Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely

Practical perspectives on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A view from the Middle East and North Africa

Clinical guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are available from several international cardiology associations. Patients with NVAF in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region present unique challenges and opportunities related to differences in geography, practice patterns, and patient demographics that are as yet unaddressed in practice guidelines. This review aims to offer a practical perspective on the management of NVAF in patients in MENA and draws on evidence-based guidelines as well as real-world evidence and expert opinion. The literature was searched for relevant original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and guideline recommendations addressing the prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF with a focus on issues relevant to the MENA region. Guideline recommendations, best practices, and expert opinion were discussed and agreed on by a working group consisting of cardiologists from across the MENA region. The incidence of stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation in patients across the MENA region is higher than rates reported globally, and this might be attributed to a higher incidence of vascular risk factors and underuse of anticoagulants in patients in the MENA. The available evidence supports the established role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF. There is a consistent body of clinical trial and real-world evidence supporting their efficacy for stroke prevention in NVAF, with more favorable bleeding risk profiles relative to vitamin K antagonists, such that guidelines now recommend the use of NOACs in preference over vitamin K antagonists. There are important opportunities to improve the management of NVAF outcomes for patients with NVAF by applying evidence-based guidelines for stroke prevention. Growing experience with NOACs in the MENA region will help guide patient selection and elucidate optimal dosing strategies to maximize the clinical benefits of the NOACs. Keywords: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation, NOACs, Stroke prevention, Middle East and North Afric

Quinidine, a life-saving medication for Brugada syndrome, is inaccessible in many countries

The aim of this study was to determine the availability of quinidine throughout the world. Quinidine is the only oral medication that is effective for preventing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias due to Brugada syndrome and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. However, because of its low price and restricted indication, this medication is not marketed in many countries. We conducted a survey of the availability of quinidine by contacting professional medical societies and arrhythmia specialists worldwide. Physicians were e-mailed questionnaires requesting information concerning the quinidine preparation available at their hospital. We also requested information concerning cases of adverse arrhythmic events resulting from unavailability of quinidine. A total of 273 physicians from 131 countries provided information regarding the availability of quinidine. Quinidine was readily available in 19 countries (14%), not accessible in 99 countries (76%), and available only through specific regulatory processes that require 4 to 90 days for completion in 13 countries (10%). We were able to gather information concerning 22 patients who had serious arrhythmias probably related (10 cases) or possibility related (12 cases) to the absence of quinidine, including 2 fatalities possibly attributable to the unavailability of quinidine. The lack of accessibility of quinidine is a serious medical hazard at the global leve