9 research outputs found
The relationship between oral health equity and socioeconomic positions in Korean adults
μΉμνκ³Ό/λ°μ¬[νκΈ]ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μνλ μ¬λ¬ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΉλ€κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨μ΄ μλ€. 20μΈκΈ° νλ°κΈ° μ΄ν μ¬νκ²½μ μ λΆνλ±μ΄ μ¬νλλ©΄μ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°λΆνλ±λ μ¬νλμ΄μλ€. μ¬λ¬ μ μ§κ΅μμλ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°λΆνλ±μ λν μ¬λ¬ κ°μ§ κΈ°μ΄μλ£λ€μ λͺ¨μΌκ³ , μ΄ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό μ¬νμ μ΄μννμ¬ μ μ±
μ μΌλ‘ λ¬Έμ ν΄κ²°νκΈ° μνμ¬ λ
Έλ ₯νκ³ μλ€. νμ§λ§ νκ΅μμλ μμ§ κ΅¬κ°κ±΄κ° λΆνλ±μ λν μ°κ΅¬κ° λ§€μ° λΆμ‘±ν μνμ΄λ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμλ 2006λ
μ κ΅κ΅¬κ°κ±΄κ°μ€νμ‘°μ¬ μλ£λ₯Ό ν΅κ³λΆμνμ¬ νκ΅ μ±μΈλ€μ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΉμ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° ννμ±μ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό μ‘°μ¬νμ¬ λ€μκ³Ό κ°μ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ»μλ€.1. 무μΉμ
μμ¨μ λνμ¬ κ΅μ‘μμ€μ΄ 12λ
μ΄κ³ΌμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 12λ
λ―Έλ§μΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR, odds ratio)κ° 3.10μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€(P<0.05). μλμμ€μ λ°λ₯Έ μ§λ¨ κ°μ μ°¨μ΄λ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνμ§ μμλ€.2. μΉμ£ΌμΌ μ λ³λ₯ μ λνμ¬ μνκ· κ°κ΅¬μλμ΄ 301λ§μ μ΄μμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 101ο½200λ§μ, 100λ§μ μ΄νμΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR)κ° κ°κ° 1.54, 1.52λ‘ λνλ¬λ€(P<0.05).κ΅μ‘μμ€μ λ°λ₯Έ μ§λ¨ κ°μ μ°¨μ΄λ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνμ§ μμλ€.3. νμ¬μΉμμ 20κ° λ―Έλ§ λ³΄μ μμ¨μ λνμ¬ μλμμ€μ΄ 301λ§μ μ΄μμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 100λ§μ μ΄νμΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR)κ° 1.41λ‘ λνλ¬λ€. κ΅μ‘μμ€μ΄ 12λ
μ΄κ³ΌμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 12λ
κ³Ό 12λ
λ―Έλ§μΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR)λ κ°κ° 2.18, 3.75λ‘ λνλ¬λ€(P<0.05).4. κΈ°λ₯μΉμμ 20κ° λ―Έλ§ λ³΄μ μμ¨μ λνμ¬ μλμμ€μ΄ 301λ§μ μ΄μμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 100λ§μ μ΄νμΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR)κ° 1.31λ‘ λνλ¬λ€. κ΅μ‘μμ€μ΄ 12λ
μ΄κ³ΌμΈ μ§λ¨μ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 12λ
κ³Ό 12λ
λ―Έλ§μΈ μ§λ¨μ κ΅μ°¨λΉ(OR)λ κ°κ° 1.65, 3.14λ‘ λνλ¬λ€(P<0.05).5. μ¬νκ²½μ μ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° ννμ±μ μ€λͺ
νλ λ°μ κΈ°λ₯μΉμμ 20κ° λ―Έλ§ λ³΄μ μμ¨ μ§μ(R-square=0.522)κ° νμ¬μΉμμ 20κ° λ―Έλ§ λ³΄μ μμ¨ μ§μ(R-square=0.467)λ³΄λ€ λ ν¨κ³Όμ μΌλ‘ μ€λͺ
νμλ€.2006λ
λ νκ΅ μ±μΈμμ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΉμ λ°λΌ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° λΉννμ±μ΄ μ‘΄μ¬νμλ€. μμΌλ‘ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΉλ€μ λν ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° ννμ± μ€νμ‘°μ¬ μ°κ΅¬κ° κ³μλμ΄μΌ νλ©°, ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° λΉννμ±μ μΌμΌν€λ κΈ°μ μ λν μ°κ΅¬κ° νμνκ³ , ꡬκ°κ±΄κ° λΉννμ±μ κ°μμν€λ €λ μ μ±
μ΄ νμνλ€.
[μλ¬Έ]Oral health status has related several socioeconomic positions. After late in the 20th century, According as socioeconomic inequalities have increased , oral health inequities have increased. many developed countries have gathered basic datum about oral health inequalities, have tried to make the social issue, and to settle the problem by political measures. but there are few studies about oral health inequality of Korean.
The study was carried out to evaluate the relationship of oral health inequities and socioeconomic positions by use of analysing the national oral health survey data 2006.
The results are as follows:
1. The odds ratio for having no tooth was 3.10 of school education 12 years. there is nonsignificant in income level groups(P3 million won. There is nonsignificant in education level groups(P<0.05).
3. The odds ratio among participants with 3 million won. the odds ratio among participants with 12 and 12 years of school education(P<0.05).
4. The odds ratio among participants with 3 million won. the odds ratio among participants with 12 and 12 years of school education(P<0.05).
5. The model of using index having less than 20 functioning teeth(R-Square=0.522) is more persuasive into the explanation of the relationship between oral health inequities and socioeconomic positions than that of using index having less than 20 present teeth(R-Square=0.467).
The study ascertain oral health inequities about socioeconomic positions of Korean adults in 2006. In the future they are required that many case studies about relationship of oral health equity and socioeconomic positions, several studies about process to make oral health inequity, and several studies about political measures to reduce oral health inequity.ope
Functioning teeth index and T-health index based on socio-economic status and oral health b
μΉμνκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μνλ λ§μ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΈκ³Ό ꡬκ°λ³΄κ±΄μμννλ€κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨μ΄ μλ€. κ·Έλμ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μνλ₯Ό λνλ΄λ μ§μλ‘μ μ°μκ²½νμꡬμΉμ§μ(DMFT μ§μ)λ₯Ό μ£Όλ‘ μ΄μ©ν΄ μμΌλ, κ·Έ μ§μμ λ§μ νκ³λ‘ μΈνμ¬ μ¬λ¬ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μμΈ λ° κ΅¬κ°λ³΄κ±΄μμννλ€κ³Ό ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μνμμ μ°κ΄μ±μ κ·λͺ
νλλ° μ΄λ €μμ΄ μμλ€.κ·Έ λμμΌλ‘ Sheihamμ κΈ°λ₯μΉμμ§μ(Functioning teeth index, FS-T μ§μ)μ 건κ°ν μΉμμ‘°μ§ μ§μ(T-Health μ§μ)λ₯Ό κ°λ°νμ¬ λ°ννμλ€.λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμλ μ λΆμ£Όλλ‘ μ΅μ΄λ‘ μλλ 2000λ
λ νκ΅ κ΅¬κ°κ±΄κ°μ€νμ‘°μ¬ μλ£μ μ€λ¬Έμλ£λ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμ¬ FS-T, T-Health μ§μ, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κ°μ€μΉμ λ³νλ₯Ό μ€ T-Health modified μ§μμ νλΉλλ₯Ό κ²ν νκΈ° μνμ¬ κΈ°μ‘΄μ DMFT μ§μμ λΉκ΅νμλ€.μ΄λ₯Ό μνμ¬ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μΈ μμΈκ³Ό ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μμννμ λ°λ₯Έ DMFT μ§μ, FS-T μ§μ, T-Health μ§μ, T-Health modified μ§μμ μκ΄κ³μμ νκ·κ³μ λ° μμ λ κ²°μ κ³μ λ±μ λΉκ΅νμ¬ λ€μκ³Ό κ°μ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ»μλ€.1. FS-T μ§μ(μμ λ κ²°μ κ³μ=0.5317), T-Health μ§μ(μμ λ κ²°μ κ³μ=0.5127), T-Health modified μ§μ(μμ λ κ²°μ κ³μ=0.4959) λ€μ μ΄μ©ν λͺ¨νμ΄ DMFT μ§μ(μμ λ κ²°μ κ³μ=0.3244)λ₯Ό μ΄μ©ν λͺ¨νλ³΄λ€ νκ΅μ±μΈμ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μΈ μμΈκ³Ό ꡬκ°λ³΄κ±΄μμννμ λνμ¬ μ€λͺ
λ ₯μ΄ λ λμλ€.2. FS-T μ§μ, T-Health μ§μ, T-Health modified μ§μλ νκ΅μ±μΈμ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μΈ μμΈκ³Ό ꡬκ°λ³΄κ±΄μμνν μ€μμ λμ΄, μ±λ³, κ΅μ‘μ λ, ꡬκ°μ§λ£κΈ°κ΄ μ΅κ·Όμ΄μ©μκΈ°, ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μ μκ°μΈμμν λ±μ λνμ¬ μκ΄μ±μ΄ μμκ³ , νΉν ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μ μκ°μΈμμνκ° κ°κ°μ μ§μμ λ³νμ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯λ ₯μ΄ μμλ€.3. T-Health modified μ§μμ λ€μν ννλ‘ κ±΄μ μΉ, μΆ©μ μΉ, μ°μμΉ, μμ€μΉμ κ°μ€μΉμ λ³νλ₯Ό μ£ΌμμΌλ κΈ°μ‘΄μ T-Health μ§μλ₯Ό μ΄μ©ν λͺ¨νκ³Ό μ¬λ¬ T-Health modified μ§μλ€μ μ΄μ©ν λͺ¨νλ€μ μ€λͺ
λ ₯μ μμ΄μ ν° μ°¨μ΄κ° μμλ€.μμΌλ‘ ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μνμ μ°κ΄μ±μ κ°μ§λ μ¬νκ²½μ μ μΈ μμΈκ³Ό ꡬκ°κ±΄κ°μμννλ₯Ό μ°κ΅¬ν λμλ, κΈ°μ‘΄μ DMFT μ§μμ ν¨κ» FS-T μ§μμ T-Health μ§μλ₯Ό ν¨κ» κ³ λ €νλ κ²μ΄ λ°λμ§νλ€κ³ μ¬κ²¨μ§λ€.
[μλ¬Έ]The status of the oral health has relation with the socio-economic factor and oral health behaviour. But DMFT index has been some difficulties in figuring out the relationship between a socio-economic factor, oral health behaviour and the status of the oral health, due to their limitation. Nevertheless it has been mainly used as a standard index in these kind of researches so far.In the context, Sheiham has made an alternative indices, so called ''Functioning teeth index and T-Health index''.The study which was carried out to evaluate the indices such as FS-T, T-Health index, T-Health modified index by use of analysing the national oral health survey data 2000.The result of analysing can be as followed.1. The model of using FS-T index (Adjusted R-Square=0.5317), T-Health index (Adjusted R-Square=0.4959) is more persuasive into the explanation of the relation between the socio-economic factor and the general behaviour of oral hygiene than that of using DMFT index(Adjusted R-Square=0.3244).2. It can be said that those indexes such as FS-T index, T-Health index and T-Health modified index have relation with the factors that are ages, sex, educational background, the recent times of visiting dental clinic and self- cognition of the oral health. The study shows that it is the self cognition of the oral health that gives the most impact on the variation of the each index.3. The study shows that there is little differences in the various indexes of T-Health and T-Health modified, though it gave some variations in the weighted index.Therefore, FS-T index and T-Health index must be considered in the future studies of the relation between a socio-economic factor and oral health behaviour.ope