3 research outputs found
Caracterización morfológica y bioquímica de Ralstonia solanacearum Raza 2, bacteria patógena en cultivos de banano y plátano en El Carmen, Manabí, Ecuador
Las musáceas son muy importantes para fines de alimentación a nivel mundial, en el Ecuador estas ocupan el 20,57 % de la superficie plantada, siendo el cantón El Carmen, uno de los principales sitios dedicados a esta explotación. Por otra parte, Ralstonia solanacearum, es la causante de la enfermedad conocida como Moko de plátano, la cual puede desaparecer el 100 % de una plantación. El objetivo fue, realizar una caracterización morfológica y bioquímica de R. solanacearum Raza 2, bacteria patógena en cultivos de banano y plátano en El Carmen, Manabí, Ecuador. El análisis bioquímico y morfológico, se realizó en los laboratorios de la Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE considerando los protocolos establecidos por diversos autores, las muestras se tomaron de plantaciones de plátano y banano (suelo y pseudotallo georeferenciadas), con síntomas de infección del Moko. Como resultado, se identificó virulencia en la mitad de las muestras, se confirmó que la bacteria es Gram negativa, en forma de bacilo, positiva a catalasa, indol negativa, con carácter oxidativo (energía en medios anaeróbicos); y fermentativos de lactosa y glucosa, sin presencia de ácido sulfhídrico, quien no fue capaz de hidrolizar almidón, in vitro; se confirmó que la temperatura de 4°C y pH de 4,5 inhiben el aumento de estas poblaciones bacterianas, sin embargo, los rangos de 25 y 37°C con pH de 6,5 a 8,5 no resultaron ser restrictivos para su propagación, por lo que se afirma, que El Carmen cumple con los estándares requeridos, para que el patógeno prolifere de manera óptima
Call for emergency action to restore dietary diversity and protect global food systems in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Results from a cross-sectional study in 38 countries
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the fragility of the global food system, sending shockwaves across countries\u27 societies and economy. This has presented formidable challenges to sustaining a healthy and resilient lifestyle. The objective of this study is to examine the food consumption patterns and assess diet diversity indicators, primarily focusing on the food consumption score (FCS), among households in 38 countries both before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 37 207 participants (mean age: 36.70 ± 14.79, with 77 % women) was conducted in 38 countries through an online survey administered between April and June 2020. The study utilized a pre-tested food frequency questionnaire to explore food consumption patterns both before and during the COVID-19 periods. Additionally, the study computed Food Consumption Score (FCS) as a proxy indicator for assessing the dietary diversity of households. Findings: This quantification of global, regional and national dietary diversity across 38 countries showed an increment in the consumption of all food groups but a drop in the intake of vegetables and in the dietary diversity. The household\u27s food consumption scores indicating dietary diversity varied across regions. It decreased in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries, including Lebanon (p \u3c 0.001) and increased in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries including Bahrain (p = 0.003), Egypt (p \u3c 0.001) and United Arab Emirates (p = 0.013). A decline in the household\u27s dietary diversity was observed in Australia (p \u3c 0.001), in South Africa including Uganda (p \u3c 0.001), in Europe including Belgium (p \u3c 0.001), Denmark (p = 0.002), Finland (p \u3c 0.001) and Netherland (p = 0.027) and in South America including Ecuador (p \u3c 0.001), Brazil (p \u3c 0.001), Mexico (p \u3c 0.0001) and Peru (p \u3c 0.001). Middle and older ages [OR = 1.2; 95 % CI = [1.125–1.426] [OR = 2.5; 95 % CI = [1.951–3.064], being a woman [OR = 1.2; 95 % CI = [1.117–1.367], having a high education (p \u3c 0.001), and showing amelioration in food-related behaviors [OR = 1.4; 95 % CI = [1.292–1.709] were all linked to having a higher dietary diversity. Conclusion: The minor to moderate changes in food consumption patterns observed across the 38 countries within relatively short time frames could become lasting, leading to a significant and prolonged reduction in dietary diversity, as demonstrated by our findings
An Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Perceived Social Distancing Policies in Relation to Planning, Selecting, and Preparing Healthy Meals: An Observational Study in 38 Countries Worldwide
Objectives: To examine changes in planning, selecting, and preparing healthy foods in relation to personal factors (time, money, stress) and social distancing policies during the COVID-19 crisis. Methods: Using cross-sectional online surveys collected in 38 countries worldwide in April-June 2020 (N = 37,207, Mage 36.7 SD 14.8, 77% women), we compared changes in food literacy behaviors to changes in personal factors and social distancing policies, using hierarchical multiple regression analyses controlling for sociodemographic variables. Results: Increases in planning (4.7 SD 1.3, 4.9 SD 1.3), selecting (3.6 SD 1.7, 3.7 SD 1.7), and preparing (4.6 SD 1.2, 4.7 SD 1.3) healthy foods were found for women and men, and positively related to perceived time availability and stay-at-home policies. Psychological distress was a barrier for women, and an enabler for men. Financial stress was a barrier and enabler depending on various sociodemographic variables (all p < 0.01). Conclusion: Stay-at-home policies and feelings of having more time during COVID-19 seem to have improved food literacy. Stress and other social distancing policies relate to food literacy in more complex ways, highlighting the necessity of a health equity lens. Copyright 2021 De Backer, Teunissen, Cuykx, Decorte, Pabian, Gerritsen, Matthys, Al Sabbah, Van Royen and the Corona Cooking Survey Study Group.This research was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (G047518N) and Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (HBC.2018.0397). These funding sources had no role in the design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data or the writing of, nor the decision to publish the manuscript.Scopu