6 research outputs found

    ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ ‘๊ทผํ•œ ๋ฒ ๋ฆฌ์–ด์˜ต์…˜์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜ํ‰๊ฐ€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌยท์ฒœ๋ฌธํ•™๋ถ€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ „๊ณต, 2013. 8. ๊ฐ•๋ณ‘๋‚จ.ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ธˆ์œต์ƒํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์›์ž์‚ฐ์ด ์ถ”๊ณ„ ํ™•๋ฅ  ๊ณผ์ •(stochastic process)์„ ๋”ฐ๋ฅผ ๋•Œ, ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ƒํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ด๋Š ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ•ด์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ์›์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ’์ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•ด์˜จ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€๋Š” ๋ฌด๊ด€(path independent)ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์›์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๊ฐ’์ด ์ •ํ•ด์ง„ ์ƒํ•œ์ด๋‚˜ ํ•˜ํ•œ์„ ๋„˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์˜์กด์ ์ธ(path dependent) ๊ธˆ์œต์ƒํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ทธ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์šด๋ฐ, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์›๋ฆฌ(reflection principle)์™€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์ ๋ถ„(path integral)์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ธˆ์œต์ƒํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„ , ์›์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด ์ •๊ทœ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์›์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ƒํ•œ๊ณผ ํ•˜ํ•œ์ด ๋™์‹œ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธˆ์œต์ƒํ’ˆ(double barrier option)์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๊ฐ’๋“ค์˜ ๋ฌดํ•œ ํ•ฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ•ด์งˆ ๋•Œ, ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐœ ํ•ญ์˜ ํ•ฉ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์›์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด ์ •๊ทœ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋‘ํ„ฐ์šด ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ(heavy-tailed distribution)๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜• ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์˜์กด์ ์ธ ๊ธˆ์œต์ƒํ’ˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜ํ‰๊ฐ€๋„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ•ด์„์ ์ธ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค.Contents Abstract I. Introduction 1.1 Langevin Evolution 1.2 Options and Barrier Options 1.2.1 Generalities 1.2.2 Terminology and Definitions 1.3 Quantum Methods in Finance 1.3.1 Generalized Potential 1.4 Solving the double knock out barrier option II. On the Trivariate Joint Distribution of Brownian Motion and its Maximum and Minimum 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Uniform Convergence 2.3 Approximation and Error Bound 2.4 Conclusion III. Fitting the Risk-Neutral Density Function: The Generalized Beta Approach 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The relation of the GB2 to log-normal distribution 3.3 Risk-neutral condition of generalized beta distribution of the second kind 3.4 GB2 Option Pricing 3.5 GB2 Single Barrier Option Pricing 3.6 GB2 double barrier option 3.6.1 Log-normal distribution Case 3.6.2 Generalized Beta distribution Case IV. Conclusions 4.1 Conclusion I. Appendix A - Proof of Equations A.1 Proof of Equation in Chapter 2 II. Appendix B - Lยดevy Diffusion and Fractional Fokkerโ€“Planck Equation B.1 Generalized Langevin equation B.2 An expression of the Fractional Fokkerโ€“Planck Equation B.3 The non uniqueness of the expression of the Fractional Fokker-Planck Equation B.4 Two alternative expressions of the Fractional Fokker-Planck Equation Bibliography Abstract in KoreanDocto

    (A) study on the attitude of nursing student towards operating room nursing practice

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ต์œก/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ์ž„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ํƒœ๋„์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ, ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ์ž…๊ฒฌ ๋ฐ ๊ธด์žฅ๊ฐ, ๋‘˜์งธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€, ์…‹์งธ, ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ํ™˜์ž ๋ฐ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„, ๋„ท์งธ, ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ค€๋น„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต ๊ต์œก ๋ฐ ์ค€๋น„๊ณ„ํš์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‘์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์„œ์šธ ์‹œ๋‚ด์— ์žˆ๋Š” 4๋…„์ œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ๊ต์œก๊ธฐ๊ด€์˜ 3, 4ํ•™๋…„ ํ•™์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๋Š” ์•ฝ 170๋ช…์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ณธ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ž…์‹ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ์ „ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์ณ ์ œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ ํ›„, ๋ณธ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1. ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ์‚ฌํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๋ น์€ 21์„ธ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ฒด 43.5%๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , 3ํ•™๋…„ ํ•™์ƒ์ด ๋Œ€๋‹ค์ˆ˜๋กœ 79.4%์˜€๋‹ค.(ํ‰๊ท ์—ฐ๋ น์€ 21์„ธ ์˜€๋‹ค.) 2. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ 79.4%์™€ ๋™๋ฃŒ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ๊ณ  21.8%๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ 95.3%๊ฐ€ ๋‚ด๊ณผ๋ณ‘์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์„ 99.4%๊ฐ€ ์™ธ๊ณผ๊ณ„ ๋ณ‘์‹ค์˜ ์‹ค์Šต ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ 57.1%๊ฐ€ ์‚ฐ์†Œ์•„๊ณผ๊ณ„ ์ž„์ƒ์‹ค์Šต์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ , 35.9%๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ฑด์†Œ์™€ ๊ทธ๋ฐ–์— ์™ธ๋ž˜ ์‹ค์Šต ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด๋ก ํ•™์Šต์€ 2ํ•™๋…„2ํ•™๊ธฐ (28.8%)์™€ 3ํ•™๋…„ 2ํ•™๊ธฐ(31.2%)์— ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์–ด์กŒ์œผ๋ฉฐ 5-8์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ด๋ก  ํ•™์Šต์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด 34.7%๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. 5. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ ํƒœ๋„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ 14๊ฐœ์˜ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ค‘ 8๊ฐœ์— ๊ณผ๋ฐ˜์ˆ˜ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ธ์ •์  ํƒœ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ์‹ฌํ•œ ์ค‘์••๊ฐ(73.5%), ๋ถˆ์•ˆ๊ฐ(73.5%), ๋ฐฐ์šด ์ง€์‹ ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์‹ ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์—ฌ(60.0%) ๋“ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 6. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๊ฐ์€ ๋ฐฐ์šด ์ด๋ก ์  ์ง€์‹์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ๋ณต์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€๋Š” ๋Œ€์ฒด๋กœ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 7. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ํ™˜์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘๋‹ต์ž์˜ ํƒœ๋„๋ฅผ ๋Œ€ํ™”์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†Œ๊ทน์  ํƒœ๋„(45.3%)๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ํƒœ๋„์˜€๋‹ค. 8. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์›์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํƒœ๋„๋Š” 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ 97.6%-100%์˜ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ํƒœ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 9. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์‹ค ์‹ค์Šต์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ค€๋น„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์  ์ง€์‹์— ๋†’์€ ์ •๋‹ต์œจ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ํŠน์ • ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ๋Š” ์ •๋‹ตํ‘œ ๊ธฐ์œจ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] The attitude of nursing students towards their operating room practice is a very important factor in the effectiveness of the operating room nursing program. consequently, those responsible for structuring and planning operating room nursing learning experiences should be aware of the attitudes which nursing students have towards the O.R. and how these attitudes change while they are in training there. The goal of this research is to discover what these attitudes are so that the knowledge can be used to design more effective training programs in the future. The specific aims of this study are as follows: 1. To delineate the general characteristics of the nursing students who enter operating room training. 2. To discover the preconceptions and feelings of tension which nursing students have towards training in the operating room. 3. To discover students' expectations about operating room nursing learning experences. 4. To find out about nursing students attitudes towards the patients and nurses in the operating room. 5. To determine how well nursing students are prepared with the skills and knowledge necessary for operating room nursing. The 170 nursing students in this study were selected from among the junior and senior nursing students of five nursing colleges in Seoul. None of the students had had any previous operating room nursing learning experiences. Responses were elicited using a pretested questionnaire. In general the senior students showed more positive attitudes than juniors, and particularly students who had had surgery themselves had much better attitudes than others. The findings of the study were as follows: 1. The modal age of the students surveyed was 21 years of age (43.5%), the majority were juniors (79.4%) and more than half were Christians. 2. Most of the respondents (79.4%) had talked with their friends about operating room nursing practice and 21.8% of the sample had had one or more operations themselves. 3. Only a little more than one-third of the students (34.7%) had had instruction of 5 to 8 hours in the theory of operating-room nursing practice. 4. More than half of the respondents showed a positive attitude towards the operating room practice as indicated by positive responses on more than half of the fourteen attitude questions. 5. Expectations towards the practice were generally positive. 6. Most of the respondents had a positive attitude towards the patients in the operating room, but only 45.3% felt that it was important to talk with the patient. 7. The students were nearly unanimous (97.6-100%) in their positive attitude towards the operating room nurses, but 1.2% felt that the scrub nurse seemed to be a technician. 8. The respondent's knowledge and skill about general operating room practice was judged to be good, but knowledge about specific operations was poor. 9. The results of this study show that nursing students should learn to give comprehensive nursing care in specific nursing areas as well as general bed-side nursing. 10. Areas related to this study which might be investigated by future research include the attitude of the operating room nurses towards the operating room and a study comparing the attitudes of student nurses before and after their operating room nursing learning experiences.restrictio

    A study on the application of Photovoltaic System for ships

    No full text
    ๊ตญ์ œํ•ด์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ œ์žฌ ๋ฐ ์ œํ•œ์ด ์‹œํ–‰๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•ด์ƒ ์šด์†ก์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์ฑ„ํƒ๋˜๊ณ  ๋Œ€์ฒด์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์ธ ์ œํ•œ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์„ ๋ฐ•์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ์™€ ์ „๋ ฅ์ „์ž๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ์„ ๋ฐ•์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ค์—ผ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „ ์ ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ๋””์ ค ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ์šดํ•ญ ์ค‘์ธ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์šด๋ฐ˜์„ ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ•์œผ๋กœ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋””์ ค ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์— ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ ๋ฐ•์ด ํ•ญํ•ด ์ค‘์—๋Š” ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ถฉ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ์— ์ €์žฅ๋œ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์šด์ „ ์ค‘์ธ ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ์™€ ๋™์‹œ์— ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ „๋ ฅ์— ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์‹œ ์ถฉ์ „ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ฐ• ์ค‘์—๋Š” ์šฐ์„  ํ•ญํ•ด ์ค‘์— ์ถฉ์ „๋œ ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ณ‘๋ ฌ์šด์ „ ์ค‘์ธ ๋‘ ๋Œ€์˜ ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์ค‘ ํ•œ ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์ •์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ „๋ ฅ์„ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ•œ ๋Œ€ ์ •์ง€ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.As restrictions of International Maritime Organization were enforced, a more efficient management approach was adopted in maritime transport, and as an alternative energy, solar power generation technology was very limited in use on ordinary ships due to technical limitations. Recently, with the development of batteries and power electronics, research on the application of solar power generation as a solution to environmental problems caused by environmental pollutants emitted from ships is being actively conducted. In this paper, evaluated and analysed the utility that can be obtained when the solar power generation system is additionally applied to the existing diesel power generation system by selecting the car carrier currently operating with the diesel power generation system as the target ship. While the ship is sailing, it generates electricity through the solar power system to charge the battery. The battery is recharged again when the increase allows solar power generation. During lying, first of all, one of the two diesel generators in parallel operation is completely stopped using battery power charged during voyage, and one diesel generator is stopped by supplying the necessary power from the battery to save fuel and reduce environmental pollutants emitted.์ œ 1 ์žฅ ์„œ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 1 1.2 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋‚ด์šฉ 2 1.3 ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 3 ์ œ 2 ์žฅ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ 5 2.1 ๊ฐœ์š” ๋ฐ ์›๋ฆฌ 5 2.2 ํƒœ์–‘์ „์ง€ 6 2.2.1 ์›๋ฆฌ 6 2.2.2 ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 7 2.2.3 ํŠน์„ฑ 10 2.3 ์ „๋ ฅ๋ณ€ํ™˜์žฅ์น˜ 13 2.4 ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ 14 2.4.1 ์ด์ฐจ์ „์ง€ 16 2.4.2 SOC (State Of Charge) 17 ์ œ 3 ์žฅ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์‹ค ์„ ๋ฐ• ์ ์šฉ ๊ฒ€ํ†  19 3.1 ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ• ์„ ์ • 19 3.2 ์šดํ•ญํ•ญ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ 20 3.3 ํ•ญ๋กœ๋ณ„ ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ„์„ 22 3.4 ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 25 ์ œ 4 ์žฅ ์„ ๋ฐ•์šฉ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง 27 4.1 ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ 27 4.1.1 ์„ ์ • 27 4.1.2 ๋ฐฐ์น˜ 29 4.2 ๋ฐฐํ„ฐ๋ฆฌ 31 4.3 MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking)์ œ์–ด 33 4.4 ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 35 ์ œ 5 ์žฅ ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ํŠน์„ฑ 38 5.1 ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์‚ฌ์–‘ 38 5.1.1 ํŠน์ •์—ฐ๋ฃŒ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰ (SFOC) 38 5.1.2 ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ฐ€์Šค 40 5.2 ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์šด์ „ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ํŠน์„ฑ 42 5.2.1 ํ•ญํ•ด ์ค‘ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์šด์ „ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ 42 5.2.2 ์ •๋ฐ• ์ค‘ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์šด์ „ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ 44 5.3 MATLAB/Simulink์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋””์ ค๋ฐœ์ „๊ธฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ 46 ์ œ 6 ์žฅ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ ์šฉ ์„ ๋ฐ•๊ณผ ๋””์ ค ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ ๋ฐ•์˜ ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๊ฐ€์Šค ๋ถ„์„ 48 6.1 ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „ ๋ฐ ์ „๋ ฅ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ 49 6.1.1 ํ•ญํ•ด ์ค‘ ์ „๋ ฅ ์šด์šฉ 52 6.1.2 ์ •๋ฐ• ์ค‘ ์ „๋ ฅ ์šด์šฉ 54 6.2 ์—ฐ๋ฃŒ์†Œ๋ชจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋น„๊ต 56 6.3 ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€ 58 ์ œ 7 ์žฅ ๊ฒฐ ๋ก  59 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 61Maste
    corecore