61 research outputs found

    The Untapped Potential of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models in Chemoprevention Research: Opportunities and Challenges

    Get PDF
    The past decade has witnessed the unveiling of a powerful new generation of genetically-engineered mouse (GEM) models of human cancer, which are proving to be highly effective for elucidating cancer mechanisms and interrogating novel experimental therapeutics. This new generation of GEM models are well-suited for chemoprevention research, particularly for investigating progressive stages of carcinogenesis, identifying biomarkers for early detection and intervention, and pre-clinical assessment of novel agents or combinations of agents. Here we discuss opportunities and challenges for the application of GEM models in prevention research, as well as strategies to maximize their relevance for human cancer

    BRAF Activation Initiates but Does Not Maintain Invasive Prostate Adenocarcinoma

    Get PDF
    Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men. Activation of MAP kinase signaling pathway has been implicated in advanced and androgen-independent prostate cancers, although formal genetic proof has been lacking. In the course of modeling malignant melanoma in a tyrosinase promoter transgenic system, we developed a genetically-engineered mouse (GEM) model of invasive prostate cancers, whereby an activating mutation of BRAFV600E–a mutation found in ∼10% of human prostate tumors–was targeted to the epithelial compartment of the prostate gland on the background of Ink4a/Arf deficiency. These GEM mice developed prostate gland hyperplasia with progression to rapidly growing invasive adenocarcinoma without evidence of AKT activation, providing genetic proof that activation of MAP kinase signaling is sufficient to drive prostate tumorigenesis. Importantly, genetic extinction of BRAFV600E in established prostate tumors did not lead to tumor regression, indicating that while sufficient to initiate development of invasive prostate adenocarcinoma, BRAFV600E is not required for its maintenance

    DNA-PKcs-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation Drives Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis.

    Get PDF
    Emerging evidence demonstrates that the DNA repair kinase DNA-PKcs exerts divergent roles in transcriptional regulation of unsolved consequence. Here, in vitro and in vivo interrogation demonstrate that DNA-PKcs functions as a selective modulator of transcriptional networks that induce cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, suppression of DNA-PKcs inhibits tumor metastases. Clinical assessment revealed that DNA-PKcs is significantly elevated in advanced disease and independently predicts for metastases, recurrence, and reduced overall survival. Further investigation demonstrated that DNA-PKcs in advanced tumors is highly activated, independent of DNA damage indicators. Combined, these findings reveal unexpected DNA-PKcs functions, identify DNA-PKcs as a potent driver of tumor progression and metastases, and nominate DNA-PKcs as a therapeutic target for advanced malignancies

    The Msx1 Homeoprotein Recruits G9a Methyltransferase to Repressed Target Genes in Myoblast Cells

    Get PDF
    Although the significance of lysine modifications of core histones for regulating gene expression is widely appreciated, the mechanisms by which these modifications are incorporated at specific regulatory elements during cellular differentiation remains largely unknown. In our previous studies, we have shown that in developing myoblasts the Msx1 homeoprotein represses gene expression by influencing the modification status of chromatin at its target genes. We now show that genomic binding by Msx1 promotes enrichment of the H3K9me2 mark on repressed target genes via recruitment of G9a histone methyltransferase, the enzyme responsible for catalyzing this histone mark. Interaction of Msx1 with G9a is mediated via the homeodomain and is required for transcriptional repression and regulation of cellular differentiation, as well as enrichment of the H3K9me2 mark in proximity to Msx1 binding sites on repressed target genes in myoblast cells as well as the developing limb. We propose that regulation of chromatin status by Msx1 recruitment of G9a and other histone modifying enzymes to regulatory regions of target genes represents an important means of regulating the gene expression during development

    Homeobox genes and cancer New OCTaves for an old tune

    Get PDF
    AbstractIn this issue of Cancer Cell, Gidekel et al. demonstrate that Oct-4, a member of the POU class of homeobox genes, is a critical player in the genesis of testicular germ cell tumors. This study provides further evidence that deregulated expression of homeobox genes, which occurs in many solid tumors, is functionally relevant for carcinogenesis and highlights unique features that distinguish homeobox genes from other cancer-promoting genes

    Working model.

    No full text
    <p>As described in the text, we have proposed that binding of the Msx1 homeoprotein to specific target genes brings G9a and/or Ezh2 to the regulatory regions of these genes to influence histone modifications. According G9a and Ezh2 bound status, the Msx1 bound and down-regulated target genes were categorized in 4 categories. (A) Category I, Msx1 brings G9a and Ezh2 to the same site on target genes. (B) Category II, Msx1 brings G9a and Ezh2 to the same target genes but at different sites. (C) Category III, Msx1 only brings Ezh2 to the Msx1 bound site on target genes. (D) Category IV, Msx1 do not brings ether G9a or Ezh2 to the target genes, but Msx1 may brings other factors to Msx1 bound site to repress target genes expression.</p

    Msx1 genomic binding associated with enrichment of the H3K9me2 repressive mark in the developing limb.

    No full text
    <p>ChIP-qPCR analyses show relative levels of H3K9me2 at Msx1 genomic binding sites in <i>Msx1; Msx2</i> conditional mutant versus wild-type limb (13.5 <i>dpc</i>). ChIP data are expressed as relative enrichment of the H3K9me2 mark normalized to input. <i>(inset)</i> ChIP data expressed as fold enrichment in wild-type embryonic limb versus <i>Msx1</i>; <i>Msx2</i> conditional mutant embryonic limb (and normalized to input). The * indicate the following: ***<i>P</i><0.0001, **<i>P</i><0.001, *<i>P</i><0.01.</p

    G9a is required for Msx1-induced redistribution of H3K27me3 by Msx1 and localization of Msx1 at the nuclear periphery in C2C12 myoblasts.

    No full text
    <p>(A) ChIP-qPCR analyses of H3K27me3 mark on Msx1 target genes in C2C12 cells lacking Msx1 or expressing exogenous Msx1 also expressing the control or G9a siRNA. ChIP data are expressed as relative enrichment of the H3K27me3 mark normalized to input. (B) ChIP-qPCR analyses of H3K27me3 mark on genes not bound by Msx1 in C2C12 cells lacking Msx1 or expressing exogenous Msx1 also expressing the control or G9a siRNA. ChIP data are expressed as relative enrichment of the H3K27me3 mark normalized to input. (C) Immunofluorescence assays were done on C2C12 cells expressing exogenous Msx1 together with the G9a siRNA or a control siRNA and detected using antibodies for Msx1 or by detection of the nuclear marker TOPRO3. Quantitative analyses of nuclear localization for Msx1 using ImageJ show representative data from 3 independent assays, each counting a minimum of 20 cells per variable. The scale bars represent 5 Β΅m.</p
    • …
    corecore