41 research outputs found

    Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic internet-based protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders versus treatment as usual in specialized care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Full text link

    Japan Unified Protocol Clinical Trial for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders (JUNP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Full text link

    No Mission Too Difficult: Responding to Military Sexual Assault

    No full text

    Do DSM-5 Changes to PTSD Symptom Cluster Criteria Alter the Frequency of Probable PTSD When Screening Treatment-Seeking Canadian Forces Members and Veterans?

    No full text
    Introduction: DSM-5 diagnostic criteria revisions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have raised concerns about PTSD prevalence – particularly the new requirement of one avoidance symptom. We examined the frequency of positive screening results for probable PTSD in treatment-seeking Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) personnel and Veterans when both DSM-5 and DSM-IV-TR symptom cluster criteria were applied. Methods: Previously collected data from 382 CAF personnel and Veterans were used to identify the frequency of positive screens using both sets of diagnostic criteria. Results: 71.2% (n=272) of participants screened positively for probable PTSD using DSM-5 symptom cluster criteria, compared to 77.7% (n=297) using DSM-IV-TR symptom cluster criteria. Percent agreement analyses found that negative percent agreement was 100.0%, positive percent agreement was 91.6%, and overall percent agreement was 93.5%. Discussion: The number of individuals who screened positively for probable PTSD using DSM-IV-TR criteria was higher than those who screened positively using DSM-5 criteria. The requirement of at least one avoidance symptom appears to have a noticeable impact on the frequency of positive screens for probable PTSD among treatment-seeking military personnel. This has important implications for pension adjudication and treatment entitlement. (article in English) Introduction : Les rĂ©visions liĂ©es aux critĂšres diagnostiques du DSM-5 pour le trouble de stress post-traumatique (TSPT) ont engendrĂ© certaines inquiĂ©tudes quant Ă  la prĂ©valence du TSPT, en particulier en ce qui concerne le critĂšre liĂ© au symptĂŽme d\u27Ă©vitement. Nous avons Ă©tudiĂ© la frĂ©quence de rĂ©sultats positifs suite au dĂ©pistage pour le TSPT utilisant les critĂšres DSM-5 et DSM-IV-TR pour le personnel des Forces armĂ©es canadiennes (FAC) et les vĂ©tĂ©ran(s) qui font une demande de traitement. MĂ©thodes : Des donnĂ©es recueillies antĂ©rieurement de 382 membres des FAC et vĂ©tĂ©ran(e)s ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es pour identifier la frĂ©quence de rĂ©sultats positifs suite au dĂ©pistage pour le TSPT utilisant les deux critĂšres. RĂ©sultats : 71,2% (n=272) des participant(e)s soumis(es) au dĂ©pistage utilisant le DSM-5 ont reçu un rĂ©sultat positif; comparativement, 77,7% (n=297) des participant(e)s soumis(es) au dĂ©pistage utilisant le DSM-IV-TR ont reçu un rĂ©sultat positif. L\u27analyse du pourcentage de concordance a dĂ©terminĂ© que le taux nĂ©gatif de concordance Ă©tait de 100,0%, le taux positif de concordance Ă©tait de 91,6% et le taux global de concordance Ă©tait de 93,5%. Discussion : Le nombre d\u27individus qui ont reçu un rĂ©sultat positif en utilisant les critĂšres DSM-IV-TR Ă©tait plus Ă©levĂ© que le nombre d\u27individus qui ont reçu un rĂ©sultat positif en utilisant les critĂšres DSM-5. L\u27exigence du minimum d\u27un symptĂŽme d\u27Ă©vitement semble avoir un impact important sur la frĂ©quence de rĂ©sultats positifs suite au dĂ©pistage pour le TSPT pour le personnel des FAC et les vĂ©tĂ©ran(s) qui font une demande de traitement. Ceci a des implications importantes pour les dĂ©cisions relatives aux pensions d\u27invaliditĂ© et Ă  l\u27accĂšs au traitement

    Military service and crime: new evidence

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that a substantial proportion of military personnel are involved in high-risk and antisocial behaviors that place them at jeopardy for criminal justice system involvement. However, prior research on military service and crime has disproportionately focused on veterans from the Vietnam War era (1955–1975), and has tended to focus on either current or former military members. METHODS: This study employed data from a population-based study (i.e., National Study on Drug Use and Health [NSDUH] between 2002 and 2014). It systematically examines the prevalence of self-reported antisocial behaviors, criminal justice system involvement, and substance abuse among the US civilian population and military service members, including reservists (n = 2206) and those who reported having been separated or retired from military service (n = 20,551). These factors are further examined across the developmental spectrum of adulthood (ages 18–34, 35–49, and 50–64). RESULTS: Results showed that military members were more prone to lifetime arrests and overall substance misuse. However, additional findings emerged suggesting that, while the military population overall seems to be positively associated with higher criminal activity than that found in the civilian population, these findings were based on a specific subgroup of the veteran population. This subgroup is comprised of individuals who likely did not fit in with the military culture and were discharged from the military early in their careers. CONCLUSION: Additional research on identifying this subgroup of military members is encouraged to better concentrate on prevention and treatment measures
    corecore