28 research outputs found

    A Study on Determination of family health worker in rural area

    No full text
    보건학과/석사[영문] [ν•œκΈ€] λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 졜근 λ†μ΄Œλ³΄κ±΄μ˜λ£Œμ‹œλ²”μ‚¬μ—…μ—μ„œ μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” 리(ι‡Œ)μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ μ–΄λ¨Έλ‹ˆλ³΄κ±΄μš”μ›μΈ κ°€ μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ ν™œλ™κ³Ό μ΄μš©μ— 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈλ“€μ„ ꡬλͺ…ν•΄ 보고자 μ‹œν–‰λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 특히 κ°€μ • κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 역할쀑 κ°€μž₯ μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  μΈμ •λ˜λŠ” 가정방문에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈκ³Ό 지역주민듀 의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ 지식, νƒœλ„ 그리고 주민의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ΄μš©μ— 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš” 인듀을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‘°μ‚¬λŒ€μƒμ€ 경기도 κ°•ν™”κ΅° 선원, λ‚΄κ°€ 2κ°œλ©΄μ— 1977λ…„ 8μ›” 1일 ν˜„μž¬ 3κ°œμ›”μ΄μƒ κ±°μ£Όν•œ 전가ꡬ와 μœ„ 2κ°œλ©΄μ—μ„œ ν™œλ™ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› 20λͺ… μ „μ›μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 각 가ꡬ에 λŒ€ ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 30%λ₯Ό ν‘œλ³ΈμΆ”μΆœν•˜μ—¬ 면접쑰사λ₯Ό ν•˜μ˜€κ³  κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 전원이 μ§ˆλ¬Έμ„œμ— λŒ€ν•΄ 자기 슀슀둜 κΈ°μž…, μ œμΆœν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜μ—¬ 자료λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‘°μ‚¬λ‚΄μš©μ€ 주민의 νŠΉμ„±, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ νŠΉμ„±, λ³΄κ±΄μ‚¬μ—…μ‘°μ§μƒμ˜ νŠΉμ„±, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› 의 가정방문정도, 주민의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ 지식 및 νƒœλ„ 그리고 주민의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ΄μš©μ •λ„ λ“±μ˜ 7개둜 크게 λΆ„λ₯˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석은 μœ„μ˜ 7개의 λ‚΄μš©μ„ λ³€μˆ˜κ΅°μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ 41개 의 λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ λ‚˜λˆ„μ–΄ μ‹œν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석을 μœ„ν•˜μ—¬λŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ΄μš©μ— 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈμ— κ΄€ν•œ λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ κ°œλ°œν•˜μ—¬ 이용 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석방법은 λ¨Όμ € μœ„μ˜ 41개 λ³€μˆ˜λ“€κ°„μ˜ Pearson μƒκ΄€κ³„μˆ˜λ₯Ό κ³„μ‚°ν•˜μ—¬ λ…λ¦½λ³€μˆ˜ 간에 κ°„ μ„­(association)이 비ꡐ적 적은 λ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€κ³  이 μ„ μ •λœ λ³€μˆ˜λ“€λ‘œμ¨ 단계적쀑희귀뢄 석(Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis)을 ν•˜μ—¬ λͺ¨ν˜•μ— λ”°λ₯Έ 각 단계별 μ’…μ†λ³€μˆ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ…λ¦½λ³€μˆ˜λ“€μ˜ μ„€λͺ…정도λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 쑰사성적을 μš”μ•½ν•˜λ©΄ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1) κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” λΆ€μΈμ˜ λΆ€λ…€νšŒ 참석정도, μ£Όλ―Ό μ§‘μ—μ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ§‘κΉŒμ§€μ˜ μ‹€μ œκ±°λ¦¬, κ°€κ΅¬μ£Όμ˜ λ‚˜μ΄ 및 λ¦¬λ³„κ°€κ΅¬μˆ˜ 등이 μ˜μ˜μžˆλŠ” λ³€ 수둜 μ„ μ •λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μœ„μ˜ 4개 λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ 11.6%λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 이쀑 λΆ€μΈμ˜ λΆ€λ…€νšŒμ°Έμ„μ •λ„κ°€ κ°€μž₯ 크게 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ΄λŠ” 첫째, ν‰μ†Œμ— λΆ€λ…€νšŒμ— 자주 μ°Έμ„ν•˜λŠ” 뢀인은 μ‚¬νšŒμƒν™œμ— 적극적이며 λ‹€λΌμ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ 접촉도 λ§Žμ•„ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ΄ 가정방문도 많이 ν–ˆμ„ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 생각할 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έλ‘œ κ°€μ • κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ΄ λΆ€λ…€νšŒμž₯을 κ²Έμž„ν•œ κ²½μš°κ°€ λ§Žμ•„ λΆ€λ…€νšŒ μ°Έμ„μœ¨μ΄ 높은 λΆ€μΈκ³ΌλŠ” 자주 접촉할 수 μžˆμ—ˆκΈ° λ•Œλ¬ΈμΈ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μΆ”μΈ‘λœλ‹€. 2) μ§€μ—­μ£Όλ―Όμ˜ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ 지식에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ μ™•λž˜μ •λ„, μΉœλΆ„μ •λ„, λ―Έμ·¨ν•™ μ•„λ™μˆ˜, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도, λΆ€μΈμ˜ λΆ€λ…€νšŒ 참석 정도, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ κ±°μ£ΌκΈ°κ°„, 주민의 κ²½μ œμƒνƒœ 및 λ¦¬λ³„κ°€κ΅¬μˆ˜ 등이 μ˜μ˜μžˆλŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ„ μ •λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μœ„μ˜ 8개 λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ 23.4%λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 3) κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ νƒœλ„μ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ μ™•λž˜μ •λ„, λ―Έμ·¨ν•™μ•„λ™μˆ˜, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도, μ£Όλ―Όμ§‘μ—μ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ§‘κΉŒμ§€μ˜ μ‹€μ œκ±° 리, κ°€κ΅¬μ›μˆ˜, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› ν™œλ™κΈ°κ°„ 등이 μ˜μ˜μžˆλŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ„ μ •λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©° 이 6개의 λ³€μˆ˜ 둜 27.4%λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ μ™•λž˜μ •λ„, μΉœλΆ„μ •λ„, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도 그리고 가정건강 μš”μ›μ˜ λ§ˆμ„λ‚΄ 거주기간등은 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ— λŒ€ν•œ 지식과 νƒœλ„μ— λͺ¨λ‘ 영ν–₯을 λ―Έμ³€λ‹€. λ”° λΌμ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ€ λ§ˆμ„λ‚΄ κ±°μ£ΌκΈ°κ°„κ³Ό λ™λ¦¬μ‚¬λžŒκ³Όμ˜ μΉœλΆ„μ •λ„ 및 λ²”μœ„λ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν•˜μ—¬ μ„ μ • ν•˜λ©° μ‚¬μ—…μ‹œν–‰μ‹œμ—λŠ” 가정방문에 역점을 두어야 ν•˜κ² λ‹€. 4) 주민의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› 방문정도에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ κ°€μ •λ°©λ¬Έ 정도, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›κ³Όμ˜ μΉœλΆ„μ •λ„, μ£Όλ―Όμ§‘μ—μ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ§‘κΉŒμ§€μ˜ 자각적 거리, κ°€μ • κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 업무에 λŒ€ν•œ 인지도, λ―Έμ·¨ν•™μ•„λ™μˆ˜, κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ λ‚˜μ΄, λ§ˆμ„μ—μ„œ λ³΄κ±΄μ§€μ†Œ κΉŒμ§€μ˜ 거리등이 μ˜μ˜μžˆλŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ„ μ •λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μœ„μ˜ 7개 λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ 32.4%λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆ λ‹€. 이쀑 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도가 주민이 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ„ μ°Ύμ•„κ°€λŠ”λ° κ°€μž₯ 큰 영ν–₯ 을 λ―Έμ³€λ‹€. κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ λ‚˜μ΄λŠ” 였히렀 λ†’μ„μˆ˜λ‘ 주민이 자주 μ°Ύμ•„μ˜€λŠ” κ²½ν–₯을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€ . λ§ˆμ„μ—μ„œ λ³΄κ±΄μ§€μ†ŒκΉŒμ§€μ˜ 거리가 λ©€μˆ˜λ‘ 주민듀이 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ„ 자주 μ°Ύμ•„μ™”λ‹€. μ „μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³Ό λ•Œ 주민의 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ΄μš©μ— κ°€μž₯ 큰 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λŠ” κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš” μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도와 μΉœλΆ„μ •λ„μ˜€μœΌλ©° κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ˜ 가정방문정도에 영ν–₯을 μ£ΌλŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λŠ” λΆ€μΈμ˜ λΆ€λ…€νšŒμ°Έμ„μ •λ„μ™€ μ£Όλ―Ό μ§‘μ—μ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ§‘κΉŒμ§€μ˜ 거리 및 κ°€κ΅¬μ£Όμ˜ λ‚˜μ΄μ˜€ λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ›μ€ 가정방문을 주둜 μ–΄λ–€ μ„ νƒλœ 집단에 ν•˜κ³  있으며 이 μ„ νƒλœ 집단이 κ°€μ •κ±΄κ°•μš”μ› μ΄μš©λ„ 자주 ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€. A STUDY ON DETERMINANTS OF UTILIZATION OF FAMILY HEALTH WORKER IN RURAL AREA Jong Ku Park Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University (Advisor, Professor Il Soon Kim, M.D.) The objectives of this study were to identify the determinants of utilization of Family Health Workers (F.H.Ws), the knowledge about F.H.Ws, the attitude toward F.H.Ws and home visiting. Data was gathered using two methods. First, information about inhabitants was gathered through an interview survey of housewives and Second, information was gathered from (F.H.Ws) who are the village health workers at the Ri level through a questionnaire survey at Sunwon Myun and Naega Myun on Kang Wha island. The variables in this study were characteristics of inhabitants, characteristics of F.H.Ws, organizational characters, home visiting, knowledge about F.H.Ws, attitude toward F.H.Ws and utilization of F.H.Ws. These variables were analyzed according to the model. +---------------+Characteristic+----------+ +---------+ +---------------+ Data was analyzed through stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results were as follows; 1) The determinants of home visiting Degree of participation in women's club, actual distance from the house of inhabitants to that of F.H.W., age of household head and number of households at each Ri were important variables for explaining home visiting. Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 11.6%. 2) The determinants of knowledge about F.H.W. Degree of communication between F.H.W. and inhabitants, aquaintance with F.H.W., number of children in household, frequency of home visiting, degree of participation to women's club, duration of residence of F.H.w. economic status of inhabitants and number of households at each Ri wee important variables for explaining knowledge about F.H.W. Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 23.4%. 3) The determinants of attitude toward F.H.W. Degree of communication between F.H.W. and inhabitants, number of children of inhabitants, home visiting, actual distance from the house of inhabitants to that of F.H.W., number of families in household and duration of work as a F.H.W. were important variables for explaining attitude toward F.H.W. Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 27.4%. 4) The determinants of utilization of F.H.W. Home visiting, inhabitant's acquaintance with F.H.W., perceptual distance from the house of inhabitants to that of F.H.W., knowledge about F.H.W., number of children in household, age of F.H.W. and distance to health subcenter from each ri were important variables for explaining utilization of F.H.W. Total coefficient of determination (R**2) was 32.4%.CharactersAttitudeKnowledgeOrganizational+---------------+ +----------+ +-----------+ +---------------+ +----------+ +---------+of F.H.W.Visitingof F.H. WsVtilizationHomeCharacterist+---------------+ +---------------+ +----------+ +-----------+of Inhabitansrestrictio

    μ„œμšΈμ‹œ κΆŒμ—­λ³„ κ΄€κ΄‘κ°œλ°œ κ³„νš 연ꡬ(A study on regional tourism development planning in Seoul 2007-2011)

    No full text
    λ…ΈνŠΈ : 이 λ³΄κ³ μ„œμ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ€ μ—°κ΅¬μ§„μ˜ κ²¬ν•΄λ‘œμ„œ μ„œμšΈνŠΉλ³„μ‹œμ˜ μ •μ±…κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯Ό μˆ˜λ„ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€

    λ―Έκ΅°μš©μ‚°κΈ°μ§€ 이전에 λ”°λ₯Έ μ΄νƒœμ› κ΄€κ΄‘νŠΉκ΅¬μ˜ λŒ€μ‘λ°©μ•ˆ(Strategies for responding to relocation of U.S. army base to promote Itaewon special tourism zone)

    No full text
    λ…ΈνŠΈ : 이 λ³΄κ³ μ„œμ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ€ μ—°κ΅¬μ§„μ˜ κ²¬ν•΄λ‘œμ„œ μ„œμšΈνŠΉλ³„μ‹œμ˜ μ •μ±…κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯Ό μˆ˜λ„ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€

    [μ‹œλ‘ ] 고용λ₯  70% 달성을 μœ„ν•œ μ§μ—…κ΅μœ‘ 과제

    No full text
    β… . 문제 제기 β…‘. κ³ μš©μ‹œμž₯ ν˜„ν™© β…’. μ§μ—…κ΅μœ‘ λ‹Ήλ©΄ 과제 β…£. κ²°
    corecore