Effect of spinal anesthesia-induced deafferentation on pain processing in healthy male volunteers: a task-related fMRI study

Stress and Psychopatholog

Learning curves for pediatric laparoscopy: how many operations are enough? The Amsterdam experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy

Few studies on the surgical outcomes of open (OP) versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) in the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis have been published. The question arises as to how many laparoscopic procedures are required for a surgeon to pass the learning curve and which technique is best in terms of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate and quantify the learning curve for the laparoscopic technique at the authors' center. A second goal of this study was to evaluate the pre- and postoperative data of OP versus LP for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. A retrospective analysis was performed for 229 patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Between January 2002 and September 2008, 158 infants underwent OP and 71 infants had LP. The median operating time between the OP (33 min) and LP (40 min) groups was significantly different. The median hospital stay after surgery was 3 days for the OP patients and 2 days for the LP patients (p = 0.002). The postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between the OP (21.5%) and LP (21.1%) groups (p = 0.947). Complications were experienced by 31.5% of the first 35 LP patients. This rate decreased to 11.4% during the next 35 LP procedures (p = 0.041). Two perforations and three conversions occurred in the first LP group, compared with one perforation in the second LP group. The number of complications decreased significantly between the first and second groups of the LP patients, with the second group of LP patients quantifying the learning curve. Not only was the complication rate lower in the second LP group, but severe complications also were decreased. This indicates that the learning curve for LP in the current series involved 35 procedure

Effect of lumbar epidural blockade and propofol on mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and bispectral index A randomised controlled and pharmacodynamic modelling study

BACKGROUND It is generally accepted that a neuraxial blockade strengthens the sedative effects of propofol. Deafferentation caused by neuraxial blockade is thought to play a key role. OBJECTIVES The objective is to determine whether epidural blockade affects the bispectral index (BIS) of propofol and two other pharmacodynamic endpoints, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). DESIGN Randomised, placebo-controlled study. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS Patients scheduled for surgery needing epidural analgesia. INTERVENTION 28 ASA one or two patients received 0, 50, 100 or 150 mg of epidural ropivacaine. After stabilisation of the epidural blockade, propofol was given by target-controlled infusion. The propofol plasma target concentrations were increased at 6-min intervals from 0 to 1, 2.5, 4 and 6 mu g ml(-1). The study was performed before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Three endpoints, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure and CO were measured from baseline (prior to the administration of epidural ropivacaine) until 2 h after the start of propofol infusion. The propofol concentration-effect data were analysed to determine the interaction between epidural blockade and propofol sedation. RESULTS In the absence of propofol, the increase in number of epidural blocked segments from 0 to 15.5 (range 6 to 21) reduced the MAP by 30%, without affecting BIS or CO. In the absence of epidural blockade, the increase in propofol concentration to 6 mu g ml(-1) reduced BIS, MAP and CO. When combined, epidural anaesthesia and intravenous propofol exhibited no pharmacodynamic interaction on any of the three endpoints. In addition, epidural blockade did not affect the propofol effect-site equilibration half-life for its haemodynamic effects (11.5 +/- 0.5 min) or for its effects on the BIS (4.6 +/- 0.4 min). CONCLUSION Epidural blockade reduces the propofol requirements for sedative end points. This is not the result of a pharmacodynamic interaction.Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcome (Anesthesiology/Intensive Care

Epidural Blockade Affects the Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Surgical Patients

Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcom

Polydisperse composition of mixed monolayer-protected, spin-labeled Au nanoparticles

Using EPR spectroscopy and spin-labeled ligands, we have studied product distribution in the ligand exchange reactions of Au nanoparticles. When the incoming ligand was used in excess, the exchanged nanoparticles had uniform composition of the organic shell. Preparative GPC was employed to fractionate these materials according to the diameter of the Au core, as confirmed by TEM, UV, and EPR measurements. When the exchange reaction was carried out with less than a stoichiometric amount of the incoming ligand, nanoparticles with polydisperse composition of the organic shell were formed. This was established by the EPR analysis of the exchange reaction mixtures following their GPC fractionation. The GPC separation of these mixtures is controlled by both Au core size and shell composition

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intrathecally administered Xen2174, a synthetic conopeptide with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and analgesic properties

Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcom

Hyperalgesia and Reduced Offset Analgesia During Spinal Anesthesia

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia induces short-term deafferentation and causes connectivity changes in brain areas involved in endogenous pain modulation. We determined whether spinal anesthesia alters pain sensitivity and offset analgesia. Offset analgesia is a manifestation of endogenous pain modulation and characterized by profound analgesia upon a small decrease in noxious stimulation.Methods: In this randomized controlled crossover trial, static thermal pain responses and offset analgesia were obtained in 22 healthy male volunteers during spinal anesthesia and control conditions (absence of spinal anesthesia). Pain responses and offset analgesia were measured on a remote skin area above the upper level of anesthesia (C8/Th1).Results: Following spinal injection of the local anesthetic, the average maximum anesthesia level was Th6. Static pain scores at C8/Th1 were higher during spinal anesthesia compared to control: 59.1 +/- 15.0 mm (spinal anesthesia) versus 51.7 +/- 19.7 mm (control; p = 0.03). Offset analgesia responses were decreased during spinal analgesia: pain score decrease 79 +/- 27% (spinal anesthesia) versus 90 +/- 17% (control; p = 0.016).Discussion: We confirmed that spinal anesthesia-induced deafferentation causes hyperalgesic responses to noxious thermal stimulation and reduced offset analgesia at dermatomes remote and above the level of deafferentation. While these data suggest that the reduction of offset analgesia has a central origin, related to alterations in brain areas involved in inhibitory pain control, we cannot exclude alternative (peripheral) mechanisms.Perioperative Medicine: Efficacy, Safety and Outcom