11 research outputs found
Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: Further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections
When observing a talking face, it has often been argued that visual speech to the left and right of fixation may produce differences in performance due to divided projections to the two cerebral hemispheres. However, while it seems likely that such a division in hemispheric projections exists for areas away from fixation, the nature and existence of a functional division in visual speech perception at the foveal midline remains to be determined. We investigated this issue by presenting visual speech in matched hemiface displays to the left and right of a central fixation point, either exactly abutting the foveal midline or else located away from the midline in extrafoveal vision. The location of displays relative to the foveal midline was controlled precisely using an automated, gaze-contingent eye-tracking procedure. Visual speech perception showed a clear right hemifield advantage when presented in extrafoveal locations but no hemifield advantage (left or right) when presented abutting the foveal midline. Thus, while visual speech observed in extrafoveal vision appears to benefit from unilateral projections to left-hemisphere processes, no evidence was obtained to indicate that a functional division exists when visual speech is observed around the point of fixation. Implications of these findings for understanding visual speech perception and the nature of functional divisions in hemispheric projection are discussed. © 2014 Jordan et al
The image used in this study. The item scanned was a piece of modern linen, manufactured c.2009.
<p>The image used in this study. The item scanned was a piece of modern linen, manufactured c.2009.</p
Seeing Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin: The Role of Psychological Influences in the Perception of Writing
The Shroud of Turin (hereafter the Shroud) is one of the most widely known and widely studied artifacts in existence, with enormous historical and religious significance. For years, the Shroud has inspired worldwide interest in images on its fabric which appear to be of the body and face of a man executed in a manner consistent with crucifixion, and many believe that these images were formed in the Shroud's fibers during the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. But, more recently, other reports have suggested that the Shroud also contains evidence of inscriptions, and these reports have been used to add crucial support to the view that the Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus. Unfortunately, these reports of inscriptions are based on marks that are barely visible on the Shroud, even when images are enhanced, and the actual existence of writing on the Shroud is still a matter of considerable debate. Here we discuss previous evidence concerning the psychological processes involved generally in the perception of writing, and especially when letters and words are indistinct. We then report two experiments in which the influence of religious context on perception of inscriptions was addressed specifically, using an image of woven fabric (modern linen) containing no writing and with no religious provenance. This image was viewed in two different contexts: in the Religious Context, participants were informed that the image was of a linen artifact that was important to the Christian faith whereas, in the non-religious Neutral Context, participants were informed that the image was of a simple piece of linen. Both groups were told that the image may contain faint words and were asked to report any words they could see. All participants detected words on the image, and indicated that these words were visible and were able to trace on the image the words they detected. In each experiment, more religious words were detected in the Religious Context condition than in the Neutral Context condition whereas the two contexts showed no effect on the number of non-religious words detected, indicating that religious context had a specific effect on the perception of illusory writing. Indeed, in the Neutral Context condition, no religious words at all were reported in either experiment. These findings suggest that images of woven material, like linen, inspire illusory perceptions of writing and that the nature of these perceptions is influenced considerably by the religious expectations of observers. As a consequence, the normal psychological processes underlying perception of writing, and the tendency of these processes to produce illusory perceptions, should be an essential consideration when addressing the existence of religious inscriptions on religious artifacts such as the Shroud of Turin
Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English
Background: Normal reading relies on the reader making a series of saccadic eye movements along lines of text, separated
by brief fixational pauses during which visual information is acquired from a region of text. In English and other alphabetic
languages read from left to right, the region from which useful information is acquired during each fixational pause is
generally reported to extend further to the right of each fixation than to the left. However, the asymmetry of the perceptual
span for alphabetic languages read in the opposite direction (i.e., from right to left) has received much less attention.
Accordingly, in order to more fully investigate the asymmetry in the perceptual span for these languages, the present
research assessed the influence of reading direction on the perceptual span for bilingual readers of Urdu and English.
Methods and Findings: Text in Urdu and English was presented either entirely as normal or in a gaze-contingent moving-
window paradigm in which a region of text was displayed as normal at the reader’s point of fixation and text outside this
region was obscured. The windows of normal text extended symmetrically 0.5° of visual angle to the left and right of fixation, or asymmetrically by increasing the size of each window to 1.5° or 2.5° to either the left or right of fixation. When
participants read English, performance for the window conditions was superior when windows extended to the right.
However, when reading Urdu, performance was superior when windows extended to the left, and was essentially the
reverse of that observed for English.
Conclusion:
These findings provide a novel indication that the perceptual span is modified by the language being read to
produce an asymmetry in the direction of reading and show for the first time that such an asymmetry occurs for reading
Urdu
Mean reading rates (words per minute) for each display condition.
<p>Mean reading rates (words per minute) for each display condition.</p
Eye Movement Measures for Each Display Condition in Urdu and English.
<p>Durations are reported in milliseconds, saccade lengths are reported in degrees of visual angle, and Standard Errors are provided in parentheses.</p
Reading direction and the central perceptual span : evidence from Arabic and English
In English and other alphabetic languages read from left to right, useful information acquired during each fixational pause is generally reported to extend much further to the right of each fixation than to the left. However, the asymmetry of the perceptual span for alphabetic languages read in the opposite direction (i.e., from right to left) has received very little attention in empirical research. Accordingly, we investigated the perceptual span for Arabic, which is one of the world's most widely read languages and is read from right to left, using a gaze-contingent window paradigm in which a region of text was displayed normally around each point of fixation, while text outside this region was obscured. Skilled Arabic readers who were bilingual in Arabic and English read Arabic and English sentences while a window of normal text extended symmetrically 0.5° to the left and right of fixation or asymmetrically, by increasing this window to 1.5° or 2.5° to either the left or the right. When English was read, performance across window conditions was superior when windows extended rightward. However, when Arabic was read, performance was superior when windows extended leftward and was essentially the reverse of that observed for English. These findings show for the first time that a leftward asymmetry in the central perceptual span occurs when Arabic is read and, for the first time in over 30 years, provide a new indication that the perceptual span for alphabetic languages is modified by the overall direction of reading