8 research outputs found
์์์ ์ ์ฃผ์ ์กฐ๊ฑด: ์ํ๊ณผ ์์ ์ ์ฐ์ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ฌด์ญ ํจํด์ ๋น๊ต๋ฅผ ํตํ์ฌ
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ (์์ฌ)-- ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๊ตญ์ ๋ํ์ : ๊ตญ์ ํ๊ณผ(๊ตญ์ ํ๋ ฅ์ ๊ณต), 2014. 8. ์ด๊ทผ.๋ณธ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ์๋ก ๋ค๋ฅธ ์ข
๋ฅ์ ์์ฐ์์์ด ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ์ด๋ค ์ํฅ์ ๊ฐ์ง๋์ง๋ฅผ ์ ์น๊ฒฝ์ ์ ๊ด์ ์์ ์ฐ๊ตฌํ์๋ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์์์ ์ ์ฃผ(Resource curse) ํ์์ ๋ํ ๋ง์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ ์์ด์์ง๋ง, ์ด๋ค์ ์์์ ๊ธฐ๋ฐํ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ์ฌ๋ก๋ฅผ ์ค๋ช
ํ์ง ๋ชปํ๋ ์ ์์ ํ๊ณ๊ฐ ์๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ์์์์กด๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ค์ ๋ค์ํ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ์ญํ๊ด๊ณ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ดํดํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ์๋ก์ด ํ์ ๋ง๋ จํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ํนํ, ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ Schwartz์ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฐ์ ๋ชจ๋ธ (Schwartzs model of late development)์ ์ฐจ์ฉ, Schwartz์ ์์๊ธฐ๋ฐ ๋ฐ์ ๋ชจ๋ธ(Extended Schwartzs model of resource-led development)์ ์ ์ํ๊ณ ์๋ค.
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋จผ์ ์ธ๊ฐ ์ํ์ ํ์์ ์๋์ง์์ธ ์ํ๊ณผ ์์ ์ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ํน์ง์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์ง ์ธก๋ฉด (์ง๋ฆฌ์ ์ง์ค๋, ์ ๋์ฑ๊ณผ ์ด์ก์๋จ, ์์์ถ์ถ๊ณผ ์์ฐ์ ์๊ตฌ๋๋ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ ฅ์ ์ ๋)์์ ๋น๊ตํ๋ค. ๋์๊ฐ ์ด๋ ๋ฏ ์๋ก ๋ค๋ฅธ ์ฑ๊ฒฉ์ ์์์ด ๋ ๊ฐ์ง ์ธก๋ฉด์์ ์์์ ์ ์ฃผ (Resource curse)์ ์์์ ์ ์ฃผ์ ๋ถ์ฌ(Non-existence of resource curse)๋ผ๋ ์๋ฐ๋ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ก ์ด์ด์ง๋ ๊ฒ์ ๋ฐํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ์ด ๋, ๋ ๊ฐ์ง ์ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ฒดํํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ์ค์ํ๋ฐ, ๋จผ์ ์์์ ์ฌ์ฉํ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ๋ฌด์ญํจํด๊ณผ ์ฐ์
๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธก๋ฉด์์ ๊ตฌ๋ณ๋๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ์ฐจ์ด๋ ๋์๊ฐ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ์ฌํ, ์ธ๋ถ ์์ ๊ฐ ์ํธ์์ฉ์๋ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ณด์ธ๋ค.
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ๊ณผ ์ฌ์ฐ๋์๋ผ๋น์๋ฅผ ๋น๊ต, ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ํ๊ณผ ์์ ๋ฅผ ์ด์ฉํ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ๊ฒฝ๋ก์ ๋ํ์ ์ฌ๋ก๋ก์จ ์ฐ๊ตฌํ์๋ค. ๋ํ ๊ฒฝ์ , ์ญ์ฌ, ์ ์น ๋ฑ ๋ค์ํ ๋ถ์ผ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋น๊ต ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ์ ์ฉํจ์ผ๋ก์จ ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ๊ตญ๋ด ์ ์น๊ฒฝ์ ์ ์ญํ ๋ฐ ๊ตญ๋ด์ ๊ตญ์ ์ ์น๊ฒฝ์ ์ ์ํธ ๊ด๊ณ๊ฐ ํ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ๊ฒฝ๋ก์ ์ํฅ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋์ง ์ค๋ช
ํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค.
์ด๋ฌํ ๊ณผ์ ์ ํตํด ๋ณธ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ๊ธฐ์กด ์์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ์ฐจ๋ณ๋๋ ์๋ก์ด ์ ์น๊ฒฝ์ ์ ๋ถ์ํ์ ์ ๊ณตํ๊ณ , ์์๊ธฐ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ๋ค์ํ ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ฒด๊ณ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ถ์ํ๋ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ฌํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค.The primary concern of the thesis is to identify heterogeneous impacts of different types of natural resources on economic development of countries. Although there have been extensive researches conducted on the phenomenon of resource curse, it is shown that they remain incomplete in failing to explain cases of resource-led economic developments found in historical perspective. Acknowledging this shortcoming, this research proposes the extended Schwartzs model of resource-led development on the basis of Schwartzs model of late development, as a new framework to understand divergent outcomes of economic development between resource-dependent countries.
First of all, this new extended model is applied to compare different characteristics of coal and oil, in terms of the geographic concentration, fluidity and means of transport, and the level of technology. Second, in more detail, it proceeds to examine two linkages connecting these distinctive characteristics of natural resources and their lead up to different consequences between existence and absence of resource curse. Here, two linkages are sequential in that the first linkage of how different types of natural resources result in distinctive trade patterns and industrial structure is what influences the second linkage of interactions between state and society vis-ร -vis external factors of influence.
Here, two case analyses cover the case of the U.S. with its reliance on large coal reserves and production in comparison with the case of Saudi Arabia with its role as a powerful oil producer.
Moreover, by incorporating different principles such as economy, history, and politics altogether in comparative perspective, this research highlights the importance of domestic politics where many different motives and interests of domestic actors are in constant contest as well as its relations to external sources of influence.
By distinguishing coal and oil and in particular by drawing a new political economy framework into the analysis, this research departs from conventional takes on resource curse, better situated to capture the comprehensive picture of the varying courses of resource-led economic development.Acknowledgements
Abstract
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
I. Introduction 1
II. Review on Previous Studies 3
2.1. Resource Curse 3
2.2. Resource Blessing 12
2.3. Theoretical approaches to economic development 15
2.3.1. Comparative Advantages and Trade 17
2.3.2. Industrialisation and late development 20
2.4. Types of natural resources 24
2.5. Research Question 26
2.5.1. Shortcomings of previous studies 26
2.5.2. Research Question 27
III. Analytical Framework 29
3.1. Schwartzs Model of Late Development 29
3.2. Extended Schwartzs model of resource-led development 36
3.3. Proposition 43
3.4. Methodology 46
IV. Analysis I- Coal and the U.S. 49
4.1. Overview 49
4.2. Basic characteristics of coal 52
4.3. Trade patterns and Industrial structure 57
4.4. Extended Schwartzs model of resource-led development 61
V. Analysis II- Oil and Saudi Arabia 68
5.1. Overview 68
5.2. Basic characteristics of oil
5.3. Trade patterns and industrial structure 73
5.4. Extended Schwartzs model of resource-led development 77
VI. Conclusion 85
References
Appendix I - Coal Production in the Leading Coal-Producing Countries of the World
Appendix II - GDP by Industry (U.S.)
Appendix III - GDP by Industry (Saudi Arabia)
Abstract (Korean)Maste
๋๋ ธ ์ฐํํฐํ๋๊ณผ ๋๋ ธ ์ฐํ์์ฐ์ด ํ ๋งํ ์ ๊ฐ๋ญ์ฝฉ์ ์์ฅ๊ณผ ํญ์ฐํ ๋ฐ์์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ํฅ
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ (์์ฌ)-- ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ํ์ : ์๋ช
๊ณผํ๋ถ, 2012. 8. ์ด์์ฃผ.Abstract
Although representative environmental pollution research institutions, the USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) and the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), have been doing research in many fields, research concerning the effects of nanoparticles on plants is still rare. In this study, I studied the effects of nanoparticles nano-TiO2, nano-ZnO on the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants.
The effects of two types of nanoparticles (nano-TiO2, nano-ZnO) on seed germination and root growth of two higher plant species, the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants were investigated. The concentration range of the nanoparticles spanned from 0 to 5000 mg/L. In order to account for agglomeration and precipitation, a filter paper in a petri dish with distilled water (DW) was used.
At all concentration levels, both nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO did not significantly affect the seed germination of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. However, significant inhibition of root length appeared in the treatment of nano-ZnO on the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plant except at the highest concentration level of nano-ZnO. The same nanoparticle, nano-ZnO, significantly hampered the root length of the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plant at high concentration levels (1000, 2500 and 5000 mg/L).
The plant seedsโ uptake of the nanoparticles was also analyzed. In regard to nano-TiO2, after an exposure of 48 hours (mg/kg), it was observed that when the concentration of nano-TiO2 on the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds increased, the uptake of nano-TiO2 by the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds increased in a linear relationship although it was not significantly different. In addition, the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds, at 100 mg/L, nano-TiO2 was not detected and at other higher nano-TiO2 concentrations it was detected. In the uptake analysis of nano-ZnO by the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds, after an exposure of 48 hours (mg/kg), kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds also showed a significantly increased nano-ZnO uptake when the concentration of nano-ZnO on kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds increased.
In addition to seeds, nanoparticle uptake by the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedlings after an exposure of 15 days (mg/kg) was also measured. Although the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings didnโt show significant differences with concentration levels of nano-TiO2, the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedlings showed significantly increased nano-TiO2 uptake at the highest concentration level (5000 mg/L). In nano-ZnO uptake by the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedlings, after an exposure of 15 days (mg/kg), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings showed significantly increased nano-ZnO uptake at the highest level (5000 mg/L) and in the case of the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seedlings, the uptake of nano-ZnO significantly increased with increased concentration levels.
To determine the size of the nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO in solution, after 14 days the hydrodynamic diameter of the nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake in a petri dish was measured. A FE-SEM (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope) was used to measure the diameter. For solutions which showed a particle diameter over 1000 nm, an Axio Zeiss Imager A1 with a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope was used. In the case of nano-TiO2, the particleโs hydrodynamic diameter at the highest concentration significantly showed the largest diameter. In the case of nano-ZnO, the hydrodynamic diameter of nano-ZnO significantly increased with increased concentration levels. Also, after 7 days in a petri dish, according to the hydrodynamic diameter of the nano-TiO2 uptake, the hydrodynamic diameter of nano-TiO2 at the highest nano-TiO2 concentration significantly showed the largest diameter.
Mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants only showed the significant difference by nano-TiO2 at the highest Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) in the highest (1000 mg/L) treatment. Also, mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants and mature kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants showed no significant differences by concentration levels of nano-ZnO. The chlorophyll contents of mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants after either nano-TiO2 or nano-ZnO exposure of 7 days (mg/L) showed no significant differences with different concentrations of nanoparticles (nano-TiO2, nano-ZnO). And chlorophyll contents of mature kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants after a nano-ZnO exposure of 7 days (mg/L) also showed no significant differences with different concentrations of nanoparticles (nano-TiO2, nano-ZnO).
After an exposure of 5 weeks (mg/L), nano-TiO2 uptake by the mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants was measured dividing plant parts by root, stem, leaf and fruit. At the root, leaf, fruit parts, there were no significant differences with different nano-TiO2 concentration levels. However, at the stem part, when nano-TiO2 concentration levels increased, the nano-TiO2 uptake of the mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants decreased inversely. Also, after an exposure of 5 weeks (mg/L), the nano-ZnO uptake of the mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants was measured and only the mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants showed significant differences. When the concentration of nano-ZnO increased, the uptake of nano-ZnO by the mature tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants also increased.
To confirm the results of the hydrodynamic diameter of the nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake, Pchem (Physical chemistry) datas (hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential) were measured by ELS. In the case of nano-TiO2 in DW, when the concentration of nano-TiO2 increased, the hydrodynamic diameter of nano-TiO2 decreased. Nano-TiO2 in a Hoagland solution showed an increased hydrodynamic diameter of nano-TiO2 when the concentration of nano-TiO2 increased. Then, we also measured the hydrodynamic diameter of nano-ZnO in DW. When the concentration level of nano-ZnO increased, the hydrodynamic diameter of nano-ZnO decreased.
Key words: nano-TiO2 , nano-ZnO, Lycopersicon esculentum, Phaseolus vulgaris, antioxidant enzyme activities, PchemList of Contents
Abstract........................................................................................................................... โ
ฐ
List of Contents............................................................................................................... โ
ณ
List of Figures................................................................................................................. โ
ต
List of Tables.................................................................................................................. โ
ถ
โ
. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1
โ
ก. Method......................................................................................................................... 4
2.1. Preparation of Particles and Cultures.................................................................. 4
2.1.1. Germination Research...................................................................................... 4
2.1.2. Root Elongation Research................................................................................ 7
2.1.3. Pot Research..................................................................................................... 7
2.2. Analyzing methods................................................................................................ 9
2.2.1. Measurement of Antioxidant enzyme activity................................................. 9
2.2.2. Measurement of Chlorophyll contents ......................................................... 10
2.2.3. ICP analysis.................................................................................................... 10
2.2.4. FE-SEM and Image J analysis....................................................................... 11
2.2.5. Pchem analysis............................................................................................... 11
2.3. Statistical analyses............................................................................................. 11
โ
ข. Results............................................................................................................... 12
3.1. Seed germination rate of nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO treated tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris)....................................................... 12
3.2.1. nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake by tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris) seeds........................................................................................... 15
3.2.2. Effect of nano-ZnO on the increase rate of kidney bean (P. vulgaris)โs seed biomass .......................................................................................................... 19
3.3. Root elongation rate of nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO treated tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris)...................................................... 21
3.4.1. nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake by tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris) seedlings................................................................................... 24
3.4.2. Effect of nano-TiO2 on the seedling biomass of tomato (L. esculentum).... 26
3.5. Hydrodynamic diameter of nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake in a petri dish. 28
3.6. Chlorophyll contents of mature tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris) after nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO exposure of 7 days (mg/L)............. 31
3.7. Antioxidant enzyme activity of tomato (L. esculentum) and kidney bean (P. vulgaris) by nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO.............................................................. 33
3.7.1. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)............................................................... 33
3.7.2. Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD)........................................................ 35
3.8.1. nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO uptake by mature tomato (L. esculentum) and mature kidney bean (P. vulgaris).................................................................... 37
3.8.2. Effect of nano-ZnO on the height of mature kidney bean (P. vulgaris)... 39
3.9. Pchem results of nano-TiO2 and nano-ZnO................................................. 41
3.9.1. Pchem results (Hydrodynamic diameter) of A) nano-TiO2 in DW and B) nano- TiO2 in Hoagland solution............................................................ 41
3.9.2. Pchem results of A) nano-ZnO (Hydrodynamic diameter) in DW and B)
nano-ZnO (Zeta Potential) in DW............................................................. 43
โ
ฃ. Discussion............................................................................................................... 45
โ
ค. References.............................................................................................................. 50Maste