8 research outputs found

    ๋ง‰๋ƒ‰๊ฐํ™€์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์Šคํ„ฐ๋นˆ ๋ธ”๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ ์„ ๋‹จ๋๋ฒฝ ๋ง‰๋ƒ‰๊ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2002.Maste

    Analysis of the impacts of policy tool changes on administrative efficiency

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ „์ž๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜์˜ ๋„์ž…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ–‰์ •ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „์ž๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜์˜ ๋„์ž…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ–‰์ •๋น„์šฉ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์ง€๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ธ ๊ฐ€์‚ฌ๊ฐ„๋ณ‘์„œ๋น„์Šค๋Š” 2008๋…„ 9์›”์— ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ž ์ง€์›๋ฐฉ์‹์—์„œ ์ „์ž๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋œ ๋ณต์ง€์„œ๋น„์Šค๋กœ์„œ ์ •์ฑ…์ˆ˜๋‹จ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ํ–‰์ •ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ค๋ฌธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž์น˜๋‹จ์ฒด ๊ฐ€์‚ฌ๊ฐ„๋ณ‘์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋‹ด๋‹น์ž์˜ ์—…๋ฌด๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ „์ž๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜์˜ ๋„์ž…์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ ๋Œ€๋น„ 0.21%, ๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜ ์ƒ์„ฑ์•ก ๋Œ€๋น„ 0.261%์˜ ํ–‰์ •๋น„์šฉ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „์ž๋ฐ”์šฐ์ฒ˜ ๋„์ž… ์ „/ํ›„์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž์น˜๋‹จ์ฒด๋ณ„ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋น„์šฉ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์‚ฐ ๋Œ€๋น„ 0.218%์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. This paper attempts to examine the impacts of policy tool changes on administrative efficiency. Introducing an electronic voucher system to welfare programs is expected to reduce administrative costs and increase budget allocation efficiency. Even though these hypotheses are supported by the literature on vouchers, empirical research with high internal and external validity is limited. Homecare service, a social welfare program, which had been provided based on the purchase-of-service contracting method, has been offered via an electronic voucher system since 2009. Taking advantage of the policy tool change, the two hypotheses are examined. The results of the analysis reveal that administrative costs have been reduced by 0.21 percent of total program budget and opportunity costs have been decreased by 0.218 percent of total budget due to the increased flexibility in budget allocation
    corecore