Food-offering calls in wild golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) : evidence for teaching behavior?

Many animals emit calls in the presence of food, but researchers do not always know the function of these calls. Evidence suggests that adult golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) use food-offering calls to teach juveniles which substrate (i.e., microhabitat) to forage on, or in, for food. However, we do not yet know whether juveniles learn from this aspect of the adults’ behavior. Here we examine whether juveniles learn to associate food-offering calls with a foraging substrate, as a step toward assessing whether these calls qualify as teaching behavior. We compared the performance of four wild juvenile golden lion tamarins that were introduced to a novel substrate while exposed to playbacks of food-offering calls (experimental condition) to the performance of three juveniles that were exposed to the novel substrate without the presence of food-offering playbacks (control condition). We varied the location of the novel substrate between trials. We found that food-offering calls had an immediate effect on juveniles’ interactions with the novel substrate, whether they inserted their hands into the substrate and their eating behavior, and a long-term effect on eating behavior at the substrate. The findings imply that juvenile golden lion tamarins can learn through food-offering calls about the availability of food at a substrate, which is consistent with (but does not prove) teaching in golden lion tamarins through stimulus enhancement. Our findings support the hypothesis that teaching might be more likely to evolve in cooperatively breeding species with complex ecological niches.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Linguistic capacity of non-human animals

This paper was funded by European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration. Grant Number: 283871Linguists interested in language evolution tend to focus on combinatorial features and rightly point out the lack of comparable evidence in animal communication. However, human language is based on various unique capacities, such as a motor capacity of sophisticated vocal control and a cognitive capacity of acting on others' psychological states. These features are only present in very rudimentary forms in non-human primates, suggesting they have evolved more recently in the human lineage. Here, the evidence from recent fieldwork for precursors of these abilities is reviewed, notably sequence-based semantic communication, vocal tract control, and audience awareness. Overall, there is evidence for both continuity and discontinuity when comparing modern primate and human communication, suggesting that the origin of language is the result of multiple gradual transitions from earlier forms of primate-like communication and social cognition, rather than a sudden and fundamental redesign in ancestral human communication and cognition.PostprintPeer reviewe

Babbling behavior in the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata)

Infant babbling in humans and a few other primates plays an important role in allowing the young to practice the adult vocal repertoire during early behavioral development. Vocalizations uttered during babbling resemble, to some degree, the acoustic structure of adult vocalizations and are often produced in long bouts independent of any social context. Similar behavior, termed subsong or plastic song, is known from a variety of songbirds. Here, we show that pups of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata), a species with an unusually large vocal repertoire, produce renditions of all known adult vocalization types during bouts of vocalizations, which appear to be independent of a distinct social context. Babbling occurs in pups of both sexes, even though only adult males, not females, utter all different vocalization types produced in infancy. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of babbling in a nonprimate mammal and suggests that infant babbling may be necessary for the ontogeny of complex vocal repertoires

Localization and Mitigation of Loss in Niobium Superconducting Circuits

Materials imperfections in planar superconducting quantum circuits - in particular, two-level-system (TLS) defects - contribute significantly to decoherence, ultimately limiting the performance of quantum computation and sensing. The identification of specific parasitic layers and their associated loss contributions has, however, proven elusive. Using a combination of x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and analytical scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), we determine the thickness, chemical composition, and location of the oxides present in niobium-on-silicon coplanar-waveguide (CPW) resonators and quantify their respective contributions to the measured single-photon quality factor (Q). Using selective chemical etching, we reduce first the substrate-air oxide then the metal-air oxide thickness, dramatically reducing both TLS (δTLS) and non-TLS (δhi) losses, resulting in a median Q value over 5×106, with individual devices approaching 6×106. We find that silicon surface oxides host 70% of TLS losses, with a δTLS:δhi loss-density ratio near 11:1. In contrast, niobium surface oxides host 77% of non-TLS losses, uniformly distributed within the oxide layer, with a δTLS:δhi loss-density ratio of 3:4 for the superconducting circuits investigated in this work. Only 7% of losses come from other sources, including the niobium-silicon interface, which is sufficiently clean in our devices to allow epitaxial Nb nucleation on Si. As we mitigate surface losses through selective modification of the interface dielectrics, we arrive in a regime where TLS losses are no longer dominant, which will allow other types of losses in superconducting circuits to be investigated in more detail, including nonequilibrium quasiparticles