29 research outputs found

    Embryonic-Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Nephrectomy.

    Get PDF
    We describe our initial experience with embryonic-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) nephrectomy in a nonfunctioning kidney. E-NOTES was performed with modified single port access by using a surgical glove and wound retractor. We used several laparoscopic instruments, such as articulating laparoscopic instruments, clips, conventional laparoscopic graspers, and dissectors. The operative time was 80 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications.ope

    Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Pathologic T2 Disease

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: To investigate the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for pathologic T2 disease, we examined differences in perioperative outcomes according to time period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2008, a total of 307 consecutive patients underwent RALP for prostate cancer and 205 patients had pathologic T2 disease. Patients were grouped into 6-month time periods. We collected and examined the patient's perioperative data including age, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), operation time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the groups in age (p=0.705), BMI (p=0.246), PSA (p=0.425), or prostate volume (p=0.380). Operation time (p<0.001) and estimated blood loss (p<0.001) decreased significantly with time. The positive surgical margin rate also showed a decreasing trend, but this was not significant (p=0.680). CONCLUSIONS: Operation time and estimated blood loss had a steep learning curve during the early 24 cases and then stabilized. A positive surgical margin rate, however, did not have a significant learning curve, although the positive surgical margin decreased continuouslyope

    Hybrid Transvaginal Gastro-Endoscopic Nephrectomy in a Porcine Model

    Get PDF
    This animal experimental study reports one case of hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for nephrectomy. We performed a nephrectomy through a transvaginal access and 2 additional 5 mm trocars in the abdomen by using the keyhole technique. The specimen was removed through the vaginal tract. The total procedure time was 102 minutes. There were no intraoperative complicationsope

    Initial Clinical Experience with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) is gaining acceptance as an alternative to open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. However, it still remains a technically challenging procedure even for experienced laparoscopists. Endophytic tumors or renal hilar tumors pose an additional challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 11 patients (mean age: 49.3 years; range: 31-67 years) who underwent RLPN for small, complex renal masses including hilar tumors and endophytic tumors. RLPN was performed with the Da Vinci(R) surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, USA) with three robot arms and intraoperative ultrasonography (Tile-pro(R) System). RESULTS: RLPN was performed successfully without complications in all cases. The mean tumor size was 3.2 cm (range, 1.1-8.0 cm). The mean operative time was 177 minutes (range, 150-260 minutes), and the mean warm ischemia time was 32 minutes (range, 25-41 minutes). The mean estimated blood loss was 177 ml (range, 50-350 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-7 days). Pathology found four patients with clear cell type renal cell carcinoma, one with multilocular multicystic renal cell carcinoma, two with papillary type, one with chromophobe type, and three with angiomyolipoma. CONCLUSIONS: RLPN is a feasible and safe surgery for complex renal tumors. In our experiences, RLPN could be a nephron-sparing surgical option for patients with compromised renal function and it could be an alternative to open partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a select group of patients.ope

    Correlation of Estimated Blood Loss and Calculated Blood Loss During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Due to the pneumoperitoneum, intraoperative bleeding is relatively limited during laparoscopic surgery. During robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP), after opening the bladder neck, the urine volume is usually incorporated in the estimated blood loss (EBL). The purpose of this study is to compare with EBL and calculated blood loss (CBL) after RLRP. Patients & Methods: Between July 2005 and April 2008, we performed 268 consecutive RLRP by single surgeon. Of these, 260 patients who did not receive blood transfusion became the subjects. We compared with EBL taken from the anesthesia report and CBL calculated from the following formula. EBV is the estimated blood volume and assumed to be 70cm3/kg. Hi and Hf are the preoperative haematocrit and the postoperative day one morning hematocrit. (3) Tu is the sum of autologous whole blood (AWB), packed red blood cells (PRBC), and cell saver (CS) units transfused. CBL=(EBVร—(Hi-Hf)/((Hi+Hf)/2)+(500ร—Tu). Results: The mean (ยฑSD) age and the mean operative time were 63.3ยฑ7.7 years and 204.8ยฑ38.1 minutes. The mean Hi and Hf were 42.0ยฑ4.3% and 36.1ยฑ5.4%. There were significant differences between Hi and Hf (p=0.000). The mean EBL and CBL were 327.4ยฑ220.8 mL and 748.5ยฑ757.4mL. There were significant differences between EBL and CBL (p=0.000). Conclusions: During RLRP, EBL estimated by anesthesiologists may underestimate CBL calculated by standard calculation. This discrepancy may be due to the hemodilution by intravenous fluid replacement postoperatively, and not by the actual postoperative hemorrhage after elimination of pneumoperitoneum.ope

    Expression of heat shock protein 70 in rat kidney with partial ureteral obstruction.

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ถ€๋ถ„์š”๊ด€ํ์ƒ‰์€ ๋น„๋‡จ๊ธฐ๊ณผ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ถˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ์ƒ‰์„ฑ ์š”๋กœ ์งˆํ™˜์ด๋‹ค. Heat shock proteins (HSPs)์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์ , ์ƒํ™”ํ•™์  ์ž๊ทน์— ์˜ํ•œ ์†์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ธํฌ์˜ ํ•ญ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ ์‹œ์ผœ์ฃผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70)์€ ์‹ ์žฅ ์กฐ์ง ๋‚ด์— ๋ถ„ํฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ์žฅ ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ €์ž๋Š” ์ผ์ธก ์š”๊ด€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ํ์ƒ‰์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚จ ํฐ์ฅ์˜ ์‹ ์žฅ์—์„œ ์„ธํฌ๋‚ด ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉด์—ญ์กฐ์งํ™”ํ•™์—ผ์ƒ‰์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ HSP70์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ผ์ธก ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์š”๊ด€ ํ์ƒ‰์ด ์‹ ์žฅ ์„ธํฌ ์†์ƒ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 250-300g์˜ ์ˆ˜์ปท Spraque-Dawley ํฐ์ฅ์˜ ์ขŒ์ธก ์‹ ์žฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์š”๊ด€ ํ์ƒ‰ ์‹œํ‚จ ๊ตฐ์„ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ (n=20)์œผ๋กœ, sham ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ตฐ์„ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ (n=20)์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ตฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ  ํ›„ 7์ผ์งธ ์ขŒ์ธก ์‹ ์žฅ์„ ์ ์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฉด์—ญ์กฐ์งํ™”ํ•™์—ผ์ƒ‰์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์—ผ์ƒ‰๋œ ์กฐ์ง์€ ์˜์ƒ๋ถ„์„๊ธฐ (Multiscan, USA)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ HSP70์˜ ์—ผ์ƒ‰ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์—์„œ HSP70์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ ์‚ฌ๊ตฌ์ฒด์™€ ์„ธ๋‡จ๊ด€ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์•ฝํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๊ตฌ์ฒด ์˜์—ญ๊ณผ ์„ธ๋‡จ๊ด€ ์˜์—ญ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ๊ตฌ์ฒด์—์„œ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’์€ 182.1ยฑ11.9์˜€๊ณ , ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” 189.6ยฑ7.9๋กœ ํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ์œ ์˜์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค (p<0.05).๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ผ์ธก ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์š”๊ด€ ํ์ƒ‰์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋˜ ๊ตฐ์—์„œ HSP70์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ๋” ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ HSP70์ด ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์š”๊ด€ ํ์ƒ‰์— ์˜ํ•œ ์„ธํฌ ์†์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Partial ureteral obstruction is a common clinical finding. Heat shock proteins(HSPs) maintain homeostasis and protect cells from various injuries by physical and biochemical stresses. Particularly, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) is contained within renal tissue and attributed to minimizing injuries of renal tissue. We tried to understand the effect of renal cellular injuries due to unilateral partial ureteral obstruction (UPUO). This was done by determining the expression of HSP70 using immunohistochemical staining to identify intracellular changes in the rat kidney with UPUO. The left kidney of the male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300gm) were used, the UPUO group was assigned to UPUO operation (n=20) and the control group was assigned to sham operation (n=20). A left nephrectomy was done 7 days after the operation in both groups. The intensity of HSP70 in the stained tissue by immunohistochemical staining was measured using image analyser (Multiscan, USA).In the control group, expression of HSP70 was weak in the glomerular area. In the UPUO group, however, expression of HSP70 was stronger than that of control group in the glomerular area. The mean intensity of the UPUO group (182.1 11.9) was significantly higher than the control (189.6 7.9) (p<0.05).The stronger expression of HSP70 in the UPUO group than the control group suggest that HSP70 may be the useful indicator for the cellular damage caused by partial ureteral obstruction.ope

    Comparison of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy for pathologic stage T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histologic features: a multi-institutional study

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) compared with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We analyzed the data from 2561 patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy for RCC at 26 institutions in Korea from June 1998 to December 2007. The clinical data of 631 patients with clear cell RCC in the LRN group were compared with the clinical data of 924 patients in the ORN group. The patients with Stage pT3 or greater and those with lymph node or distant metastases were excluded to avoid a selection bias. To evaluate the technical adequacy and oncologic outcome, we compared the perioperative parameters and 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly longer in the LRN group than in the ORN group (219 ยฑ 77 vs 182 ยฑ 62 minutes, P < .001), but the estimated blood loss and complication rate were significantly lower in the LRN group than in the ORN group (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). On univariate analysis, the LRN group had 5-year overall (93.5% vs 89.8%, P = .120) and recurrence-free (94.0% vs 92.8%, P = .082) survival rates equivalent to those of the ORN group. Even after adjusting for age, sex, T stage, tumor grade, and body mass index in a Cox proportional hazards model, statistically significant differences between the 2 groups were not found for the 5-year overall (hazard ratio 1.523, P = .157) and recurrence-free (hazard ratio 0.917, P = .773) survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our large multi-institutional data have shown that LRN provides survival outcomes equivalent to those of ORN in patients with Stage pT1-T2 clear cell RCC.ope
    corecore