61 research outputs found

    Analysis of nursing productivity in the care of patients with angina pectoris in general medical wards of a university hospital

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณด๊ฑด ์˜๋ฃŒ์กฐ์ง์€ ๊ทธ ์–ด๋–ค ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๊ฒƒ์ด๊ฑด ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ธ๋™์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ธ๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์†Œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ธ๋ ฅ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚ ์˜ ๋ณ‘์›์กฐ์ง์—์„œ๋Š” 1989๋…„ ์ดํ›„์˜ ์ „๊ตญ๋ฏผ ๊ฐœ๋ณดํ—˜ํ™”์ดํ›„์— ๊ธ‰์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ์˜๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์š”์™€ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ์ž…์›์ˆ˜์š”๋„ ๊ธ‰์ฆํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ๋ณ‘์›์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ฒฝ์˜์€ ์ ์  ๋” ์••๋ฐ•์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณ‘์›์ธ๋ ฅ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณ‘์›๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์ œ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ํšจ์œจ์  ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์˜ ํฐ ๊ณผ์ œ์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ๋Œ€๋‘๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ผ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์› ๋‚ด๊ณผ๋ณ‘๋™์—์„œ ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ž…์› ๊ฐ€๋ฃŒ์‹œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ์ ‘์ด‰ํ•œ ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜๋ณ„๋กœ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ถ”์ด๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•ด๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์„œ์šธ์‹œ๋‚ด ์ผ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์› ๋‚ด๊ณผ๋ณ‘๋™์—์„œ 1985๋…„๊ณผ 1990์˜ ๊ฐ 9์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 12์›” 31์ผ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์ž…์› ๊ฐ€๋ฃŒํ•œ ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆํ™˜์ž ์ „์ˆ˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 1991๋…„ 10์›” 15์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 11์›” 30์ผ๊นŒ์ง€์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์ง€์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ทŒ, ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1) ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ (ํ‰๊ท  ํ™˜์ž ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)์€ 1985๋…„ 158.93ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 198.00ํšŒ๋กœ์จ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค(t=1.94, d. f.=78. p<.05). ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ 1990๋…„์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์€ 1985๋…„์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 2) ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„, ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)์€ 1985๋…„ 135.5ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 175.03ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค (t=2.22, d. f.=78, p<.05). ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ 1990๋…„์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1 ์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์€ 1990๋…„์ด 1985๋…„์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„๋กœ๋Š” ํ™œ๋ ฅ์ฆ์ƒ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๊ธฐํƒ€์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋งŒ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ 1985๋…„ 23.15ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 33.00ํšŒ๋กœ์จ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ (t=3.24, d. f.=78, p<.01).ํˆฌ์•ฝ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 41.5 5ํšŒ,1990๋…„ 61.03ํšŒ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค(t=2.16, d. f.=78, p<.05). ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹์ด(t=2.86, d. f.=78, p<.01),์„ญ์ทจ๋Ÿ‰/๋ฐฐ์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ •(t=3.39, d. f.=64, p<.001), ์ฒ˜์น˜(t=3.39, d. f.=60, p<.001) ๋ฐ ํ‡ด์›(t=8.02, d. f.=65, p<.001)๋“ฑ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋„ 1990๋…„์ด1985๋…„์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3) ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ๋น„์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„, ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ (ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)์€ 1985๋…„ 24.43ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 22.98ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4) ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)์€ ์ œ 1์ผ์ด 1985๋…„ 16.60ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 21.15ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ (t=3.36, d. f.=78, p<.01), ์žฌ 2์ผ์€ 1985๋…„ 16.45ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 21.05ํšŒ๋กœ์จ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค(t=2.76, d. f.=78, p<.01). ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ž…์› ์ œ 1์ผ๊ณผ ์ œ 2์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์€ 1990๋…„์ด 1985๋…„์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณธ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ์ œ 3์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ œ 9์ผ๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” 1985๋…„๊ณผ 1990๋…„๊ฐ„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ๋‚ ์€ ํ‰๊ท  9์ผ์˜ ์ž…์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ค‘ ์ œ 4์ผ๋กœ์จ 1985๋…„ 19.38ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 21.78ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ œ 5์ผ ์ดํ›„์—๋Š” ์ ์  ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ 9์ผ์งธ์—๋Š” 6.53ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 7.45ํšŒ์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. 5) ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„, ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ (ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ œ 1์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 14.23ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 17.58ํšŒ๋กœ์จ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ (t=2.63, d.f.=78,p<.01), ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(t=2.03, d. f.=78,p<.01),ํˆฌ์•ฝ(t=2.85, d.f.=59, p<.01),์„ญ์ทจ๋Ÿ‰/๋ฐฐ์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ • (t=2.71, d. f.=68,p<.01)์˜์—ญ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ 2์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 17.63ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 20.43ํšŒ๋กœ์จ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(t=2.01, d. f.=78, p<.05), ํ™œ๋ ฅ์ฆ์ƒ ์ธก์ • (t=3.38,d. f.=64. p<.001), ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ( t=1.79, d. f.=78, p<.01) ,ํˆฌ์•ฝ( t=3.67, d. f.=51,p<.001), ์‹์ด(t=3.57, d. f.=54, p<.001) ๋ฐ ์„ญ์ทจ๋Ÿ‰/๋ฐฐ์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ •(t=3.30, d. f.=62, p<.01)์˜์—ญ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 3์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 18.00ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 19.45ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ (t=.90, d. f.=78, p<.05). ํ™œ๋ ฅ์ฆ์ƒ ์ธก์ • (t=2.02, d. f.=78,p<.05), ํŠน์ˆ˜๊ฒ€์‚ฌ (t=2.22, d. f.=78, p<.05) ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”์‹œ(Prn)ํˆฌ์•ฝ(t=2.06, d. f.=65,p<.05)์˜ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 4์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 16.10ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 16.68ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(t=2.63, d. f.=78, p<.01), ํˆฌ์•ฝ(t=2.32, d. f.=50, p<.05) ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜์น˜(t=2.95, d. f.=47, p<.01) ์˜์—ญ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ 5์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 13.40ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 17.85ํšŒ์˜€๊ณ , ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ(t=2.67, d. f.=70, p<.01), ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(t=3.68, d. f.=65,p<.001)๋ฐ ์„ญ์ทจ๋Ÿ‰/๋ฐฐ์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ •(t=2.30, d. f.=70, p<.001)๋“ฑ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 6์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ™˜์ž ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 10.45ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 14.33ํšŒ๋กœ์จ 1985๋…„์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค(t=2.29. d. f.=02, p<.05). ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„๋กœ๋Š” ํˆฌ์•ฝ(t=2.76, d. f.=52 p<.01),์„ญ์ทจ๋Ÿ‰, ๋ฐฐ์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ์ธก์ •(t=2.75, d. f.=62 , p<.01) ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜์น˜(t=2.52, d. f.=48, p<.01)์˜์—ญ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 7์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ™˜์ž ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1986๋…„ 8.38ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 11.15ํšŒ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ œ 8์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ™˜์ž์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋„ 1985๋…„ 7.20ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 8.38ํšŒ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ 9์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ™˜์ž ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ 5.63ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 5.83ํšŒ๋กœ ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜๋ณ„๋กœ ๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์€ ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ 1985๋…„๊ณผ 1990๋…„๊ฐ„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  9์ผ์˜ ์ž…์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ค‘ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™˜์ž์™€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ํ•œ ๋‚ ์€ 1985๋…„์€ ์ œ 3์ผ๋กœ์จ ํ‰๊ท  18.00ํšŒ์˜€๊ณ , 1990๋…„์€ ์ œ 2์ผ๋กœ์จ ํ‰๊ท  20.43ํšŒ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์ดํ›„๋กœ๋Š” ์ ์  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ9์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ํ™˜์ž ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋Š” 1985๋…„ ํ‰๊ท  5.63ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ ํ‰๊ท  5.83ํšŒ์— ๋ถˆ๊ณผํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 6) ์ž…์›์ผ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„, ๋น„์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜)๋Š” 1985๋…„๊ณผ 1990๋…„๊ฐ„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  9์ผ์˜ ์ž…์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ค‘ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™˜์ž์™€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ ‘์ด‰ํšŸ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ๋‚ ์€ ์ œ 1์ผ๋กœ์จ 1985๋…„ 4.03 ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 4.27ํšŒ์˜€๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์ดํ›„์—๋Š” ์ ์  ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ 9์ผ์€ 1985๋…„ 90ํšŒ, 1990๋…„ 1.00ํšŒ๋กœ ๋ถˆ๊ณผ 1ํšŒ ์ดํ•˜์˜ ์ ‘์ด‰๋งŒ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์˜ํ•˜๋ฉด ํ˜‘์‹ฌ์ฆ ํ™˜์ž ์ž…์›๊ฐ€๋ฃŒ์‹œ 1990๋…„์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ 1์ธ๋‹น ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์€ 1985๋…„๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ™œ๋™ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์žฌ์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์— ์†ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ๋ณ‘์›์šด์˜์ƒ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ, ์ฆ‰ ๋ณ‘์›์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ€์ •๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ๋„์ž…๋“ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ๊ทน์ ์ธ ์ œ๋„๊ฐœ์„ ์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ์•ผ ํ•˜๊ฒ ๋‹ค. Analysis Nursing Productivity in the Care of Patients with Angina Pectoris in General Medical Wards of a University Hospital Hong, Hye Kyung Department of Nursing The Graduate School of Yonsei University (Directed by Professsr Kim,Mo Im, Dr.P.H.) The purpose of this study was to compare nursing productivity in terms of the nurse-patient contacts according to the year patients were cared for and the length of hospitalization in general medical wards of a university hospital. The subjects of this study were patients who were hospitalized for the treatment of angina pectoris from September 1 through December 31,1985 and 1990. Data were collected from October 15 to November 14, 1991. The Medical records of these patients were obtained from the recording center of a university hospital . Data for this study included 1) demographic, social and economic factors, 2)admisson related factors and 3) information obtained from a form developed by the researcher to identify the nursing productivity of nursing activity. The major results of the this study were as follows: 1. Significant differences were found in the mean scores of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in 1985 (158.93) and in 1990 (198.00), (t=1.94, d. f.=78.p<.05) So, nursing productivity per one nurse in 1990 was greater than in 1985 2. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in nursing activities based on the doctor's orders in 1985 (135.5) and in 1990 (175.03), (t=2.22,d. f.=78, p<.05), So, nursing productivity per one nurse in nursing activities based on the doctor's orders in1990 was greater than in 1985. These nursing activities included medical tests(t=3.24, d. f.=78, p<.01), medications(t=2.16, d. f.=78, p<.05), diets(t=2.86, d. f.=78,p<.01), intake/output check (t=3.39, d. f.=64, p<.001), therapies(t=3.39, d. f.=60,p<.001), and discharge (t=8.02, d. f.=65,p<.001). There were no significant differences found in vital sign checks. 3. The average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in the areas of nursing activities performed without the doctor's order were 24.43 in 1985,and 22.98 in 1990. There were no significant differences found in nursing productivity per one nurse in the areas of nursing activity performed without the doctor's order in 1985 and 1990. 4. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization in 1985 (16.60) and in 1990 (21.15) on the 1st day of hospitalization, (t=3.36, d. f.=78, p<.01) and on the 2nd day of hospitalization in 1985(16.45) and in 1990(21.05), (t=2.76,d. f.= 78,p=.01). So nursing productivity per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization on the 1st and 2nd day of hospitalization in 1990 was greater than for that of 1985. 5. The findings regarding nursing productivity per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization and the doctor's orders were as follows. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 1st day's hospitalization in 1985 (14.23) and in 1990 (17.58), (t=2.63,d. f.=59,p<.01). The nursing activities included medical tests (t=2.63, d. f.=78, p<.01), medications (t=2.85, d. f.=59, p<.01), and intake/output checks(t=2.71, d. f.=68, p<.01). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 2nd day's hospitalization in 1985 (17.63) and in 1990 (20.43), (t=2.01, d. f.=78, p<.05). The nursing activities included vital sign checks (t=3.38, d. f.=64, p<.001), medical tests (t=1.79. d. f.=78.p<.01),medications (t=3.67, d. f.=51, p<.001), diets(t=3.57, d. f.=54, p<.001), and intake/output check(t=3.30, d. f.=62, p<.001). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 3rs day's hospitalization in 1985 (18.00) and in 1990 (19.45):t=.90, d. f.=78,p<.05. The nursing activities included vital sign checks(t=2.02, d. f.=78,p<.05), special medical tests(t=2.22, d. f.=78,p<.05), and PRN medications(t=2.06, d. f.=65, p<.05). No significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 4th day's hospitalization in 1985(16.10) and in 1990 (6.68). But significant differences were found medical tests(t=2.63. d. f.=78, p<.01), medications(t=2.32, d. f.=50, p<.05), and therapies(t=2.95,d. f.=78, p<.01) were. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 5th day's hospitalization in 1985 (13.40) and in 1990 (17.85): t=2.67,d. f.=70.p<.01. The nursing activities included medical tests(t=3.68, d. f.=65, p<.001) and intake/output check(t=2.30, d. f.=70, p<.001). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 6th day's hospitalization in 1985 (10.45) and in 1990(14.33), (t=2.29.d. f.=62,p<.05). The nursing activities included medications(t=2.76, d. f.=52,7.01), intake/output check(t=2.75, d. f.=62,p<.01), and therapies(t=2.52, d. f.=48,p<.01). No significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 7th, 8th, and 9th days. In regard to the average length of hospitalization in 1985. the 3rd day(18.00) had the highest average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse, and in1990, the 2nd day (20.43) had the highest average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse. After the 2nd and 3rd days the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse decreased, and on the 9th day the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in 1985 were 5.63,and in 1990 were 5.83. 6. No significant differences were found in the average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in the areas of nursing activities performed without the doctor's order according to the legnth of hospitalization in 1985 and 1990. [์˜๋ฌธ] The purpose of this study was to compare nursing productivity in terms of the nurse-patient contacts according to the year patients were cared for and the length of hospitalization in general medical wards of a university hospital. The subjects of this study were patients who were hospitalized for the treatment of angina pectoris from September 1 through December 31,1985 and 1990. Data were collected from October 15 to November 14, 1991. The Medical records of these patients were obtained from the recording center of a university hospital . Data for this study included 1) demographic, social and economic factors, 2)admisson related factors and 3) information obtained from a form developed by the researcher to identify the nursing productivity of nursing activity. The major results of the this study were as follows: 1. Significant differences were found in the mean scores of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in 1985 (158.93) and in 1990 (198.00), (t=1.94, d. f.=78.p<.05) So, nursing productivity per one nurse in 1990 was greater than in 1985 2. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in nursing activities based on the doctor's orders in 1985 (135.5) and in 1990 (175.03), (t=2.22,d. f.=78, p<.05), So, nursing productivity per one nurse in nursing activities based on the doctor's orders in1990 was greater than in 1985. These nursing activities included medical tests(t=3.24, d. f.=78, p<.01), medications(t=2.16, d. f.=78, p<.05), diets(t=2.86, d. f.=78,p<.01), intake/output check (t=3.39, d. f.=64, p<.001), therapies(t=3.39, d. f.=60,p<.001), and discharge (t=8.02, d. f.=65,p<.001). There were no significant differences found in vital sign checks. 3. The average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in the areas of nursing activities performed without the doctor's order were 24.43 in 1985,and 22.98 in 1990. There were no significant differences found in nursing productivity per one nurse in the areas of nursing activity performed without the doctor's order in 1985 and 1990. 4. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization in 1985 (16.60) and in 1990 (21.15) on the 1st day of hospitalization, (t=3.36, d. f.=78, p<.01) and on the 2nd day of hospitalization in 1985(16.45) and in 1990(21.05), (t=2.76,d. f.= 78,p=.01). So nursing productivity per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization on the 1st and 2nd day of hospitalization in 1990 was greater than for that of 1985. 5. The findings regarding nursing productivity per one nurse according to the length of hospitalization and the doctor's orders were as follows. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 1st day's hospitalization in 1985 (14.23) and in 1990 (17.58), (t=2.63,d. f.=59,p<.01). The nursing activities included medical tests (t=2.63, d. f.=78, p<.01), medications (t=2.85, d. f.=59, p<.01), and intake/output checks(t=2.71, d. f.=68, p<.01). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 2nd day's hospitalization in 1985 (17.63) and in 1990 (20.43), (t=2.01, d. f.=78, p<.05). The nursing activities included vital sign checks (t=3.38, d. f.=64, p<.001), medical tests (t=1.79. d. f.=78.p<.01),medications (t=3.67, d. f.=51, p<.001), diets(t=3.57, d. f.=54, p<.001), and intake/output check(t=3.30, d. f.=62, p<.001). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 3rs day's hospitalization in 1985 (18.00) and in 1990 (19.45):t=.90, d. f.=78,p<.05. The nursing activities included vital sign checks(t=2.02, d. f.=78,p<.05), special medical tests(t=2.22, d. f.=78,p<.05), and PRN medications(t=2.06, d. f.=65, p<.05). No significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 4th day's hospitalization in 1985(16.10) and in 1990 (6.68). But significant differences were found medical tests(t=2.63. d. f.=78, p<.01), medications(t=2.32, d. f.=50, p<.05), and therapies(t=2.95,d. f.=78, p<.01) were. Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 5th day's hospitalization in 1985 (13.40) and in 1990 (17.85): t=2.67,d. f.=70.p<.01. The nursing activities included medical tests(t=3.68, d. f.=65, p<.001) and intake/output check(t=2.30, d. f.=70, p<.001). Significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 6th day's hospitalization in 1985 (10.45) and in 1990(14.33), (t=2.29.d. f.=62,p<.05). The nursing activities included medications(t=2.76, d. f.=52,7.01), intake/output check(t=2.75, d. f.=62,p<.01), and therapies(t=2.52, d. f.=48,p<.01). No significant differences were found in the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse during the 7th, 8th, and 9th days. In regard to the average length of hospitalization in 1985. the 3rd day(18.00) had the highest average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse, and in1990, the 2nd day (20.43) had the highest average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse. After the 2nd and 3rd days the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse decreased, and on the 9th day the average number of the nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in 1985 were 5.63,and in 1990 were 5.83. 6. No significant differences were found in the average number of nurse-patient contacts per one nurse in the areas of nursing activities performed without the doctor's order according to the legnth of hospitalization in 1985 and 1990.restrictio

    ๋ˆ„์— ํ•ต๋‹ค๊ฐ์ฒด๋ณ‘ ๋ฐ”์ด๋Ÿฌ์Šค์˜ p10 ํ”„๋กœ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ Baculovirus ๋ฐœํ˜„๋ฒกํ„ฐ ์ œ์ž‘

    No full text
    Thesis (master`s)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋†์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™๊ณผ ๊ณค์ถฉํ•™์ „๊ณต,1999.Maste

    ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฉ”์‚ฐ์ง€์›€ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ์‚ฐํ™” LDL์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋˜๋Š” PAI-1 ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ERK MAP kinase์™€ TGF-รŸ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋‹ฌ๊ณ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ

    No full text
    Thesis(doctor`s)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์˜ํ•™๊ณผ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ „๊ณต,2006.Docto

    Antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid profile of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

    No full text
    ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์ž„๊ท ์˜ ๊ฐ์—ผ๋นˆ๋„๋Š” ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์–ผ์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋„์ƒ๊ตญ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•„์ง๋„ ๋งŽ์€ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, penicillinase ์ƒ์„ฑ๊ท ์ฃผ (penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae, PPNG)์˜ ์ถœํ˜„์œผ๋กœ penicillin์€ ์ž„๊ด€ ๊ฐ์—ผ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ํŠน์ˆ˜์ง์—…์—ฌ์„ฑ์˜ surveillance culture์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ž„๊ท ์„ ๋””์Šคํฌ ํ™•์‚ฐ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์„ ์‹œํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€๋˜ ๋ฐ”, ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” ๋‚ด์„ฑ๋ณด๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋˜ ciprofloxacin ๊ณผ ceftriaxone์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ด ๋œํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์–ด, ์ด์˜ ๊ทœ๋ช…์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. PPNG๋Š” ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ๋‚˜๋ผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ฮฒ-lactamase plasmid์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์—์„œ๋Š” 4.4-MD plasmid๋งŒ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” 1993๋…„ ํŠน์ˆ˜์ง์—…์—ฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ž„๊ท ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ฮฒ-lactamase ์ƒ์„ฑ์‹œํ—˜๊ณผ ํ•œ์ฒœํฌ์„๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ•ญ๊ท ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์„ ์‹œํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ตญ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜๋Š” ์ž„๊ท ์˜ ์—ญํ•™์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ €, PPNG์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ plasmid DNA ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ์‹œํ—˜๋œ ์ž„๊ท  225์ฃผ ์ค‘ 160์ฃผ (71%)๊ฐ€ ฮฒ-lactamase ์–‘์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. Penicillin G์— ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ธ ๊ท ์ฃผ๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๊ณ , ฮฒ-lactamase ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ ๊ท ์ฃผ๋„ 58%๋Š” penicillin G์— ๋‚ด์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. Tetracycline์—๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์ค‘ 2%๋Š” ๊ณ ๋„๋‚ด์„ฑ์ฃผ์˜€๋‹ค. 4. Macrolide์— ๋‚ด์„ฑ์ธ ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ non-PPNG ์ค‘์—๋Š” ์–ผ์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, PPNG ์ค‘์˜ 17%๊ฐ€ dirithromycin์— ๋‚ด์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 5. ๋””์Šคํฌ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ceftriaxone์— ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ด ๋œํ•œ ๊ท ์ฃผ๋„ ํฌ์„๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ciprofloxacin์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” 27%์˜ ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ด ๋œ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 6. PPNG์˜ ฮฒ-lactamase plasmid๋Š” 4.4-MD์™€ 3.05-MD์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 44%์™€ 55%์˜ ๊ท ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜๋Š” ์ž„๊ท  ์ค‘์—๋Š” PPNG๊ฐ€ ๋งก๊ณ , ์ด๋“ค์€ 4.4-MD plasmid์™€ 3.05-MD์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋˜๋Š” plasmid๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ciprofloxacin์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ์ด ๋œํ•œ ๊ท ์ฃผ์˜ ๋น„์œจ์ด ์ ์ฐจ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Gonococcal infections are still prevalent in developing countries, though the accurate incidence are unknown. Because of the isolation of penicillinase-producing Nesseria gonorrhoeae (PPNG) stains, it became difficult to use penicillin for the empirical treatment of gonococcal infection. It was noted that N. gonorrhoeae strains isolated for surveillance from prostitutes were less susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin by disk diffusion test. Upto the present such isolates have not been reported, requiring the confirmation. Plasmid profiles of PPNG were different depending on the isolated countries. In Korea, only 4.4-MD plasmids were reported. In this study, strains isolated fron prostitutes in 1993 were tested far the ฮฒ-lactamase production and the susceptibilities to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and others, by an agar dilution test. The plasmid pro51e of PPNGs were determined by electrophoresis. 1. Number of ฮฒ-lactamase-producing strains were 160 (71%) among the 225 tested. 2. No isolates were susceptible to penicillin G, and among the non-PPNG strains 58% were resistant. 3. All of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline and the proportion of high level resistant strains were 2%. 4. Among the non-PPNGs, no isolates were resistant to macrolide, and 17% of PPNGs were resistant to dirithromycin. 5. All of the isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone by an agar dilution, regardless of the penicillinase production, while 27% were less susceptible to ciprofloxacin. 6. PPNGs were found to carry either previously known 4.4-MD or new one with approximately 3.05-MD in size. In conclusion, PPNGs are very prevalent in our country and the strains carry 4.4-MD and suspected 3.05-MD plasmids, and the strains less susceptible to ciprofloxacin, and it is needed to monitor the pattern of susceptibilities periodically.restrictio

    ๋‹นํ™”๋œ ์•Œ๋ถ€๋ฏผ์ด ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฉ”์‚ฐ์ง€์›€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ TGF-ฮฒโ‚mRNA ๋ฐœํ˜„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์˜ํ•™๊ณผ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์ „๊ณต,1999.Maste

    N102S Mutation of UBIAD1 Gene in a Family with Schnyder Crystalline Corneal Dystrophy

    No full text
    Purpose: Schnyder crystalline corneal dystrophy (SCCD) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by progressive central corneal opacification and premature development of peripheral arcus in the cornea. This disease results from a point mutation of UBIAD1 in chromosome 1p34-36. Until now, 15 different mutations of UBIAD1 gene on chromosome 1p34-36 have been reported for Schnyder crystalline corneal dystrophy. More point mutations are expected to be added to the list in the future. Schnyder crystalline corneal dystrophy is a rare disease, with only three reported cases in Korea, although there has been no report of a genetically confirmed case of the disease. Case summary: We encountered six patients with an N102S mutation of UBIAD1, who are from a family of two generation with 12 family members. Genetic confirmation for Schnyder crystalline corneal dystrophy was performed on these patients. This was the first report of a genetic confirmation of Schnyder crystalline corneal dystrophy in Korea. We will discuss our cases along with a review of the related literatureope

    Inhibitory Effect of Tranilast on Transforming Growth Factor-Beta-Induced Protein in Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type 2 Corneal Fibroblasts

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of tranilast, an inhibitor of chemical mediators and fibroblast proliferation, on the expression of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ฮฒ)-induced protein (TGFBIp) in wild-type (WT) and homozygous (HO) granular corneal dystrophy type 2 corneal fibroblasts. METHODS: Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were measured by Cell Counting Kit-8 and lactate dehydrogenase assay. Western blotting and real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to determine changes in the expression of TGFBIp and TGFBI mRNA. We determined the effects of tranilast on phosphorylated Smad2 (pSmad2) and pSmad3, wound-healing, and expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (ฮฑ-SMA), type I collagen, and integrins. RESULTS: High concentrations of tranilast decreased proliferation of corneal fibroblasts but did not cause elevation of lactate dehydrogenase, except at 1.0 mM tranilast. TGF-ฮฒ increased the expression of TGFBIp and TGFBI mRNA in WT and HO corneal fibroblasts. Cotreatment of corneal fibroblasts with tranilast and TGF-ฮฒ reduced the levels of TGFBIp and TGFBI mRNA. In addition, application of tranilast reduced pSmad2 in WT and HO corneal fibroblasts and pSmad3 in HO corneal fibroblasts, both of which were increased initially by TGF-ฮฒ. Tranilast delayed wound healing and reduced the expression of ฮฑ-SMA, type I collagen, and some of integrins in WT and HO corneal fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: Application of tranilast in WT and HO corneal fibroblasts inhibited the expression of TGFBIp by blocking TGF-ฮฒ signaling. Thus, tranilast may be useful in delaying or preventing the recurrence of corneal opacity in TGFBI-linked corneal dystrophies if clinical studies confirm these findings.ope
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore