Aortomonoiliac Endografting after Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Indications and Long-term Results

AbstractObjectivesTo present long-term results of endoleak/endograft migration treatment by aortomonoiliac (AMI) endografting after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.DesignPost hoc analysis of a prospectively gathered database at a tertiary care university hospital.Materials and methodsFrom March 1995 to November 2010, 23 patients were identified who underwent modification into AMI configuration after failed elective EVAR. Major causes for modification were type I (with/without endograft migration) or type III endoleaks with aneurysm expansion. An average increase in aneurysm size of 1.6 cm (range: −1.5 to 10.5 cm) since initial aneurysm treatment was observed. Interventional outcomes and long-term results were recorded for analysis.ResultsTechnical success rate of AMI endografting was 95.65% (n = 22). All except two endoleaks could be successfully sealed with this manoeuvre (94.44%). Median time to modification was 5.3 years (interquartile range Q1–Q3: 1.3–9.3 years). No intra-operative conversion to open surgery was necessary and mortality was 0%. Median follow-up was 44 months (interquartile range Q1–Q3: 17–69 months).ConclusionsTreatment of graft-related endoleaks/endograft migration by AMI endografting after failed EVAR represents a safe and feasible procedure. This approach broadens the minimal invasive opportunities of aneurysm treatment, and open surgical conversion may be avoided except in selected patients

Final measurement. Deliverable D5.3

This deliverable D5.3 presents the GEN6 Final Measurement. It describes the outputs, outcomes and impact of the GEN6 project, based on other project deliverables inputs of the pilot leaders of the active GEN6 pilots and the individual consortium partners. The final measurement aims to show the amount of achievements within GEN6 and spill-over of pilot experiences to other organisation: (“paving the way for others”), in order to addresses the main goal the European Commission has stated for this project. It also presents the main attention points for IPv6 introduction experienced in seven different IPv6-pilots