904 research outputs found

    A VIEW FROM THE GROUND: A REFORM GROUP’S PERSPECTIVE ON THE ONGOING EFFORT TO ACHIEVE MERIT SELECTION OF JUDGES

    Get PDF
    This article describes the history of judicial selection in the state of Pennsylvania. It describes the judicial selection reform movement and the growth of the organization Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts ( PMC ) which devises solutions to meet the various challenges to judicial integrity in Pennsylvania. It focuses on the merit system that PMC has been trying to achieve for Pennsylvania\u27s appellate courts

    Weld microfissuring in Inconel 718 minimized by minor elements

    Get PDF
    Manganese, silicon, and magnesium markedly reduce the tendency of Inconel 718 to weld microfissuring. By combining a manganese, 0.20 percent by content, with silicon, greater than 0.25 percent content, or by adding 20 ppm of magnesium, the weld microfissuring decreased in the standard alloy

    Judicial Fact-Finding and the Trial Court Judge

    Get PDF

    Letter to RJM from Shira A. Scheindlin

    Get PDF

    Legal Services-Past and Present

    Get PDF

    A Dialogue with Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin

    Get PDF

    Shira A. Scheindlin, May 3, 1988

    Get PDF

    The Right Fit: Improving the Algorithm that Matches Students to Colleges Based on Test Scores

    Get PDF
    Introduced by Gale and Shapley in 1962, the deferred acceptance algorithm has been applied to an array of markets, including that of college admissions (a two-sided matching game assigning students to colleges). In the case where colleges’ preferences are completely determined by students’ test scores, this research proves that the Student Optimal Deferred Acceptance (SODA) algorithm never rewards a student for doing less well on an exam, i.e. satisfies “positive responsiveness.” The SODA algorithm is unique in that it yields an outcome that is stable, fair, and elicits positive responsiveness in the scenario of two students, two colleges, and two tests. Further, we compare this algorithm relative to other matching mechanisms, extracting key features that set SODA apart. There is no two-sided stable matching algorithm (one-to-one matching or many-to-one matching) that is strategy proof; however, when the preferences of the college are completely determined by the test scores of the students, regardless of the number of tests, we show that SODA not only satisfies positive responsiveness, but that it is also strategy proof in the case of any number of students, any number of colleges, and any number of tests. The implications of this are pertinent to the future of the college admissions process
    • …
    corecore