7 research outputs found

    Far UV responsivity of commercial silicon photodetectors

    Get PDF
    Abstract Responsivity measurements have been performed on commercial silicon photodetectors in the UV range 200–400 nm. The microstrip and pixel detectors have been reverse biased in fully depleted condition (more than 25 V reverse bias) and in partially depleted condition (5 V reverse bias). We have also performed measurements in back illumination geometry, of particular interest in most industrial applications. Promising results obtained with commercial photodetectors in the UV range in terms of photocurrent stability and sensitivity open a variety of applications

    Gallium arsenide photodetectors for imaging in the far ultraviolet region

    Get PDF
    The aim of the present work is to systematically investigate the response and stability of commercial GaAs devices in the 200–400 nm UV range with a view to establishing their potentiality in imaging devices. The irradiation results of GaAs detectors with various geometries are presented and discussed. The detectors were reverse biased in fully depleted condition and in partially depleted condition (5 V reverse bias) in order to investigate the possibilities of integration with the standard bias values of read-out-integrated circuits. The results show that fabrication technology for nondedicated devices is still immature

    Investigation of the burn-in effect in microwave GaInP/GaAs HBTs by means of numerical simulations

    No full text
    The GaInP/GaAs HBTs demonstrate outstadning long-term reliability performance. Nevrtheless they still suffer from a short-term DC current gain instability, known as the Burn-in effect. Even if the effect is usually attributed to Hydrogen contamination passivating the Carbon atoms employed as base dopant, the underlying physical mechanism is still unclear.The present work addresses the Burn-in effect by means of numerical simulations performed with the device simulation software BLAZE by Silvaco. The rsults give support to the hypothesis that the Burn-in effect is a surface related phenomenon. The simulations reveal that a fixed surface charge located near the edge of the emitter mesa should be introduced. The work points out also that simultaneous variations of both this charge and of the surface recombination velocity should be taken into account. This simulation approach could be a useful tool, in order to develop a chemical/physical model of the Burn-in effect

    Echocardiography and strain analysis in Malaysian elite athletes versus young healthy adults

    No full text
    Background: Athletes have changes that can mimic pathological cardiomyopathy. Methods: Echocardiographic study of 50 male, female athletes (MA, FA) and non-athletes (MNA, FNA) age 18 to 30 years. These athletes participate in sports with predominantly endurance component. All participants exhibit no known medical illnesses or symptoms. Results: MA have thicker wall (IVSd) than MNA. No MA have IVSd > 1.2 cm and no FA have IVSd > 1.0 cm. Left ventricle internal dimension (LVIDd), left ventricle end diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) is bigger in athletes. None have LVIDd > 5.8 cm. Right ventricle fractional area change (FAC) is lower in athletes. (MA vs MNA, p = 0.013, FA vs FNA, p = 0.025). Athletes have higher septal and lateral e’ (Septal e’; MA 13.57 ± 2.66 cm/s vs MNA 11.46 ± 2.93 cm/s, p  1.2 cm and/or LVIDd > 5.8 cm. There is no difference in GLS, RVFWS and GCS but athletes have smaller LArS and LAbS

    Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events
    corecore