4 research outputs found
(An) analysis of job stress in NICU nurses.
μ§μμ¬νκ°νΈνκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
μ΅κ·Ό μ μμμ λν κ΄μ¬μ μ¦κ°μ ν¨κ» μ μμ μ€νμμ€μ μμμ΄ νλλ¨μ λ°λΌ κ·Έκ³³μμ 근무νκ³ μλ κ°νΈμ¬λ€μ μ
무μ ν¨μ¨μ±μ λμ΄κΈ° μν΄μ κ°νΈμ¬λ€μ΄ μ§κ°νλ μ
무 μ€νΈλ μ€ μμμ νμ
νμ¬ κ°νΈμ¬μ μ€νΈλ μ€λ₯Ό κ°μμν€κ±°λ λλ μ€νΈλ μ€μ μ μ ν λμ²ν μ μλ λ°©μμ λͺ¨μνμ¬ λ³΄λ€ λμ κ°νΈλ₯Ό μ§ν₯ν΄μΌ ν νμμ±μ΄ μ κΈ°λλ€.
κ·Έλ¬λ―λ‘ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μ μμ μ€νμμ€ κ°νΈμ¬μ μ
무μ€νΈλ μ€ μμμ νμ
ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄μ λ°λ₯Έ λμ² λ°©μμ λͺ¨μνμ¬ μ
무μ μ μλ ₯μ λμΌ μ μλλ‘ νλλ° κΈ°μ΄μλ£λ‘ νμ©νκ³ μ μλνκ² λμλ€.
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μ μ°κ΅¬λμμ 2001λ
10μ μμΈ λ° μΈμ²μ§μμ λΆν¬λμ΄ μλ 9κ° λνλ³μ μ€ 2μ°¨ λ³μμ΄μμ μ μμ μ€νμμ€μμ 근무νκ³ μλ κ°νΈμ¬ 139λͺ
μ΄λ©°, μλ£μμ§κΈ°κ°μ 2001λ
10μ 10μΌλΆν° 20μΌκΉμ§ 11μΌ λμμ΄μλ€. λ°°λΆλ μ€λ¬Έμ§λ μ΄ 150λΆμμΌλ©° κ·Έ μ€
μμ 139λΆκ° νμλμ΄ νμμ¨μ 93%μ΄μλ€. μ°κ΅¬λꡬλ λ¬Ένκ³ μ°°κ³Ό μ μμ μ€νμμ€μμ 근무νκ³ μλ κ°νΈμ¬λ€κ³Όμ λ©΄λ΄κ³Ό μ€λ¬Έμ§μ‘°μ¬μ μν΄ μ€νΈλ μ€ λ¬Ένμ νμ νκ³ μ λ¬Έκ°μ μλ¬Έμ μ»μ΄μ κ°λ°νμλ€.
μ€νΈλ μ€ μΈ‘μ λꡬλ νμμ§μ κ°νΈμ κ΄λ ¨λ 17κ° λ¬Έν, μ§λ¬΄νκ²½μ κ΄λ ¨λ 8κ° λ¬Έν, λμΈκ΄κ³μ κ΄λ ¨λ 12κ° λ¬Έν, μ§μ λ° κΈ°μ κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨λ 5κ° λ¬Έν, λ³μνμ λ° λ³λκ΄λ¦¬μ κ΄λ ¨λ 7κ° λ¬ΈνμΌλ‘, μ΄ 5κ° μμμ 49κ° λ¬ΈνμΌλ‘ ꡬμ±λμλ€. μλ£ λΆμμ SPSS/PCν
λ‘κ·Έλ¨μΌλ‘ ν΅κ³ μ²λ¦¬νμμΌλ©°, λ¬Ένλ³ μ μλ νκ· , νμ€νΈμ°¨λ₯Ό ꡬνμκ³ , μΌλ°μ νΉμ±μ λ°λ₯Έ μ
λ¬΄λ³ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ νκ· μΉμ μ°¨μ΄ κ²μ μ λ³μμ νΉμ±μ λ°λΌ t-testμ ANOVA(F-test)λ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμλ€.
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ»μ μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
1. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬ λμμμ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ μ΅μ 1.63μμ μ΅κ³ 5.00μ΄μμΌλ©°, νκ· νμ μ 3.72λ‘ μ€μ λ μ΄μμ΄μλ€.
2. μ μμ μ€νμμ€ κ°νΈμ¬κ° κ²½ννλ μμλ³ μ€νΈλ μ€ μμΈμ λμΈκ΄κ³μ λν μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 3.88λ‘ κ°μ₯ λμκ³ , νμμ§μ κ°νΈμ λν μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ 3.84, μ§μ λ° κΈ°μ μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 3.76, λ³μνμ λ° λ³λκ΄λ¦¬μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 3.60, μ§λ¬΄νκ²½μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 3.30μ μμΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€.
3. μμλ³ λ¬Ένμ λ°λ₯Έ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ₯Ό μ΄ν΄λ³΄λ©΄ νμμ§μ κ°νΈ μμμ μμ΄μλ 'λ΄ κ·Όλ¬΄ μκ°μ μκΈ° μνκ° κΈκ²©ν λλΉ μ§κ±°λ μ¬μ₯λ°λμ μ§μ κ°μ μκΈμν©μ΄ μμ£Ό λ°μν λ'μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 4.46μΌλ‘ κ°μ₯ λκ² λνλ¬μΌλ©°, 4μ μ΄μλλ λ¬Ένμ΄ μ΄ 17κ° λ¬Έ
ν μ€ 6κ°μλ€. λμΈκ΄κ³ μμμ μμ΄μλ 'νμκ°νΈμ μκΈμν©μ΄ λ°μνμ κ²½μ° μμ¬μ μ°λ½μ΄ μλ λ'κ° 4.47λ‘ κ°μ₯ λκ² λνλ μ΄ λ¬Ένμ€ κ°μ₯ λμ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ₯Ό 보μ΄κ³ μμλ€. μ§μ λ° κΈ°μ μμμμλ 'νμμ λ¬Έμ κ° λ³΅μ‘νμ¬ κ°νΈμ¬λ‘μ ν΄κ²°νκΈ°μ ν
κ³λ₯Ό λλ λ'μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° 4.05λ‘ κ°μ₯ λκ² λνλ¬λ€.
4. μΌλ°μ νΉμ±μ λ°λ₯Έ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ μμ΄μλ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μν μ°¨μ΄λ 보μ΄μ§ μμλ€.
5. 근무νΉμ±μ λ°λ₯Έ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ μμ΄μλ λ³μμ νμ λ°λ₯Έ λμΈκ΄κ³ μμμμ 3μ°¨ λ³μ(3.98)μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° λκ² λνλ¬μΌλ©° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνμλ€(t=3.88, p<0.05). μ΄κ²½λ ₯μ λ°λ₯Έ λμΈκ΄κ³ μμμ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ μμ΄μλ 근무 5λ
(4.09) κΉμ§ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° μ μ λμμ§λ€κ° 5λ
μ΄ μ§λλ©΄ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° κ°μνλ κ²½ν₯μ 보μ΄κ³ μμΌλ©° κ·Έ μ°¨μ΄λ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μ νμλ€ (F=3.12, p<0.05). μ
무λμ λ°λ₯Έ μ 체 μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμμλ μ΄ μ°κ΅¬ μ€ κ°μ₯ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μν κ²°κ³ΌμμΌλ©°, μ
무λκ³Ό μ§λ¬΄νκ²½Β·μ§μ λ°
κΈ°μ Β·λ³μ νμ λ° λ³λκ΄λ¦¬ μμμ μμ΄μ μ μν μ°¨μ΄λ₯Ό 보μ΄κ³ μλ€ (F=3.42, p<0.05). μ΄μμ μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όμμ μ μμ μ€νμμ€ κ°νΈμ¬μ μ
무 μ€νΈλ μ€ μμ μ€ λμΈκ΄κ³ μμμ λ°λ₯Έ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λκ° κ°μ₯ λκ² λνλ¬μΌλ©°, μ
무 μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ μμ΄μ μ
무λ
μ λ°λ₯Έ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λμ μ°¨μ΄κ° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνμλ€.
κ·Έλ¬λ―λ‘ μ μμ μ€νμμ€μμ 근무νλ κ°νΈμ¬ μ
무κ΄λ ¨ μ€νΈλ μ€ μμΈμ νμμ§μ κ°νΈ μμ, μ§λ¬΄νκ²½ μμ, λμΈκ΄κ³ μμ, μ§μ λ° κΈ°μ μμ, λ³μ νμ λ° λ³λκ΄λ¦¬ μμμΌλ‘ λ€μνλ©°, λͺ¨λ μμμμ κ°νΈμ¬κ° μ§κ° νλ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ λλ€κ³ ν μ μμΌ
λ©° μ΄λ₯Ό μ μ ν μ€μ¬ ν νμκ° μμκ²μ΄λ€.
[μλ¬Έ]
Today increasingly keen interest in neonates leads the domain of the neonate intensive care unit to a multiplied signification. With this in mind this study put its principal objective on grasping job stress patterns that nurses perceive, to enhance the work efficiency of nurses working with neonate intensive care units, groping for strategies for reducing or properly coping for their stress, and then aiming at realizing nursing of better quality.
For that purpose, this study made an attempt to provide fundamental data needed for ameliorating the work adaptability of nurses by grasping job stress patterns of nurses at neonate intensive care units and groping for proper stress management.
Randomly sampled out from nine university hospitals distributed in Seoul and Inchon were 139 nurses who worked with neonate intensive care units, in October 2001. The period of data collection ranged for eleven days from Oct. 10 through 20, 2001. The number of questionnaire forms came to 150 in total, of which 139 were returned, and the return ratio 93%. Study methods depended upon reviews based on the literature, interviews with those nurses who worked with neonate intensive care units, and a questionnaire poll, in which questions were posed by the advise of specialists.
The stress-measuring tool consisted of 17 questions as to direct nursing of patients, 8 ones as to working conditions, 12 ones as to interpersonal relations, 5 ones as to knowledge and technology, 7 ones as to hospital administration and ward management, totaling to 49 ones out of five domains. Data analysis processed with statistic treatment with the SPSS/PC program. Rating was based on mean scores and standard deviations, and difference tests of mean values on stress levels by duty
had recourse to t-test or ANOVA (F-test) according to the characteristics of variables.
Resultant findings were revealed, as follows:
1. The stress value of the respondents was from as low as 1.63 times to as high as 5.00 times as much as the moderate level and the mean score was 3.72, a level higher than the moderate one.
2. As for stress factors by domain that neonate intensive care unit nurses experience, stress related to interpersonal relations showed the highest score, 3.88, that related to direct nursing of patients 3.84, that related to knowledge and technology 3.76, that related to hospital administration and ward management 3.60, and thatrelated to working conditions 3.30.
3. As regards stress levels by question in each of domains, the highest level of stress, a score of 4.46, emerged 'when the health condition of those neonates becomes deteriorated while I am on duty or such an emergency situation as cardiac arrest often occurs,' and the number of questions indicating a score higherthan 4 pointed to 6 of 17 questions in total. In the domain ofinterpersonal relations, the highest stress level, 4.47, was represented 'when I fail to contact to a doctor at the time ofoccurrence of an emergency situation,' reflecting the highest score in all questions.' In the domain of knowledge and technology, the highest stress level, 4.05, was shown 'when I feel my limits as a nurse to solve the problem of a neonate patient because it is too complicate.'
4. No statistically significant difference was shown of stress levels by general characteristics.
5. On the stress levels by the characteristics of duties, the highest level of stress, 3.98, was disclosed from the third grade hospital in the domain of Interpersonal relations by hospital type, beingstatistically significant (t=3.88, p<0.05). The stress level of the domain of interpersonal relations by overall
experience gradually increased up to the fifth year of service with a score of 4.09, and then decreased posterior to the fifth year, and the difference was statistically significant (p=3.12, p<0.05). The aggregate stress level by workload revealed the highest statistical significance in this study, and a statistically significant difference was shown in domains such as workload, working conditions, knowledge, technology, hospital administration, and ward management(F=3.42, p<0.05). As aforementioned, the highest stress level was disclosed fromthe domain of interpersonal relations among work stress domains of nurses at neonate intensive care units, and stress levels byworkload pointed to a statistically significant difference.
Therefore, work-related stress factors of nurses who were working with neonate intensive care units consisted of such domains as direct nursing of patients, working conditions, interpersonal relations, knowledge and technology, hospital
administration and ward management, and stress levels in all the domains are presumed to be generally high, thereupon appropriate intervention is necessitated for better nursing.ope