IPHAS and the symbiotic stars. I. Selection method and first discoveries

The study of symbiotic stars is essential to understand important aspects of stellar evolution in interacting binaries. Their observed population in the Galaxy is however poorly known, and is one to three orders of magnitudes smaller than the predicted population size. IPHAS, the INT Photometric Halpha survey of the Northern Galactic plane, gives us the opportunity to make a systematic, complete search for symbiotic stars in a magnitude-limited volume, and discover a significant number of new systems. A method of selecting candidate symbiotic stars by combining IPHAS and near-IR (2MASS) colours is presented. It allows us to distinguish symbiotic binaries from normal stars and most of the other types of Halpha emission line stars in the Galaxy. The only exception are T Tauri stars, which can however be recognized because of their concentration in star forming regions. Using these selection criteria, we discuss the classification of a list of 4338 IPHAS stars with Halpha in emission. 1500 to 2000 of them are likely to be Be stars. Among the remaining objects, 1183 fulfill our photometric constraints to be considered candidate symbiotic stars. The spectroscopic confirmation of three of these objects, which are the first new symbiotic stars discovered by IPHAS, proves the potential of the survey and selection method.Comment: Accepted for publication on Astronomy and Astrophysics. 12 pages, 8 figure

Development and clinical acceptability of a pre-operative risk stratification tool of cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with posterior fossa tumour

Aims: Despite identification of numerous pre-operative cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) clinical and radiological predictors, a unifying pre-operative risk stratification model for use during surgical consent is currently lacking. The aims of the project are (1) to develop a simple, easy to implemented risk scoring scheme to flag patients at higher risk of post-operative CMS; and (2) to assess its clinical acceptability amongst medical professionals. Methods: The combined cohort consists of 89 patients from two major treatment centres (age: 2-23yrs, gender 28M,61F, MRI pathology estimate 36 medulloblastoma, 40 pilocytic astrocytoma, 12 ependymoma, 1 non-committal); 26 (29%) of whom developed post-operative CMS. Post-operative CMS status was ascertained from clinical notes and pre-operative MRI scans, blinded to CMS status, underwent structured evaluation for 21 tightly-defined candidate imaging risk markers based on prior literature. All variables were first screened based upon results from univariate analysis and C4.5 decision tree. Stepwise logistic regression was then used to develop the optimal model, and multiple logistic regression coefficients for the predictors were converted into risk scores. Results: Univariate analysis identified five significant risks and C4.5 decision tree identified six predictors. The final model (Table 1) has an accuracy of 88.8% (79/89), with a sensitivity of 96.2% (25/26) and specificity of 85.7% (54/63). Using risk score cut-offs 203 and 238 permit discrimination into low (38/89, predicted probability < 3%), intermediate (17/89, predicted probability 3–52%) and high-risk (34/89, predicted probability 52%), respectively (Figure 1). Three illustrative cases from these categories will be used to collect clinicians’ opinion on surgical treatment decision and the acceptability of using this risk stratification for decision making and surgical consenting process. A web-based voting app will be used. Conclusions: A risk stratification model for post-operative CMS could flag patients at increased risk pre-operatively and may influence strategies for surgical treatment of cerebellar tumours. Following future testing and prospective validation, this risk scoring scheme may be utilised during the surgical consenting process

Development and clinical acceptability of a pre-operative risk stratification tool of cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with posterior fossa tumour

Aims: Despite identification of numerous pre-operative cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) clinical and radiological predictors, a unifying pre-operative risk stratification model for use during surgical consent is currently lacking. The aims of the project are (1) to develop a simple, easy to implemented risk scoring scheme to flag patients at higher risk of post-operative CMS; and (2) to assess its clinical acceptability amongst medical professionals. Methods: The combined cohort consists of 89 patients from two major treatment centres (age: 2-23yrs, gender 28M,61F, MRI pathology estimate 36 medulloblastoma, 40 pilocytic astrocytoma, 12 ependymoma, 1 non-committal); 26 (29%) of whom developed post-operative CMS. Post-operative CMS status was ascertained from clinical notes and pre-operative MRI scans, blinded to CMS status, underwent structured evaluation for 21 tightly-defined candidate imaging risk markers based on prior literature. All variables were first screened based upon results from univariate analysis and C4.5 decision tree. Stepwise logistic regression was then used to develop the optimal model, and multiple logistic regression coefficients for the predictors were converted into risk scores. Results: Univariate analysis identified five significant risks and C4.5 decision tree identified six predictors. The final model (Table 1) has an accuracy of 88.8% (79/89), with a sensitivity of 96.2% (25/26) and specificity of 85.7% (54/63). Using risk score cut-offs 203 and 238 permit discrimination into low (38/89, predicted probability < 3%), intermediate (17/89, predicted probability 3–52%) and high-risk (34/89, predicted probability 52%), respectively (Figure 1). Three illustrative cases from these categories will be used to collect clinicians’ opinion on surgical treatment decision and the acceptability of using this risk stratification for decision making and surgical consenting process. A web-based voting app will be used. Conclusions: A risk stratification model for post-operative CMS could flag patients at increased risk pre-operatively and may influence strategies for surgical treatment of cerebellar tumours. Following future testing and prospective validation, this risk scoring scheme may be utilised during the surgical consenting process