Negative parental responses to coming out and family functioning in a sample of lesbian and gay young adults

Parental responses to youths' coming out (CO) are crucial to the subsequent adjustment of children and family. The present study investigated the negative parental reaction to the disclosure of same-sex attraction and the differences between maternal and paternal responses, as reported by their homosexual daughters and sons. Participants' perceptions of their parents' reactions (evaluated through the Perceived Parental Reactions Scale, PPRS), age at coming out, gender, parental political orientation, and religiosity involvement, the family functioning (assessed through the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, FACES IV), were assessed in 164 Italian gay and lesbian young adults. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relation between family functioning and parental reaction to CO. The paired sample t-test was used to compare mothers and fathers' scores on the PPRS. Hierarchical multiple regression was conducted to analyze the relevance of each variable. No differences were found between mothers and fathers in their reaction to the disclosure. The analysis showed that a negative reaction to coming out was predicted by parents' right-wing political conservatism, strong religious beliefs, and higher scores in the scales Rigid and Enmeshed. Findings confirm that a negative parental reaction is the result of poor family resources to face a stressful situation and a strong belief in traditional values. These results have important implications in both clinical and social fields

Phase II study of two dose schedules of C.E.R.A. (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator) in anemic patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: C.E.R.A. (Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator) is an innovative agent with unique erythropoietin receptor activity and prolonged half-life. This study evaluated C.E.R.A. once weekly (QW) or once every 3 weeks (Q3W) in patients with anemia and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: In this Phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter, dose-finding study, patients (n = 218) with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 11 g/dL were randomized to one of six treatment groups of C.E.R.A. administered subcutaneously for 12 weeks: 0.7, 1.4, or 2.1 μg/kg QW or 2.1, 4.2, or 6.3 μg/kg Q3W. Primary endpoint was average Hb level between baseline and end of initial treatment (defined as last Hb measurement before dose reduction or transfusion, or the value at week 13). Hematopoietic response (Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL or achievement of Hb ≥ 12 g/dL with no blood transfusion in the previous 28 days determined in two consecutive measurements within a 10-day interval) was also measured. RESULTS: Dose-dependent Hb increases were observed, although the magnitude of increase was moderate. Hematopoietic response rate was also dose dependent, achieved by 51% and 62% of patients in the 4.2 and 6.3 μg/kg Q3W groups, and 63% of the 2.1 μg/kg QW group. In the Q3W group, the proportion of early responders (defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase in Hb from baseline during the first 22 days) increased with increasing C.E.R.A. dose, reaching 41% with the highest dose. In the 6.3 μg/kg Q3W group, 15% of patients received blood transfusion. There was an inclination for higher mean Hb increases and lower transfusion use in the Q3W groups than in the QW groups. C.E.R.A. was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: C.E.R.A. administered QW or Q3W showed clinical activity and safety in patients with NSCLC. There were dose-dependent increases in Hb responses. C.E.R.A. appeared to be more effective when the same dose over time was given Q3W than QW, with a suggestion that C.E.R.A. 6.3 μg/kg Q3W provided best efficacy in this study. However, further dose-finding studies using higher doses are required to determine the optimal C.E.R.A. dose regimen in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Darbepoetin alfa given every 1 or 2 weeks alleviates anaemia associated with cancer chemotherapy

In part A of this study, patients were randomised to cohorts receiving darbepoetin alfa at doses of 0.5 to 8.0 m.c.g. kg(−1) wk(−1) or to a control group receiving epoetin alfa at an initial dose of 150 U kg(−1) three times weekly. In part B, the cohorts were darbepoetin alfa 3.0 to 9.0 m.c.g. kg(−1) every 2 weeks or epoetin alfa, initial dose 40 000 U wk(−1). Safety was assessed by adverse events, changes in blood pressure, and formation of antibodies to darbepoetin alfa. Efficacy was assessed by several haematologic endpoints, including change in haemoglobin from baseline. The adverse event profile of darbepoetin alfa was similar to that of epoetin alfa. No relationship between the rapidity of haemoglobin response and any adverse event was observed. No antibodies to darbepoetin alfa were detected. Higher doses of darbepoetin alfa increased the proportion of patients with a haemoglobin response and decreased the median time to response. The overall dose of darbepoetin alfa required to produce a mean increase in haemoglobin does not increase when the dosing interval is increased from 1 to 2 weeks. Therapy with darbepoetin alfa is safe and effective in producing a dose-related increase in haemoglobin levels in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 268–276. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600465 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research U

Development and evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of darbepoetin alfa in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing multicycle chemotherapy

Anemia is frequently observed in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Administration of darbepoetin alfa, a recombinant erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that has longer residence time than endogenous erythropoietin, to patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) increases mean hemoglobin concentration, reduces risk of red blood cell transfusions, and improves patient-reported outcomes. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PkPd) model was developed using data from patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and CIA who were receiving darbepoetin alfa. A 2-compartment Pk model with linear elimination described the Pk data obtained in 140 CIA patients after intravenous and subcutaneous (SC) doses of 2.25 μg/kg every week and SC doses of 6.75 μg/kg every 3 weeks. The population typical values of key Pk parameters were clearance, 2010 mL/day; steady-state volume of distribution, 3390 mL; and bioavailability, 44.3%. A modified indirect response model, wherein serum concentrations stimulated the production of hemoglobin through an Emax-type equation, described the hemoglobin levels after SC doses of 0.5 μg/kg every week to 15 μg/kg every 3 weeks in 573 CIA patients. The estimated incremental maximum stimulation of hemoglobin production was 43.7% and darbepoetin alfa serum concentration at half-maximal stimulation was 3.68 ng/mL. The impact of covariates (body weight and platinum-containing chemotherapy) on the PkPd response was evaluated based on point and interval estimates of parameters, rather than through stepwise hypothesis testing. The final PkPd model adequately predicted hemoglobin response in a test data set, thereby confirming the predictive capability of the model. Based on simulations, it was not possible to categorize the influence of any covariate as clinically important