An observational study of the medical events associated with clinician-initiated changes in treatment for essential hypertension

We report a retrospective longitudinal observational study of co-morbidities and medical events associated with initiations and changes in antihypertensive therapy in 475 hypertensive patients of a large general practice. The median follow-up time was 7.0 years for males and 7.2 years for females. The data showed a low frequency of appropriate lifestyle recommendations (<30%), a gender-bias in lifestyle recommendations against women and that more than half of all patients' blood pressure (BP) was uncontrolled when last seen. Nearly half of all patients had co-morbidities relevant to essential hypertension (EHT) at first treatment for EHT and more than 11% of patients had more than one such co-morbidity. Whilst there was an increase in usage of ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCB) as first treatment for EHT, there was also evidence that the existence of relevant co-morbidities rationally accounted for the majority of that increase. There were 5176 medical events relevant to EHT associated with change of drug or dosage treatment of EHT and the study provided evidence that the occurrence of such relevant medical events can rationally account for the majority of changes to EHT treatment. The study suggests that whilst general practitioners may fail to promote lifestyle changes to their patients with EHT, there is evidence that, when examined in sufficient detail, general practitioners' decisions to initiate changes in antihypertensive therapy are in keeping with the evidence base

Home blood pressure measurements: Advantages and disadvantages compared to office and ambulatory monitoring

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an easy and standardized tool to measure blood pressure (BP) at home, which is recommended by several national and international guidelines to obtain reliable BP values. It is a useful and dependable measure of BP, which can add information to the more common and standardized methods, such as office (OBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), and sometimes substitute for them. Along with ABPM, HBPM detects out-of-office BP levels, helping to identify the white-coat effect and masked hypertension. Moreover, the large number of BP measurements obtained with HBPM has been demonstrated to be associated with future cardiovascular events and to provide information on day-to-day variability; this is a new aspect, the clinical significance of which is still under evaluation. By giving patients a more active role in the management of their chronic disease, HBPM can improve treatment adherence. The present review focuses on all these aspects and describes the pros and cons of HBPM use compared to OBPM and ABPM. In conclusion, although some aspects need to be clarified, the scientific evidence collected so far should encourage the more widespread use of HBPM in clinical practice