3 research outputs found

    Factors associated with TBS worse than BMD in non-osteoporotic elderly population: Bushehr elderly health program

    Get PDF
    Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) are moderately correlated. TBS is sometimes used as an adjuvant to BMD in the fracture risk assessment. Some individuals with normal BMD or osteopenia, have more degraded TBS. We aimed to identify factors associated with TBS worse than BMD in the non-osteoporotic elderly population. Methods: The study subjects were selected from 2384 women and men aged ≥60 years participating in the second stage of the Bushehr Elderly Health program, a population-based prospective cohort study in Iran. The BMDs of different sites and the lumbar spine texture were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the TBS algorithm, respectively. Subjects were categorized based on their BMD and TBS status

    Comparison of the Bone Turn-over Markers in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Control Subjects

    No full text
    One of the major concerns for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is developing osteoporosis, especially when corticosteroid treatment is used. The aim of the present study is to compare the bone turnover markers in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy control subjects. A total of 176 subjects were enrolled in this case-control. Ninety-one MS patients with mean age of 35.26 ± 8.76 yrs were randomly selected from the Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry. The control group was composed of 85 healthy subjects who were recruited from the Iranian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (IMOS). Fasting serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25 (OH) D3, osteocalcin and cross laps were measured in two groups. Hip and spine BMD were measured using DXA. Our findings showed significant differences in hip BMD and its T-score and Z-score values between MS patients and the control group. Osteoporosis prevalence at hip area of the MS patients was almost 5 times higher than the control group [OR=4.66, (95% CI 0.97 to 22.27), RR=4.29, (95% CI 0.95 to l9.32), p value=0.03]. No significant difference was found in BMD L2-L4, BMD T-score and BMD Z-score of lumbar area between two groups. The PTH and cross laps serum concentrations in MS patients were significantly higher than the control group. We did not find significant difference in serum osteocalcin level between the two groups. We concluded that in our study the serum levels of bone resorbtion markers in MS patients were significantly higher than the healthy control group. This may explain, at least in part, the elevated susceptibility of MS patients for developing osteoporosis

    Social�capital determinants of the women with diabetes: a population�based study

    No full text
    Introduction: Social-capital level contributes to clinical factors and health outcomes of patients suffering from diabetes. Considering the social determinants of type 2 diabetes patients could benefit to prevention of diabetes complications especially in women population. This study aims to determine social capital determinants in women with diabetes. Methods: Four hundred and thirty-five women with diabetes take-part in this cross-sectional, multi-centric study. The data was completed by a demographic questionnaire and the Social Capital instrument (SC-IQ). This study is investigating demographic (age, gender, BMI, marital, educational and social-economic status), and lifestyle factors (physical activity, nutrition), Diabetes status (HbA1c Level, medications, complications, duration of diabetes), general health status (life satisfaction, self-rated health, physical activity, and depression) and Social capital items (Value of life, Tolerance of Diversity, Neighborhood network, Family and Friends Connections, Work connections, Community participation, Feeling of trust and Safety and Proactivity). The descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to assess the associations between social capital and determinants. Results: The mean age of participants was 50 (SD: 7.7), range 28�71 year. The mean social capital score was 77.8 (SD: 15.8). In linear regression analysis, results showed that women who had the greater score in total social-capital (�: 3.7, SE: 1.5) and Feeling of trust and Safety (�: 0.87, SE: 0.42) had vigorous physical activity and also women who had greater score in Neighborhood Connections had moderate physical activity in comparison with patients who had low physical activity. (�: 0.67, SE: 0.26 and �: 0.61, SE: 0.26).Also, the findings showed that women who had had a lower score in total social-capital (�: 6, SE: 1.47), Community participation (�: 1.44, SE: 0.37), Value of life (�: 1.71, SE: 0.24), Family and Friends Connections (�: 0.88, SE: 0.25) and proactivity (�: 0.71, SE: 0.25) had depression in comparison with patients who had no depression. The findings revealed that instead of each year increase in the duration of diabetes, the total social-capital score had decreased about the half score (�: 0.48, SE: 0.21). Conclusions: Important social factors that make diabetes control are alterable to health interventions. The results of the current study suggest that social capital status may determine how effectively the women with diabetes have been managed. This initial finding permits subsequent experimental investigations to identify social strategies that can be valuable to improve diabetes control. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG
    corecore