22 research outputs found

    Relation between Kawasaki Disease and Immunoglobulin E

    Get PDF
    Objective Kawasaki disease is a systemic vascular disease which is caused by an immunologic response. The purpose of this study is to see how a high IgE level affects Kawasaki disease, in two groups of high IgE level and low IgE level. Methods A retrospective study was done from 2008 to 2010, among patients, who were admitted in Severance Children's Hospital for Kawasaki disease with IgE levels checked. Age groups with an IgE level above reference ranges and those with normal ranges were done. Also, clinical characteristics were analyzed. Statistical method was done by SPSS 18. Results A total of 198 Kawasaki patients were analyzed from 2008 to 2010. Among them 123 (62%) patients showed elevated IgE levels. Patients with high IgE had a significantly higher lymphadenopathy prevalence (p=0.006), however they had no connection with quantitative values. Patients with BCG site redness appeared to have lower IgE levels than patients without redness. Coronary complication had no relation with IgE levels. There was no correlation between laboratory results and IgE levels. Conclusion 62% of Kawasaki disease patients show high IgE levels in our study. The symptoms of BCG site redness aged less than 1 year seemed to be related with IgE level. To understand the pathophysiology of Kawasaki disease, more studies should be performed on the role of IgE.ope

    A Case of Lung Involvement Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

    Get PDF
    Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can develop extra-articular manifestations, including growth retardation, osteopenia and chronic uveitis. However, pleuropulmonary involvement is rare. Approximately 40% of patients with JIA have abnormal pulmonary function tests without pulmonary symptoms, with the commonest abnormality in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, but clinically evident pulmonary parenchymal disease in JIA is extremely uncommon. We describe a 15-year-old male with JIA who presented with dyspnea due to interstitial lung disease.ope

    Enhanced detection and serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae using multiplex polymerase chain reaction

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Methods for quick and reliable detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae are needed for the diagnosis of pneumococcal disease and vaccine studies. This study aimed to show that sequential multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is more efficient than conventional culture in achieving S. pneumoniae -positive results. Methods: Nasopharyngeal (NP) secretions were obtained from 842 pediatric patients admitted with lower respiratory infections at Severance Childrenโ€™s Hospital in Korea between March 2009 and June 2010. For identification and serotype determination of pneumococci from the NP secretions, the secretions were evaluated via multiplex PCR technique with 35 serotype-specific primers arranged in 8 multiplex PCR sets and conventional bacteriological culture technique. Results: Among the results for 793 samples that underwent both bacterial culture and PCR analysis for pneumococcal detection, 153 (19.3%) results obtained by PCR and 81 (10.2%) results obtained by conventional culture technique were positive for S. pneumoniae. The predominant serotypes observed, in order of decreasing frequency, were 19A (23%), 6A/B (16%), 19F (11%), 15B/C (5%), 15A (5%), and 11A (4%); further, 26% of the isolates were non-typeable. Conclusion: As opposed to conventional bacteriological tests, PCR analysis can accurately and rapidly identify pneumococcal serotypes.ope

    Phylogenetic Analysis of Human Bocavirus in Hospitalized Children with Acute Respiratory Tract Infection in Korea

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Human bocavirus (hBoV), a recently discovered virus, has been detected in children with respiratory tract infections worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and molecular phylogeny of hBoV in the respiratory samples of children with acute respiratory tract infections in 2010. Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 953 children with lower respiratory tract infections at Severance childrenโ€™s hospital in Korea from January 2010 to December 2010. We applied the multiplex PCR technique for the identification of 12 respiratory viruses from the samples. Among the total specimens, hBoV positive samples were subjected to phylogenetic analysis by sequencing a fragment of the VP1/VP2 gene junction. Results: hBoV was detected in 141 (14.8%) among 953 patients. The 61.7% of hBoV-positive samples were found to co-exist with other respiratory viruses. The results of phylogenetic analysis showed that all 141 hBoV-positive isolates were identified as hBoV 1, revealing a high similarity among the isolates (>98%). Conclusion: hBoV 1 with minimal sequence variations circulated in children with acute respiratory infections during 2010. More research is needed to determine the clinical severity and outcomes of the minimal sequence variations.ope

    A Nationwide Survey on the Child Day Care and Common Infectious Diseases

    Get PDF
    Purpose : As the number of children who attend child care centers has increased, concerns has increased about the effect of child day care on childhood illness. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between experience in child care and common infectious diseases in children under 5 years of age. Methods : Data were collected by surveying 1,000 respondents with children under age 5 through online interviews using a structured questionnaire. The contents of the survey were composed of demographic characteristics, child care facilities usage, experience in infectious diseases, and immunization status. Results : Among the 1,000 children <5 years of age, 78.5% attended a child care facility. Rates of common communicable illnesses were higher in children in child care than for children reared exclusively at home. The predominant communicable diseases which the respondents' children experienced, in order of decreasing frequency, were gastroenteritis (47.1%), otitis media (41.8%) and pneumonia (19.1%). The immunization rate of vaccines that are not included the national immunization program (NIP) (Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine - 76.6%, hepatitis A vaccine - 63.3%, pneumococcal vaccine - 59.4%, rotavirus vaccine - 43.1%) was lower than that of the NIP vaccines (90.4%). Conclusion : Children in child care experience more bouts of common infectious disease, so nationwide policies to prevent or to control the spread of infectious agents in a child-care should be available and appropriate immunization should be emphasized as the most effective method for the control of infectious disease for children.ope

    Clinical Manifestation of Human Metapneumovirus Infection in Korean Children

    Get PDF
    Purpose : The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, epidemiology and the clinical manifestation of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection in Korean children. Methods : From February 2010 to January 2012, we collected nasopharyngeal aspiration from 1,554 children who were hospitalized for acute lower respiratory tract infections at the Department of Pediatrics, Severance Childrenโ€™s Hospital. hMPV was detected by performing reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The medical records of the patients with positive results were retrospectively reviewed. Results : We detected hMPV in 99 of the 1,554 hospitalized children. The mean age of the hMPV infected children was 25 months, and 87% of the illnesses occurred between April and June. The most common diagnoses were pneumonia (73%) and bronchiolitis (16%). The clinical manifestations included cough, fever, respiratory distress, hoarseness, tachypnea, and wheezing. Coinfection with other respiratory viruses was found in 43 children (43%). Conclusion : hMPV is one of the major virus causing acute respiratory tract infection in the age between 13 months and 48 months old with peaks during April to June. Reports of hMPV in Korea has been increasing but additional studies are required to define the epidemiology and the extent of disease caused by hMPV to determine future development of this illness in Korean children.ope

    ๋ถˆ์™„์ „์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ž์ด๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ์ง„๋™์ˆ˜ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2011.8. ๊น€์ง€ํ™˜.Maste

    ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ณต๊ธ‰์—ญํ•™: ์ˆ˜์ถœ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ด ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2012. 8. ํ™ฉ์ผ์ˆœ.running more interaction programs for a global code of conductestablishing a multinational consortium for reactors, fuels, components, enrichment, reprocessing, and storagesand forming higher diplomatic, economic, and technical interdependence among suppliers.and 3) a moderate competition between the United States and Canada in export to South Korea. As a result, a new supply dynamics model for nuclear export decision-making has been developedit was tested via the three cases and a new cooperation case between the United States and India. The nuclear supply dynamics model shows that suppliers pursuit of economical, strategic, and political benefits produces the four types of feedback among suppliers. A nuclear export decision can be politically driven based on consideration of market importance and nonproliferation requirement. In the risk-taking feedback scenario, a supplier can compromise conditions of supply in order to avoid negotiation deadlock with a recipientotherwise, the supplier must risks losing its competitive position. In the lack of vigilance feedback scenario, a supplier can be distracted to attract markets while it deals with no vigilance with unattractive recipients. In the consensus-building feedback scenario, a supplier can build consensus with other suppliers on conditions of supply to avoid being the only party in negotiation conflict with a recipient, and thus to seek its competitive position. Finally, in the external constraint feedback scenario, if a supplier tries to loosen conditions of supply, other suppliers constrain it from doing so to keep their competitive positions. The first two types of feedback can loosen conditions of supply, while the latter two can strengthen the conditions. Under high competition, Canada and the United States compromised safeguards conditions of supply to India that was the largest democracy and business economic market โ€“ the risk-taking feedback was dominant. Under low competition, the Soviet Union as well as other suppliers was indifferent to proliferation risks in North Korea where market attractiveness was trivial and Soviet political influence seemed credible โ€“ the lack of vigilance feedback was superior. Under moderate competition, the United States persuaded Canada to build consensus on stringent conditions of supply while constraining France from supplying South Korea with sensitive reprocessing technology โ€“ the consensus-building and external constraint feedback were prominent. In summary, the nuclear supply dynamics model predicts that a high competition renders suppliers to discount recognized proliferation risk, whereas a low competition may also increase potential proliferation risk due to lack of vigilance of suppliers. It is expected that a moderate competition results in healthy feedback among suppliers, allowing them to pay due attention to strict nonproliferation conditions of supply. Case-specific supplier behaviors have been preserved up to date with continuing pursuit for gaining strategic advantages and economic profits. The United States lifted a ban on India permitting the unaccepted nuclear weapon state legitimate access to civil nuclear technology and materials without requiring her ratification of NPT. This recent example highlights that strong strategic and economic stake of the supplier led to pursue the market at the expense of negative impact on the international nonproliferation regime while most nuclear transactions still rely on specific bilateral arrangements. Such a bilateral negotiation process between a supplier and a recipient is usually exclusivefew interaction opportunities are allowed for other nuclear suppliers. There is no way that other suppliers can legally require a disclosure of nuclear negotiation processes. In addition, nuclear suppliers are sharing scant political, strategic, and economic benefits, although interdependence among suppliers is important to maintain a power balance and prevent a supplier from violating the global nuclear export guidelines. Therefore, todays nuclear export systems need to be upgraded so as to facilitate transparent interactions with each supplier, and to create more political, strategic, and economic benefits shared by nuclear suppliers. The upgraded strategy can assure the consensus-building process and reinforce the external constraint mechanism, while preventing both special concessions to win intense competition and lack of vigilance in a monopolistic trade. Practicable approaches for more supply-side interaction and more benefit-sharing include: building a global negotiation framework based on nonproliferation conditions of supply while classifying other business conditions์ง€๋‚œ 60๋…„๊ฐ„ ํ‰ํ™”์  ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋œ ํ•ต๋ฌผ์งˆโ€ข์žฅ๋น„โ€ข๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ ํ•ต๋ฌด๊ธฐ, ํ•ตํ…Œ๋Ÿฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์–‘์‚ฐํ•ด์™”๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์ด ์ž๊ตญ์˜ ์ด์ต์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŠน์ • ์ˆ˜์š”๊ตญ์—๋งŒ ํŠนํ˜œ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋ณ„์  ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ •์ฑ…์€ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ์— ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณ์™”๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ทœ์ œํ•˜๋Š” ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ตญ์ œ์ˆ˜์ถœํ†ต์ œ์ฒด์ œ์˜ ๊ถŒํ•œ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๊ณ , ์•„์ง๋„ ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์ถœ์€ ์–‘์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ด€๊ณ„์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด, ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ฑ์€ ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์— ๊ณ„์† ๋‚ด์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์œ„ํ—˜์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ˆ˜์ถœ์ฒด์ œ๊ฐ€ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒช์œผ๋ฉด์„œ ๋” ๋„๋“œ๋ผ์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒด๋ฅด๋…ธ๋นŒ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ์ด์ „๊นŒ์ง€ ์„ค์น˜์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ 90%๋ฅผ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๋˜ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ, ๋Ÿฌ์‹œ์•„, ํ”„๋ž‘์Šค, ์˜๊ตญ, ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค, ๋…์ผ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์ด ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ์ดํ›„์—๋Š” 30%๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ, ์ด์ œ๋Š” ์‹ ๊ทœ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์ด ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์ด ์‚ฐ์—…ํ™”๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์— ์ทจ์•ฝํ•œ ๋ถˆ๋ฒ•๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ํ˜น์€ ํ…Œ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์‚ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ์—๋„, ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ˆ˜์š”์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฃผ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์ธก๋ฉด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด๋‹ค. ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ž์ธก ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฃผ์š”๋…ผ์ง€๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์ œโ€ข์ •์น˜โ€ข์ „๋žต์  ์ด์ต์ถ”๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ทน์‹ฌํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ˆ˜์š”์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ์„ ํ–‰์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ฑ„ ์ˆ˜์ถœ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด, ํ†ต๊ณ„์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ ๊ณ  ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ์ธ๊ณผ๊ด€๊ณ„ ํŒŒ์•…๋งˆ์ €๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์˜ค์ง ์†Œ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณผ์—ด๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์—๋งŒ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๋Š”์ง€ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ƒ์„ธํ•œ ์ธ๊ณผ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜๋ฏธ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์ œ์–ธ์„ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ โ‘  ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์ถœ์—์„œ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐโ€ขํ•ต์•ˆ๋ณด ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€? โ‘ก ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ด ์ด ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ๊ฐ€?์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ต์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋กœ ์‹ค์ œ ์ˆ˜์ถœ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ธ๊ณผ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํ˜€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ์ด‰์ง„์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ๊ทœ์ œํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์ฑ…์ œ์–ธ์„ ๋„์ถœํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ถ„์„์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ตญ์˜ ์ •์น˜์  ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ, ์ˆ˜์š”๊ตญ์˜ ์‹œ์žฅ๋งค๋ ฅ๋„, ์ข…์†๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ตญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ์˜ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ์š”๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์„ค์ •ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ ํ™•๋ณด๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•œ 1950-70๋…„๋Œ€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์˜ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ณผ์—ด๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์€ ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค์™€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์˜ ์ธ๋„์ˆ˜์ถœ, ๋…์ ์ฒด์ œ๋Š” ์†Œ๋ จ์˜ ๋ถํ•œ์ˆ˜์ถœ, ์ค‘๊ฐ„์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ๋ฏธ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค์˜ ํ•œ๊ตญ์ˆ˜์ถœ์„ ์„ ํƒํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ถ„์„์—์„œ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜์‹์„ ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ธ๋„ ์›์ž๋ ฅํ˜‘์ • ์‚ฌ๋ก€์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„ ์ œ๋„์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์„ ์ ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค์™€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์€ ์ธ๋„๋กœ์˜ ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์ถœ์ด ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ธ์ง€ํ–ˆ์Œ์—๋„, ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฏธโ€ข์†Œโ€ข์˜โ€ข์บโ€ขํ”„๋Š” ์ง€์ •ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋งค๋ ฅ์ ์ธ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์ธ๋„๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์น˜์—ดํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์„ ๋ฒŒ์˜€๊ณ , ๊ทธ ์ค‘ ํ›„๋ฐœ์ฃผ์ž์— ๊ตญ๋‚ด์‹œ์žฅ๋„ ์ž‘์€ ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์—์„œ ์Šน๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ ๊ทน ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๊ฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋ จ์€ ๋Œ€๋ถํ•œ ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์—์„œ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ธ์ง€ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฌด๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ถํ•œ์„ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ์˜๋ฌด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž์œ ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ๋‚ด๋ฒ„๋ ค๋’€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ถˆํ™ฉ์€ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์˜ ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์ถœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ธ์„ ์•ฝํ™”ํ•ด, ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ํ•ต๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋‘”ํ™”์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋ถํ•œ ํ•ต๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์˜ ์ €ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ, ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€์„œ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ ์œ„ํ—˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌด๊ด€์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. 1970๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดˆ, ํ•œ๊ตญ์€ ํ”„๋ž‘์Šค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์žฌ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์‹œ์„ค ๋„์ž…์„ ์‹œ๋„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์€ ์บ๋‚˜๋‹ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ƒ์—…์›์ „์„ ํ˜‘์ƒ์นด๋“œ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ตญ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์„ค๋“ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ์š”์ฒญํ–ˆ๊ณ , ํ”„๋ž‘์Šค์—๋Š” ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ์žฌ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์‹œ์„ค ๋Œ€์‹  ํ•ต์—ฐ๋ฃŒ์ œ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์šฐ๋ผ๋Š„์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ˆ˜์ถœํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ถŒ๊ณ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ƒํ˜ธํ˜‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ๊ทœ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—„๊ฒฉํ•œ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์ด ๋Š์Šจํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋กœ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ๋นผ์•—๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€๋„ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์— ์ทจ์•ฝํ•œ ์ฐจ๋ณ„์  ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ •์ฑ…์€ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€๋„ ๊ณ„์†๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์€ 2005๋…„์— ์ธ๋„๊ฐ€ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ์กฐ์•ฝ์— ๊ฐ€์ž…ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ•ต๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ธฐํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ˆ˜์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํŠนํ˜œ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ •๋„์™€ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†์ด ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ž์˜ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐโ€ขํ•ต์•ˆ๋ณด ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ๊ฒฝ์ œโ€ข์ •์น˜โ€ข์ „๋žต์  ์ด์ต์€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์š”์ธ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ธ ํŠนํ˜œ ๋˜๋Š” ๋…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ง๋ฏธ์•”์€ ๋ฌด๊ด€์‹ฌ์€ ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๊ธฐ๋„ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์ •๋„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ž๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธํ˜‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ๊ทœ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ง€๋‚˜์นœ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ด๋‚˜ ๋…์ ์˜ ๋ฌด๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์›์ž๋ ฅ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์— ๋™๋ฐ˜๋˜๋Š” ํ•ตํ™•์‚ฐ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๋ ค๋ฉด, ๊ตญ์ œ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ์ฒด์ œ๋„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธํ˜‘๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์ƒํ˜ธ๊ทœ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ ํˆฌ๋ช…์„ฑ์ด ๋ณด์žฅ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ตญ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ•ต๋น„ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์กฐ๊ฑด์— ํŠนํ™”๋œ ๊ตญ์ œํ˜‘์ƒ์ ˆ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์— ์ด ํ˜‘์ƒ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ง€์ผœ๋ณด๊ณ  ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉํ•  ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์ค˜์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ๋กœ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๊ตญ๋“ค์ด ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ถŒ๋ฆฌ์™€ ์˜๋ฌด ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ด์ต ๋ฐ ์˜์กด๋„๋ฅผ ํ‚ค์›Œ์„œ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ๋œ ๊ตญ์ œํ˜‘์ƒ์ ˆ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ƒํ˜ธํ˜‘๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ƒํ˜ธ๊ทœ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.In commercial nuclear trade, buyer-dependent profit-oriented nuclear export competition has promoted the spread of nuclear weapons technology and weapons-grade fissile materials. Even today, the existing international nuclear export control regime such as Nuclear Suppliers Group is still too weak to maintain consistent export policies for nuclear nonproliferation and nuclear security. Moreover, the export control regime is traditionally governed by nuclear weapons states encountering a transition, as new nuclear power plants are mostly supplied by emerging nuclear suppliers. Under such a power transition, disagreements on export practices between new and old suppliers may deepen. In addition, nuclear transactions would evolve from point-to-point transfers to a system of complex trade networks, and the non-binding global regime has no control over every detail of nuclear export. The regime can also face a dilemma over the choice between the erosion of technical barriers to proliferation and the denial of sensitive technology transfer. Despite the importance of supply-side dynamics in nuclear proliferation, the majority of past studies have focused on the demand-side aspects. Limited studies on the supply-side dynamics to date have identified at least two important challenges. First, various statistical analyses have yet failed to generate reliable quantitative datasets with no success in yielding a critical causal relationship among decision-making components. Second, case studies only looked at the impact of excessive competition among suppliers, without attempting to develop an understanding about underlying mechanisms. With the advent of new suppliers, it is necessary to investigate an evolving spectrum of export competition based on structured and focused case studies. The present dissertation is aiming at suggesting a set of positive reformative strategies for an improved nuclear export control regime. A systems-thinking model is employed to address two critical questions: 1) what types of supply-side feedback influence nuclear suppliers to decide nonproliferation conditions of supply, and 2) how political and business competition among suppliers, in turn, affects the feedback structures. The proposed reformative strategies can strengthen the types of feedback that can reinforce nonproliferation, or can weaken the feedback to proliferation. Three export cases of 1960-70s representing different competition levels were studied: 1) a strong export competition between Canada and the United States to India2) a monopolistic case of the Soviet Union to North KoreaAbstract i Acknowledgements vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Objectives: reforming nuclear export controls 2 1.2 The dual-use nature of nuclear energy and the transition of nuclear export environment 3 1.3 The dilemma: the erosion of technical barriers versus the regime of sensitive-technology denial 12 Chapter 2 Review of the State of the Art 19 2.1 State-level theory of nuclear proliferation and reversal: two different views of trade actors 20 2.1.1 Demand-side approach of decision-making on nuclear weapons development 22 2.1.2 Supply-side approach of decision-making on nuclear materials and technology export 27 2.2 System-level assessments of proliferation risk 34 2.2.1 Attribute analysis on nuclear proliferation vulnerability of materials and technology 37 2.2.2 Scenario analysis of overall nuclear system responses to nuclear proliferation 40 2.3 Research rationale from a gap in the literature 42 Chapter 3 Research Design 47 3.1 Research questions and approaches 47 3.2 Methodology 53 3.2.1 Controlled comparison of cases 53 3.2.2 System thinking and causal loop diagrams 56 3.3 Case selection 60 3.3.1 Statistical overview 61 3.3.2 Rationale for case selection 70 Chapter 4 Nuclear Decision-Making Model for Conditions of Supply 83 4.1 Competitive, regulated, political nuclear market 84 4.2 Feedback loosening conditions of supply 86 4.2.1 The risk-taking feedback 87 4.2.2 The lack of vigilance feedback 89 4.3 Feedback strengthening conditions of supply 91 4.3.1 The consensus-building feedback 91 4.3.2 The external constraint feedback 94 4.4 Inter-linkages and other influencing factors 96 Chapter 5 Analysis of Nuclear Export Cases 99 5.1 Exports from Canada and the United States to India: high attractiveness, high competition, high risk-taking 100 5.1.1 Nuclear assistance and nuclear program 102 5.1.2 Nuclear exports from Canada and the United States 107 5.1.3 Assessment, summary and lessons 127 5.2 The Soviet Union to North Korea: unattractiveness, low competition, lack of vigilance 131 5.2.1 Nuclear assistance and nuclear program 132 5.2.2 Nuclear exports from the Soviet Union 138 5.2.3 Assessment, summary and lessons 158 5.3 The United States and Canada to South Korea: modest competition, nonproliferation feedback 162 5.3.1 Nuclear assistance and nuclear program 163 5.3.2 Nuclear exports from the United States and Canada 169 5.3.3 Assessments, summary and lessons 187 Chapter 6 Cross-case Comparison and Verification with Current Export Regime 191 6.1 Cross-case comparison: export to India, North Korea, and South Korea 191 6.2 Application to U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement 207 6.3 Evaluation of current global nuclear export regime 214 Chapter 7 Conclusion 221 7.1 Policy recommendation on nuclear export controls 222 7.2 Summary, findings, and future work of dissertation 232 Bibliography 239 Abbreviation 257 ์ดˆ๋ก 259Docto

    synthesis of polymer binder based on phenanthrene for Si anode via Suzuki polycondensation

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2014. 8. ๊น€์˜๊ทœ.์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ณ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์ „๋ ฅ์ €์žฅ์žฅ์น˜๋“ฑ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ฆฌํŠฌ์ด์˜จ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•ด์™”๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ถ”์„ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋ก ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ํฐ ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์ฝ˜์ด ๊ธ‰๋ถ€์ƒํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์ฝ˜์˜ ์ƒ์—…ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€๋„ ์•„์ง ํƒ„์†Œ๊ณ„ ์Œ๊ทน์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์ฝ˜์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ถฉ๋ฐฉ์ „์‹œ ๋งค์šฐ ํฐ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๊ณ  ์ด์— ํ™œ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ํŒŒ์‡„ ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ „์ง€์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋กœ ์ „์ง€๋กœ์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋‚œ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™œ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”(๋‚˜๋…ธ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”, ์ถฉ์ „์žฌ์™€์˜ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋“ฑ)์— ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๊ฐ€ cyclic performance๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผœ์ค„์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋ณด๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋˜์–ด ์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”์˜ ์„ ํƒ์ด ๊ณ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์Œ๊ทน์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ• ์ˆ˜ ์ž‡๊ฒ ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ์‹คํ—˜์‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „๋„์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๊ฐ€ ๋„์ „์žฌ์˜ ์—ญํ• ๋„ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋˜ ๋„์ „์žฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ํ•„์š”์—†์ด ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ง€์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ• ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์†Œ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋”๋ฆฌ๋„ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์ ์ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์œ ์ง€์‹œ์ผœ ์ค„์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„๊ฑฐ๋ผ๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด๋ฐ”์ธ๋” ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ 3,6-poly(phenanthrenequinone)์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ์Šค์ฆˆํ‚ค ์ปคํ”Œ๋ง ๋ฐ˜์‘์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋งŒ์„ ํ™œ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ํ•œ ์ „์ง€๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด ์ถฉ๋ฐฉ์ „ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ•œ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฆฌํŠฌ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋ฐ›์„์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” mixed conductor๋กœ์„œ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™œ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ์„œ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ํ• ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ข€๋” ๋†’์€ ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค ํ• ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์›์ธ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ์— ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋ฅผ ํ•ฉ์„ฑํ• ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ด๋ณธ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์†๋„ํŠน์„ฑ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜ฌ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ๋จธ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ถ„์ž๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜์™”๊ณ  ์•ฝ 100000์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ ์†๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๋ช…ํŠน์„ฑ์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋„ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ข‹์€ ์ˆ˜๋ช…ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์ด ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ  ๋†’์€ ๋ถ„์ž๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋” ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์ „๋„์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋” ์ข‹์€ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ํ•œ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๋œ ๊ณ ๋ถ„์ž๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์“ฐ๋˜ ๋„์ „์žฌ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์—†์ด๋„ ์‹ค๋ฆฌ์ฝ˜์ „๊ทน์˜ ๋„์ž…์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์•ž์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ”์ธ๋”๋กœ์„œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค.ABSTRACT LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF SCHEMES LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Introduction 1. Introduction of Lithium ion batteries 2. Anode 2.1. Silicon as anode material 3. Polymer binder 4. Conducting polymer 4.1. Doping Results & discussion 1.Initial studies for conductve binder 1.1. Design of target molecule 1.2. Synthesis of PPH derivative and its copolymers 2.Design of modified target polymer and its synthesis 2.1. Design of new target polymer 2.2. Synthesis of 3,6-poly(phenanthrenequinone) 2.3. 3,6-PPQ as mixed conductor 2.4. Modified synthetic scheme of 3,6-PPQ 2.5. Electrochemical test with synthesized PPQ Experimental Details REFERENCES ABSTRACT IN KOREANMaste

    Random Accessible Mesh Compression for Large Meshes

    No full text
    Docto
    corecore