28 research outputs found
A Study on Determination of family health worker in rural area
보건νκ³Ό/μμ¬[μλ¬Έ]
[νκΈ]
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μ΅κ·Ό λμ΄λ³΄κ±΄μλ£μλ²μ¬μ
μμ μ΄μ©νλ 리(ι)μμ€μ μ΄λ¨Έλ보건μμμΈ κ°
μ 건κ°μμμ νλκ³Ό μ΄μ©μ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈλ€μ ꡬλͺ
ν΄ λ³΄κ³ μ μνλμλ€. νΉν κ°μ
건κ°μμμ μν μ€ κ°μ₯ μ€μνλ€κ³ μΈμ λλ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈκ³Ό μ§μμ£Όλ―Όλ€
μ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν μ§μ, νλ κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμ μ΄μ©μ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μ
μΈλ€μ λΆμνμλ€.
μ‘°μ¬λμμ κ²½κΈ°λ κ°νκ΅° μ μ, λ΄κ° 2κ°λ©΄μ 1977λ
8μ 1μΌ νμ¬ 3κ°μμ΄μ κ±°μ£Όν
μ κ°κ΅¬μ μ 2κ°λ©΄μμ νλνκ³ μλ κ°μ 건κ°μμ 20λͺ
μ μμΌλ‘ νμλ€. κ° κ°κ΅¬μ λ
ν΄μλ 30%λ₯Ό νλ³ΈμΆμΆνμ¬ λ©΄μ μ‘°μ¬λ₯Ό νμκ³ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν΄μλ μ μμ΄ μ§λ¬Έμμ
λν΄ μκΈ° μ€μ€λ‘ κΈ°μ
, μ μΆνλλ‘ νμ¬ μλ£λ₯Ό μμ§νμλ€.
μ‘°μ¬λ΄μ©μ μ£Όλ―Όμ νΉμ±, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ νΉμ±, 보건μ¬μ
μ‘°μ§μμ νΉμ±, κ°μ 건κ°μμ
μ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λ, μ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν μ§μ λ° νλ κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμ
μ΄μ©μ λ λ±μ 7κ°λ‘ ν¬κ² λΆλ₯νμλ€. λΆμμ μμ 7κ°μ λ΄μ©μ λ³μκ΅°μΌλ‘ νμ¬ 41κ°
μ λ³μλ‘ λλμ΄ μννμλ€.
λΆμμ μνμ¬λ κ°μ 건κ°μμ μ΄μ©μ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈμ κ΄ν λͺ¨νμ κ°λ°νμ¬ μ΄μ©
νμλ€.
λΆμλ°©λ²μ λ¨Όμ μμ 41κ° λ³μλ€κ°μ Pearson μκ΄κ³μλ₯Ό κ³μ°νμ¬ λ
립λ³μ κ°μ κ°
μ(association)μ΄ λΉκ΅μ μ μ λ³μλ₯Ό μ μ νμκ³ μ΄ μ μ λ λ³μλ€λ‘μ¨ λ¨κ³μ μ€ν¬κ·λΆ
μ(Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis)μ νμ¬ λͺ¨νμ λ°λ₯Έ κ° λ¨κ³λ³ μ’
μλ³μμ
λν λ
립λ³μλ€μ μ€λͺ
μ λλ₯Ό μΈ‘μ νμλ€.
μ‘°μ¬μ±μ μ μμ½νλ©΄ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
1) κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈμΌλ‘λ λΆμΈμ λΆλ
ν μ°Έμμ λ, μ£Όλ―Ό
μ§μμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ§κΉμ§μ μ€μ 거리, κ°κ΅¬μ£Όμ λμ΄ λ° λ¦¬λ³κ°κ΅¬μ λ±μ΄ μμμλ λ³
μλ‘ μ μ λμλ€. μμ 4κ° λ³μλ‘ 11.6%λ₯Ό μ€λͺ
ν μ μμλ€.
μ΄μ€ λΆμΈμ λΆλ
νμ°Έμμ λκ° κ°μ₯ ν¬κ² μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€. μ΄λ 첫째,
νμμ λΆλ
νμ μμ£Ό μ°Έμνλ λΆμΈμ μ¬νμνμ μ κ·Ήμ μ΄λ©° λ€λΌμ κ°μ 건κ°μμκ³Όμ
μ μ΄λ λ§μ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ΄ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έλ λ§μ΄ νμ κ²μΌλ‘ μκ°ν μ μλ€. λμ§Έλ‘ κ°μ
건κ°μμμ΄ λΆλ
νμ₯μ κ²Έμν κ²½μ°κ° λ§μ λΆλ
ν μ°Έμμ¨μ΄ λμ λΆμΈκ³Όλ μμ£Ό μ μ΄ν
μ μμκΈ° λλ¬ΈμΈ κ²μΌλ‘ μΆμΈ‘λλ€.
2) μ§μμ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν μ§μμ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈμΌλ‘λ κ°μ 건κ°μμκ³Όμ
μλμ λ, μΉλΆμ λ, λ―Έμ·¨ν μλμ, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λ, λΆμΈμ λΆλ
ν μ°Έμ
μ λ, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ±°μ£ΌκΈ°κ°, μ£Όλ―Όμ κ²½μ μν λ° λ¦¬λ³κ°κ΅¬μ λ±μ΄ μμμλ λ³μλ‘
μ μ λμλ€. μμ 8κ° λ³μλ‘ 23.4%λ₯Ό μ€λͺ
ν μ μμλ€.
3) κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν νλμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμΌλ‘λ κ°μ 건κ°μμκ³Όμ μλμ λ,
λ―Έμ·¨νμλμ, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λ, μ£Όλ―Όμ§μμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ§κΉμ§μ μ€μ κ±°
리, κ°κ΅¬μμ, κ°μ 건κ°μμ νλκΈ°κ° λ±μ΄ μμμλ λ³μλ‘ μ μ λμμΌλ©° μ΄ 6κ°μ λ³μ
λ‘ 27.4%λ₯Ό μ€λͺ
ν μ μμλ€.
κ°μ 건κ°μμκ³Όμ μλμ λ, μΉλΆμ λ, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λ κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κ°μ 건κ°
μμμ λ§μλ΄ κ±°μ£ΌκΈ°κ°λ±μ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λν μ§μκ³Ό νλμ λͺ¨λ μν₯μ λ―Έμ³€λ€. λ°
λΌμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λ§μλ΄ κ±°μ£ΌκΈ°κ°κ³Ό λ리μ¬λκ³Όμ μΉλΆμ λ λ° λ²μλ₯Ό κ³ λ €νμ¬ μ μ
νλ©° μ¬μ
μνμμλ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ μμ μ λμ΄μΌ νκ² λ€.
4) μ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμ λ°©λ¬Έμ λμ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈμΌλ‘λ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έ
μ λ, κ°μ 건κ°μμκ³Όμ μΉλΆμ λ, μ£Όλ―Όμ§μμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ§κΉμ§μ μκ°μ 거리, κ°μ
건κ°μμμ μ
무μ λν μΈμ§λ, λ―Έμ·¨νμλμ, κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λμ΄, λ§μμμ 보건μ§μ
κΉμ§μ 거리λ±μ΄ μμμλ λ³μλ‘ μ μ λμλ€. μμ 7κ° λ³μλ‘ 32.4%λ₯Ό μ€λͺ
ν μ μμ
λ€.
μ΄μ€ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λκ° μ£Όλ―Όμ΄ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ μ°Ύμκ°λλ° κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯
μ λ―Έμ³€λ€. κ°μ 건κ°μμμ λμ΄λ μ€νλ € λμμλ‘ μ£Όλ―Όμ΄ μμ£Ό μ°Ύμμ€λ κ²½ν₯μ 보μλ€
. λ§μμμ 보건μ§μκΉμ§μ κ±°λ¦¬κ° λ©μλ‘ μ£Όλ―Όλ€μ΄ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ μμ£Ό μ°Ύμμλ€.
μ 체μ μΌλ‘ λ³Ό λ μ£Όλ―Όμ κ°μ 건κ°μμ μ΄μ©μ κ°μ₯ ν° μν₯μ μ£Όλ λ³μλ κ°μ 건κ°μ
μμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λμ μΉλΆμ λμμΌλ©° κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ λμ μν₯μ μ£Όλ λ³μλ
λΆμΈμ λΆλ
νμ°Έμμ λμ μ£Όλ―Ό μ§μμ κ°μ 건κ°μμ μ§κΉμ§μ 거리 λ° κ°κ΅¬μ£Όμ λμ΄μ
λ€. λ°λΌμ κ°μ 건κ°μμμ κ°μ λ°©λ¬Έμ μ£Όλ‘ μ΄λ€ μ νλ μ§λ¨μ νκ³ μμΌλ©° μ΄ μ νλ
μ§λ¨μ΄ κ°μ 건κ°μμ μ΄μ©λ μμ£Ό νκ³ μλ κ²μΌλ‘ λ³Ό μ μλ€.
A STUDY ON DETERMINANTS OF UTILIZATION OF FAMILY HEALTH WORKER IN RURAL AREA
Jong Ku Park
Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University
(Advisor, Professor Il Soon Kim, M.D.)
The objectives of this study were to identify the determinants of utilization of
Family Health Workers (F.H.Ws), the knowledge about F.H.Ws, the attitude toward
F.H.Ws and home visiting.
Data was gathered using two methods. First, information about inhabitants was
gathered through an interview survey of housewives and Second, information was
gathered from (F.H.Ws) who are the village health workers at the Ri level through a
questionnaire survey at Sunwon Myun and Naega Myun on Kang Wha island.
The variables in this study were characteristics of inhabitants, characteristics
of F.H.Ws, organizational characters, home visiting, knowledge about F.H.Ws,
attitude toward F.H.Ws and utilization of F.H.Ws. These variables were analyzed
according to the model.
+---------------+Characteristic+----------+ +---------+
+---------------+
Data was analyzed through stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results were
as follows;
1) The determinants of home visiting
Degree of participation in women's club, actual distance from the house of
inhabitants to that of F.H.W., age of household head and number of households at
each Ri were important variables for explaining home visiting. Total coefficient of
determination (R**2) was 11.6%.
2) The determinants of knowledge about F.H.W.
Degree of communication between F.H.W. and inhabitants, aquaintance with F.H.W.,
number of children in household, frequency of home visiting, degree of
participation to women's club, duration of residence of F.H.w. economic status of
inhabitants and number of households at each Ri wee important variables for
explaining knowledge about F.H.W.
Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 23.4%.
3) The determinants of attitude toward F.H.W.
Degree of communication between F.H.W. and inhabitants, number of children of
inhabitants, home visiting, actual distance from the house of inhabitants to that
of F.H.W., number of families in household and duration of work as a F.H.W. were
important variables for explaining attitude toward F.H.W.
Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 27.4%.
4) The determinants of utilization of F.H.W.
Home visiting, inhabitant's acquaintance with F.H.W., perceptual distance from
the house of inhabitants to that of F.H.W., knowledge about F.H.W., number of
children in household, age of F.H.W. and distance to health subcenter from each ri
were important variables for explaining utilization of F.H.W.
Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 32.4%.CharactersAttitudeKnowledgeOrganizational+---------------+ +----------+ +-----------+
+---------------+ +----------+ +---------+of F.H.W.Visitingof F.H. WsVtilizationHomeCharacterist+---------------+
+---------------+ +----------+ +-----------+of Inhabitansrestrictio
μμΈμ κΆμλ³ κ΄κ΄κ°λ° κ³ν μ°κ΅¬(A study on regional tourism development planning in Seoul 2007-2011)
λ
ΈνΈ : μ΄ λ³΄κ³ μμ λ΄μ©μ μ°κ΅¬μ§μ 견ν΄λ‘μ μμΈνΉλ³μμ μ μ±
κ³Όλ λ€λ₯Ό μλ μμ΅λλ€
λ―Έκ΅°μ©μ°κΈ°μ§ μ΄μ μ λ°λ₯Έ μ΄νμ κ΄κ΄νΉκ΅¬μ λμλ°©μ(Strategies for responding to relocation of U.S. army base to promote Itaewon special tourism zone)
λ
ΈνΈ : μ΄ λ³΄κ³ μμ λ΄μ©μ μ°κ΅¬μ§μ 견ν΄λ‘μ μμΈνΉλ³μμ μ μ±
κ³Όλ λ€λ₯Ό μλ μμ΅λλ€
λΆλμ°μμ₯ ν¬λͺ νμ μ± λΆμ(An analysis of the transparent policy of real estate market)
[μλ‘ ] κ³ μ©λ₯ 70% λ¬μ±μ μν μ§μ κ΅μ‘ κ³Όμ
β
. λ¬Έμ μ κΈ°
β
‘. κ³ μ©μμ₯ νν©
β
’. μ§μ
κ΅μ‘ λΉλ©΄ κ³Όμ
β
£. κ²°