71 research outputs found

    μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„±, μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지, κ΅° μƒν™œ λ§Œμ‘±λ„κ°€ κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό, 2014. 2. ν•˜μ–‘μˆ™.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λ³‘μ‚¬λ‘œμ„œ κ΅° 의무볡무λ₯Ό 마친 μ œλŒ€ ꡰ인듀을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ κ·Έλ“€μ˜ κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯에 λŒ€ν•΄ νŒŒμ•…ν•˜κ³ , 이에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈλ“€μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ„œμˆ μ  쑰사 연ꡬ이닀. κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯μ΄λž€ μ—­κ²½ ν›„ μ„±μž₯(Posttraumatic Growth) κ°œλ…μ„ μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λ‚¨μ„±μ˜ νŠΉμ§•μ μΈ μ—­κ²½ κ²½ν—˜μΈ κ΅° 볡무에 μ μš©ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ, κ΅° 볡무λ₯Ό κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λ©° 개인이 μ–»κ²Œ λ˜λŠ” 긍정적인 심리변화λ₯Ό λœ»ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ κ΅° 볡무 ν›„ 개인이 μ–΄λ– ν•œ μ„±μž₯을 κ²½ν—˜ ν•˜λŠ”μ§€ ν™•μΈν•˜κ³ , 이 과정에 μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„±, μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지, κ΅° μƒν™œ λ§Œμ‘±λ„κ°€ λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯이 무엇인지 λΆ„μ„ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λŒ€μƒμžλŠ” μ „μ—­ ν›„ ν˜„μž¬ 4λ…„μ œ λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ— μž¬ν•™ 쀑인 λŒ€ν•™μƒμœΌλ‘œ 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘μ€ 2013λ…„ 9μ›”βˆΌ10μ›” 쀑 μ‹œν–‰λœ 학생 μ˜ˆλΉ„κ΅° ν›ˆλ ¨ κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ ν›ˆλ ¨ 쀑인 λΆ€λŒ€μ— μ—°κ΅¬μžκ°€ λ°©λ¬Έν•˜μ—¬ 연ꡬ에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ„€λͺ… ν•œ ν›„ μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬μ—λŠ” κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœ 섀문지λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 연ꡬλ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 배포된 450λΆ€μ˜ μ„€λ¬Έ 쀑 μžλ£Œκ°€ λΆˆμΆ©λΆ„ν•˜κ²Œ κΈ°μž…λ˜μ–΄ μžˆκ±°λ‚˜ λ³‘μ‚¬λ‘œ κ·Όλ¬΄ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 자, μ „μ—­ ν›„ 5λ…„ 이상 κ²½κ³Όν•œ 자, κ΅° μƒν™œμ„ μ—­κ²½μœΌλ‘œ μƒκ°ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” 자 λ“± λ³Έ 연ꡬ에 μ ν•©ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ 자료λ₯Ό μ œμ™Έν•˜μ—¬ 총 317λΆ€λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 자료 뢄석은 SPSS 19.0 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° 기술 톡계 및 t-test, ANOVA, 상관뢄석, 닀쀑 νšŒκ·€ λΆ„μ„μ˜ 방법이 μ‚¬μš©λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. λŒ€μƒμžλ“€μ˜ κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯ μ μˆ˜λŠ” 3.09점으둜 쀑간보닀 높은 μˆ˜μ€€μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, κ°€μž₯ 큰 μ„±μž₯을 보인 ν•˜μœ„μš”μΈμ€ 개인 내적인 힘의 μ„±μž₯μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 2. κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯은 μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„±(r=.39, p<0.01), μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지(r=.43, p<0.01), κ΅° μƒν™œ 만쑱(r=.52, p<0.01)κ³Ό λͺ¨λ‘ μ–‘μ˜ 상관관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€μœΌλ©° κ·Έ μ€‘μ—μ„œλ„ κ΅° μƒν™œ 만쑱의 ν•˜μœ„μš”μΈμΈ 의미만쑱과 높은 상관을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€(r=.56, p<0.01). 3. μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„± 쀑 λ‚™κ΄€μ„±(Ξ²=.21, p<0.001), μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지 쀑 정보적 지지(Ξ²=.23, p<0.001), κ΅° μƒν™œ 만쑱 쀑 의미만쑱(Ξ²=.43, p<0.001), μ •μ„œμ  μ—­κ²½ 정도(Ξ²=.16, p<0.001)λŠ” κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ 이 λͺ¨ν˜•μ˜ μ„€λͺ…λ ₯은 43%μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ’…ν•©ν•˜μ—¬ λ³Ό λ•Œ, λŒ€μƒμžλ“€μ€ κ΅° κ²½ν—˜μ„ 톡해 긍정적인 μ„±μž₯을 κ²½ν—˜ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 보인닀. 특히, 낙관적인 μ„±ν–₯κ³Ό κ΅° μƒν™œμ— λŒ€ν•΄ μΆ©λΆ„ν•œ 좩고와 쑰언을 λ°›μœΌλ©° κ΅° 볡무에 λŒ€ν•΄ λͺ…μ˜ˆμ™€ μžλΆ€μ‹¬μ„ λŠλΌλŠ” 것이 μ„±μž₯에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ κ΅° μƒν™œμ˜ 의미, ν™˜κ²½, 관계, 업무에 λŒ€ν•œ 만쑱감이 μ„±μž₯κ³Ό 관련이 λ†’μŒμ„ 확인 ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ μž₯병듀이 κ΅° μƒν™œμ„ 톡해 긍정적인 μ„±μž₯을 많이 κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ ν™˜κ²½μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ©°, μ„±μž₯을 μ΄‰μ§„μ‹œν‚€κΈ° μœ„ν•œ 체계적인 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ˜ 마련이 μš”κ΅¬λœλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ κ΅° μƒν™œ 만쑱과 높은 상관을 보인 κ΅° λ‚΄λΆ€μžμ›μ˜ 지지λ₯Ό μƒμŠΉμ‹œν‚€λ©°, κ΅° μƒν™œ λ§Œμ‘±λ„λ₯Ό 높이기 μœ„ν•΄ λ‹€κ°λ„λ‘œ μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜κ³  λ…Έλ ₯ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  것이닀. μ£Όμš”μ–΄ : κ΅° 볡무, μ—­κ²½, μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„±, μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지, κ΅° μƒν™œ λ§Œμ‘±λ„, κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯β… . μ„œλ‘  1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ  3. μš©μ–΄μ˜ μ •μ˜ β…‘. λ¬Έν—Œκ³ μ°° 1. κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ 1) κ΅° 볡무와 μ—­κ²½ 2) κ΅° μƒν™œ 만쑱 2. μ—­κ²½ ν›„ μ„±μž₯ 3. μ„±μž₯ κ΄€λ ¨μš”μΈ 1) μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„± 2) μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지 β…’. 이둠적 κΈ°ν‹€ β…£. 연ꡬ방법 1. 연ꡬ섀계 2. μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμž 3. 연ꡬ도ꡬ 4. μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘ 5. μžλ£ŒλΆ„μ„ β…€. 연ꡬ결과 1. μ—°κ΅¬λ³€μˆ˜μ˜ κΈ°μˆ ν†΅κ³„ 2. 일반적 νŠΉμ„±κ³Ό μ—­κ²½ 정도에 λ”°λ₯Έ 차이 3. 각 λ³€μˆ˜κ°„μ˜ 상관뢄석 4. 각 λ³€μˆ˜κ°€ κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯ β…₯. λ…Όμ˜ 1. κ΅° κ²½ν—˜ ν›„ μ„±μž₯ 2. μ„±μž₯ κ΄€λ ¨ μš”μΈ 3. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ˜μ˜μ™€ μ œν•œμ  β…¦. κ²°λ‘  및 μ œμ–Έ μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 뢀둝 AbstractMaste

    Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus(Fasting Plasma Glucose by the ADA Criteria) and Impaired Fasting Glucose according to Anthropometric Characteristics and Dietary Habits

    Get PDF
    Background: The study is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in Korea(1998). With these data, we want to predict the prevalence of diabetes mellitus(DM) and impaired fasting glucose(IFG), By investigating anthropometric characteristics and dietary intake habits, we also wanted to analyze any significant correlation between those factors and the prevalences of DM and IFG. Methods: The study group was comprised of 8,166 people, a representative group of Koreans, who had undergone a health check-up and food intake survey among the total 39,331 members of 12,189 families who were surveyed. Results: The final results are as the follows. 1) The peak prevalence of DM was 15.92% among women in their sixties and 18.21% among men in their fifties, and that of IFG was found to be 16.27% of women in their seventies and 14.09% of men in their sixties. 2) When analyzing the eating habits and the prevalences of DM and IFG, we found that women with more glucose intake had a lesser risk of DM, but this was of no statistical significance. 3) In men, age, total cholesterol, triglyceride(TG), and hypertension(HTN) were revealed as meaningful factors and in women, age, TG, and HTN were revealed as meaningful factors. As to the IFG, in females, age and TG were meaningful factors, and in males, age, TG, the waist/hip ratio (WHR), and body mass index (BMI) were meaningful factors. Conclusion: Although this study could not demonstrate meaningful correlation between diet habits and DM, the prevalence of IFG and the recent increase in the prevalence of DM in Koreans, owing to alterations in their diet habits, demands further organized group study for a better understanding of their relationshipope

    전톡 μŒμ•…μ˜ κΈ°μ•… 지도법에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν˜‘λ™κ³Όμ • μŒμ•…κ΅μœ‘μ „κ³΅,1999.Maste

    생애λͺ©ν‘œ μ˜λ―Έμ™€ 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ •

    No full text
    생애λͺ©ν‘œλŠ” 개인이 μ‚Άμ—μ„œ ꢁ극적으둜 이루고자 ν•˜λŠ” 지ν–₯점을 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚Έλ‹€. 성인이 되기 μ „ 학생듀은 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κΈ°μ— μ ν•©ν•œ 인지적 λŠ₯λ ₯듀을 κ³„λ°œν•˜λŠ” λ°œλ‹¬μ  단계에 μžˆμ„ 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ(Keating, 1980), λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³  μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 것은 ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ 심리적 건강과 학업성취에도 결정적인 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉœλ‹€(Cantor et al., 1991; Harris et al., 2003; Headey, 2008; Nurmi, Salmela-Aro & Koivisto, 2002). κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ§€κΈˆκΉŒμ§€ 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ™€ κ΄€λ ¨λœ 연ꡬ듀은 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ˜ λ‚΄μš©κ³Ό 인식 λ“± 생애λͺ©ν‘œκ°€ 이미 μ„€μ •λœ 이후 λͺ©ν‘œμ— λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석이 μ£Όλ₯Ό 이루고 있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ—(Schmuck & Sheldon, 2001), 학생듀이 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³  μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 세뢀적 과정에 λŒ€ν•œ 이해가 λΆ€μ‘±ν•˜λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ―€λ‘œ, μ•„μ§κΉŒμ§€ μ„ ν–‰μ—°κ΅¬λ“€μ—μ„œ 많이 닀루지 μ•Šμ•˜λ˜ 생애λͺ©ν‘œ μ„€μ •κ³Ό 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ •μ˜ 동기적 νŠΉμ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 학생듀이 보닀 성곡적인 μ„±μΈμœΌλ‘œ μ„±μž₯ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ 도움을 μ£ΌλŠ” μ€‘μš”ν•œ ꡐ윑적 μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ μ œμ‹œν•  수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. κ·Έλ¦¬ν•˜μ—¬ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ ν™•μΈν•˜κ³ μž ν•œ 연ꡬ λ¬Έμ œλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 첫째, 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 λŒ€ν•™μƒλ“€μ—κ²Œ 생애λͺ©ν‘œ μ„€μ •μ˜ μ˜λ―ΈλŠ” 무엇인가? λ‘˜μ§Έ, 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 λŒ€ν•™μƒλ“€μ€ μ–΄λ– ν•œ 과정을 톡해 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³  μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λŠ”κ°€? μœ„μ˜ μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œλ₯Ό ν™•μΈν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•œ λŒ€ν•™μƒ 5λͺ…κ³Ό 그렇지 λͺ»ν•œ λŒ€ν•™μƒ 2λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ 심측 면담이 μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ—ˆκ³ , κ·Όκ±° 이둠(grounded theory)에 κΈ°λ°˜ν•œ 주제 뢄석(thematic analysis) (Braun & Clarke, 2006)을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λ©΄λ‹΄ λ‚΄μš©μ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό, 학생듀이 각자 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ— λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” μ˜λ―ΈλŠ” 크게 κ°€μΉ˜μ§€ν–₯적과 결과지ν–₯적 의미둜 κ΅¬λΆ„λ˜λ©°, 생애λͺ©ν‘œκ°€ 지ν–₯ν•˜λŠ” μ˜λ―Έμ— 따라 ν˜•μ„±λ˜λŠ” λͺ©ν‘œμ˜ μœ ν˜•μ— 차이가 μžˆμŒμ„ 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. κ°€μΉ˜μ§€ν–₯적 λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 학생듀은 개인 μ΄μƒμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ— 의미 μžˆλŠ” κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  λͺ©μ (social purpose)(Damon, Menon & Bronk, 2003)을 λ°œλ‹¬ν•œ 반면 결과지ν–₯적 λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ 생애λͺ©ν‘œλŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  인정과 관계λ₯Ό μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  λͺ©ν‘œ(social goal)의 ν˜•νƒœλ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄λŠ” 것을 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 학생듀은 κ³΅ν†΅μ μœΌλ‘œ 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 이루고자 ν•˜λŠ” 뢄야에 λŒ€ν•œ 높은 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ λ‚΄μž¬μ  ν₯λ―Έλ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 이 학생듀이 가지고 μžˆλŠ” 높은 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ ν₯λ―ΈλŠ” 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜λŠ” 데 κ°€μž₯ 결정적인 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ‚΄μž¬μ  ν₯λ―ΈλŠ” λ˜ν•œ ν•™μƒλ“€λ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬κΈˆ 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 달성해야 ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 신념을 ν˜•μ„±ν•˜κ²Œ ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 일뢀 학생듀은 λͺ©ν‘œλΏ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 달성할 수 μžˆλŠ” 개인의 λŠ₯λ ₯에 λŒ€ν•œ 확신을 λ°œλ‹¬ν•˜λŠ” 것을 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 학생듀은 그렇지 λͺ»ν•œ ν•™μƒλ“€κ³ΌλŠ” 달리 λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ 자기쑰절λŠ₯λ ₯κ³Ό μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„±μ΄λΌλŠ” 차별적 νŠΉμ„±μ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό 가진 학생은 학업을 ν¬ν•¨ν•œ μ „λ°˜μ μΈ 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 좔ꡬ 과정에 λŠ₯λ™μ μœΌλ‘œ μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜κ³  λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 인지적 μ „λž΅μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜λŠ” 메타인지λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•˜λŠ” 자기쑰절적 λͺ¨μŠ΅μ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό λͺ©ν‘œ 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ κ²½ν—˜ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λŠ” μ—¬λŸ¬ 어렀움에 μœ μ—°ν•˜κ²Œ λŒ€μ²˜ν•˜κ³  κ·Έ κ²½ν—˜μ„ 자기 κ³„λ°œμ˜ 기회둜 μ‚Όμ•„ λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€ν•΄ 긍정적인 κΈ°λŒ€λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•˜λŠ” μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯적 νŠΉμ„±μ„ 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 성인이 되기 μ „ 학생듀이 개개인의 ν₯λ―Έ μžˆλŠ” λΆ„μ•Όλ₯Ό νƒμƒ‰ν•˜κ³  μžμ‹ μ˜ λŠ₯λ ₯에 λŒ€ν•΄ 긍정적 인식을 κ°€μ§ˆ 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ ꡐ윑적 κ°œμž…μ΄ μ€‘μš”μ‹œλ¨μ„ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” ν₯미와 성곡 κ°€λŠ₯성에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식이 학생듀이 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³  적극적으둜 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ”λ° 핡심적 역할을 ν•˜κ³ , 생애λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 과정을 톡해 학생듀은 자기쑰절λŠ₯λ ₯κ³Ό μžμ•„νƒ„λ ₯μ„± λ“±μ˜ λ°œλ‹¬μ  μžμ‚°μ„ μ–»κ²Œ 되기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ 학생듀이 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ˜ 개인적 μΈ‘λ©΄κ³Ό μ‚¬νšŒμ  츑면을 톡합할 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ 기회λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ³  μ‚¬νšŒμ  κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό λ‚΄λ©΄ν™” ν•˜λ„λ‘ κ°•μ‘°ν•˜λŠ” 것은 ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ 개인적 μ„±μž₯뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ λ―Έλž˜μ‚¬νšŒμ— κΈ°μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 인재둜의 μ„±μž₯에 κΈ°μ—¬ν•  수 μžˆμ„ κ²ƒμž„μ„ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” 바이닀.I. μ„œ λ‘  1 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 및 λͺ©μ  1 2. 연ꡬ 문제 5 II. 이둠적 λ°°κ²½ 6 1. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 6 2. 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ˜ 선행연ꡬ 8 3. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ • 11 4. 생애λͺ©ν‘œμ™€ 동기적 μš”μΈ 15 III. 연ꡬ 방법 22 1. 연ꡬ μ°Έμ—¬μž 23 2. 연ꡬ 방법 및 절차 27 3. 자료 뢄석 및 연ꡬ 결과의 타당화 30 IV. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ • 32 1. 물리학을 μ•Œλ©΄ λͺ¨λ“ μ§€ ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€(μ†μ„Έμœ€) 32 2. 뜬 건 λ°˜λ“œμ‹œ 가라 μ•‰λŠ”λ‹€(μ˜€μ—°μˆ˜) 41 3. μžμ—°μ—μ„œ ν•˜λŠ” 게 훨씬 μ’‹μœΌλ‹ˆκΉŒ(κ°•ν˜„μ„) 47 4. 노벨상 μˆ˜μƒ(κΉ€λŒ€μ˜) 55 5. 이제 μ’€ 더 λŠ₯λ™μ μœΌλ‘œ(김지성) 63 6. κ·Έλƒ₯ ν•΄μ•Ό λ˜λŠ” 쀄 μ•Œκ³ (μ „μž¬μš±) 70 7. 꿈이 계속 μ—†μ—ˆμ–΄μš”(μ‹ μˆ˜μ§€) 77 V. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 의미 및 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ • 82 1. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 의미 82 2. 생애λͺ©ν‘œ 좔ꡬ κ³Όμ • 92 VI. κ²°λ‘  130 1. μš”μ•½ 130 2. λ…Όμ˜ 및 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  133 3. μΆ”ν›„μ—°κ΅¬μ œμ–Έ 142 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 145 Abstract 161Maste

    Study on job-related stress of nurse in non-life insurance company.

    No full text
    μ§€μ—­μ‚¬νšŒ κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€] λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€ μ’…λ₯˜μ™€ 정도λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬κ°€ κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λŠ” μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€μ— λŒ€ν•œ 기본정보λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ³ μž μ‹œλ„ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λŒ€μƒμ€ 2001λ…„ 4μ›” μ „κ΅­ 직할 νŒ€(Direct Controlling Compensation Team)에 λΆ„ν¬λ˜μ–΄ μžˆλŠ” κ΅­λ‚΄ 11개 μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬ 133λͺ…이며, μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘κΈ°κ°„μ€ 2001λ…„ 4μ›” 1일 ~ 2001λ…„ 4μ›” 16μΌκΉŒμ§€ 16일 λ™μ•ˆμ΄λ‹€. λ°°λΆ€λœ μ„€λ¬Έμ§€λŠ” 총 151뢀이며 κ·Έ μ€‘μ—μ„œ 138λΆ€κ°€ νšŒμˆ˜λ˜μ–΄ νšŒμˆ˜μœ¨μ€ 91%μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬λ„κ΅¬λŠ” μ—°κ΅¬μ£Όμ œμ™€ κ΄€λ ¨λœ λ¬Έν—Œ κ³ μ°°κ³Ό 전화인터뷰λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ λ¬Έν•­κ°œλ°œμ„ ν•œ ν›„, surveyλ₯Ό κ±°μ³μ„œ 슀트레슀 도ꡬ 20문항을 ν™•μ •ν•˜μ˜€κ³  μ „λ¬Έκ°€μ˜ μžλ¬Έμ„ μ–»μ–΄μ„œ λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 타당도 κ²€μ¦μ˜ 절차λ₯Ό κ±°μ³μ„œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μžκ°€ κ°œλ°œν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이 연ꡬ도ꡬλ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€ 정도λ₯Ό νŒŒμ•…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 섀문지 총 λ¬Έν•­ μˆ˜λŠ” 58λ¬Έν•­μœΌλ‘œμ„œ 일반적인 νŠΉμ„± 13λ¬Έν•­, μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€μ •λ„ 20λ¬Έν•­, 슀트레슀 κ°ˆλ“±μš”μΈ 및 ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμ€ 25λ¬Έν•­μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 자료 뢄석은 Windows SAS 6.12λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ μ „μ‚°μ²˜λ¦¬ 톡계방법을 μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 일반적인 νŠΉμ„±μ€ λΉˆλ„μ™€ λ°±λΆ„μœ¨μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 문항별 μ μˆ˜λŠ” 평균, ν‘œμ€€νŽΈμ°¨λ₯Ό κ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 일반적인 νŠΉμ„±μ— λ”°λ₯Έ μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€μ •λ„μ— λŒ€ν•œμ°¨μ΄κ²€μ¦μ€ λ³€μˆ˜μ˜ νŠΉμ„±μ— 따라 t-test λ˜λŠ” F-test(ANOVA)λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬλ₯Ό 톡해 얻은 μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 업무 슀트레슀 문항에 λ”°λ₯Έ 슀트레슀 μ •λ„λŠ” μ΅œλŒ€ 4.11, μ΅œμ†Œ 2.85, 평균 3.46μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 2. μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬κ°€ κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λŠ” 슀트레슀 μš”μΈμ€ [심사업무에 λŒ€ν•œ 심리적인 뢀담감]이 κ°€μž₯ 높은 3.65둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, [타 λΆ„μ•Ό μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ κ°ˆλ“±]이 3.64, [μ „λ¬Έμ§μœΌλ‘œμ„œμ˜ μ—­ν• κ°ˆλ“±]이 3.57, [μ—…λ¬΄λŸ‰ 과쀑]이 3.36, [μ—…λ¬΄μˆ˜ν–‰κ°ˆλ“±]이 3.15의 μˆœμ„œλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 3. μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ˜ 일반적인 νŠΉμ„±λ³„ 슀트레슀 μ •λ„μ—λŠ” 톡계적인 검증을 ν†΅ν•œ μœ μ˜ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ 전체λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜λ©΄ ν˜„ λΆ€μ„œμ˜ 근무경λ ₯κ³Ό μ†Œμ†λΆ€μ„œμ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 관계가 μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 슀트레슀 μš”μΈμ—μ„œ μ „λ¬Έμ§μœΌλ‘œμ„œμ˜ μ—­ν• κ°ˆλ“± κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ 일반적인 νŠΉμ„± 쀑 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 것은 μ›”ν‰κ· μ†Œλ“(F=4.63, p<0.05)κ³Ό μ†Œμ†λΆ€μ„œ(F=5.80, p<0.01)이닀. 이외에도 μ—…λ¬΄μˆ˜ν–‰κ°ˆλ“±κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ 일반적인 νŠΉμ„± 쀑 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 것은 μ†Œμ†λΆ€μ„œ(F=4.75, p<0.05)둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, 타 λΆ„μ•Ό μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ κ°ˆλ“±κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ 일반적인 νŠΉμ„± 쀑 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 것은 μž…μ‚¬ν•˜κΈ° μ „ μž„μƒκ·Όλ¬΄κΈ°κ°„(λ…„)으둜(t=2.16,p<0.05) λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©° 연령이 만 31~ 35μ„Έ, μž…μ‚¬ν•˜κΈ° μ „ μž„μƒκ²½λ ₯ 5λ…„ μ΄μƒμ˜ κ²½λ ₯을 μ§€λ‹Œκ·Όλ¬΄μžκ°€ 높은 슀트레슀λ₯Ό κ²½ν—˜ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 4. μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬λ“€μ΄ 타 직쒅에 κ·Όλ¬΄ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ™€λŠ” λ‹€λ₯΄κ²Œ μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬μ—μ„œ 주둜 λ‹΄λ‹Ήν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 5가지 λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 업무 μ’…λ₯˜(μΉ˜λ£ŒλΉ„μ‹¬μ‚¬, ν™˜μžκ΄€λ¦¬, 신체감정, μž₯ν•΄μœ¨ν‰κ°€, μ§μ›κ΅μœ‘)와 κ΄€λ ¨λœ 각각의 κ°ˆλ“±λ‚΄μš© 및 ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ μΉ˜λ£ŒλΉ„μ‹¬μ‚¬μ˜ κ°ˆλ“±λ‚΄μš© 1μˆœμœ„λŠ” 합리적인 μ μš©κΈ°μ€€μ΄ μ—†λ‹€λŠ” 것이고, ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆ 1μˆœμœ„λŠ” 싀무λ₯Ό μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ κ³ λ €ν•œ 심사기쀀 μ±…μžκ°€ λ§ˆλ ¨λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” ν•­λͺ©μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 이외에도 μ‹ μ²΄κ°μ •μ˜ κ°ˆλ“± λ‚΄μš©μœΌλ‘œμ„œλŠ” ν™˜μž(ν”Όν•΄μž)에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ˜ν•™μ μΈ νŒλ‹¨ 및 결정을 ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ°μ •μ˜μ‚¬ ν˜Ήμ€ ν”Όν•΄μžλ₯Ό 직접 λ§Œλ‚˜λŠ” κ²ƒμ΄λ‚˜, 신체감정 λ³‘μ›μ˜ νƒœλ„κ°€ λΉ„ν˜‘μ‘°μ μ΄λΌλŠ” 것이 λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ„ μ°¨μ§€ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œλŠ” 신체감정 μ˜ˆμ•½μ œλ„κ°€ ν™œμ„±ν™” λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€ μ΄κ±°λ‚˜ 신체감정을 μ „μž„ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 직원을 μ–‘μ„±ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것이 ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μž₯ν•΄μœ¨ 평가에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ κ°ˆλ“± λ‚΄μš©μ€ μ μš©κΈ°μ€€μ΄ λ―ΈλΉ„ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 것이 κ°€μž₯ λ§Žμ€ 수λ₯Ό λ‚˜νƒ€λƒˆμœΌλ©° ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œλŠ” λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„ ν™œμš© κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ κΈ°μ€€μ±…μžλ₯Ό λ§ˆλ ¨ν•΄μ•Όν•œλ‹€λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. ν™˜μžκ΄€λ¦¬μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ κ°ˆλ“±λ‚΄μš©μ˜ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ€ λ°©λ¬Έ ν›„ ν–₯ν›„ μž₯ν•΄ 문제 λ³΄μƒκΈˆμ•‘κ³Ό κ²°λΆ€ν•˜μ—¬ 보고(report)λ₯Ό ν•΄μ•Ό ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμ—μ„œ 주둜 κ°ˆλ“±μ„ λŠλΌλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©° ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œλŠ” 직원간 정기적인 ν† μ˜λ₯Ό ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것과 주치의λ₯Ό λ©΄λ‹΄ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ§μ›κ΅μœ‘μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ κ°ˆλ“±λ‚΄μš©μ˜ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ€ ꡐ윑 자료λ₯Ό μž‘μ„±ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©° ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμ˜ μš°μ„ μˆœμœ„λ‘œ ꡐ윑 자료의 보완 및 κ΅μœ‘λΆ€μ—μ„œ κ΅μœ‘μ„ μ „μž„ν•΄μ•Ό ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œλ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όμ—μ„œ, μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜νšŒμ‚¬ μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄μŠ€νŠΈλ ˆμŠ€ μš”μΈ μ€‘μ—λŠ” 심사업무에 λŒ€ν•œ 심리적인 뢀담감, 타 λΆ„μ•Ό μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ κ°ˆλ“± 등이 높은 슀트레슀 μš”μΈμΈ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ νŒŒμ•…λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ νšŒμ‚¬μ˜ κ΄€λ¦¬μžλŠ” μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬λ“€μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄νŠΉμ„±μ„ ꡬ체적으둜 νŒŒμ•…ν•˜μ—¬ μ—…λ¬΄κ°œλ°œ 및 싀행에 λ§Žμ€ 관심을 κ°–κ³  λ³΄ν—˜μ‹¬μ‚¬λ₯Ό λ‹΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” 인λ ₯을 μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ 지원해주며, 타 λΆ„μ•Ό μš”μ›κ³Όλ„ 업무가 μ›ν™œν•˜κ²Œ 잘 이루어지도둝 지원해 쀄 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. 인λ ₯κ°„μ˜ κ°ˆλ“± μ‘°μ • λ°©μ•ˆμ„ κ°•κ΅¬ν•˜κ³ , 슀트레슀λ₯Ό μ™„ν™”μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ” ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ œκ³ ν•œλ‹€λ©΄ μ†ν•΄λ³΄ν—˜μ—…κ³„μ— μ’…μ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” μ‹¬μ‚¬κ°„ν˜Έμ‚¬μ˜ μ—…λ¬΄νš¨μœ¨μ„± μ¦λŒ€ 및 μœ„μƒκ°•ν™”κ°€ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§μœΌλ‘œμ¨ νšŒμ‚¬κ²½μ˜μˆ˜μ§€μ—λ„ 긍정적인 업무결과λ₯Ό 얻을 수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. [영문] The purpose of this study is to provide basic information about job-related stress of nurses in non-life insurance companies through the analysis of its type and degree. The subjects of this study were 133 nurses working at 'Direct Controlling Compensation Team' of 11 domestic non-life insurance companies in Korea as in April 2001. Research materials have been collected for 16 days from April 1, 2001 to April 16, 2001. 151 sets of questionnaires were distributed and 138 sets of answered questionnaires corresponding to 91% of distributed ones were collected. The tool for this study was developed through the procedures as follows and the degree of their job-related stress was analyzed with this tool. Β­Creating questions through reviewing documents related to the theme of this study and telephone interviews Β­Selecting 20 questions to measure the degree of job-related stress after survey Β­Verifying the validity of those questions by professionals A questionnaire had 58 questions consisting of 13 questions for general characteristics, 20 for the degree of job-related stress and 25 for conflict factors and solutions of the stress. Computerized statistical method using 'Windows SAS 6.12' was utilized for the analysis of materials. The survey results about general characteristics were expressed in frequency and percentage. And in case of the survey results having scores per question, mean and standard deviation of those scores were calculated. Also either t-test or F-test (ANOVA) considering the characteristics of variables was used to verify the difference of the degree of job-related stress in relation to general characteristics. The results of this study were as follows. 1.With regard to the degree of job-related stress of the subjects of this study calculated and expressed in score from the relevant questions, the highest, lowest and mean scores were 4.11, 2.85 and 3.46 respectively. 2.Of the job-related stress factors of nurses in non-life insurance companies, "psychological burden on their own works" recorded the highest score of 3.65 and "conflict with their business counterparts", "conflict on their roles as professionals", "heavy workload" and "conflict in working activities" were followed with the scores of 3.64, 3.57, 3.36, and 3.15 respectively. 3.The degree of job-related stress of nurses in non-life insurance companies was statistically correlated to their working years and department of general characteristics, judging from the result of statistical verification. And conflict on their roles as professionals of the job-related stress factors was statistically correlated to their average monthly income (F=4.63, p<0.05) and working departments (F=5.80, p<0.01) of general characteristics. Besides, conflict in working activities was statistically correlated to their working departments (F=4.75, p<0.05) and conflict with business counterparts was statistically correlated to working period at medical center before joining non-life insurance company (t=2.16, p<0.05). Especially, nurses at the age of 31 to 35 and with 5 years of working experience at medical center showed the highest degree of job-related stress. 4.Different from nurses working at another business area, nurses in non-life insurance companies had their own conflicts and solutions in regard to their 5 main responsibilities such as screening propriety of medical fees, patient management, examination and judgment of patients' physical conditions, grading disablement and employee education. The major conflict related to screening medical fee was that there were no reasonable criteria in screening medical fees. And the best solution for this conflict was to make proper screening guidelines. For examination and judgment of patients' physical conditions, meeting the doctors in charge and patients was very important in examining and judging patients' physical conditions. But the hospital staffs were not so cooperative in general. Therefore, establishing appointment system for physical examination of patients and training professional staffs in charge were suggested as solutions. Regarding grading disablement, the conflict of improper grading guidelines and the solution of introduction of practical grading system were selected. In patient management, making the reports on the estimation of future development of patients' disablement and on the decision of appropriate compensation amount was the major conflict. And regular discussions with their colleagues and meetings with the doctors in charge were proposed as solutions. The conflict in employee education was to prepare education materials by themselves. The suggested solution was that education department prepared education materials with their assistance. Judging from the above study results, psychological burden on their own works and conflict with business counterparts proved to be the major factors of the highest degree of job-related stress of nurses in non-life insurance companies. Therefore, upper level of managements of non-life insurance companies need to understand characteristics of nurses' responsibilities in detail, to pay keen attention to their business development and performance, to maintain the proper number of manpower and to provide opportunities and environment for harmonious cooperation with business counterparts. In conclusion, the efficiency of business performance of nurses in non-life insurance companies will be enhanced by mitigating their job-related stress through the fulfillment of the solutions suggested in the above. And this will be contributed to the development and profitability of non-life insurance companies where they work.ope

    μŒμ•… 뢄석을 ν†΅ν•œ μŒμ•… κ²½ν—˜μ˜ ν‘œμƒμ  λ‚΄μš© κ³ μ°°

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μŒμ•…κ³Ό 이둠전곡,1995.Maste

    General Agreement on Trade in Services of the Free Trade Agreement and the Healthcare Services of South Korea and the Prospect of the System

    Get PDF
    Purpose:The purpose of this study is aimed to examine the Free Trade Agreement and its General Agreement on Trade in Services, especially, the healthcare service and the rospect of the system. Methods: This study was based on fourteen literature reviews from 2001 to 2014. Results: Free Trade Agreement and the General Agreement on Trade in Services were examined and Japan, China, and the United States's examples were shown. Healthcare market opening issues are the tendency of this era with the concept of globalization. Conclusion: This study highlights the tendency of healthcare market opening with all the pros and cons. The healthcare system along with the medical and nursing fields need to modify their system based on the globalization

    (A) study on the dietary habit and prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose

    No full text
    역학및건강증진학과/석사[ν•œκΈ€] λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” ꡭ민건강 μ˜μ–‘μ‘°μ‚¬μžλ£Œ(1998)λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ λ―Έκ΅­λ‹Ήλ‡¨λ³‘ν•™νšŒ(American Diabetes Association)의 진단기쀀(1997)에 μ˜ν•΄ 당뇨병과 κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ• μ˜ 성별 μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ„ μΆ”μ •ν•˜κ³ , μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ κ΅­λ―Όλ“€μ˜ ν‰μ†Œ μ‹μ‚¬μŠ΅κ΄€ 및 κ³ΌμΌμ„­μ·¨λŸ‰μ„ 쑰사함과 λ™μ‹œμ—, μ‹μ‚¬μŠ΅κ΄€ 및 κ³ΌμΌμ„­μ·¨λŸ‰κ³Ό 당뇨병 및 κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ• μ˜ μœ λ³‘λ₯ κ³Όμ˜ 관계λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ μž μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 1998.11.1~12.30κΉŒμ§€ μ‹œν–‰λœ ꡭ민건강 μ˜μ–‘μ‘°μ‚¬ 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ‘°μ‚¬λŠ” 전ꡭ을 λŒ€ν‘œν•˜λŠ” 12,189κ°€κ΅¬μ˜ 전체 가ꡬ원 39,331λͺ… 쀑 건강검진을 μ‹€μ‹œν•œ 20μ„Έ μ΄μƒμ˜ 인ꡬ 7,962λͺ…κ³Ό μ‹ν’ˆμ„­μ·¨μ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•œ 11,267λͺ… 쀑 20μ„Έ μ΄μƒμ˜ 인ꡬ 8,166λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 얻어진 μ£Όμš”ν•œ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. 당뇨병과 κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ•  μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ€ 남·녀 λͺ¨λ‘μ—μ„œ 연령이 λ§Žμ„μˆ˜λ‘ λ†’μ•˜κ³ , λ‚¨μ„±μ˜ μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ΄ 여성보닀 λ†’μ•˜λ‹€. κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμ„ κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•œ 당뇨병 μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ€ 여성은 60-69μ„Έ ꡰ의 μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ΄ 15.92%둜 κ°€μž₯ λ†’μ•˜κ³ , 남성은 50-59μ„Έ κ΅°μ—μ„œ 18.21%둜 κ°€μž₯ λ†’μ•˜λ‹€. λ‹Ήν™”ν˜ˆμƒ‰μ†Œλ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•œ 당뇨병 μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ€ 여성은 60-69μ„Έ κ΅°μ—μ„œ 11.99%, 남성은 50-59μ„Έ κ΅°μ—μ„œ 11.96% μ˜€λ‹€. κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ• μ˜ μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ€ 여성은 70μ„Έ 이상 κ΅°μ—μ„œ 19.87%둜 κ°€μž₯ λ†’μ•˜κ³ , 남성은 60-69μ„Έ κ΅°μ—μ„œ 16.53%둜 κ°€μž₯ λ†’μ•˜λ‹€. 2. μ‹ν’ˆμ„­μ·¨ 및 μ‹μ‚¬μŠ΅κ΄€κ³Ό 당뇨병 및 κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ• μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό, κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμ„ κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ ν•œ 경우 μ—¬μ„±μ—μ„œ λ‹Ήλ₯˜μ„­μ·¨λŸ‰μ΄ μ¦κ°€ν•˜λ©΄ λ‹Ήλ‡¨λ³‘μ˜ μœ„ν—˜λ₯ μ΄ κ°μ†Œν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κ²°κ³Όκ°€ ν•΄μ„λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜, λŒ€μƒμž 쀑 당뇨병에 μ΄ν™˜λœ 경우λ₯Ό μ œμ™Έν•˜λ©΄ ν†΅κ³„ν•™μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. λ‹Ήν™”ν˜ˆμƒ‰μ†Œλ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•œ 경우 λ‚¨μ„±μ—μ„œ 당뇨병 포함ꡰ과 μ œμ™Έκ΅° λͺ¨λ‘μ—μ„œ κ²°μ‹λΌλ‹ˆκ°€ ν†΅κ³„ν•™μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ 역상관을 λ³΄μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ—¬μ„±μ—μ„œλŠ” 당뇨병 ν¬ν•¨κ΅°μ—μ„œ 과일 μ„­μ·¨λŸ‰μ΄ μœ μ˜ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜ μ œμ™Έκ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” μœ μ˜ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜κ³ , κ²°μ‹λΌλ‹ˆλŠ” 당뇨병 포함ꡰ과 μ œμ™Έκ΅° λͺ¨λ‘μ—μ„œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 역상관을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. 3. κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμ΄ 126mg/dL 이상을 당뇨병 ꡰ으둜 μ •μ˜ν•˜μ˜€μ„ λ•Œ 이에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ€ 남성은 μ—°λ Ή, 총 μ½œλ ˆμŠ€ν…Œλ‘€, 쀑성지방, κ³ ν˜ˆμ••, ν—ˆλ¦¬Β·μ—‰λ©μ΄ λ‘˜λ ˆλΉ„(WHR) μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 여성은 μ—°λ Ή, 쀑성지방, κ³ ν˜ˆμ••μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. λ‹Ήν™”ν˜ˆμƒ‰μ†Œκ°€ 6%λ₯Ό μ΄ˆκ³Όν•œ ꡰ을 λ‹Ήλ‡¨κ΅°μœΌλ‘œ μ •μ˜ν•˜μ˜€μ„ λ•Œ 이에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ€ 남성은 μ—°λ Ή, LDL μ½œλ ˆμŠ€ν…Œλ‘€, 쀑성지방, ν—ˆλ¦¬Β·μ—‰λ©μ΄ λ‘˜λ ˆλΉ„(WHR) μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , 여성은 μ—°λ Ή, κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€, 총 μ½œλ ˆμŠ€ν…Œλ‘€, 쀑성지방, κ³ ν˜ˆμ••, ν—ˆλ¦¬λ‘˜λ ˆ, ν—ˆλ¦¬&#8729;엉덩이 λ‘˜λ ˆλΉ„(WHR) μ˜€λ‹€. κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯애에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ€ 남성은 μ—°λ Ή, 쀑성지방, ν—ˆλ¦¬Β·μ—‰λ©μ΄ λ‘˜λ ˆλΉ„(WHR), μ‹ μ²΄μ§ˆλŸ‰μ§€μˆ˜(BMI) μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , 여성은 μ—°λ Ή, 쀑성지방 μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 단면적 μ—°κ΅¬μ„€κ³„μ˜ μ œν•œμ μœΌλ‘œ μ‹μ‚¬μŠ΅κ΄€μ˜ 당뇨병 및 κ³΅λ³΅ν˜ˆλ‹Ήμž₯μ• μ™€μ˜ 톡계적 μœ μ˜μ„±μ„ λ°νžˆμ§€ λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜, 졜근 λ“€μ–΄ 당뇨병 μœ λ³‘λ₯ μ˜ 증가와 ν•¨κ»˜ κ²°μ‹μ΄λ‚˜ 과식을 ν•˜λŠ” κ²½ν–₯이 많고 과일의 μ„­μ·¨λŸ‰μ΄ κΈ‰κ²©νžˆ μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ―€λ‘œ, μ „ν–₯적 μ½”ν˜ΈνŠΈ 연ꡬ에 κΈ°λ°˜ν•˜μ—¬ 체계적이고 지속적인 연ꡬ가 이루어져야 ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μƒκ°ν•œλ‹€. [영문]This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus(DM) and Impaired Fasting Glucose(IFG), and to examine the determinants focused on dietary habits and fruit intakes of these prevalence. We used data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 1998. Of 39,331 entire family members from 12,189 families representing the nation in the 1998 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey which was carried out November the 1st to December the 30th, 1998. A total number of 7,962 people who were over 20 years of age and checking the health examination and 8,166 people who were 20 years of age and investigated food intake survey were analyzed in this study. The results are as follows. 1. Prevalence of DM and IFG was high in old age for both men and women, and higher in men than in women. The highest prevalence rate of DM based on fasting plasma glucose(defined by FPGβ‰₯126mg dL) was 15.92% for women in the age of 60~69, and 18.21% for men in the age of 50~59. When based on Hemoglobin A1c, the prevalence of DM(defined by HbA1c>6%) was 11.99% for women in the age of 60~69, and 11.96% for men in the age of 50~59. The highest prevalence of IFG was 19.87% for women in the age over 70, and 16.53% for men in the age of 60~69. 2. As to the relation between the prevalence of DM based on fasting plasma glucose and IFG and dietary habit and fruit intake, prevalence of DM in the women decreased significantly when their glucose intake increased, but significance was disappeared when observations with morbidity of DM were excluded. When based on hemoglobin Alc, skip-eating was inversely associated with the prevalence of DM in men and women when including and excluding the observations with morbidity of DM. For women, fruit intake was inversely significant but not significant in the case of excluding the observations with morbidity of DM. 3. The prevalence of DM based on FPG was related to age, total cholesterol, triglyceride, hypertension, waist to hip ratio(WHR) for men, and age, triglyceride, and hypertension for women. Based on hemoglobin A1c, the prevelance of DM was related to age, LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, and WHR for men, and age, educational background, total cholesterol, triglyceride, hypertension, waist circumference, and WHR for women. Factors related to IFG were age, triglyceride, WHR, Body Mass Index(BMI) for men, and age and triglyceride for women. This study didn’t make statistical relation about dietary habit of DM and IFG. It was due to the limit of cross-sectional study. Prospective cohort study, however, is clearly needed, because the frequency of skip-eating or overeating is escalating and fruit intake along with the prevalence is rapidly increasing in our country.ope

    The Study on the Revitalization of National Records Designation System

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사) --μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :ν˜‘λ™κ³Όμ • 기둝관리학전곡,2007.Maste

    Isomorphism Classes Elliptic and Hyperelliptic Curves over Finite Fields

    No full text
    Docto
    • …
    corecore