24 research outputs found

    A thermodynamic study of mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic L-arabinose isomerases: the effects of divalent metal ions on protein stability at elevated temperatures

    Get PDF
    To gain insight into the structural stability of homologous homo-tetrameric l-arabinose isomerases (AI), we have examined the isothermal guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl)-induced unfolding of AIs from mesophilic Bacillus halodurans (BHAI), thermophilic Geobacillus stearothermophilus (GSAI), and hyperthermophilic Thermotoga maritima (TMAI) using circular dichroism spectroscopy. The GdnHCl-induced unfolding of the AIs can be well described by a two-state reaction between native tetramers and unfolded monomers, which directly confirms the validity of the linear extrapolation method to obtain the intrinsic stabilities of these proteins. The resulting unfolding free energy (Ξ”GU) values of the AIs as a function of temperature were fit to the Gibbs–Helmholtz equation to determine their thermodynamic parameters based on a two-state mechanism. Compared with the stability curves of BHAI in the presence and absence of Mn2+, those of holo GSAI and TMAI were more broadened than those of the apo enzymes at all temperatures, indicating increased melting temperatures (Tm) due to decreased heat capacity (Ξ”Cp). Moreover, the extent of difference in Ξ”Cp between the apo and holo thermophilic AIs is larger than that of BHAI. From these studies, we suggest that the metal dependence of the thermophilic AIs, resulting in the reduced Ξ”Cp, may play a significant role in structural stability compared to their mesophilic analogues, and that the extent of metal dependence of AI stability seems to be highly correlated to oligomerization.ope

    A Study on Grammar Education Utilizing Colloquial Expressions Found in Written Text

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό(κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ „κ³΅), 2023. 2. ꡬ본관.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μŒμ„± 기반 μ˜μ‚¬μ†Œν†΅μ˜ 본질적 속성인 ꡬ어성에 μ£Όλͺ©ν•˜μ—¬, ν•™μŠ΅μžκ°€ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈλ₯Ό μƒμ‚°ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μœ ν˜•μ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ„ 효과적으둜 ν™œμš©ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” λŠ₯λ ₯을 길러주기 μœ„ν•œ ꡐ윑 λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ²΄κ³„ν™”ν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” ꡬ어성에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식과 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™œμš© μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ 정신ꡬ쑰적 μž‘μš©μ— λŒ€ν•œ 본질적 λ¬ΌμŒμ— ν„°ν•˜κ³  있으며, μΈκ°„μ˜ 사고(思考)와 언어적 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ κΈ΄λ°€ν•œ μƒν˜Έ μž‘μš© 관계λ₯Ό νƒκ΅¬ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ κ΅¬μ²΄ν™”λœλ‹€. ꡬ어가 λ§μ†Œλ¦¬λΌλŠ” ν‘œν˜„ 맀체둜 μ‹€ν˜„λ˜λŠ” μ–Έμ–΄λ‘œμ„œ 자료체 μΈ΅μœ„μ˜ κ°œλ…μ΄λΌλ©΄ κ΅¬μ–΄μ²΄λŠ” λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œ ν•„μžμ— μ˜ν•΄ μ˜λ„μ μœΌλ‘œ μ„ νƒλœ 문체의 성격을 지녀 μœ ν‘œμ„±μ„ 띠게 λœλ‹€. μš°λ¦¬λŠ” 특히 μΈκ°„μ˜ 사고가 μž‘λ™ν•˜λŠ” 관념 μΈ΅μœ„μ˜ κ°œλ…μœΌλ‘œμ„œ ꡬ어성에 μ£Όλͺ©ν•  ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. ꡬ어성은 ꡬ어와 ꡬ어체에 ꡬ어적인 ν‘œν˜„ νŠΉμ„±μ„ λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 근원적 자질이기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ€ 본질적 μ†μ„±μœΌλ‘œμ„œμ˜ ꡬ어성 μ„ΈλΆ€ μžμ§ˆμ„ κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 보닀 상세화될 수 μžˆλ‹€. 이듀은 ν•„μžμ˜ 관념 μΈ΅μœ„μ—μ„œ μž‘μš©ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ— λŒ€ν™”μ  속성을 λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ„ μ‹€ν˜„ν•œλ‹€. 1) λ§₯λ½μ˜μ‘΄μ„±μ€ μƒλž΅ ν‘œν˜„κ³Ό 인용 ν‘œν˜„μ„ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜λŠ” 데 μž‘μš©ν•œλ‹€. 2) 선쑰성은 병렬 ν‘œν˜„κ³Ό μ„œμˆ μ  ν‘œν˜„, 3) μ‹€μ‹œκ°„μ„±μ€ 첨가 ν‘œν˜„κ³Ό 반볡 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™œμš©κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœλ‹€. 4) μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©μ„±μ€ μ˜λ¬Έν˜•, λͺ…λ Ήν˜•, μ²­μœ ν˜•, κ°νƒ„ν˜• ν‘œν˜„μ΄λ‚˜ 비격식적 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™œμš© κΈ°λ°˜μ„ λ§ˆλ ¨ν•΄μ€€λ‹€. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œλŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ΄ ν™œμš©λ¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λ‹€μ±„λ‘œμš΄ ν‘œν˜„ 효과λ₯Ό μœ λ°œν•˜κΈ°λ„ ν•œλ‹€. λΆ€λ“œλŸ¬μ›€μ΄λ‚˜ 친근감과 같은 μ •μ˜μ  효과λ₯Ό λΆ€μ—¬ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜, λ…μžμ™€μ˜ 적극적인 μƒν˜Έ μž‘μš©μ„ μ΄‰μ§„ν•˜λŠ”κ°€ ν•˜λ©΄, ν•„μžμ˜ 주관적인 μƒκ°Β·κ΄€μ Β·κ°œμ„± λ“±μœΌλ‘œ λŒ€λ³€λ˜λŠ” λͺ©μ†Œλ¦¬(voice)λ₯Ό μƒμƒν•˜κ²Œ λ“œλŸ¬λƒ„μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 섀득λ ₯ μžˆλŠ” κΈ€μ“°κΈ°λ₯Ό κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κ²Œ ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λ•Œ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό κ°•ν™”ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈλ₯Ό μƒμ‚°ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ“°κΈ° λ§₯λ½μ΄λ‚˜ μ–Έμ–΄ κ·œλ²” 같은 λ¬Έμ–΄μ„± μš”μΈκ³Όμ˜ 볡합적인 μƒν˜Έ μž‘μš©μ„ ν•„μˆ˜μ μœΌλ‘œ κ³ λ €ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. ν•œνŽΈ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© 양상을 μ‹€μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œ ν¬μ°©ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 고등학ꡐ ν•™μŠ΅μž 32λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν™œλ™ 과제λ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό ꡬ어성에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식 μΈ΅μœ„λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ ν‘œμΈ΅μ /심측적 인식 양상을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™œμš© μˆ˜μ€€μ„ κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ λ‹¨μˆœν•œ/μ •κ΅ν•œ ν™œμš© 양상을 λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν•΄λ‹Ή 기쀀을 μ μš©ν•  λ•Œ, ν•™μŠ΅μž μœ ν˜•μ€ 크게 μ—¬μ„― κ°€μ§€λ‘œ λ²”μ£Όν™”λœλ‹€. μ œν•œμ  μΈμ‹ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 1)μ΄λ‚˜ 문어체 ν™œμš©ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 2)은 λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό κΈ°λŒ€ν•˜κΈ° μ–΄λ €μš΄ κ²½μš°μ— ν•΄λ‹Ήν•œλ‹€. ν•œμ •μ  ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 3)μ΄λ‚˜ 뢀뢄적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 4)은 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μ•½ν•œ κ²½μš°μ΄λ‹€. 잠재적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 5)κ³Ό 효과적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜•(μœ ν˜• 6)은 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ νš¨κ³Όκ°€ κ°•ν•œ κ²½μš°μ— ν¬ν•¨λœλ‹€. ꡬ어성과 ꡬ어체가 λ§ΊλŠ” κ΄€κ³„λ‘œλΆ€ν„° λ„μΆœλ˜λŠ” 사고와 ν‘œν˜„μ„ ν–₯ν•œ 본질적 λ¬ΌμŒμ€ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ μ˜μ†μ  이해λ₯Ό μΆ”λ™ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ λ°±μ›Œλ“œ 섀계 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ 톡해 κ΅¬λ„ν™”λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ¨Όμ € λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ„ μ •κ΅ν•˜κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³ , λŠ₯λ™μ μœΌλ‘œ νƒκ΅¬ν•˜λ©°, 적극적으둜 ν™œμš©ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” μ—­λŸ‰ 함양을 λͺ©ν‘œλ‘œ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ 효과적인 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš©μ„ μœ„ν•œ 평가 κ³Όμ œμ™€ 이에 λ”°λ₯Έ 채점 λ£¨λΈŒλ¦­μ„ μ„€κ³„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λμœΌλ‘œλŠ” κ΅μˆ˜Β·ν•™μŠ΅ κ΅­λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ‹€ν–‰ κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ ν•™μŠ΅ κ²½ν—˜ 및 ν™œλ™μ˜ μ‹€λ‘€(ε―¦δΎ‹)λ₯Ό λ§ˆλ ¨ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μΈκ°„μ˜ 관념 μΈ΅μœ„μ—μ„œ μž‘μš©ν•˜λŠ” ꡬ어성을 ν™•μž₯적으둜 재쑰λͺ…ν•˜κ³ , μΈκ°„μ˜ 사고와 언어적 ν‘œν˜„ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ 관계에 λŒ€ν•œ 본질적 λ¬ΌμŒμ„ ν† λŒ€λ‘œ ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ μ˜μ†μ μΈ μ–Έμ–΄ 인식을 좔동할 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ•ˆλ‚΄ν•˜λŠ” ꡐ윑 λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ²΄κ³„ν™”ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μ˜μ˜κ°€ μžˆλ‹€. λ”λΆˆμ–΄ 효과적인 ν‘œν˜„μ„ μœ„ν•œ 언어적 μžμ›μ„ μ¦λŒ€ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ ν•™μŠ΅μžκ°€ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈλ₯Ό μƒμ‚°ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ„ λŠ₯μˆ™ν•˜κ²Œ λΆ€λ € μ“Έ 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ λ•λŠ” ν‘œν˜„ λŠ₯λ ₯을 μ‹ μž₯ν•˜λŠ” 데 κΈ°μ—¬ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° ꡐ윑적 μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ μ œμ‹œν•  수 μžˆλ‹€.The purpose of this study is to design educational methods to develop learners ability to effectively utilize various types of colloquial expressions in the process of producing written text, focusing on orality, an essential attribute of voice-based communication. This is based on the essential question of the psychodynamics between the perception of orality and the use of colloquial expressions, and is embodied by exploring the close interaction between human thought and language. Spoken language is a concept based on medium of speech at the medial aspects, and Colloquial style has the character of a style intentionally selected by the writer in the written text and therefore is considered marked. In particular, we need to pay attention to orality as a concept at the conceptual aspects in which human thought process functions. This is because orality is a fundamental feature that gives colloquial expression characteristics to colloquial style and spoken language. The Colloquial expression in the written text can be more detailed based on the features of orality as an essential attribute. They realize colloquial expression by giving dialogic attributes to written text by acting on the writers conceptual aspects. 1) Context dependency works to construct ellipsis expressionsand quotation expressions. 2) Linearity is related to the use of parataxis expression and verbal expression, and 3) real-time is related to the use of additive expression and repetitive expression. 4) Interactivity provides the basis for the use of interrogative, imperative, propositive, exclamative expression or informal expression. In written text, various colloquial expressions can cause various rhetorical effects. It allows writing with power by giving affective effects such as tenderness or familiarity, promoting active interaction with audience, and vividly revealing the voice represented by writers subjective thoughts, perspectives, and individuality. At this time, in order to strengthen the effect of colloquial expression, complex interactions with literary factors such as writing customs and language code must be considered in the production of written text. Meanwhile, this study was carried out on 32 high school learners to analyze and describe learners use of colloquial expressions in written text. The result showed that it was divided into surface/deep perception according to the level of perception of orality, and it also could be divided into simple/refined use according to the level of use of colloquial expression. When applying the criteria, the learner types are categorized into six categories. 1) limited recognition type, and 2) literacy utilization type. In these case, it is difficult to expect the effect of colloquial expression in written text. 3) limited orality utilization type, and 4) partial orality utilization type. In these case, the effect of colloquial expression on written text is weak. 5) potential orality utilization type, and 6) effective orality utilization type. In these case, the effect of colloquial expression in written text is strong enough. The essential questions pertaining to the relationship between thought and language, like the one between orality and colloquial expressions, are structured through a backward design model to drive learners enduring understanding. First, the goal of Grammar Education Utilizing Colloquial Expressions Found in Written Text is to cultivate the ability to finely recognize, actively explore, and actively utilize various colloquial expressions in written texts. Second, the assessment task and rubric are planned for effective use of colloquial expression. Third, authentic examples of practical learning experiences and activities in the teaching and learning are designed by a researcher. The importance of this study lies in that it designs an educational method that extensively re-examines orality working on the human conceptual aspects and guides learners to drive enduring language awareness based on essential questions about the relationship between human thought and language. In addition, educational implications can be found in that by increasing linguistic resources for effective expression, it can contribute to enhancing expression skills that help learners use various colloquial expressions in the process of producing written text.I. μ„œ λ‘  1 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 및 λͺ©μ  1 2. 연ꡬ사 9 2.1. κ΅¬μ–΄μ²΄μ˜ 이해에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ 10 2.2. κ΅¬μ–΄μ²΄μ˜ ν™œμš©μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ 18 3. 연ꡬ 방법 및 자료 21 3.1. 연ꡬ 방법 21 3.2. 연ꡬ 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘ κ³Όμ •κ³Ό λ‚΄μš© 25 II. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ λ…Όμ˜μ˜ ν† λŒ€ 32 1. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™•μž₯적 κ°œλ… 정립 32 1.1. ꡬ어체 κ΄€λ ¨ κ°œλ…κ³Ό ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 32 1.2. ꡬ어성 μ„ΈλΆ€ 자질과 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 42 2. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ μœ ν˜•κ³Ό νŠΉμ„± 54 2.1. λ§₯λ½μ˜μ‘΄μ„±μ— λ”°λ₯Έ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 57 1) μƒλž΅ ν‘œν˜„ 57 2) 인용 ν‘œν˜„ 61 2.2. 선쑰성에 λ”°λ₯Έ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 64 1) 병렬 ν‘œν˜„ 65 2) μ„œμˆ μ  ν‘œν˜„ 67 2.3. μ‹€μ‹œκ°„μ„±μ— λ”°λ₯Έ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 69 1) 첨가 ν‘œν˜„ 70 2) 반볡 ν‘œν˜„ 72 2.4. μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©μ„±μ— λ”°λ₯Έ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 74 1) μ˜λ¬Έν˜•, λͺ…λ Ήν˜•, μ²­μœ ν˜•, κ°νƒ„ν˜• ν‘œν˜„ 75 2) 비격식적 ν‘œν˜„ 78 3. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ν™œμš© 83 3.1. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ ꡬ성 83 1) ꡬ어성과 λ¬Έμ–΄μ„±μ˜ 볡합적 μƒν˜Έ μž‘μš© 83 2) λ§ν•˜λ“―μ΄ 쓰기와 ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ 86 3.2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ 효과 90 1) ν•„μž μΈ‘λ©΄ 90 2) λ…μž μΈ‘λ©΄ 91 3) ν…μŠ€νŠΈ μΈ‘λ©΄ 93 4. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 κ΅­μ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ  μœ„μƒ 95 4.1. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© κ΄€λ ¨ κΈ°μ‘΄ ꡐ윑의 λ°˜μ„±μ  κ²€ν†  95 1) κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 및 κ΅κ³Όμ„œ 차원 95 (1) κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 차원 96 (2) κ΅κ³Όμ„œ 차원 105 2) ν•™μŠ΅μž κ²½ν—˜ 및 인식 차원 111 (1) κ΅¬μ–΄λ¬Έμ–΄μ˜ νŠΉμ„±μ— λŒ€ν•œ ꡐ윑 κ²½ν—˜ 111 (2) ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš©μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν”Όλ“œλ°± κ²½ν—˜ 113 (3) κ΅¬μ–΄μ²΄λ¬Έμ–΄μ²΄μ˜ 관계에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식 114 4.2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 의의 117 1) κ΅¬μ–΄μ„±μ˜ νšŒλ³΅μ„ ν†΅ν•œ μ–Έμ–΄ 인식 ν™•μž₯ 117 2) 효과적인 ν‘œν˜„μ„ μœ„ν•œ 언어적 μžμ› μ¦λŒ€ 119 III. ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© 양상 뢄석 122 1. 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘ 및 뢄석 방법 122 1.1. 과제 섀계 및 λ‚΄μš© 122 1) 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘ λŒ€μƒ 123 2) μ œμ‹œλ¬Έ μ„ μ • 125 3) 과제 μˆ˜ν–‰ 단계 130 1.2. 자료 뢄석 κΈ°μ€€ 및 방법 134 1) 자료 뢄석 κΈ°μ€€ 134 2) 자료 뢄석 방법 142 2. ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© 양상 뢄석 144 2.1. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ 효과λ₯Ό κΈ°λŒ€ν•˜κΈ° μ–΄λ €μš΄ 경우 145 1) μœ ν˜• 1: μ œν•œμ  μΈμ‹ν˜• 145 2) μœ ν˜• 2: 문어체 ν™œμš©ν˜• 147 2.2. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μ•½ν•œ 경우 153 1) μœ ν˜• 3: ν•œμ •μ  ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜• 153 2) μœ ν˜• 4: 뢀뢄적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜• 156 2.3. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„μ˜ νš¨κ³Όκ°€ κ°•ν•œ 경우 158 1) μœ ν˜• 5: 잠재적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜• 158 2) μœ ν˜• 6: 효과적 ꡬ어체 ν™œμš©ν˜• 160 3. ν•™μŠ΅μžμ˜ λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© 양상 λΆ„μ„μ˜ μ‹œμ‚¬μ  164 3.1. ꡬ어성에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식 심화확μž₯의 ν•„μš”μ„± 164 3.2. ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ꡬ성 및 ν™œμš© λŠ₯λ ₯ μ •κ΅ν™”μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 168 IV. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 μ‹€μ œ 173 1. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑 μ„€κ³„μ˜ ꡬ도화 173 1.1. λ°±μ›Œλ“œ 섀계 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ ν†΅ν•œ ꡐ윑 λ°©μ•ˆ 섀계 κ³Όμ • 173 1.2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ 체계 ν‹€ 177 2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 λͺ©ν‘œ 181 2.1. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 λͺ©ν‘œ 181 2.2. μ˜μ†μ  이해λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ ꡐ윑 λͺ©ν‘œμ˜ μž¬κ΅¬μ„± 185 2.3. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ κΈ°λ³Έ 원리 187 3. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 평가 κ³„νš 189 3.1. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 μˆ˜ν–‰κ³Όμ œ 190 3.2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 채점 루브릭 193 4. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 μ‹€μ œ 196 4.1. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ κ΅μˆ˜ν•™μŠ΅ λͺ¨ν˜• 196 4.2. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 ν•™μŠ΅ κ²½ν—˜κ³Ό μˆ˜μ—… κ³„νš 201 4.3. λ¬Έμ–΄ ν…μŠ€νŠΈμ—μ„œμ˜ ꡬ어체 ν‘œν˜„ ν™œμš© ꡐ윑의 μ˜ˆμ‹œ 204 V. κ²° λ‘  216 μ°Έ κ³  λ¬Έ ν—Œ 221 λΆ€ 둝 236 Abstract 242석

    Origins of the structure and strategy of reconstituting scholarly articles in Hanseongsunbo

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› μΈλ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™ ꡭ사학과, 2017. 8. 문쀑양.λ³Έ 논문은 μ‘°μ„  졜초의 κ·ΌλŒ€μ  μ‹ λ¬ΈμœΌλ‘œ μ•Œλ €μ§„ γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ 지성사적 의미λ₯Ό κ³ μ°°ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹λŠ” 1883λ…„ 10μ›”λΆ€ν„° κ°‘μ‹ μ •λ³€μ˜ μ—¬νŒŒλ‘œ νκ°„λ˜κΈ°κΉŒμ§€ μ•½ 1λ…„ λ™μ•ˆ μ‘°μ„  μ •λΆ€κ°€ λ°œκ°„ν•œ 맀체둜, κ°œν•­ ν›„ θ¬εœ‹ε…¬ζ³•μœΌλ‘œ ν‘œμƒλ˜λŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ ꡭ제 μ§ˆμ„œμ— μ μ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μ‘°μ„ μ˜ 정책적 μ‚°λ¬Όμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 이에 γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹ μ§€λ©΄μ˜ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ€ κΈ‰λ³€ν•˜λŠ” ꡭ제 μ •μ„Έ 보도 기사와 μ„œμ–‘ 지식을 μ†Œκ°œν•˜λŠ” ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λ‘œ μ±„μ›Œμ Έ μžˆλ‹€. γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ 필진은 창간사λ₯Ό 톡해 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 지식과 정보듀에 λŒ€ν•œ 포폄(θ€’θ²Ά)κ³Ό κΆŒμ§•(勸懲)의 λœ»μ„ λ‹΄κ³ μž ν–ˆλ‹€. λ‹€μ‹œ 말해 그듀은, μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 지식에 λŒ€ν•œ 도덕적, 학문적 기쀀을 μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ² λ‹€λŠ” λœ»μ„ λΆ„λͺ…νžˆ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν•„μ§„μ˜ 취지가 κ°€μž₯ 잘 반영된 것은 μ„œμ–‘ 지식을 μ†Œκ°œν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬μ΄λ‹€. 이듀 ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λŠ” γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹ 필진듀이 λ‹ΉλŒ€ λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„μ—μ„œ ν†΅μš©λ˜λ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ„œν•™μ„œμ™€ μž‘μ§€λ“€λ‘œλΆ€ν„° κ΄€λ ¨ 지식을 μ„ λ³„ν•˜κ³  μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•œ κ²ƒμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. λ°”λ‘œ 그와 같은 속성은 γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ가 언둠사적 μ˜μ˜μ— λͺ»μ§€μ•Šκ²Œ 지성사적 λ§₯락으둜 ν™•μž₯되고 μ‹¬ν™”λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•  ν•„μš”λ₯Ό μ›…λ³€ν•œλ‹€. λ³Έ 논문은 λ¨Όμ € 지적 κ΅¬μ„±λ¬Όλ‘œμ„œμ˜ γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹κ°€ 가진 ꡬ성적 νŠΉμ§•μ˜ 연원을 μΆ”μ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 외ꡭ기사에 νŽΈμ€‘λœ νŽΈμ§‘μ€ γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹ μ°½κ°„ μ€€λΉ„λ₯Ό μ£Όλ„ν•œ μœ κΈΈμ€€μ˜ μ§„λ‹¨λŒ€λ‘œ λ‚™ν›„λœ ꡐ톡과 μ‚¬μ‹€μ˜ 보도에 λŒ€ν•œ κ±°λΆ€κ°μœΌλ‘œ 인해 1880λ…„λŒ€ μ‘°μ„ μ˜ ν˜„μ‹€ μ†μ—μ„œλŠ” 차라리 κ°•μš”λœ 선택에 κ°€κΉŒμ› λ‹€. 그에 λΉ„ν•΄ ꡭ제 정세와 μ„œμ–‘ 지식을 μ†Œκ°œν•˜λŠ” 외ꡭ기사듀은 μ‘°μ„  μ •λΆ€κ°€ μ •μ±…μ μœΌλ‘œ μˆ˜μ§‘ν•œ ζ™‚ε‹™μ„œμ λ“€κ³Ό μ™Έκ΅­μ˜ 정기간행물듀에 λ‹΄κΈ΄ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 정보듀을 ν™œμš©ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ 세뢀적인 지면 ꡬ성은 ν›„μΏ μžμ™€ μœ ν‚€μΉ˜(福澀諭吉)κ°€ μ°½κ°„ν•œ 일본의 γ€Šζ™‚δΊ‹ζ–°ε ±γ€‹λ‘œλΆ€ν„° 영ν–₯을 λ°›μ•˜μ„ κ²ƒμ΄λΌλŠ” 톡념과 달리, 19μ„ΈκΈ° μ€‘κ΅­μ—μ„œ ν™œλ™ν•œ κ°œμ‹ κ΅ 선ꡐ사듀이 지식 μ„ κ΅μ˜ λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ λ°œκ°„ν•œ μž‘μ§€ν˜• μ •κΈ°κ°„ν–‰λ¬Όλ“€κ³Ό 맀우 ν‘μ‚¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 특히 γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹λŠ” 1874λ…„λΆ€ν„° μƒν•΄μ—μ„œ λ°œκ°„λœ γ€Šθ¬εœ‹ε…¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ μ²΄μž¬μ™€ 의제λ₯Ό 상당뢀뢄 κ³΅μœ ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ νŒλ‹¨λœλ‹€. γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ 지성사적 μ˜μ˜λŠ” κ·Έ κ΅¬μ„±μ˜ 연원은 λ¬Όλ‘  ν•¨κ»˜ 전체 ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬μ˜ 뢄야와 μΆœμ²˜μ™€ μ£Όμš” λ‚΄μš©μ— λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석을 ν•„μš”λ‘œ ν•œλ‹€. ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λŠ” λ‹ΉλŒ€ μ‘°μ„  μ •λΆ€μ˜ μ„œμ  μˆ˜μ§‘μ„ 톡해 μΆ•μ λœ 지식 μ•„μΉ΄μ΄λΈŒλ₯Ό 기반으둜 ν•œ κΈ€λ“€μ΄λ―€λ‘œ, μˆ˜μ§‘λœ μ„œμ μ˜ κ²½ν–₯성은 곧 ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬μ— κ·ΈλŒ€λ‘œ λ°˜μ˜λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 좜처λ₯Ό μ μ‹œν•˜κ³  μžˆμ§€ μ•Šμ€ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„ ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λ“€μ˜ ν™œμš© μΆœμ²˜λŠ” 기쑴에 μ•Œλ €μ§„ 것보닀 훨씬 더 λ‹€μ–‘ν–ˆλ‹€. ν•œμ—­μ„œν•™μ„œμ™€ 청의 지식 μž‘μ§€λ“€μ€ λ¬Όλ‘  일뢀 μΌμ—­μ„œν•™μ„œλ„ ν™œμš©ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ ν™•μΈλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ κΈ°μ‚¬μ˜ μΆœμ²˜κ°€ 규λͺ…됨에 따라 λΉ„λ‘œμ†Œ 기사 내에 ν˜Όμž¬λ˜μ–΄ 있던 지식 정보와 그에 λŒ€ν•œ ν•„μ§„μ˜ 해석을 ꡬ별할 수 있게 λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, ν•„μ§„λ“€μ˜ 지식 μž¬κ΅¬μ„± 양상이 λ“œλŸ¬λ‚˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 필진듀은 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 지식에 λŒ€ν•œ 사견을 덧뢙이기도 ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , ν•„μš”μ— 따라 볡수의 μΆœμ²˜λ‘œλΆ€ν„° 지식을 λͺ¨μ•„ μƒˆλ‘­κ²Œ 기사λ₯Ό κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κΈ°λ„ ν–ˆλ‹€. κ·Έ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ μ„œμ–‘ 지식에 λŒ€ν•œ μ€‘κ΅­μ˜ λ²ˆμ—­κ³Ό 일본의 λ²ˆμ—­μ΄ ν•œ 기사 λ‚΄μ—μ„œ κ³΅μ‘΄ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λŠ” κ²½μš°λ„ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ„œμ–‘μ„ λͺ¨λ°©ν•œ 메이지 일본의 μ œλ„μ— λŒ€ν•œ 관심은 μΌλ³ΈμœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° μˆ˜μ§‘ν•œ μ„œμ μ˜ μ’…λ₯˜λŠ” λ¬Όλ‘ , μ„œμ–‘μ˜ μ œλ„λ₯Ό μ†Œκ°œν•˜λŠ” ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λ“€μ˜ μ„œμ‚¬ ꡬ쑰에도 μ§€λŒ€ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―Έμ³€λ‹€. μ΄λ ‡κ²Œ γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬λ“€μ€ μ§€μ‹μ˜ μ„ λ³„μ΄λΌλŠ” μ˜λ―ΈλŠ” λ¬Όλ‘  지식 자체의 μž¬κ΅¬μ„±μ΄λΌλŠ” μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλ„ μ†ŒκΈ°μ˜ μ„±κ³Όλ₯Ό κ±°λ‘μ—ˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ‘°μ„  역사상 졜초의 μ‹œλ„μ˜€λ˜ 정기간행물을 ν†΅ν•œ μ„œμ–‘ μ§€μ‹μ˜ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±μ˜ μ„±κ³ΌλŠ” μ œν•œμ μΌ μˆ˜λ°–μ— μ—†μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 뢈과 1년에 그친 λ°œκ°„ 기간은 κ·Έ ν•œκ³„λ₯Ό κ·Ήλ³΅ν•˜κΈ°μ— λ„ˆλ¬΄ 짧은 μ‹œκ°„μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€.머리말 1 δΈ€. γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ ꡬ성적 νŠΉμ§•κ³Ό κ·Έ 연원 9 1.γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ 외ꡭ기사 νŽΈμ€‘μ„±κ³Ό ꡭ내적 λ°°κ²½ 9 2. 19μ„ΈκΈ° 쀑ꡭ μ •κΈ°κ°„ν–‰λ¬Όμ˜ 영ν–₯ 10 二 .γ€ŠζΌ’εŸŽζ—¬ε ±γ€‹μ˜ ν•™μˆ κΈ°μ‚¬ μž¬κ΅¬μ„± 양상 26 1. μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ§€μ‹μ˜ 좕적과 κ·Έ κ²½ν–₯ 28 2. μΆ•μ λœ μ§€μ‹μ˜ μž¬κ΅¬μ„± 37 맺음말 54 λΆ€ν‘œ 1 56 參考文獻 71 Abstract 75Maste

    좩남 인ꢌ 심포지엄(λ¬Έκ²½λž€,μ΄μƒμž¬,이수철,박진)

    No full text
    β—‹ 일 μ‹œ: 2014. 12. 16(ν™”) 14:00~17:00 β—‹ μž₯ μ†Œ: λ•μ‚°μŠ€νŒŒμΊμŠ¬ β—‹ μ£Ό 제: 인ꢌ의 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 도전-μ§€μ—­μ‚¬νšŒμ™€ 인ꢌ β—‹ ν˜• 식: 인ꢌ ν•™μˆ λŒ€νšŒ(심포지움)+토크쇼 β—‹ μ£Ό 졜: 좩청남도, 좩청남도 λ„λ―ΌμΈκΆŒμ¦μ§„μœ„μ›νšŒ, μΆ©λ‚¨λ°œμ „μ—°κ΅¬μ› β—‹ μ£Ό κ΄€: 좩청남도, μΆ©λ‚¨λ°œμ „μ—°κ΅¬μ›1. μ„œμšΈμ‹œ μΈκΆŒμ •μ±…μ˜ 의미 λ¬Έκ²½λž€μ„œμšΈμ‹œ μΈκΆŒμœ„μ›μž₯ 2. μ§€μ—­μ—μ„œ 인ꢌ의 의미 μ΄μƒμž¬λŒ€μ „μΆ©λ‚¨μΈκΆŒμ—°λŒ€ 사무ꡭμž₯ 3. μΆ©λ‚¨μ˜ μΈκΆŒμ •μ±… κΈ°λ³Έκ³„νšμ˜ μ˜λ―Έμ™€ 과제 μ΄μˆ˜μ² μΆ©λ‚¨λ°œμ „μ—°κ΅¬μ› μ±…μž„μ—°κ΅¬μ› 4. κΈ°μ΄ˆμ§€μžμ²΄μ˜ μΈκΆŒμ¦μ§„ 사둀: μˆ˜μ›μ‹œ λ°• μ§„λ‹€μ‚°μΈκΆŒμ„Όν„° μƒμž„ν™œλ™
    corecore