21 research outputs found
The Relationship between Sleep Quality and Stress among Nursing Students in Korea
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between sleep quality and stress among nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 94 nursing students from a University in Seoul. Participants completed questionnaires and the data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The mean score of sleep quality was 6.93Β±2.66 among nursing students and 81.9% had a sleep problem. The mean score of stress was 18.61Β±4.84. Sleep quality was significantly different by clinical practice days per week, subjective physical health status, and subjective mental health status. Stress levels were significantly different by subjective physical health status, subjective mental health status, social relationship satisfaction, and satisfaction levels of nursing major and university. A significant relationship between sleep quality and stress (r=.45, p<.001) was found, meaning that a lower quality of sleep was significantly correlated with higher stress level. Conclusion: The results indicated that most nursing students had sleep problems and stress. Therefore, interventions are needed to be developed to lower the level of stress and increase the quality of sleep among nursing students.ope
Factors affecting trust in healthcare among middle-aged to older Korean American women
BACKGROUND: Predictors of trust in healthcare providers and the healthcare system have never been studied in Korean Americans (KA) despite the fact that trust plays an important role in health behaviors. The purpose of this study is to examine factors influencing trust in the healthcare system and providers among KA women. METHODS: Data were collected in 196 KA women examining the effects of perceived discrimination and trust on breast cancer screening in the Chicago metropolitan area. Path analysis was used to identify factors influencing trust in the healthcare system and providers. RESULTS: Acculturation was positively related to trust in healthcare providers (beta = .15, p =. 002), and discrimination in the healthcare system was inversely related to trust in healthcare providers (beta = -.60, p <. 001). Length of stay in the US was inversely related to distrust in the healthcare system (beta = -.14, p <. 001), and discrimination in healthcare was positively related to distrust in the healthcare system (beta = .60, p <. 001). Trust in healthcare providers and distrust in the healthcare system were moderately correlated (r = .51, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Higher levels of acculturation and lower levels of perceived discrimination were identified as predictors of higher levels of trust in healthcare providers. A shorter stay in the US and higher levels of discrimination were identified as predictors of higher levels of distrust in the healthcare system. Perceived discrimination is a target for interventions to enhance trust in the healthcare system, and therefore reduce healthcare disparities in KAs.ope
Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale (HCSD-K) in Korean American Women
BACKGROUND:
Trust in the healthcare system is a major contributor for racial disparities in health and health care. We aimed to formally translate and cross-culturally adapt the Korean version of the Revised Health Care System Distrust (HCSD-K) scale with a sample of Korean American women and examine the psychometric properties of the HCSD-K scale.
METHODS:
Ten Korean American women participated in the cognitive interview. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 196 Korean American women aged 50β»74 years. Instrument adaptation was performed using committee-based translation and cognitive interviewing. Construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency were examined to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HCSD-K scale.
RESULTS:
The translated instrument was found to be semantically sound. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure with an excellent fit. Convergent validity was supported by correlations between the HCSD-K scale and both the Perceived Discrimination in Health Care and Trust in Physician scales. Cronbach's alpha for the total HCSD-K was 0.83.
CONCLUSION:
The nine-item HCSD-K scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. It is an appropriate instrument for measuring healthcare system distrust in Korean American women. Further study is needed to confirm the study results in a gender-mixed Korean population.ope
μλμ€νΌμ μ골 μ²μλ μ νΌμμ¬μ©μ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈ
κ°νΈνκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
[μλ¬Έ]Ethiopia is the second most populous country in sub-Saharan Africa, and also a nation ofyoung people as many other developing countries. The total fertility rate in Ethiopia is 5.4,and many adolescents begin to bear children at very young age causing many pregnancyrelated complication. However, health information on never married adolescents is relativelylimited, and those available are predominantly school based and from urban areas.This study was designed to explore factors influencing the contraceptive use amongadolescents in the rural areas of Ethiopia, thus these factors can be used as resources inplanning and implementation of family planning and reproductive health education to decreasefertility rate and enhance reproductive health of adolescents.This study was based on a baseline survey of Community-Based Family PlanningCapacity Building Project called(KEYFP: Korea-Yonsei-Ethiopia Family Planning project)which was done between May and June, 2009 in 7 randomly selected enumeration areasconducted by Yonsei University, College of Nursing.Among 226 adolescents selected from randomly chosen households, 120(53.1%) werecurrently using or ever used contraceptive methods in the past. Household income(x??=10.08,p=.007), education (x??=15.64, p.05) except theattitude of mothers(t=-2.52, p=.013). When the correlation between knowledge and attitude of adolescents and parents were tested, only attitude of mothers correlated with the attitude ofadolescents(r=-.310, p=.001). Logistic regression showed participants from household incomebetween 10,000birr(1180.00) tended to practice contraceptives lesswhen compared to participants from household income below 10,000birr ($790.00)(OR: .168,95% CI: 0.053-0.529). The participants tended to practice contraceptives more when theywere more knowledgeable about contraceptive methods and had more positive attitude towardfamily planning(OR 1.241, 95% CI: 1.090-1.413 and OR: 3.551, 95% CI: 1.876-6.720respectively).Based on the findings, strengthened school health programs and community outreachprograms on contraceptive methods and family planning services are needed to reach remoteareas and adolescents who are out of school. These services should consider developing youthfriendlyprograms to increase participation and should also consider sustainability of programs.Also, involving women(mothers) would be beneficial to increase positive attitude ofadolescents and further increase contraceptive use among adolescents.restrictio
Peer Victimization, Supportive Parenting, and Depression Among Adolescents in South Korea: A Longitudinal Study
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine relationships among peer victimization, supportive parenting, and depression in South Korean adolescents and the moderating effect of supportive parenting on the peer victimization-depression relationship.
METHODS: Data were drawn from the Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey performed from 2010 to 2016. The first-year middle-school panel collected from the first year of middle school to the first year of university was used, and the final sample size was 1750. Generalized estimating equation models were employed to examine relationships among peer victimization, supportive parenting, and depression.
RESULTS: About 6% of participants reported the experience of peer victimization at least once during the previous year. Females were more likely to report higher level of depression compared to males. Participants who were from lower family income, reported the past experience of peer victimization, and reported less supportive parenting were more likely to report higher level of depression compare to the counterpart. The moderating effect of supportive parenting on the association between peer victimization and depression was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants who had experienced of peer victimization and less supportive parenting showed higher levels of depression. The supportive parenting did not have significant moderating effect on the relationship between peer victimization and depression.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future research on adolescent depression should include development of interventions targeting both adolescent students' behaviors and their parents' styles of parenting aimed at the reducing the rate of peer victimization and the level of depression among adolescents in South Korea.restrictio
1970λ λ μ²λ μνμ κ°κ°μ± μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (μμ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : κ΅μ΄κ΅λ¬Ένκ³Ό, 2017. 2. μμΉκ΅.λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ λͺ©μ μ μ²λ
μνμ λνλ κ°κ°μ±μ λν΄ κ³ μ°°ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄μ μκΈ°μ λ³λ³λλ μ΄ μνλ€μ νΉμ±μ κ·λͺ
νλ κ²μ΄λ€. λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμμ μ²λ
μνλ 1974λ
4μ 26μΌ κ°λ΄ν <λ³λ€μ κ³ ν₯>μΌλ‘λΆν° 1979λ
2μ 9μΌ κ°λ΄ν <λ³νμ μμ>μ μ΄λ₯΄λ μνλ€μ κ°λ¦¬ν¨λ€. μ²λ
μνλ κΈ°μ‘΄ μνμ ꡬλ³λλ λλΌλ§ν¬λ₯΄κΈ°μ μμμ μ 보μμΌλ‘μ¨ κ²μ΄κ³Ό λΆν©μ μ΄μ€κ³ μ μ²νλ 1970λ
λ νκ΅μνμ νλ‘λ₯Ό λ§λ ¨νλ€κ³ νκ°λμ΄ μλ€. μ²λ
μνμ λ±μ₯μ κ°λ
κ³Ό κ΄κ°μ μΈλκ΅μ²΄λΌ λ°μλ€μ¬μ Έ μμΌλ©°, μ μ μ κΆ λ° κ°λΆμ₯μ μ΄λ°μ¬λ‘κΈ°μ λν μ²λ
μ μ ν/μμμ΄λΌλ νλ μμ μν΄ ν΄μλμ΄ μλ€.
κΈ°μ‘΄ μ°κ΅¬μμ 1970λ
λ μ²λ
μ βν΅λΈμ(ν΅κΈ°νΒ·λΈλ£¨μ§Β·μλ§₯μ£Ό)βμΌλ‘ λνλλ 1970λ
λ μ²λ
λ¬Ένλ₯Ό λ°νμΌλ‘ μΈλμ μΈ μ 체μ±μ νμ±ν μ§λ¨μΌλ‘ κ·μ λμ΄ μλ€. νμ§λ§ λΉλμ μ¬λ¬ μ ν©λ€μ κΈ°μ‘΄ μ°κ΅¬μμ μ μ λμ΄ μ¨ μ²λ
κ°λ
μ΄ μΌλ§λ μ ν¨νμ§ μλ¬Έμ κ°κ² νλ€. ν¬ν¬ μμ
μ΄λ μ²λ°μ§ λ±μ΄ μ£Όλ‘ μ μμ΄λ€ μ¬μ΄μμ μ ννλ€κ³ λ ν μ μμΌλ, βν΅λΈμβμ μμ λ€μ μ€νμΌλ‘ μμΈμ°κ³ λ¬Ένμ°μ
μ°μ
μ νλλ₯Ό λ€νλλ μ§λ¨μΌλ‘μμ μ²λ
μ μμ νκΈ° μ΄λ ΅λ€. λ°λΌμ μ²λ
μνμ μλ‘μμ μ²λ
μ΄λΌλ μ§λ¨μ μλ‘μμ λ°νμΌλ‘ μ€λͺ
λ μ μμΌλ©°, μ€νλ € μ²λ
μνλ₯Ό λΉλ‘―ν λ¬Έν μ°λ¬Όλ€μ μλ‘μμΌλ‘λΆν° βμ²λ
βμ΄λΌλ νμ νΉμ κ°λ
μ΄ κ΅¬μ±λ λ° κ°κΉμ λ€. μ²λ
μνμ λ±μ₯μ μ΄μ μκΈ°μ λ¬Έν μ°λ¬Όλ‘λΆν° μΆμ λμ΄ μ¨ λ³νμ μ°¨μμμ μ΄ν΄λ νμκ° μμΌλ©°, μ²λ
μνμ λ±μ₯κ³Ό μ κ°λ μ²λ
μ΄λΌλ κ°λ
μ΄ μμ±λκ³ λ³ννλ κ³Όμ κ³Ό λλΆμ΄ κ³ μ°°λ μ μλ€.
1970λ
λλ μ°μ
νΒ·λμνμ μμ§μμ΄ κ°μνλμμΌλ©°, 1960λ
λμ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘λ 맀체μ μ λΉλ₯Ό λ°νμΌλ‘ λμ€λ¬Ένκ° ν½μ°½Β·λΆννλ μκΈ°μ΄λ€. μ΄μ κ°μ λ³νλ‘ μΈν μμ²κ°μ μκ·Ήμ μ¦κ°λ λΉλ νκ΅μ¬νμμλ μκΈ°λ‘κΉμ§ λ°μλ€μ¬μ§ λ§νΌ ν° μΆ©κ²©μ΄μλ κ²μΌλ‘ 보μΈλ€. νμ§λ§ λ€λ₯Έ ννΈμΌλ‘λ μ μ μΈ΅μ΄ μμ²κ°μ μν΅ λ°©μμ μ΅μν΄μ§κ² νλ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ³μμΌλ©°, μν΅λλ μ§μμ μμ λν λ³νμμΌ°λ κ²μΌλ‘ 보μΈλ€. μ²λ
μνλ μ΄λ¬ν 맀체 νκ²½ μμμ λΆμν λ¬Έν μ°λ¬Όμ΄λΌκ³ ν μ μλ€.
μ΄μ κ΄λ ¨ν΄μ μ²λ
μνμ λν λΉνμ μΈ μμμ΄λ‘ λΉλ²νκ² λ±μ₯νλ βκ°κ°βμ μ£Όλͺ©ν μ μλ€. βκ°κ°μ βμ΄λΌλ μμμ΄λ μ²λ
μνκ° λ±μ₯νκΈ° μ΄μ μλ βμΈλ ¨λ¨β λ΄μ§λ βμλ‘μβμ΄λΌλ μλ―Έλ‘ μ¬μ©λμμ§λ§ λ€μ μ°λ°μ μΌλ‘ μ°μ¬ μλ€. μ΄μ λΉν΄ μ²λ
μνμ κ²½μ° βκ°κ°μ βμ΄λΌλ μμμ΄λ μ²λ
μνλ₯Ό κ·μ νλ ν΅μ¬ μμ±μ΄μ, μ²λ
μνκ° κ΄κ°μ νΈμμ μ»μ΄λΈ μμΈμ΄λΌ μ¬κ²¨μ‘λ€.
μ²λ
μνμ λν λΉλ λΉνμμ βκ°κ°μ βμ΄λΌλ μμμ΄λ ν¬κ² λ κ°μ§ μλ―Έλ‘ μ¬μ©λκ³ μλ€. 첫째, κ΄κ°μ κ°κ°μ μκ·Ήνλ μ²λ
μνμ μμ κΈ°λ²μ΄λ€. μνλ κΈ°λ³Έμ μΌλ‘ μμ²κ°μ μκ·Ήμ 맀κ°λ‘ μν΅νλ 맀체μ§λ§, μνμλ νΉλ³ν βκ°κ°μ βμΈ μμκ° μμ μ μλ€. λ΄λ¬ν°λΈλ₯Ό μ λ¬νλ μμλ‘ κΈ°λ₯ν기보λ€λ κ·Έ μμ²΄λ‘ κ΄κ°μ κ΄μ¬μ λλ 물리μ μμμΈ βκ³Όμ(excess)βμ΄ μ΄μ ν΄λΉνλ€. μ²λ
μνμλ βκ³Όμβμ΄ λΉλ²νκ² μΆνν λΏλ§ μλλΌ, βκ³Όμβμ΄ κ°λ λ°λ΄λ¬ν°λΈμ μ΄κ³ λ°ν΅ν©μ μΈ μ±κ²©μ΄ λλλ¬μ§κ³ μλ€. λμ§Έ, βνμβΒ·βμνβ λ± μ²λ
μνμ μμ¬λ‘, μ΄λ₯Ό ν¬κ΄ν μ μλ λ§μ μΌμμ΄λ€. μ΄μ μκΈ°μ νκ΅μν μ€μλ μΌμμ μμ¬λ‘ ν μνλ€μ΄ μμμ§λ§, μ²λ
μνμμ μΌμμ΄ λ€λ€μ§λ λ°©μμ κΈ°μ‘΄μ νκ΅μνμμ μΌμμ΄ λ€λ€μ Έ μ¨ λ°©μκ³Ό λ€μ μμ΄νλ€. μ²λ
μνμμλ νκ΅¬κ° κ°μ
λμ§ μμ κΈ°λ‘μ²λΌ μΌμμ ν¬μ°©νμ¬ μ μνλ μμμ΄ λλλ¬μ§λ€. μ΄λ λΉλμ μμ²κ°μ λ§€μ²΄κ° ν½μ°½νλ©΄μ μΌμμ μκΈ°λ μ¬μ°μ ννλ‘ λ€λ£¬ μμ¬λ¬Όλ€λ ν¨κ» κΈμ¦ν μν©κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨μ΄ μλ€κ³ λ³Ό μ μλ€.
<λ³λ€μ κ³ ν₯>μ΄ μ΄μ μνμ λΉν΄ μλ‘κ² μ¬κ²¨μ§κ³ βμ²λ
βμ΄λΌλ ν€μλμ μ μλ κ²μ, μ΄ μνμμ μ΅μν μμ¬λ₯Ό μλ‘κ² λ³΄μ¬μ£Όκ³ κ·Έ μμμ κ°κ°μ μκ·Ήνλ λ°©μ λλ¬Έμ΄λΌκ³ ν μ μλ€. νΉμ ν λ©μμ§λ₯Ό μ λ¬νκΈ° μν΄ μ°μλ μ΄μ μκΈ°μ λͺ½νμ£Όμλ λ¬λ¦¬, <λ³λ€μ κ³ ν₯>μ μμ£Ό μ°μΈ λͺ½νμ£Ό κΈ°λ²μ μΌνΈλ€ κ°μ μ°κ΄ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μΌμμ μΈ μ μλ₯Ό μ΄λ°νκ³ μλ€. <λ³λ€μ κ³ ν₯>μμλ λμμ μ 체μμ 보μ¬μ£ΌκΈ°λ³΄λ€λ, λͺ½νμ£Όλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μμ²κ°μ μκ·Ήμ΄ λ²λνλ λμμ νκ²½μ μκΈ°μν¨λ€. <λ΄ λ§μμ νμ°¨>μ <κ·Έλ κ·Έλ μ€λμ μλ
>μμλ λμμ μ 체μμ μ μν기보λ€λ μ¬νλ€μ ν΄λ‘μ¦μ
μΌλ‘ λ λͺ½νμ£Όλ₯Ό μ μν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ¬νλ€μ μ§κ°μ λΆκ°μν€κ³ , μ¬νλ€μ΄ μ§μ΄λ λμ 곡κ°μ λλμ μ λ¬νκ³ μ νμλ€. μ²κ°μ μΈ βκ³Όμβμ μ¬μ© μμ μ²λ
μνκ° μλ‘λ€κ³ λ°μλ€μ¬μ§λ λ° κΈ°μ¬νλ κ²μΌλ‘ 보μΈλ€. <μ΄μ λ΄λ¦° λΉ>μ <λ°λ³΄λ€μ νμ§>μ κ²½μ° μ²κ°μ μΈ κΈ°νΈμ μ¬μ©μ μμ λ€μ κ²°ν¨μ κ³Όμνλ―μ΄ λλ¬λ΄λ λ±μ₯μΈλ¬Όλ€ νΉμ μ νλμ κ²°ν©νλ€. μ΄λ€μ΄ μμ μ κ²°ν¨μ κ³Όμν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄λ€μ κ²°ν¨ μ체보λ€λ κ³Όμνλ νλμ μ΄μ μ΄ λ§μΆ°μ Έ, μ΄λ€μ κ²°ν¨μ μ΄μ²λΌ λΉλΉνκ² λλ¬λΌ μ μλ λ±μ₯μΈλ¬Όμ νλκ° νμΈ΅ λΆκ°λλ€. λ°λΌμ μ΄λ₯Ό βμ λλ μκΈ°κ³ΌμβλΌ λͺ
λͺ
νκ³ μ νλ€.
<λ°λ³΄λ€μ νμ§>μ λνμλ€μ μΌμμ μμ¬λ‘ ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ κΈ°μ‘΄κ³Όλ ꡬλ³λλ μ²λ
μμ μ μνκ³ μ ν μνμ΄λ€. <λ°λ³΄λ€μ νμ§>μμλ μλ‘ μ°κ΄ κ΄κ³κ° λμ¨ν μνΌμλλ€μ ν΅ν΄ μ²λ
λ€μ μꡬμ μ’μ μ 보μ¬μ€μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄λ€μ μΌμ μμμ μλμ±μ λ°κ²¬νκ³ μλ€. μ΄λ μ΄μ μκΈ°μ μ μμ΄λ€μ μ£ΌμΈκ³΅μΌλ‘ λ΄μΈμ λ μνλ€μ΄ μ΄μνλ λͺλͺ λ±μ₯μΈλ¬Όλ€μ λ΄λ¬ν°λΈλ₯Ό μ€μ¬μΌλ‘ μ κ°λλ©΄μ μꡬμ μΈ μνμμμ μ μνλ λ° μ£Όλ ₯νλ κ²κ³Όλ μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μΈλ€. λν <λ°λ³΄λ€μ νμ§>μμλ λνμλ€μ μ 체λ₯Ό ννΈννμ¬ μ μν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ κΈ°μ‘΄μ νμ ꡬμ λ°μ§ μλ μμ λΆλ°©ν μ²λ
μμ νμννμλ€. ννΈνλμ΄ μ¬λ¬Όμ²λΌ μ μλ μ΄λ€μ μ 체λ κΈ°μ‘΄μ μ μ²΄κ° μ μλμ΄ μ¨ κ·λ²μΌλ‘ νμλμ§ μμ λΏ μλλΌ, μ€νλ € μ΄μ μλ μ 체μ νλ ₯μ νκΈ°μν¨λ€. <κ±·μ§ λ§κ³ λ°μ΄λΌ>μμλ ννΈνλ μ μ²΄κ° λ±μ₯νμ¬, μΈκ°μ μ 체μ λΉμ·ν λμμ 보λ λ°μ μ€λ λ―μ¦κ³Ό 맀νΉμ λμμ μ λ°νλ€.
1975λ
μ μ§λλ©΄μ μ²λ
μνμλ μ‘°κΈμ© λ³νκ° κ°μ§λλ€. μ²λ
μνμ κ°κ°μ±μ νκ΅μνμ μμμ μ κ³ νκ³ , κ΄κ°λ€μ κ·Ήμ₯μΌλ‘ λΆλ¬ λͺ¨μ μμΈμ΄λΌ νκ°λμλ€. κ·Έλ μ§λ§ λμμ μ£Όμ μμμ΄ κ²°μ¬λμλ€λ λΉλμ λμμ΄ λκΈ°λ νμλ€. μ²λ
μν μμ°μλ€μ μ΄μ κ°μ λΉνμ λ°μλ€μ¬, μ²λ
μνμ βκ°κ°μ βμΈ μμμΈμ΄λ₯Ό μ£Όμ μμμ μ λ¬νλ λ° μ¬μ©νλ€. κ°κ°μ μΈ μμμΈμ΄ μΈμλ 맀체 νκ²½μ λ³ν, λνμ λ¬Ένμ μ μΉνλ μ΄μ κ°μ λ³νλ μ²λ
μνκ° κ΄κ°μκ² νΈμμ μ»λ λ° κΈ°μ¬νμ κ²μΌλ‘ 보μΈλ€. νμ§λ§ μ£Όμ μμμ μ λ¬νκΈ° μν΄ μμ²κ°μ μμλ₯Ό νμ©ν κ² μ체λ κΈ°μ‘΄ μνλ€μμλ μ°Ύμλ³Ό μ μμλ μ μ΄λ©°, μ²λ
μνκ° μ₯λ₯΄λ‘μ κ°λ λ³λ³μ±μ λ§μ΄ μ½νλμλ€.1. μλ‘ 1
1.1. μ°κ΅¬μ¬ κ²ν λ° λ¬Έμ μ κΈ° 1
1.2. μ°κ΅¬μ λ²μ λ° μ°κ΅¬μ μκ° 8
2. 'κ°κ°μ ' μμμΈμ΄μ νμ©κ³Ό μ²λ
κ³Όμ μ μ 21
2.1. λͺ½νμ£Ό κΈ°λ²μ μ¬μ©κ³Ό λμ 곡κ°μ λͺ
λμ± νμΆ 21
2.2. μ²κ°μ κΈ°νΈμ 'κ³Όμ'κ³Ό μ²λ
μ μ λλ μκΈ°κ³Όμ 47
3. μ΄μνλ μ²λ
μ(ε)μ κ±°λΆμ λ₯λμ 주체μ λΆμ 67
3.1. μ²λ
μμ¬μ λ³νμ ν΅ν μΌμμ μλμ± ν¬μ°© 67
3.2. μ΅λͺ
νλ μ 체μ μ μμ κ΄μ΅μ μΈ κ·λ²μ νκ΄΄ 87
4. μ£Όμ μμμ μν¬νμ μ²λ
μνμ μ λ½ 100
5. κ²°λ‘ 113
μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν 115
Abstract 125Maste
Effects of Perceived Discrimination and Trust on Breast Cancer Screening among Korean American Women
OBJECTIVE: Korean American (KA) women continue to have lower breast cancer screening rates than other racial groups. Perceived discrimination and trust have been associated with breast cancer screening adherence, but little is known about the associations in KA women. METHODS: Surveys were completed by 196 KA women in the Chicago metropolitan area. Multiple and Firth logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors (perceived discrimination, trust, acculturation, cultural beliefs, health care access) influencing breast cancer screening adherence (mammogram). In addition, SPSS macro PROCESS was used to examine the mediating role of trust between perceived discrimination and breast cancer screening adherence. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of the women surveyed had health insurance and 54% reported having a mammogram in the past 2 years. Predictors of having a mammogram were knowing where to go for a mammogram, having a regular doctor or usual place for health care, greater trust in health care providers, and lower distrust in the health care system. Perceived discrimination had an indirect effect on breast cancer screening through trust. CONCLUSIONS: The breast cancer screening rate among KA women is low. Perceived discrimination in health care, trust in health care providers, and distrust in the health care system directly or indirectly influenced breast cancer screening adherence in KA women. Trust is a factor that can be strengthened with educational interventions.restrictio