who underwent unilateral PCNL during a 20-month period, were prospectively collected. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative details were recorded. The preoperative variables analysed included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, degree of hydronephrosis, previous ipsilateral open renal surgery, stone size and complexity. The operative variables analysed included: number of tracts, operative time, size of Amplatz sheath, type of anaesthesia, and complications such as calyceal and pelvic perforation. Results: The variables of age, sex, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and a preoperative creatinine level of >1.4 mg/dL had no significant effect on blood loss (all P > 0.05). However, the rate of bleeding was significantly higher (P ⩽ 0.05) in patients who had a history of previous open renal surgery, intraoperative pelvicalyceal perforations, and Guy’s Stone Score (GSS) grade 3 and 4 complex stones; however, absence of hydronephrosis, larger stone size, operative time (>83 min), more than one puncture, and size of the Amplatz sheath (26–30 F) did not maintain their significance in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: According to our present results stone complexity (GSS grade 3 and 4), history of ipsilateral renal stone surgery, and occurrence of intraoperative pelvicalyceal perforation are alarming variables for post-PCNL bleeding
    corecore