Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Congenital Hydrocephalus in Mono and Dizygotic Twins

Background: Information regarding the occurrence of hydrocephalus (HC) in twins is important in establishing the significance of environmental factors as well as a genetic basis in congenital HC aetiology. This was the basis for this study. Methods: A single institution retrospective study was conducted between August 1, 2006 and July 31, 2008. Only those cases of hydrocephalus (based on clinical and radiological testscranial Computeried tomographic or Magnetic resonance imaging scan) that required placement of a ventricular shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy were included in the study. Data regarding the patient’s demographics, clinical history, examination and the maternal demographics were retrieved and analysed. DNA analysis was done to confirm the fraternity of the twins when applicable. Results: Fifty-eight patients with congenital hydrocephalus presented to the unit over the study period. We identified three sets of twins in the study. Only one set were identical (both male) and both had hydrocephalus. In the remaining two sets only one out of each pair had hydrocephalus (one male and one female). Two of the patients (1male, 1female) were twins with discordant HC. All the children had normal thumbs. DNA analysis confirmed identical twins in both the like sex twins. The mothers were not known diabetics, hypertensive or sickle cell patients neither did they smoke or take alcohol. There was no family history of hydrocephalus in all patients. Conclusion: Concordance for HC is likely if the twins are like sex and identical. Congenital hydrocephalus seems to be a multifactorial disorder, triggered by environmental factors in genetically predisposed individuals

The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator: development and validation of a tool for identifying African surgical patients at risk of severe postoperative complications

Background: The African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS) showed that surgical patients in Africa have a mortality twice the global average. Existing risk assessment tools are not valid for use in this population because the pattern of risk for poor outcomes differs from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to derive and validate a simple, preoperative risk stratification tool to identify African surgical patients at risk for in-hospital postoperative mortality and severe complications. Methods: ASOS was a 7-day prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery in Africa. The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator was constructed with a multivariable logistic regression model for the outcome of in-hospital mortality and severe postoperative complications. The following preoperative risk factors were entered into the model; age, sex, smoking status, ASA physical status, preoperative chronic comorbid conditions, indication for surgery, urgency, severity, and type of surgery. Results: The model was derived from 8799 patients from 168 African hospitals. The composite outcome of severe postoperative complications and death occurred in 423/8799 (4.8%) patients. The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator includes the following risk factors: age, ASA physical status, indication for surgery, urgency, severity, and type of surgery. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.805 and good calibration with c-statistic corrected for optimism of 0.784. Conclusions: This simple preoperative risk calculator could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients in African hospitals and facilitate increased postoperative surveillance. © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Medical Research Council of South Africa gran