21 research outputs found

    Application of simulated three dimensional CT image in orthognathic surgery

    No full text
    μΉ˜μ˜ν•™κ³Ό/박사[ν•œκΈ€] μΉ˜μ•„ ꡐ정 및 악ꡐ정 수술 λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ λ‘κ°œμ•ˆλ©΄ 골격 ν˜•νƒœμ˜ 진단 및 μΉ˜λ£Œν‰κ°€μ— λ‘λΆ€κ·œκ²© 방사선사진이 널리 μ‚¬μš©λ˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ μž…μ²΄μ μΈ ꡬ쑰물을 ν‰λ©΄μ μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λƒ„μœΌλ‘œ 인해 ν‰κ°€μ‹œ μ •ν™•ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ΄ˆλž˜ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ ꡬ쑰물은 μž…μ²΄μ μΈ μƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄λŠ” 것이 λ°”λžŒμ§ν•˜λ©° 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ΄ κ°€μž₯ 쒋은 방법이닀. μž„μƒμ„ μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 치료 결과의 평가와 치료 μ „ν›„μ˜ 비ꡐ 뢄석이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ©° λ”°λΌμ„œ 수술 전에 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ„ ν•˜μ—¬ 진단과 치료 κ³„νšμ„ μ„Έμ›Œ μˆ˜μˆ ν•œ ν™˜μžλŠ” 수술 후에도 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ„ ν•˜μ—¬ 수술 μ „ν›„λ₯Ό μž…μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œ ν‰κ°€ν•œλ‹€λ©΄ λ”μš± μ •ν™•ν•œ 비ꡐ와 평가λ₯Ό ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 3차원 μ’Œν‘œκ³„λ‘œλΆ€ν„°μ˜ μ •μƒμΉ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν‘œμ€€ν™”λœ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όκ°€ μ—†μ–΄ μž„μƒμ— μ μš©ν•˜κΈ° μ–΄λ ΅κ³  λ˜ν•œ κ³ κ°€μ˜ μž₯λΉ„ 및 λΉ„μš©κ³Ό 방사선 ν”Όν­λŸ‰ λ“±μ˜ 문제둜 인해 λ§Žμ€ μž₯점에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” 단측상은 널리 μ‚¬μš©λ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. μ €μžλŠ” 악ꡐ정 수술 μ „ν›„μ˜ ν›„μ „λ°© 및 μΈ‘λ°© λ‘λΆ€κ·œκ²© λ°©μ‚¬μ„ μ‚¬μ§„μ—μ„œμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 악ꡐ정 수술 μ „μ˜ 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” 단측상에 μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λͺ¨μ˜ μ‘°μ’…λœ 3차원상을 μ–»λŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 방법을 λ§Œλ“€μ–΄ λ³΄μ•˜κ³  이 방법을 κ²€μ¦ν•˜κ³ μž 악ꡐ정 μˆ˜μˆ μ„ κ°€μƒν•˜μ—¬ ν•˜μ•…κ³¨μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜λ₯Ό λ³€ν™”μ‹œν‚¨ 건쑰 λ‘κ°œκ³¨μ˜ 4 가지 κ²½μš°μ™€ 악ꡐ정 μˆ˜μˆ μ„ 받은 4 λͺ…μ˜ ν™˜μžμ— μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 보아 λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€. 1. ν•˜μ•…κ³¨μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜λ₯Ό λ‹¬λ¦¬ν•˜κ³  μ‹œν–‰λœ 건쑰 λ‘κ°œκ³¨μ˜ 4 가지 κ²½μš°μ—μ„œ ν•˜μ•…κ³¨μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜ λ³€ν™” μ „ν›„μ˜ ν›„μ „λ°© 및 μΈ‘λ°© λ‘λΆ€κ·œκ²© λ°©μ‚¬μ„ μ‚¬μ§„μ—μ„œμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό ν•˜μ•…κ³¨μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜ λ³€ν™” μ „μ˜ 3차원 상에 μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‘œ λͺ¨μ˜ μ‘°μ’…λœ 3차원 상과 ν•˜μ•…κ³¨μ˜ μœ„μΉ˜ λ³€ν™” 후에 μ‹€μ œ 촬영된 3차원 상 κ°„μ˜ μ’Œν‘œκ°’μ˜ λ³€μœ„ λ²”μœ„λŠ” -1.8 mmμ—μ„œ 1.8 mmκΉŒμ§€μ˜€κ³  λͺ¨λ“  λ³€μœ„κ°’μ˜ 94%κ°€ -1.4 mmμ—μ„œ 1.4 mmκΉŒμ§€μ˜€μœΌλ©° λ˜ν•œ 두 상 간에 μœ μ˜μ°¨λŠ” μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€(p>0.05). 2. 악ꡐ정 μˆ˜μˆ μ„ 받은 4 λͺ…μ˜ ν™˜μžμ—μ„œ 수술 μ „ν›„μ˜ ν›„μ „λ°© 및 μΈ‘λ°© λ‘λΆ€κ·œκ²© 방사선 μ‚¬μ§„μ—μ„œμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 수술 μ „μ˜ 3차원 상에 μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‘œ λͺ¨μ˜ μ‘°μ’…λœ 3차원 상과 수술 후에 μ‹€μ œ 촬영된 3차원 상 κ°„μ˜ μ’Œν‘œκ°’μ˜ λ³€μœ„ λ²”μœ„λŠ” -6.7 mmμ—μ„œ 7.7 mmκΉŒμ§€μ˜€κ³  λͺ¨λ“  λ³€μœ„κ°’μ˜ 90%κ°€ -4.0 mmμ—μ„œ 4.0 mmκΉŒμ§€μ˜€μœΌλ©° λ˜ν•œ 두 상 간에 μœ μ˜μ°¨λŠ” μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€(p>0.05). 결둠적으둜 수술 μ „μ˜ 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” 단측사진과 수술 μ „ν›„μ˜ ν›„μ „λ°© 및 μΈ‘λ°© λ‘λΆ€κ·œκ²© 방사선사진을 μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‘œ λͺ¨μ˜ μ‘°μ’…λœ 3차원 상을 μ–»μ–΄ 건쑰 λ‘κ°œκ³¨κ³Ό 악ꡐ정 수술 ν™˜μžμ— 각각 μ μš©ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό μ•žμœΌλ‘œ 수술 후에 3차원 μ „μ‚°ν™” λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ„ ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³ λ„ 수술 ν›„μ˜ 3차원 상을 얻을 수 μžˆλŠ” κ°€λŠ₯성이 μ œμ‹œλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. [영문] In orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, cephalogram has been routine practice in diagnosis and treatment evaluation of craniofacial deformity. But its inherent distortion of actual length and angles during projecting three dimensional object to two dimensional plane might cause errors in quantitative analysis of shape and size, Therefore, it is desirable that three dimensional object is diagnosed and evaluated three dimensionally and three dimensional CT image is best for three dimensional analysis. Development of clinic necessitates evaluation of result of treatment and comparison before and after surgery. It is desirable that patient that was diagnosed and planned by three dimensional computed tomography before surgery is evaluated by three dimensional computed tomography after surgery, too. But Because there is no standardized normal values in three dimension now and three dimensional Computed Tomography needs expensive equipments and because of its expenses and amount of exposure to radiation, limitations still remain to be solved in its application to routine practice. If postoperative three dimensional image is constructed by pre and postoperative lateral and postero-anterior cephalograms and preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram, pre and postoperative image will be compared and evaluated three dimensionally without three dimensional computed tomography after surgery and that will contribute to standardize normal values in three dimension. This study introduced new method that computer-simulated three dimensional image was constructed by preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram and pre and postoperative lateral and postero-anterior cephalograms, and for validation of new method, in four cases of dry skull that position of mandible was displaced and four patients of orthognathic surgery, computer-simulated three dimensional image and actual postoperative three dimensional image were compared. The results were as follows. 1. In four cases of dry skull that position of mandible was displaced, range of displacement between computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional images in co-ordinates values was from -1.8 mm to 1.8 mm and 94% in displacement of all co-ordinates values was from -1.0 mm to 1.0 mm and no significant difference between computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional images was noticed(P>0.05). 2. In four cases of orthognathic surgery patients, range of displacement between computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional images in co-ordinates values was from -6.7 mm to 7.7 mm and 90% in displacement of all co-ordinates values was from -4.0 to 4.0 mm and no significant difference between computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional images was noticed(P>0.05). Conclusively, computer-simulated three dimensional image was constructed by preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram and pre and postoperative lateral and postero-anterior cephalograms. Therefore, potentiality that can construct postoperative three dimensional image without three dimensional computed tomography after surgery was presented.restrictio

    (The) study of comparison before and after orthodontic treatment in class I bialveolar protrusion cases with four bicuspid extraction

    No full text
    μΉ˜μ˜ν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€] μ €μžλŠ” 제 1 μ†Œκ΅¬μΉ˜ 발치λ₯Ό λ™λ°˜ν•œ 제 I κΈ‰ μΉ˜μ‘°μ„± μ–‘μ•… μ „λŒ ν™˜μžμ˜ 석고 λͺ¨ν˜•κ³Ό μΈ‘λͺ¨ 두뢀 방사선 μ‚¬μ§„μƒμ—μ„œμ˜ 치료 μ „ν›„μ˜ λ³€ν™”λŸ‰μ„ μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κ³  견치의 후방견인 방법(Sectional canine retractionκ³Ό Sliding canine retraction)κ³Ό anchorage의 보강(Head gear, Tr anspalatal arch와 Lingual arch)μœ λ¬΄μ— λ”°λ₯Έ μ „μΉ˜μ™€ ꡬ치의 이동양을 비ꡐ해 보고 λ˜ν•œ 석고λͺ¨ν˜•κ³Ό μΈ‘λͺ¨ 두뢀 방사선 사진을 연관지어 μΉ˜λ£ŒκΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ λ°œμƒλœ λ³€ν™” 양상을 μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κ³ μž μ΄ˆμ§„μ‹œ 16μ„Έ μ΄μƒμ˜ μ—¬μžν™˜μž 77λͺ…μ˜ 치료 μ „ν›„μ˜ 석고 λͺ¨ν˜•κ³Ό μΈ‘λͺ¨ 두뢀 방사선 사 진을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ‘°μ‚¬ν•œ λ°” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€. 1. μΉ˜λ£ŒκΈ°κ°„ 쀑 λŒ€κ΅¬μΉ˜κ°„ 폭경, μΉ˜μ—΄κΆ μž₯κ²½, μΉ˜μ—΄κΆ μ£Όμœ„ μž₯결은 μƒν•˜μ•… λͺ¨λ‘ 치료 후에 μœ μ˜μ„± μžˆλŠ” κ°μ†Œλ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€κ³  κ²¬μΉ˜κ°„ 폭경은 μƒν•˜μ•… λͺ¨λ‘ μœ μ˜μ„± μžˆλŠ” 차이λ₯Ό 보이지 μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. 2. 상악 μ€‘μ ˆμΉ˜(Ul)와 μƒμˆœ(Ls)의 이동 λΉ„μœ¨μ€ 2.84 : 1이며 ν•˜μ•… μ€‘μ ˆμΉ˜(Ll)와 ν•˜μˆœ(Li)의 이동 λΉ„μœ¨μ€ 1.45 : 1 μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 3. μ „μΉ˜μ˜ ν›„λ°© 이동양과 ꡬ치의 μ „λ°© μ΄λ™μ–‘μ˜ λΉ„κ΅μ—μ„œ 견치의 ν›„λ°© 견인 방법(sectional canine retraction λŒ€ sliding canine retraction)κ³Ό transpalatal archλ‚˜ lingual arch의 μ‚¬μš© μœ λ¬΄μ— λ”°λΌμ„œλŠ” μœ μ˜μ„± μžˆλŠ” 차이가 μ—†μ—ˆμœΌλ©° head gearλ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•œ ꡰ이 사 μš©ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ ꡰ에 λΉ„ν•΄ μ „μΉ˜μ˜ ν›„λ°© 이동양은 μœ μ˜μ„± 있게 크게 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬κ³  ꡬ치의 μ „λ°© 이동양은 μœ μ˜μ„± 있게 μž‘κ²Œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 4. 치료 μ „ν›„μ˜ 석고 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ ν†΅ν•œ 악ꢁ 크기의 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μΈ‘λͺ¨ 두뢀 방사선 μ‚¬μ§„μƒμ—μ„œμ˜ 변화와 연관지어 μ „μΉ˜ 견치 및 λŒ€κ΅¬μΉ˜μ˜ 변화양상을 μ•Œμ•„λ³Έ λ°” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같이 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 1) 상악 μ€‘μ ˆμΉ˜λŠ” ν›„λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 3.77mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , κ²¬μΉ˜λŠ” μ™ΈμΈ‘μœΌλ‘œ 0.22mm ν›„λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 3.70mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° λŒ€κ΅¬μΉ˜λŠ” λ‚΄μΈ‘μœΌλ‘œ 0.535mm μ „λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 2.29mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 2) ν•˜μ•… μ€‘μ ˆμΉ˜λŠ” ν›„λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 3.04mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , κ²¬μΉ˜λŠ” μ™ΈμΈ‘μœΌλ‘œ 0.145mm ν›„λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 3.92%mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° λŒ€κ΅¬μΉ˜λŠ” λ‚΄μΈ‘μœΌλ‘œ 0.755mm μ „λ°©μœΌλ‘œ 1.77mm μ΄λ™ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. THE STUDY OF COMPARISON BEFORE AND AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT IN CLASS I BIALVEOLAR PROTRUSION CASES WITH FOUR BICUSPID EXTRACTION HYUNG DON KIM, D.D.S. Department of Dental science, Graduate School, Yonsei University (Directed by prof. Young-Ghel Park, D.D.S., Ph.D.) The purposes of present study were to evaluate changes in models and lateral cephalometric head films during orthodontic treatment and to compare the amount of incisal retraction and anterior movement of molars with the two approaches of the retraction method of canine(sectional canine retractions vs sliding canine retractions) and the anchorage management(head gears vs no head gears, transpalatal arches vs no transpalatal arches and lingual arches vs no lingual arches) and to evaluate changes during orthodontic treatment in models with relation to lateral cephalometric head films. 67 Korean women with Angle's Class I bialveolar protrusion were selected, whose initial chronologic age was above 16 yrs. Models and lateral cephalometric head films were taken before and after orthodontic treatment with four bicuspid extraction. the results were obtained as follows : 1. Significant decreases were observed in intermolar with, arch length and arch perimeter of maxilla and mandible but significant difference was not obserred in intercanine with of maxilla and mandible during treatment period. 2. The linear change of the upper incisor to upper lip was 2.84 : 1 and the linear change of the lower incisor t? lower lip was 1.45 : 1. 3. There were no significant differences between the two groups(sectional canine retractions vs sliding canine retractions), the two groups(transpalatal aches vs no transpalatal arches) and the two groups(lingual arches vs no lingual arches) in the amount of incisal retraction and anterior movement of molars. There were a greater amount of maxillary incisal retraction and a lesser amount of anterior movement of maxillary molars with the use of head gears than no use of head gears. 4. Changes during orthodontic treatment in models with relation to lateral cephalometric head films were obtained as follows : 1) maxilla Central incisors were moved 3.77mm backward, canines were moved 0.22mm laterally and 3.70mm backward, and molars were moved 0.57mm medially and 2.29mm forward. 2) Mandible Central incisors were moved 3,04mm backward, canines were moved 0.145mm laterally an d3.92mm backward, and molars were moved 0.755mm medially and 1.77mm forward. [영문] The purposes of present study were to evaluate changes in models and lateral cephalometric head films during orthodontic treatment and to compare the amount of incisal retraction and anterior movement of molars with the two approaches of the retraction method of canine(sectional canine retractions vs sliding canine retractions) and the anchorage management(head gears vs no head gears, transpalatal arches vs no transpalatal arches and lingual arches vs no lingual arches) and to evaluate changes during orthodontic treatment in models with relation to lateral cephalometric head films. 67 Korean women with Angle's Class I bialveolar protrusion were selected, whose initial chronologic age was above 16 yrs. Models and lateral cephalometric head films were taken before and after orthodontic treatment with four bicuspid extraction. the results were obtained as follows : 1. Significant decreases were observed in intermolar with, arch length and arch perimeter of maxilla and mandible but significant difference was not obserred in intercanine with of maxilla and mandible during treatment period. 2. The linear change of the upper incisor to upper lip was 2.84 : 1 and the linear change of the lower incisor t? lower lip was 1.45 : 1. 3. There were no significant differences between the two groups(sectional canine retractions vs sliding canine retractions), the two groups(transpalatal aches vs no transpalatal arches) and the two groups(lingual arches vs no lingual arches) in the amount of incisal retraction and anterior movement of molars. There were a greater amount of maxillary incisal retraction and a lesser amount of anterior movement of maxillary molars with the use of head gears than no use of head gears. 4. Changes during orthodontic treatment in models with relation to lateral cephalometric head films were obtained as follows : 1) maxilla Central incisors were moved 3.77mm backward, canines were moved 0.22mm laterally and 3.70mm backward, and molars were moved 0.57mm medially and 2.29mm forward. 2) Mandible Central incisors were moved 3,04mm backward, canines were moved 0.145mm laterally an d3.92mm backward, and molars were moved 0.755mm medially and 1.77mm forward.restrictio

    A study on the role of AtcwINV1 in the plant response to cytokinin

    No full text
    Maste
    corecore