Comparative assessment of the comfort of two soft contact lenses

Background: Perception of lens comfort is a critical factor and predictor of whether or not an individual will be able to successfully achieve refractive correction with contact lenses. Recent advances in lens materials raise the question of which materials are the best to prescribe. It is important to have some basis on which to compare the various materials in regards to comfort in addition to standard lab bench tests such as Dk and hydration percentage. Methods: The purpose of this study was to compare Brand A, a silicone hydrogel lens, with Brand B, a conventional hydrogel lens, in regards to wearer comfort. Twenty-nine subjects were randomly assigned to wear either Brand A or Brand B for four weeks and then the other brand for four weeks. Twenty-six subjects successfully completed the study. Subjects returned for follow-up visits at two and four week intervals after the initial fitting of each brand. Comfort was rated by acquiring subjective reports regarding comfortable wearing time and by marking an analogue comfort scale. Subjects also kept a home journal for recording comfort levels. Results: Statistical analysis showed virtually no difference in the subjects\u27 responses between the left and right eyes. As such only the data for the right eye was fully analyzed. The order in which the lenses were assigned was determined to not have a significant effect in the results; consequently, data was analyzed by brand without concern for an order effect. A slight decrease in comfort was noted for both brands from the two week reporting time to the 4 week reporting time. Conclusion: The data showed no significant difference between the brands in either subject comfort response or subjective hours of comfortable wear. It can be inferred that both Brand A and Brand B performed equally well in the perceived wearer comfort. This suggests that current silicone hydrogel lenses are as effective at maintaining sufficient lens hydration as conventional hydrogel lenses thereby providing an equally effective level of comfort longevity

Evaluating country-specific characteristics

Background: Measuring quality of life (QOL) is fundamental to understanding the impact of disease and treatment on patients’ lives. Objectives: This study aimed to explore QOL in an international sample of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), the association between patient characteristics and QOL, and international variation in QOL and its relationship to country-specific characteristics.Objectives: This study aimed to explore QOL in an international sample of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), the association between patient characteristics and QOL, and international variation in QOL and its relationship to country-specific characteristics.Methods: We enrolled 4,028 adults with CHD from 15 countries. QOL was assessed using a linear analog scale (LAS) (0 to 100) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (5 to 35). Patient characteristics included sex, age, marital status, educational level, employment status, CHD complexity, and patient-reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Country-specific characteristics included general happiness and 6 cultural dimensions. Linear mixed models were applied.Results: Median QOL was 80 on the LAS and 27 on the SWLS. Older age, lack of employment, no marriage history, and worse NYHA functional class were associated with lower QOL (p < 0.001). Patients from Australia had the highest QOL (LAS: 82) and patients from Japan the lowest (LAS: 72). Happiness scores and cultural dimensions were not associated with variation in QOL after adjustment for patient characteristics and explained only an additional 0.1% of the variance above and beyond patient characteristics (p = 0.56).Conclusions: This large-scale, international study found that overall QOL in adults with CHD was generally good. Variation in QOL was related to patient characteristics but not country-specific characteristics. Hence, patients at risk for poorer QOL can be identified using uniform criteria. General principles for designing interventions to improve QOL can be developed.peer-reviewe

Quality of Life of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease in 15 Countries

Measuring quality of life (QOL) is fundamental to understanding the impact of disease and treatment on patients' lives. This study aimed to explore QOL in an international sample of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), the association between patient characteristics and QOL, and international variation in QOL and its relationship to country-specific characteristics. We enrolled 4,028 adults with CHD from 15 countries. QOL was assessed using a linear analog scale (LAS) (0 to 100) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (5 to 35). Patient characteristics included sex, age, marital status, educational level, employment status, CHD complexity, and patient-reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Country-specific characteristics included general happiness and 6 cultural dimensions. Linear mixed models were applied. Median QOL was 80 on the LAS and 27 on the SWLS. Older age, lack of employment, no marriage history, and worse NYHA functional class were associated with lower QOL (p <0.001). Patients from Australia had the highest QOL (LAS: 82) and patients from Japan the lowest (LAS: 72). Happiness scores and cultural dimensions were not associated with variation in QOL after adjustment for patient characteristics and explained only an additional 0.1% of the variance above and beyond patient characteristics (p = 0.56). This large-scale, international study found that overall QOL in adults with CHD was generally good. Variation in QOL was related to patient characteristics but not country-specific characteristics. Hence, patients at risk for poorer QOL can be identified using uniform criteria. General principles for designing interventions to improve QOL can be develope

Quality of Life of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease in 15 Countries

Measuring quality of life (QOL) is fundamental to understanding the impact of disease and treatment on patients' lives. This study aimed to explore QOL in an international sample of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), the association between patient characteristics and QOL, and international variation in QOL and its relationship to country-specific characteristics. We enrolled 4,028 adults with CHD from 15 countries. QOL was assessed using a linear analog scale (LAS) (0 to 100) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (5 to 35). Patient characteristics included sex, age, marital status, educational level, employment status, CHD complexity, and patient-reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Country-specific characteristics included general happiness and 6 cultural dimensions. Linear mixed models were applied. Median QOL was 80 on the LAS and 27 on the SWLS. Older age, lack of employment, no marriage history, and worse NYHA functional class were associated with lower QOL (p <0.001). Patients from Australia had the highest QOL (LAS: 82) and patients from Japan the lowest (LAS: 72). Happiness scores and cultural dimensions were not associated with variation in QOL after adjustment for patient characteristics and explained only an additional 0.1% of the variance above and beyond patient characteristics (p = 0.56). This large-scale, international study found that overall QOL in adults with CHD was generally good. Variation in QOL was related to patient characteristics but not country-specific characteristics. Hence, patients at risk for poorer QOL can be identified using uniform criteria. General principles for designing interventions to improve QOL can be develope