36 research outputs found

    ๋ณด์œก๋น„๋Š” ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์—ฌ์„ฑ์˜ ๋…ธ๋™๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฐ์ •์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์ธ๊ฐ€?

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ฒฝ์ œํ•™๋ถ€ ๊ฒฝ์ œํ•™์ „๊ณต,2006.Maste

    Shear bond strength of ceramic and resin brackets used with visible light-cured adhesives

    No full text
    ์น˜์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์„ฑ์ธ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ์‹ฌ๋ฏธ์ ์ธ ์žฅ์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋„์žฌ๋‚˜ ๋ ˆ์ง„ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์—์„œ์˜ ๊ด‘์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ์งง์€ ๊ด‘์กฐ์‚ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—์„œ๋„ ๊ด‘์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์žฅ์ ์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ฌ๋ฏธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜ ์ข…์˜ ๋„์žฌ ๋ฐ ๋ ˆ์ง„ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์„ ์ˆ˜ ์ข…์˜ ๊ด‘์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ๋กœ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์‹œ์ผœ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„์™€ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ํŒŒ์ ˆ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ต์ • ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐœ๊ฑฐํ•œ 140๊ฐœ์˜ ์†Œ๊ตฌ์น˜๋ฅผ ํ˜‘์ธก๋ฉด์ด ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋„๋ก ์ž๊ฐ€์ค‘ํ•ฉ ๋ ˆ์ง„์œผ๋กœ ๋งค๋ชฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์†Œ๊ตฌ์น˜ ํ˜‘์ธก๋ฉด์— Plastic bracket, Transcend 6000, Signature ๋ฐ Starfire TMB ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์„ Orthobond, Light Bond ๋ฐ Transbond๋กœ ์ œ์กฐ์ž ์ง€์‹œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์‹œ์ผœ ์—ด๋ณ€ํ™˜๊ธฐ๋กœ 1800ํšŒ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ค€ ํ›„ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋Šฅ์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ ‘์ฐฉ ํŒŒ์ ˆ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์ž…์ฒดํ˜„๋ฏธ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  10์ดˆ์™€ 20์ดˆ์˜ ๊ด‘์กฐ์‚ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋‘๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ด‘์›์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ๋™์ผํ•œ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์„ Orthobond, Light Bond์™€ Transbond๋กœ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์‹œ์ผฐ์„ ๋•Œ ์ด๋“ค๊ฐ„์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” Plastic bracket์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ ๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œ ์˜์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค(p<0.O5). 2. ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ๋กœ Plastic bracket, Transcend 6000, Signature, Starfire TMB๋ฅผ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์‹œ์ผฐ์„ ๋•Œ ์ด๋“ค๊ฐ„์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œ ์˜์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(p<0.05). Plastic ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์€ BIS-GMA ๊ณ„ํ†ต์˜ ๊ด‘์ค‘ํ•ฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์— ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 3. ์ ‘์ฐฉ ํŒŒ์ ˆ์€ ์ „์ฒด ๊ตฐ์—์„œ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ˜ ์ด์ƒ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์น˜์•„๋ฉด์— ๋‚จ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ 72.1%๋กœ ๋Œ€๊ฐœ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“๊ณผ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ํŒŒ์ ˆ์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. 4. ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ ์ค‘ํ•ฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ด‘์กฐ์‚ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ 10์ดˆ์™€ 20์ดˆ์—์„œ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œ ์˜์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ 400mW/cm**2 ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ด‘๋„์—์„œ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ด‘์›์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด๋„ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œ ์˜์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05). [์˜๋ฌธ] The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength obtained from ceramic and plastic brackets bonded with various light-cured adhesives and to evaluate their debonded failure sites. Plastic brackets, Transcend 6000, Signature and Starfire TMB brackets were bonded with Orthobond, Light Bond and Transbond on one hundred forty extracted human premolar teeth as manufacturer's descriptions. After thermocycling the brackets were debonded with an Instron universal testing machine and the debonded bracket base surfaces were inspected under stereoscope to evaluate the failure sites. Also the shear bond strength and failure patterns with different curing time and with two different source of light were compared. The results were as follows. 1. There were no statistically significant differences among the mean shear bond strength of Orthobond, Light Bond and Transbond in a same bracket group except Plastic bracket group(p<0.05). 2. The mean shear band strength of each adhesive with different bracket groups showed statistically significant differences(p<0.05). Plastic brackets shewed insufficiently low bonding strength with BIS-GMA type Bight-cured adhesives. 3. The various bonding failure patterns were occurred among different bracket groups but most of failure sites were bracket base-adhesive interfaces. 4. There were no statistically significant differences in shear bond strength between the groups with curing time of 10 second and 20 second, and between the groups with two different sources of light as long as sufficient light intensity(above 400mW/cm**2) were provided(P<0.05).restrictio

    ์กฐ์„ ์‹œ๋Œ€ ์ €๊ณ ๋ฆฌ้กž ๋ช…์นญ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์˜๋ฅ˜ํ•™๊ณผ,1999.Maste

    ์˜๋ฌด ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„์™€ ํˆฌํ‘œ์œจ์ด ์ •๋ถ€ ๋ณต์ง€ ์žฌ์ •์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ฒฝ์ œํ•™๋ถ€, 2017. 2. ๊น€๋ณ‘์—ฐ.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ค‘์œ„์ž ์ •๋ฆฝ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜๋ฌด ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„์™€ ์ •๋ถ€ ๋ณต์ง€ ์žฌ์ •์— ๊ด€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ž์œ  ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„ ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ค‘์œ„์ž ํˆฌํ‘œ์ž ์†Œ๋“์€ ์ „์ฒด ์ธ๊ตฌ ์†Œ๋“์˜ ์ค‘์•™๊ฐ’๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ๊ณค ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถ€์œ ์ธต์˜ ํˆฌํ‘œ์œจ์ด ๋นˆ๊ณค์ธต์˜ ํˆฌํ‘œ์œจ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋†’๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ชจ๋“  ์‹œ๋ฏผ๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ํˆฌํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์˜๋ฌดํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ œ๋„์—์„œ์˜ ์ค‘์œ„์ž ํˆฌํ‘œ์ž ์†Œ๋“์€ ์ž์œ  ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„ ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ค‘์œ„์ž ํˆฌํ‘œ์ž ์†Œ๋“๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์œ„์ž ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ •๋ฆฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํƒํ•  ์‹œ, ์ค‘์œ„ ํˆฌํ‘œ์ž๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•˜๋Š” ์ž…์žฅ์„ ์ทจํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์˜๋ฌด ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„๋Š” ๋นˆ๊ณคํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ํˆฌํ‘œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ฆ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ •๋ถ€ ๋ณต์ง€ ์žฌ์ •์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. 2๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ตœ์†Œ ์ž์Šน (Two-Stage Least Squares) ๊ณผ ๋‚˜๋ผ๋“ค์˜ 1990-1998๋…„์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ด๋ก ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ๊ฐ•์ œ ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„๋Š” ํˆฌํ‘œ์œจ์„ ๋†’์ž„์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณต์ง€ ๋ณต์ง€ ์žฌ์ •์„ ํ™•์žฅ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์˜๋ฌด ํˆฌํ‘œ ์ œ๋„์˜ ๋ฒŒ์น™ ์ œ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ํˆฌํ‘œ์œจ์ด ๋” ๋†’๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ๋“ค์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์žฌํ™•์ธ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹คThis paper explores the link between mandatory voting rules and government welfare spending, applying the Median Voter Theorem. In a voluntary voting system, the median voters income is likely to be higher than the median income of the population because high-income people are more likely to vote than low-income people. However, under a mandatory voting rule which obligates people from every income level to vote by law, the median voters income would be lower than the median voters income under a voluntary voting rule. According to the Median Voter Theorem, the preference of the median voter is pivotal in government policiesthus, more low-income voters in a mandatory voting rule would expand government welfare spending. Using Two-Stage Least Squares estimation with cross-country data averaged between 1990 and 1998, I find that mandatory voting increases government welfare spending indirectly via turnout. Furthermore, consistent with previous literatures, findings confirm that turnouts are higher when sanctions on non-voters are harsher in mandatory voting rules.1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Reviews 3 2.1. Mandatory Voting Rule and Turnout 3 2.2. Electoral Turnout and Welfare Spending 4 2.3. Mandatory Voting Rule, Inequality and Welfare Spending 5 2.4. Direction of this paper 6 3. Theory and Hypothesis 8 3.1. Median Voter Theorem 8 3.2. Median Voter Theorem with Mandatory Voting Rule 9 4. Data and Methodology 11 4.1. Data 11 4.2. Variables 11 4.3. Methods 12 4.3.1. Ordinary Least Squares 12 4.3.2. Two-Stage Least Squares 13 5. Results and Robustness Check 15 5.1. Results 15 5.2. Robustness Check 18 6. Limitations and Policy Implications 20 7. Appendix 21 8. References 29 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 34Maste

    Usability Considerations of Training in the Field of Broadcasting Practice Based on the Job Competency : Focusing on TV Producers and Scriptwriters

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ˜„์ง PD ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์ž‘๊ฐ€ 343๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ง๋ฌด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ ์ธ์‹ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ง๋ฌด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก์„ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ง‘๋‹จ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ทธ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์‚ฌ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ๊ด€์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก ๊ฒฝํ—˜์€ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๋“ค์˜ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ ์ธ์‹์— ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์€๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด, ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋“ฑ ๊ณต๊ต์œก๊ธฐ๊ด€์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์€ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ ์ธ์‹์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์†กํ•™๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก ์ฃผ์ฒด๊ฐ€ ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด์ž, ๋Œ€ํ•™์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ง๋ฌด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ฐ•ํ™” ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ธฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋ฐฉ์†ก ์ข…์‚ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์—ญํ•  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€ ์ž์•„ ํšจ๋Šฅ๊ฐ์ด ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก ๊ฒฝํ—˜ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ ์ธ์‹์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ž์•„ ํšจ๋Šฅ๊ฐ์ด ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก ๊ฒฝํ—˜๊ณผ ์—ญํ•  ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์กฐ์ ˆ ํšจ๊ณผ๋„ ๋ฐํž ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ง๋ฌด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ํ˜„์žฅ ์ข…์‚ฌ์ž๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜์˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š”๋‹ค.This study explores how the TV producers and scriptwriters realize the importance of training in the field of broadcasting practices based on the job competency. Results show that respondents who have training experiences from their public education curriculum tend to recognize the importance more highly compared to those who don't. In particular, the results indicated that private education experiences do not have any relationship with the usability perception of training based on the job competency. This emphasizes the role of public education institutions in training for the broadcasting practices. Not only does this study reveals that those who have more training experience suffer less role stress while they perform their job, but also that the training in the field of broadcasting practices based on the job competency is helpful especially for the group whose members estimate their self-efficacy as low
    corecore