11 research outputs found

    μœ μ°½μ„±, μœ΅ν†΅μ„±, λ…μ°½μ„±μ§€μ‹œκ°€ 확산적 사고에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 효과

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :심리학과 λ°œλ‹¬μ‹¬λ¦¬ν•™μ „κ³΅,1995.Maste

    μ†Œμ…œλ―Έλ””μ–΄μƒ μ½˜ν…μΈ  μ§€ν‘œλ“€μ„ ν†΅ν•œ μžκ°€μƒκ΄€ 및 κ·Έλ ˆμΈμ € 인과관계 뢄석

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ²½μ˜λŒ€ν•™ κ²½μ˜ν•™κ³Ό, 2018. 2. μœ λ³‘μ€€.λͺ¨λ°”일 μž₯치 및 ICT의 λ°œμ „κ³Ό ν•¨κ»˜ μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄μ˜ μ„±μž₯은 μ§€λ‚œ λͺ‡ λ…„ λ™μ•ˆ κΎΈμ€€νžˆ μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ–΄ μ™”μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄μ˜ μΆœν˜„μœΌλ‘œ 컨텐츠 μ œμž‘μžλŠ” 방솑ꡭ을 ν†΅ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³  μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄λ₯Ό 톡해 κ³ ν’ˆμ§ˆμ˜ 컨텐츠λ₯Ό μ‹œμž₯에 배포 ν•  수 있게 λ˜μ—ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 이에 따라 μ‹œμž₯μ—μ„œλŠ” MCNκ³Ό 같은 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λΉ„μ¦ˆλ‹ˆμŠ€ λͺ¨λΈμ΄ λ“±μž₯ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ‚˜μ•„κ°€μ„œ μ†ŒλΉ„μžλ“€μ€ μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄μ—μ„œ 과거처럼 μˆ˜λ™μ μœΌλ‘œ μ½˜ν…μΈ λ₯Ό μ†ŒλΉ„ν•˜λŠ” 것에 κ·ΈμΉ˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³  적극적으둜 곡유 및 ν™•μ‚° ν™œλ™μ— μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ½˜ν…μΈ  μ œμž‘μžλŠ” 쒋은 컨텐츠λ₯Ό 생산할 뿐 만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ†ŒλΉ„μžκ°€ μ½˜ν…μΈ λ₯Ό κ³΅μœ ν•˜κ³  ν™•μ‚°μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ‘°μ •ν•˜λŠ” λŠ₯λ ₯을 μš”κ΅¬ λ°›κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ†ŒλΉ„μž λ°˜μ‘μ— 따라 μƒμ‚°λ˜λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ½˜ν…μΈ  μ§€ν‘œ κ°„μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜κ³ μž ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ €λŠ” μ„œλ‘œ λ‹€λ₯Έ 두 ν”Œλž«νΌμ—μ„œ 생성 된 μ§€ν‘œλ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ§€ν‘œ κ°„μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό μ°Ύκ³ , ν”Œλž«νΌ 간에 μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ 차이가 μžˆλŠ”μ§€ ν™•μΈν•΄λ³΄μ•˜μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ 자주 μ‚¬μš©λ˜λŠ” Granger Causality Test 및 Auto-Regressive λͺ¨λΈμ„ 톡해 뢄석을 μ‹€μ‹œ ν–ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 이 λ…Όλ¬Έμ—λŠ” 두 가지 μ˜μ˜κ°€ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 첫째, μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄ μ§€ν‘œλΌλŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ˜μ—­μ— 기쑴의 톡계 기법을 μ μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ˜λ―Έκ°€ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, μ†Œμ…œ λ―Έλ””μ–΄λ₯Ό 톡해 μ½˜ν…μΈ λ₯Ό λ°°ν¬ν•˜λ €λŠ” μ œμž‘μžμ—κ²Œ μ‹€μ§ˆμ μΈ 도움을 쀄 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€λ©λ‹ˆλ‹€.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Questions 3 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 The growth of Social-Media and participation of consumers 4 2.2 Social-Media Traffic Analysis 5 2.3 Granger-Causality Test 6 2.4 Autoregressive model 7 2.5 summary for Literature Review 8 3. Data 10 3.1 Data Discription 10 3.2 Indicators 12 4. Hypothesis 13 4.1 Granger-Causailty test within the same platform 13 4.2 Granger-Causailty test across different platforms 14 4.3 Autoregressive model wirhin the same platform 15 5. Results 15 5.1 H1a / H2b 16 5.2 H2 17 5.3 H3a / H3b 19 6. Conclusion 21 6.1 Business Implication 21 6.2 Limitation 23 6.3 Future Research 24 6.4 Summary 25 References 26 Appendix 29 κ΅­ λ¬Έ 초 둝 41Maste

    A Study on the Effect of One Session Group Counseling in the Classroom on Students' Examination Preparation Behaviors and Academic Achievement

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담이 μ€‘ν•™μƒμ˜ μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ν–‰λ™μ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 효과λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 즉, λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ€‘ν•™μƒλ“€μ—κ²Œ μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ λ…μ„œλ°©λ²•, μ‹œν—˜λΆˆμ•ˆκ΄€λ¦¬, λ§Œμ‘±μ§€μ—°, κΈ‰μš°μ™€μ˜ ν˜‘λ ₯, μ‹œκ°„κ³„νš 및 κ΄€λ¦¬μ˜ μ˜μ—­μ—μ„œ μžμ‹ λ“€μ˜ 행동을 κ°κ΄€μ μœΌλ‘œ μ‚΄ν”Όκ³ , 보닀 효율적 행동을 ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ•ˆλ‚΄ν•˜λŠ” ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ κ°œλ°œν•˜μ—¬ κ·Έ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ΄ μ€‘ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ν–‰λ™μ„ κ°œμ„ ν•  수 μžˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ λŒ€μƒμ€ 좩청남도 Cμ‹œ μ†Œμž¬ 쀑학ꡐ 1ν•™λ…„ 2개 반 44λͺ…(μ‹€ν—˜μ§‘λ‹¨, 24λͺ…-남학생 12λͺ…, 여학생 12λͺ…, ν†΅μ œμ§‘λ‹¨ 20λͺ…-남학생 10λͺ…, 여학생 10λͺ…)μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜μ§‘λ‹¨μ—κ²ŒλŠ” μš”κ΅¬μ‘°μ‚¬μ™€ 예슡과제 λΆ€μ—¬(20λΆ„ μ†Œμš”), ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담(45λΆ„ μ†Œμš”), 3νšŒμ— 걸쳐 각 5λΆ„ λ™μ•ˆμ˜ μΆ”μˆ˜μƒλ‹΄(15λΆ„ μ†Œμš”)을 μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν†΅μ œμ§‘λ‹¨μ—κ²ŒλŠ” λ‹΄μž„κ΅μ‚¬μ— μ˜ν•œ 일반적인 μ‹œν—˜ μ€€λΉ„κ΅μœ‘ 이외에 μ•„λ¬΄λŸ° μ²˜μΉ˜λ„ ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. μ‚¬μ „κ²€μ‚¬λŠ” μ‹€ν—˜μ²˜μΉ˜ 2일 μ „, μ‚¬ν›„κ²€μ‚¬λŠ” μ‹€ν—˜μ²˜μΉ˜ 3μ£Ό 후에 각각 μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ결과에 μ˜ν•˜λ©΄, ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담은 μ‹€ν—˜μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ν–‰λ™ 쀑 일뢀λ₯Ό μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°œμ„ μ‹œν‚¨ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 즉, ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담은 μ‹€ν—˜μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ν–‰λ™ 전체, λ…μ„œλ°©λ²•, μ‹œν—˜λΆˆμ•ˆκ΄€λ¦¬ 행동을 μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°œμ„ μ‹œν‚¨ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” ν•™κΈ‰λ‹¨μœ„ λ‹¨νšŒ 집단상담이 μ‹œν—˜μ€€λΉ„ν–‰λ™ κ°œμ„ μ„ μœ„ν•œ μœ μš©ν•œ μƒν™œμ§€λ„μ™€ μƒλ‹΄μ˜ ν•œ λ°©λ²•μž„μ„ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of one session group counseling in the classroom on students' examination preparation behaviors and academic achievement. Subjects were 44 students of 7th grade in Chunan City Chungnam Province of Korea. The research design was pretest-posttest with control group. The experimental group were treated in on session group counseling during 45minutes and pre-session and followup session. The instrument of measurement used in this study were Exmination Preparing Behaviors Scale' The results of this study were as follow; Examination preparing behaviors total score was significantly improved in the experimental group. Specifically, Reading skill scores and test anxiety management score were significantly improved in the experimental group. In conclusion, findings of this study suggested that One-session group counseling in the classroom be used as an effective way for student's examination preparation improvement

    A Study on the Factors for an Open School Climate Using Mixed Research Methods: Focusing on the Dahaengbok School in Busan

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 탐색 μ„€κ³„λΌλŠ” 톡합연ꡬ방법을 ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ 개방적 ν•™κ΅ν’ν† μ˜ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ΄ 무엇인지λ₯Ό 밝히고자 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 선행연ꡬ 뢄석 및 ꡬ성원 면담을 톡해 이둠적 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ λ„μΆœν•˜κ³ , λΆ€μ‚°κ΅μœ‘μ’…λ‹¨μ—°κ΅¬ 제4차연도 데이터λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ 이λ₯Ό ν™•μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ±Έκ³Ό 개방적 ν•™κ΅ν’ν† μ˜ ν˜•μ„± μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ ①학ꡐμž₯의 리더십, ⑑민주적인 κ΅μœ‘ν™œλ™/ν•™κ΅μš΄μ˜, β‘’μžλ°œμ  λͺ¨μž„을 기반으둜 ν˜‘λ ₯ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ사, β‘£μ—΄μ˜κ°€ 있고 ꡐ직에 λ§Œμ‘±ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ사 등이 ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό λΆ€μ‚°μ‹œκ΅μœ‘μ²­ 및 λΆ€μ‚°μ‹œ μ€‘λ“±ν•™κ΅λ“€μ˜ κ΄€λ ¨ ꡬ성원듀은 학ꡐ풍토λ₯Ό κ°œμ„ ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 λ…Έλ ₯을 기울일 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. 첫째, 학ꡐμž₯ 리더십을 μ œκ³ ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ ꡐμž₯ 자격 κ³Όμ •, 자격 이후 μ—°μˆ˜ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ²΄κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μš΄μ˜ν•  ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, κ΅μœ‘ν™œλ™κ³Ό ν•™κ΅μš΄μ˜μ— 민주적 μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ • 체제λ₯Ό κ·œμΉ™κ³Ό 제반 μ œλ„λ‘œμ„œ λͺ…ν™•νžˆ 확립할 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ 전문적 ν•™μŠ΅κ³΅λ™μ²΄λ₯Ό λΉ„λ‘―ν•œ 자발적 ꡐ사λͺ¨μž„을 λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜κ²Œ μ§€μ›ν•˜κ³  κ²©λ €ν•˜λ©° 보μž₯ν•΄μ£Όμ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. λ„·μ§Έ, 학ꡐμž₯κ³Ό ꡐ사가 λͺ¨λ‘ 리더십을 λ°œνœ˜ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ 긍정적 ꡐ직관과 μ—΄μ˜λ₯Ό μž₯λ €ν•˜λŠ” 풍토λ₯Ό μ‘°μ„±ν•΄μ•Όν•œλ‹€. λ‹€μ„―μ§Έ, 학ꡐ풍토λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•˜λŠ” μ„€λ¬Έ 문항을 보닀 λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜κ²Œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ—¬ ν™•μž₯ν•˜κ³ , μœ μ‚¬ν•œ μ„€λ¬Έ 문항을 학생듀을 톡해 μ‘λ‹΅ν•˜κ²Œ ν•˜μ—¬ 학ꡐ풍토가 κ΅μ‚¬λΏλ§Œ μ•„λ‹Œ, 학생듀에 μ˜ν•΄μ„œλ„ 츑정될 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ, 질적 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό μΈμ •λœ λ‹€ν–‰λ³΅ν•™κ΅μ˜ 개방적 학ꡐ풍토 ν˜•μ„±μ— λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯은 μΆ”ν›„ λΆ€μ‚°κ΅μœ‘μ’…λ‹¨μ—°κ΅¬ 쑰사 μ„€κ³„μ—μ„œ 닀행볡학ꡐ μƒ˜ν”Œ μΆ”κ°€ λ˜λŠ” 학ꡐ풍토에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯을 보닀 μž₯기적 μ‹œκ°μ—μ„œ κ³„μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μ°°ν•˜λŠ” λ…Έλ ₯이 μš”μ²­λœλ‹€. The purpose of this study is to find out what factors influence the open school climate with an exploratory mixed methods approach. A theoretical framework was derived through analysis of previous studies and FGI, and verified by using data from the 4th year of the BELS. As a result, as factors for an open school climate are β‘ leadership of the principal, β‘‘democratic educational activities/school management, β‘’teachers who cooperate voluntarily, β‘£teachers who are enthusiastic and satisfied with the teaching profession. Research suggestions are as follows. First, it is necessary to operate the principal qualification course and post-qualification training program to enhance the principal's leadership. Second, it is needed to clearly establish a democratic decision-making system as rules for school management. Third, it is necessary to encourage a variety of voluntary teacher meetings. Fourth, efforts should be made to create a school climate that encourages teachers' positive teaching intuition and enthusiasm. Fifth, the questionnaire that measures the school climate should be expanded in a variety of ways, and the school climate should be investigated not only for teachers but also for students.N
    corecore