9 research outputs found

    The relationship between oral health equity and socioeconomic positions in Korean adults

    No full text
    μΉ˜μ˜ν•™κ³Ό/박사[ν•œκΈ€]κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœλŠ” μ—¬λŸ¬ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μœ„μΉ˜λ“€κ³Ό 관련이 μžˆλ‹€. 20μ„ΈκΈ° ν›„λ°˜κΈ° 이후 μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  λΆˆν‰λ“±μ΄ μ‹¬ν™”λ˜λ©΄μ„œ κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•λΆˆν‰λ“±λ„ μ‹¬ν™”λ˜μ–΄μ™”λ‹€. μ—¬λŸ¬ μ„ μ§„κ΅­μ—μ„œλŠ” κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•λΆˆν‰λ“±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ—¬λŸ¬ 가지 κΈ°μ΄ˆμžλ£Œλ“€μ„ λͺ¨μœΌκ³ , 이 문제λ₯Ό μ‚¬νšŒμ  μ΄μŠˆν™”ν•˜μ—¬ μ •μ±…μ μœΌλ‘œ 문제 ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ λ…Έλ ₯ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ ν•œκ΅­μ—μ„œλŠ” 아직 ꡬ강건강 λΆˆν‰λ“±μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ가 맀우 λΆ€μ‘±ν•œ μƒνƒœμ΄λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 2006λ…„ μ „κ΅­κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ‹€νƒœμ‘°μ‚¬ 자료λ₯Ό ν†΅κ³„λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ ν•œκ΅­ μ„±μΈλ“€μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μœ„μΉ˜μ™€ ꡬ강건강 ν˜•ν‰μ„±μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜μ—¬ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€.1. λ¬΄μΉ˜μ•…μžμœ¨μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ 12λ…„ 초과인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 12λ…„ 미만인 μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR, odds ratio)κ°€ 3.10으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€(P<0.05). μ†Œλ“μˆ˜μ€€μ— λ”°λ₯Έ 집단 κ°„μ˜ μ°¨μ΄λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€.2. μΉ˜μ£Όμ—Ό μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 월평균 κ°€κ΅¬μ†Œλ“μ΄ 301λ§Œμ› 이상인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 101~200λ§Œμ›, 100λ§Œμ› μ΄ν•˜μΈ μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR)κ°€ 각각 1.54, 1.52둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€(P<0.05).κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€μ— λ”°λ₯Έ 집단 κ°„μ˜ μ°¨μ΄λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€.3. ν˜„μž¬μΉ˜μ•„μˆ˜ 20개 미만 λ³΄μœ μžμœ¨μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ†Œλ“μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ 301λ§Œμ› 이상인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 100λ§Œμ› μ΄ν•˜μΈ μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR)κ°€ 1.41둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ 12λ…„ 초과인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 12λ…„κ³Ό 12λ…„ 미만인 μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR)λŠ” 각각 2.18, 3.75둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€(P<0.05).4. κΈ°λŠ₯μΉ˜μ•„μˆ˜ 20개 미만 λ³΄μœ μžμœ¨μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ†Œλ“μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ 301λ§Œμ› 이상인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 100λ§Œμ› μ΄ν•˜μΈ μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR)κ°€ 1.31둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ 12λ…„ 초과인 집단을 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 12λ…„κ³Ό 12λ…„ 미만인 μ§‘λ‹¨μ˜ ꡐ차비(OR)λŠ” 각각 1.65, 3.14둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€(P<0.05).5. μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  ꡬ강건강 ν˜•ν‰μ„±μ„ μ„€λͺ…ν•˜λŠ” 데에 κΈ°λŠ₯μΉ˜μ•„μˆ˜ 20개 미만 보유자율 μ§€μˆ˜(R-square=0.522)κ°€ ν˜„μž¬μΉ˜μ•„μˆ˜ 20개 미만 보유자율 μ§€μˆ˜(R-square=0.467)보닀 더 효과적으둜 μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.2006년도 ν•œκ΅­ μ„±μΈμ—μ„œ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μœ„μΉ˜μ— 따라 ꡬ강건강 λΉ„ν˜•ν‰μ„±μ΄ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ•žμœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μœ„μΉ˜λ“€μ— λŒ€ν•œ ꡬ강건강 ν˜•ν‰μ„± μ‹€νƒœμ‘°μ‚¬ 연ꡬ가 κ³„μ†λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•˜λ©°, ꡬ강건강 λΉ„ν˜•ν‰μ„±μ„ μΌμœΌν‚€λŠ” 기전에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ가 ν•„μš”ν•˜κ³ , ꡬ강건강 λΉ„ν˜•ν‰μ„±μ„ κ°μ†Œμ‹œν‚€λ €λŠ” 정책이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. [영문]Oral health status has related several socioeconomic positions. After late in the 20th century, According as socioeconomic inequalities have increased , oral health inequities have increased. many developed countries have gathered basic datum about oral health inequalities, have tried to make the social issue, and to settle the problem by political measures. but there are few studies about oral health inequality of Korean. The study was carried out to evaluate the relationship of oral health inequities and socioeconomic positions by use of analysing the national oral health survey data 2006. The results are as follows: 1. The odds ratio for having no tooth was 3.10 of school education 12 years. there is nonsignificant in income level groups(P3 million won. There is nonsignificant in education level groups(P<0.05). 3. The odds ratio among participants with 3 million won. the odds ratio among participants with 12 and 12 years of school education(P<0.05). 4. The odds ratio among participants with 3 million won. the odds ratio among participants with 12 and 12 years of school education(P<0.05). 5. The model of using index having less than 20 functioning teeth(R-Square=0.522) is more persuasive into the explanation of the relationship between oral health inequities and socioeconomic positions than that of using index having less than 20 present teeth(R-Square=0.467). The study ascertain oral health inequities about socioeconomic positions of Korean adults in 2006. In the future they are required that many case studies about relationship of oral health equity and socioeconomic positions, several studies about process to make oral health inequity, and several studies about political measures to reduce oral health inequity.ope

    Functioning teeth index and T-health index based on socio-economic status and oral health b

    No full text
    μΉ˜μ˜ν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€] κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœλŠ” λ§Žμ€ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μš”μΈκ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•λ³΄κ±΄μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœλ“€κ³Ό 관련이 μžˆλ‹€. κ·Έλ™μ•ˆ κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœλ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄λŠ” μ§€μˆ˜λ‘œμ„œ μš°μ‹κ²½ν—˜μ˜κ΅¬μΉ˜μ§€μˆ˜(DMFT μ§€μˆ˜)λ₯Ό 주둜 μ΄μš©ν•΄ μ™”μœΌλ‚˜, κ·Έ μ§€μˆ˜μ˜ λ§Žμ€ ν•œκ³„λ‘œ μΈν•˜μ—¬ μ—¬λŸ¬ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ  μš”μΈ 및 κ΅¬κ°•λ³΄κ±΄μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœλ“€κ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœμ™€μ˜ 연관성을 규λͺ…ν•˜λŠ”λ° 어렀움이 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.κ·Έ λŒ€μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œ Sheiham은 κΈ°λŠ₯μΉ˜μ•„μ§€μˆ˜(Functioning teeth index, FS-T μ§€μˆ˜)와 κ±΄κ°•ν•œ μΉ˜μ•„μ‘°μ§ μ§€μˆ˜(T-Health μ§€μˆ˜)λ₯Ό κ°œλ°œν•˜μ—¬ λ°œν‘œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ •λΆ€μ£Όλ„λ‘œ 졜초둜 μ‹œλ„λœ 2000년도 ν•œκ΅­ κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ‹€νƒœμ‘°μ‚¬ μžλ£Œμ™€ μ„€λ¬Έμžλ£Œλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ FS-T, T-Health μ§€μˆ˜, 그리고 κ°€μ€‘μΉ˜μ— λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ€€ T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜μ˜ 타당도λ₯Ό κ²€ν† ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ 기쑴의 DMFT μ§€μˆ˜μ™€ λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ μΈ μš”μΈκ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœμ— λ”°λ₯Έ DMFT μ§€μˆ˜, FS-T μ§€μˆ˜, T-Health μ§€μˆ˜, T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜μ˜ μƒκ΄€κ³„μˆ˜μ™€ νšŒκ·€κ³„μˆ˜ 및 μˆ˜μ •λœ κ²°μ •κ³„μˆ˜ 등을 λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ—¬ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€.1. FS-T μ§€μˆ˜(μˆ˜μ •λœ κ²°μ •κ³„μˆ˜=0.5317), T-Health μ§€μˆ˜(μˆ˜μ •λœ κ²°μ •κ³„μˆ˜=0.5127), T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜(μˆ˜μ •λœ κ²°μ •κ³„μˆ˜=0.4959) 듀을 μ΄μš©ν•œ λͺ¨ν˜•μ΄ DMFT μ§€μˆ˜(μˆ˜μ •λœ κ²°μ •κ³„μˆ˜=0.3244)λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ λͺ¨ν˜•λ³΄λ‹€ ν•œκ΅­μ„±μΈμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ μΈ μš”μΈκ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•λ³΄κ±΄μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ„€λͺ…λ ₯이 더 λ†’μ•˜λ‹€.2. FS-T μ§€μˆ˜, T-Health μ§€μˆ˜, T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜λŠ” ν•œκ΅­μ„±μΈμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ μΈ μš”μΈκ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•λ³΄κ±΄μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœ μ€‘μ—μ„œ λ‚˜μ΄, 성별, κ΅μœ‘μ •λ„, κ΅¬κ°•μ§„λ£ŒκΈ°κ΄€ μ΅œκ·Όμ΄μš©μ‹œκΈ°, κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ˜ μžκ°€μΈμ‹μƒνƒœ 등에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 상관성이 μžˆμ—ˆκ³ , 특히 κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ˜ μžκ°€μΈμ‹μƒνƒœκ°€ 각각의 μ§€μˆ˜μ˜ 변화에 κ°€μž₯ 큰 영ν–₯λ ₯이 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.3. T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ ν˜•νƒœλ‘œ κ±΄μ „μΉ˜, μΆ©μ „μΉ˜, μš°μ‹μΉ˜, μƒμ‹€μΉ˜μ˜ κ°€μ€‘μΉ˜μ— λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ£Όμ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜ 기쑴의 T-Health μ§€μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ λͺ¨ν˜•κ³Ό μ—¬λŸ¬ T-Health modified μ§€μˆ˜λ“€μ„ μ΄μš©ν•œ λͺ¨ν˜•λ“€μ€ μ„€λͺ…λ ₯에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ 큰 차이가 μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€.μ•žμœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœμ™€ 연관성을 κ°€μ§€λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒκ²½μ œμ μΈ μš”μΈκ³Ό κ΅¬κ°•κ±΄κ°•μ˜μ‹ν–‰νƒœλ₯Ό 연ꡬ할 λ•Œμ—λŠ”, 기쑴의 DMFT μ§€μˆ˜μ™€ ν•¨κ»˜ FS-T μ§€μˆ˜μ™€ T-Health μ§€μˆ˜λ₯Ό ν•¨κ»˜ κ³ λ €ν•˜λŠ” 것이 λ°”λžŒμ§ν•˜λ‹€κ³  여겨진닀. [영문]The status of the oral health has relation with the socio-economic factor and oral health behaviour. But DMFT index has been some difficulties in figuring out the relationship between a socio-economic factor, oral health behaviour and the status of the oral health, due to their limitation. Nevertheless it has been mainly used as a standard index in these kind of researches so far.In the context, Sheiham has made an alternative indices, so called ''Functioning teeth index and T-Health index''.The study which was carried out to evaluate the indices such as FS-T, T-Health index, T-Health modified index by use of analysing the national oral health survey data 2000.The result of analysing can be as followed.1. The model of using FS-T index (Adjusted R-Square=0.5317), T-Health index (Adjusted R-Square=0.4959) is more persuasive into the explanation of the relation between the socio-economic factor and the general behaviour of oral hygiene than that of using DMFT index(Adjusted R-Square=0.3244).2. It can be said that those indexes such as FS-T index, T-Health index and T-Health modified index have relation with the factors that are ages, sex, educational background, the recent times of visiting dental clinic and self- cognition of the oral health. The study shows that it is the self cognition of the oral health that gives the most impact on the variation of the each index.3. The study shows that there is little differences in the various indexes of T-Health and T-Health modified, though it gave some variations in the weighted index.Therefore, FS-T index and T-Health index must be considered in the future studies of the relation between a socio-economic factor and oral health behaviour.ope
    corecore