Evolution number of litigation cases and expenditure with monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab and Panitumumab) and tirosine kinase inhibitor (Regorafenib) for the treatment of cancer in Minas Gerais-Brazil : A preliminary analysis from 2009 to 2016

Introduction: The last decade was marked by the widespread use of molecular biological agents in combination with 5-FU / oxaliplatin or irinotecan-containing regimens in the treatment of cancer. Such biological medicines have significantly increased the costs of oncological treatment, leading to concerns about the future sustainability of drug policy and, as a consequence, health systems with universal access to health care. In the case of Brazil, the tree MoAbs BEVACIZUMAB(BEVA), CETUXIMAB(CETUX), PANITUMUMAB(PANIT) and one tirosin kinase inhibitor REGORAFENIB(REGORA) compared in this study can only be used by the patient when there is a litigation against the State, since they are not incorporated into the Single System of Health-SUS. Objectives: To evaluate the evolution number of litigation cases and expenditure with monoclonal antibodies(MoAbs) (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab and Panitumumab) and tirosin kinase inhibitor (Regorafenib) for the treatment of cancer in Minas Gerais-Brazil. Method: Retrospective descriptive study whose judicial information was extracted from the database of the Minas Gerais State Secretariat - SES-MG. The judicial actions were filed against the State of Minas Gerais for Cancer treatment and refer to the period from January 2009 to December 2016. The study was cut from the judicialized MoAbs (BEVA, CETUX, PANIT) and tirosin kinase inhibitor (REGORA) for the treatment of Colorectal Cancer (CCR). The cost of the treatments was calculated based on the prices of the Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos (CMED) ANVISA, taking into account the official dollar exchange rate of the Central Bank on January 31, 2018 and there is no adjustment for inflation. Results and discussion: Preliminary results showed that in the period between 2009 and 2016, 1024 lawsuits were filed against the State of Minas Gerais for cancer treatment, making 766 for BEVA, 206 for CETUX, 35 for PANIT and 17 for REGORA . The total cost obtained considering a 6-month overall survival for each patient was $ 22,260,536. In Brazil, the growing number of litigation and drug costs (BEVA, CETUX, PANIT and REGORA) per year is worrying, considering the increase of 5.100% for judicial actions and 1899% for treatment costs in the period 2009 to 2016 (TABLE 1). Conclusion: The exponential increase in lawsuits against the State of Minas Gerais demonstrates the growing pressure on the resources available to attend a reduced number of patients, who are available to judicialize treatments outside universal health coverage, which is already guaranteed right by the Brazilian constitution

The variability and predictors of quality of AIDS care services in Brazil

Abstract Background Since establishing universal free access to antiretroviral therapy in 1996, the Brazilian Health System has increased the number of centers providing HIV/AIDS outpatient care from 33 to 540. There had been no formal monitoring of the quality of these services until a survey of 336 AIDS health centers across 7 Brazilian states was undertaken in 2002. Managers of the services were asked to assess their clinics according to parameters of service inputs and service delivery processes. This report analyzes the survey results and identifies predictors of the overall quality of service delivery. Methods The survey involved completion of a multiple-choice questionnaire comprising 107 parameters of service inputs and processes of delivering care, with responses assessed according to their likely impact on service quality using a 3-point scale. K-means clustering was used to group these services according to their scored responses. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of high service quality. Results The questionnaire was completed by 95.8% (322) of the managers of the sites surveyed. Most sites scored about 50% of the benchmark expectation. K-means clustering analysis identified four quality levels within which services could be grouped: 76 services (24%) were classed as level 1 (best), 53 (16%) as level 2 (medium), 113 (35%) as level 3 (poor), and 80 (25%) as level 4 (very poor). Parameters of service delivery processes were more important than those relating to service inputs for determining the quality classification. Predictors of quality services included larger care sites, specialization for HIV/AIDS, and location within large municipalities. Conclusion The survey demonstrated highly variable levels of HIV/AIDS service quality across the sites. Many sites were found to have deficiencies in the processes of service delivery processes that could benefit from quality improvement initiatives. These findings could have implications for how HIV/AIDS services are planned in Brazil to achieve quality standards, such as for where service sites should be located, their size and staffing requirements. A set of service delivery indicators has been identified that could be used for routine monitoring of HIV/AIDS service delivery for HIV/AIDS in Brazil (and potentially in other similar settings). </jats:sec