15 research outputs found

    μ‚¬νšŒμ  지원 연결망에 λ”°λ₯Έ ν•œκ΅­μΈ μ—°λ Ήκ΅¬κ°„μ˜ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬νšŒν•™κ³Ό, 2013. 8. ν•œμ‹ κ°‘.μ‚¬λžŒμ€ νƒœμ–΄λ‚˜μ„œ μ£½κΈ°κΉŒμ§€ λ‚˜μ΄λ₯Ό 먹으며 μƒμ˜ 과정을 κ²ͺλŠ”λ‹€. 이 과정은 μƒλ‘œλ³‘μ‚¬μ˜ 생물학적 변화뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 배우고 읡히며 생업을 μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜κ³  가쑱을 μ΄λ£¨λŠ” λ“±μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ  λ³€ν™”λ‘œλ„ 이뀄진닀. 그리고 이 λ³€ν™”λŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ λ¬Έν™”, κ·œλ²”, 체계 등에 μ˜ν•΄ κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœλ‹€. 연령은 λ‹¨μˆœν•œ 생쑴 ν–‡μˆ˜κ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ κ·Έ μ‚¬λžŒμ΄ μ‚¬νšŒμ—μ„œ μ°¨μ§€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μœ„μΉ˜, μ—­ν• , μ‚¬νšŒμ  정체성을 λ°˜μ˜ν•΄ λ³΄μ—¬μ£ΌλŠ” μ£Όμš”ν•œ μ§€ν‘œμΈ 것이닀. κ·Έλ ‡κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ‚¬νšŒκ³Όν•™ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 연령은 맀우 μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ³  기본적인 λ³€μˆ˜μ΄μ§€λ§Œ, κ·Έ μ€‘μš”μ„±κ³Ό ν•¨μ˜μ— λΉ„ν•΄ 뢄석 κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œλŠ” λ‹¨μˆœν•˜κ²Œ μ‚¬μš©λ˜μ–΄μ™”λ‹€. 연령을 μ—°μ†μ β€§μ„ ν˜•μ  λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜, 5λ…„ λ˜λŠ” 10λ…„ λ‹¨μœ„μ˜ λ²”μ£Ό λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜λŠ” 것은 인간 μ‚Άμ˜ 변화와 그에 λ”°λ₯Έ μ‚¬νšŒμ  μ’Œν‘œ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ œλŒ€λ‘œ ν¬μ°©ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œλ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 이에 문제λ₯Ό μ œκΈ°ν•˜κ³ , 이둠적 기반 μœ„μ—μ„œ 싀증적인 뢄석을 톡해 μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£Όλ₯Ό μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ—°λ Ή μž¬κ΅¬μ„±μ— 기반이 λ˜λŠ” 이둠은 μ‚¬νšŒ 연결망 이둠이닀. μ‚¬νšŒ 연결망 이둠은 ν•œ μ‚¬λžŒμ€ κ·Έ μ‚¬λžŒμ΄ μ†ν•œ κ΄€κ³„μ˜ μ΄ν•©μ΄λΌλŠ” 관계둠적 μ‹œκ°μœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬νšŒλ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•œλ‹€. λ‚˜μ΄λ“€λ©° κ²ͺλŠ” μ‚¬νšŒμ  λ³€ν™”λŠ”, μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ μ—°λ Ή κ·œλ²”κ³Ό ꡬ쑰 μ†μ—μ„œ κ·Έ μ‚¬λžŒμ΄ μœ„μΉ˜ν•œ λ‹€λ₯Έ μ‚¬λžŒλ“€κ³Όμ˜ 관계 λ³€ν™”μ—μ„œ ν¬μ°©ν•˜λŠ” 것이 νš¨κ³Όμ μ΄λ‹€. 이에 따라 μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ—°κ²°λ§μ΄ 연령에 따라 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ λ‹¬λΌμ§€λŠ”κ°€λ₯Ό μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄κ³ , λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ 연결망을 가진 μ—°λ ΉλΌλ¦¬λŠ” 같은 κ΅¬κ°„μœΌλ‘œ, λ‹€λ₯Έ 연결망을 가진 연령은 λ‹€λ₯Έ κ΅¬κ°„μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„λ₯˜ν•˜μ—¬ 연령을 μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 즉 ꡬ간 λ‚΄ λ™μ§ˆμ„±κ³Ό ꡬ간 κ°„ 차별성을 μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£Όν™”μ˜ 방법둠적 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ μ‚Όμ•˜λ‹€. 뢄석 μžλ£ŒλŠ” ν•œκ΅­μ’…ν•©μ‚¬νšŒμ‘°μ‚¬(KGSS) 2004λ…„μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ  지원망 쑰사문항이닀. 도ꡬ적 지원 μ˜μ—­, 물질적 지원 μ˜μ—­, μ •μ„œμ  지원 μ˜μ—­μ—μ„œ 도움이 ν•„μš”ν•  λ•Œ 도움을 μš”μ²­ν•  μ‚¬λžŒμ„ μ‘°μ‚¬ν•œ μžλ£Œλ‹€. 이 응닡 μ •λ³΄λŠ” 배우자, λΆ€λͺ¨λ‹˜μ—μ„œλΆ€ν„° 동넀 μ˜μ‚¬λ‚˜ μ‚¬μ±„μ—…μžκΉŒμ§€λ₯Ό ν¬κ΄„ν•˜μ—¬ μ•½ 33개의 μœ ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ 이뀄져 μžˆμ—ˆλŠ”λ°, latent class λΆ„μ„μœΌλ‘œ λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ 지원 νŒ¨ν„΄μ„ λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 7개 μ§‘λ‹¨μœΌλ‘œ 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν–ˆλ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό ν•œκ΅­μΈμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ  지원 집단은 배우자/ μΉœν•œ 친ꡬ/ μ–΄λ¨Έλ‹ˆμ™€ μ—¬μžν˜•μ œ/ λ”Έκ³Ό 이웃/ 아버지, μ•„λ“€, λ‚¨μžν˜•μ œ 및 μ€ν–‰β€§κΈˆμœ΅κΈ°κ΄€/ 가깝지 μ•Šμ€ μΉœμ²™μ„ ν¬ν•¨ν•œ 기타/ κ·Έ μ™Έμ˜ λͺ¨λ“  기타 집단이 ν”ΌλΌλ―Έλ“œ ν˜•νƒœμ˜ ꡬ쑰둜 쀑심-쀑간-주변측을 이룸을 λ°ν˜”λ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ 이 7개 집단이 연령에 따라 λ³€ν•˜λŠ” νŒ¨ν„΄μ— 따라 μƒˆ μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£Όλ₯Ό κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‚¬μš©ν•œ 뢄석법은 νŒλ³„λΆ„μ„μ΄λ©°, 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό λ„μΆœλœ μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£ΌλŠ” 18~26μ„Έ/ 27~30μ„Έ/ 31~39μ„Έ/ 40~67μ„Έ/ 68~76/ 77~93μ„Έμ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ²”μ£ΌλŠ” μ‚¬νšŒ μ—°κ²°λ§μ—μ„œ μΉœκ΅¬μ™€ λΆ€λͺ¨κ°€ μ€‘μš”ν•œ 역할을 ν•˜λ‹€κ°€ 혼인 ν›„ 배우자의 μ€‘μš”μ„±μ΄ κΈ‰κ²©νžˆ 늘고, μΆœμ‚°μ„ 기점으둜 이웃이 λ“±μž₯ν•˜λ©°, 고령이 될수둝 μΉœκ΅¬μ™€ 배우자의 비쀑은 쀄어듀고 μžλ…€μ˜ 비쀑이 λŠ˜μ–΄λ‚˜λŠ” λ“±μ˜ ν•œκ΅­μΈμ˜ 생애주기와 λ°€μ ‘νžˆ 맞물렀 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 삢이 λ³€ν•˜λŠ” μ†λ„μ˜ 완급에 따라 λ²”μ£Ό κ΅¬κ°„μ˜ 길이도 λ‹€λ₯΄κ²Œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ 뢄석 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 뢄산뢄석을 μ‚¬μš©ν–ˆλ‹€. 뢄산뢄석은 집단 κ°„ 차이와 집단 λ‚΄ 차이의 λΉ„μœ¨κ°’μœΌλ‘œ 집단 κ°„ 차이λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜λ―€λ‘œ, ꡬ간 λ‚΄ λ™μ§ˆμ„±κ³Ό ꡬ간 κ°„ 차별성을 방법둠적 κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ 삼은 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°©ν–₯κ³Ό μΌμΉ˜ν•œλ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό, 기쑴의 μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£Όλ“€ 간에 차이가 μžˆλŠ” μ€€κ±° λ³€μˆ˜μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 이 연ꡬ가 κ΅¬μ„±ν•œ μ—°λ Ή 범주도 μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€μœΌλ©°, λŒ€μ²΄λ‘œ 더 λ‚˜μ€ μ„€λͺ…λ ₯을 λ³΄μ—¬μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. μ‚¬νšŒ 연결망 이둠을 λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ 싀증적 자료 뢄석을 톡해 생애주기λ₯Ό λ°˜μ˜ν•˜λŠ” μ—°λ Ή λ²”μ£Όλ₯Ό κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ² λ‹€λŠ” 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ„ λ‹¬μ„±ν•œ 것이닀. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ λ™μ‹œμ—, λͺ‡λͺ‡ λ³€μˆ˜μ—μ„œλŠ” κ°€μž₯ 쒋은 μ„€λͺ…λ ₯을 보여 μ€€ λ²”μ£Όκ°€ 각기 λ‹¬λžλ‹€. 연령은 신체적, 심리적, μ‚¬νšŒμ  μ°¨μ›μ—μ„œ μ—¬λŸ¬ νŠΉμ„±μ„ ν•¨μΆ•ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ§€ν‘œμ΄κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— κ·Έ λ§₯락에 따라 κ°™κ³  λ‹€λ¦„μ˜ λ²”μ£Όκ°€ λ‹¬λΌμ§ˆ 수 있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 연령이 효과적인 뢄석 λ²”μ£Όκ°€ 되기 μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ κ³Ό 뢄석 λŒ€μƒμ— λ”°λ₯Έ 싀증적 λ²”μ£Όν™”κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μš”μ²­μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ λͺ¨λΈμ΄μž, 생애주기λ₯Ό κ΄€κ³„λ‘ μ μœΌλ‘œ 읽어낸 결과이닀.1μž₯. λ‚˜μ΄ν…Œμ™€ μ—°λ Ή 2μž₯. 관계둠적 μ‹œκ°μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜μ΄ν…Œ λ‹€μ‹œ 읽기 1. κΈ°μ‘΄ μ„ κΈ‹κΈ° 방식과 κ·Έ ν•œκ³„ 2. μƒˆ ν‹€ 짜기 (1) 관계둠적 μ‹œκ°μœΌλ‘œ λ³Έ μ—°λ Ή (2) ν‹€ 짜기 3μž₯. λ‚˜μ΄ν…Œ μƒˆλ‘œ 그리기 1. 자료: ν•œκ΅­μ’…ν•©μ‚¬νšŒμ‘°μ‚¬ (1) 2004λ…„ ν•œκ΅­μ’…ν•©μ‚¬νšŒμ‘°μ‚¬ (2) μ‚¬νšŒμ  연결망 쑰사 λ¬Έν•­ (3) λ³€μˆ˜ 닀듬기: ν΄λŸ¬μŠ€ν„° 뢄석 2. 뢄석: μ„ κΈ‹κΈ° (1) 1단계: μ—°λ Ή 크게 λ¬ΆκΈ° (2) 2단계: λͺ…ν™•ν•˜κ²Œ μ„  κΈ‹κΈ° 3. 해석: 그어놓은 μ„  읽기 4μž₯. μ œν’ˆ μ‹œν—˜ 1. μ‹œν—˜ 방법 2. μ‹œν—˜ κ²°κ³Ό (1) μ •μΉ˜μ  νƒœλ„ (2) μ‚¬νšŒμ  지원 제곡 ν–‰μœ„μ˜ 정도 (3) κ°€μ‘±κ³Ό μΉœκ΅¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ°€μΉ˜κ΄€ 5μž₯. κ²°λ‘  1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μš”μ•½ 및 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 및 더 λ‚˜μ•„κ°ˆ λ°©ν–₯ μ œμ‹œ μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ AbstractMaste

    Development of Tourism and the Change of Production and Meaning System of Thai Handicraft : a case study of Baan Thawai, a woodcarving village in Chiangmai

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :인λ₯˜ν•™κ³Ό 인λ₯˜ν•™ 전곡,2003.Docto

    Migration from Urban to Rural in the 2010's: New Possibilities of Population Mobility and Rural Space

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬νšŒκ³Όν•™λŒ€ν•™ μ‚¬νšŒν•™κ³Ό, 2022. 2. λ°•κ²½μˆ™.This study reconstructs the increasing phenomenon of rural population inflow in the 2010's with the demographic concept of 'urban-rural migration', and discusses the characteristics and causes of migration. It is confirmed that in the 2010's, Korean society has experienced a structural demographic shift toward rural areas. We have discovered that the context behind this migration is the increased mobility and diverse imaginations of rural spaces. The structural sustainability of urban-rural migration in the 2010's was confirmed by chronological analysis of rural inflow population in the overall population movement. In terms of population size, the proportion of the population as a whole is not yet large, but it is a new population trend that is drawing attention in terms of persistence and spatial range. It is also distinguished from sub-urbanization. Although it is a non-metropolitan movement, it has persistence and scalability. The reason why this phenomenon has occurred in the 2010's was analyzed by regional-level statistics and micro-level interviews with migration actors. Urban-rural migration in the 2010's is still a new phenomenon, relatively small, and is progressing in various ways, making it difficult to explain in a causal model. For this reason, there are few overall and comprehensive prior studies. Therefore, this paper uses mixed data and various theories. First of all, using regional-level statistics and a demographic migration model, this study examined the factors affecting rural population inflow. As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions were drawn for each factors. 1) Economic Factors: Employment is important, but competition density is more important than quality of employment. 2) Policy factors; It only affects the settlement, while the effect on the selection of region is unclear. However, regional development policies have negative effects. 3) Living environment: The more houses there are in the area, the more negative effects appear. The urban environment (educational facilities, roads, etc.) has a negative effect. In other words, it shows a different characteristic from the urban mobility mechanism. Population density, however, was found to be an important variable. However, population density was found to be an important variable. It was reconfirmed that a reasonable level of population is important to the local society. 4) Natural environment; non-artificial natural scenery, tourism landscape, and agricultural landscape were classified and analyzed. Among them, only the sightseeing scenery was meaningful. Summarizing theses results, it can be concluded that mechanism of urban-rural migration in the 2010's is different from that of migration toward a city. Then, how does the mechanisms of urban-rural migration work on the experiences of people who has moved to rural area in the 2010's? The study reconstructed people's migration experience as a step-by-step process of "background - determination - choice - practice." Then, from a mobility theory perspective, this study tried to find factors and driving forces that play an important role in each stage. Through this, what is the new meaning that has not been illuminated in the existing discussions and what is the common context of various causes of occurrence is explained as follows. In the interview, senses of mobility, cultural values, evaluation of urban life-style, and prospects for rural place appeared as the background of the urban-rural migration. These factors are linked to the increase in mobility and liquidity, the trend of 'returning to rural' movement, spread of diversity and ecological values in Korean society in the 2010's. These factors were latent in the lives of actors and triggered urban-rural migration when pressure of transition occurred due to life events or jobs. The triggered migration decision establishes a path to the region through social networks, SNS, media, and policies. Finally, the destination was determined under the influence of these factors; 'natural environment', 'living conditions', and 'resident's hospitality'. In this process, it was discovered that rural space are expected to be different from traditional ones. In traditional discourse, rural spaces are represented as an opposite site of a city. Rural space also functions as a 'kitchen garden' where actors can practice their prospect. The reason why people think so is that the countryside is 'empty'. There are only few people, there are low competition, no rules, no orders. It gives the impression that people can freely decide and experiment on your own. Urban and urban problems arose from domestic migration toward development during the industrialization period. This study argues that the new flow of urban-rural migration in the 2010's is also likely to create a new space in rural region. As described above, this paper presented a new possibility of urban-rural migration in the 2010's. The direction of movement, the mechanism of operation, and the meaning of space are different from before. Up until now, rural areas have been described by keywords such as "agriculture, opposition to urbanization and retirement". Regional population problems have been explained by keywords such as "economy, development, productive population and the youth". However, these keywords are based on the view that "rural areas are opposing spaces against cities", that "movement is cost", and that "the production population and growth are key solution to demographic crisis". However, this study has argued that all of these perspectives did not properly recognize the urban-rural migration phenomenon in the 2010's. This article proposes the possibility of a new interpretation. The phenomenon of urban-rural migration in the 2010's is a new flow of migration, a result of various mobility, and the possibility of change in rural spaces.이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 2010λ…„λŒ€ μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ„μ‹œμ—μ„œ λ†μ΄ŒμœΌλ‘œμ˜ 이주 ν˜„μƒμ„ 이도ν–₯촌 μ΄μ£ΌλΌλŠ” 인ꡬ학적 κ°œλ…μœΌλ‘œ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ³ , 이 μ΄λ™μ˜ 성격과 λ°œμƒ λ§₯락을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό 톡해 2010λ…„λŒ€ ν•œκ΅­μ‚¬νšŒμ— λ„μ‹œμ—μ„œ λ†μ΄ŒμœΌλ‘œ ν–₯ν•˜λŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 인ꡬ이동이 μ‚¬νšŒκ΅¬μ‘°μ  μˆ˜μ€€μ—μ„œ ν˜•μ„±λ˜μ–΄μžˆμŒμ„ ν™•μΈν•˜κ³ , 이 이동을 μΆ”λ™ν•˜λŠ” λ°œμƒ λ§₯락에 μš°λ¦¬μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ λͺ¨λΉŒλ¦¬ν‹° 증가와 λ†μ΄Œ 곡간에 λŒ€ν•œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 전망이 μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ²Œ μž‘μš©ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ λ„μΆœν–ˆλ‹€. λ¨Όμ € 전체 인ꡬ이동 흐름 μ†μ—μ„œ 촌 지역에 μœ μž…λ˜λŠ” 인ꡬλ₯Ό μ‹œκ³„μ—΄μ μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 ꡬ쑰적 지속성을 ν™•μΈν–ˆλ‹€. 인ꡬ 크기의 κ΄€μ μœΌλ‘œλŠ” 이도ν–₯촌 이주가 아직 전체 μΈκ΅¬μ΄λ™λŸ‰μ—μ„œ μ°¨μ§€ν•˜λŠ” 비쀑이 크지 μ•Šμ§€λ§Œ, μ‹œκ°„μ  지속성과 곡간적 ν™•μž₯μ„±μ˜ κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ 이 이동은 2010λ…„λŒ€μ— μ£Όλͺ©λ˜λŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 인ꡬ이동 λ‹¨κ³„λ‘œ 평가될 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ κ΅μ™Έν™”λœ 이동과도 κ΅¬λΆ„λ˜λŠ” μ΄λ™μœΌλ‘œμ„œ, λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  μ΄λ™μ΄λ©΄μ„œλ„ 지속성과 ν™•μž₯성을 가진 μ΄λ™μž„μ„ ν™•μΈν–ˆλ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν˜„μƒμ΄ 2010λ…„λŒ€μ— λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” 이유λ₯Ό 지역 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 톡계와 λ―Έμ‹œμ  ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ κ²½ν—˜ μ„œμ‚¬λ₯Ό ν•¨κ»˜ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄λŠ” λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 μ΄μ£ΌλŠ” 아직은 μƒˆλ‘­κ²Œ μ‹œμž‘λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” ν˜„μƒμ΄λ©°, μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ μž‘μ€ 규λͺ¨λ‘œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜κ²Œ μ „κ°œλ˜κ³  있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— 이 ν˜„μƒμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒκ΅¬μ‘°μ  원인을 인과적 λͺ¨ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ ν’€μ–΄λ‚΄λŠ” 것은 μƒλ‹Ήνžˆ μ–΄λ ΅λ‹€. 이 ν˜„μƒμ„ μ „μ²΄μ μœΌλ‘œ, 그리고 μ’…ν•©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ„€λͺ…ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” κΈ°μ‘΄ λ…Όμ˜κ°€ λ§Žμ§€ μ•Šμ€ κΉŒλ‹­μ΄λ‹€. κ·Έλž˜μ„œ 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ μ „λž΅μœΌλ‘œ λ³Έ 논문은 ν˜Όν•©μ  μžλ£Œμ™€ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 이둠적 관점을 μ°¨μš©ν•œλ‹€. μš°μ„  지역 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 톡계와 인ꡬ이동 기제 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 이도ν–₯촌 μΈκ΅¬μœ μž…μ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μš”μΈλ“€μ΄ 무엇인가λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 각 μ˜μ—­λ³„λ‘œ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 결둠이 λ„μΆœλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 1) 경제적 μš”μΈμ€ μΌμžλ¦¬κ°€ μ€‘μš”ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ 일자리의 μˆ˜μ€€ λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” 경쟁이 ν¬ν™”μƒνƒœκ°€ μ•„λ‹Œ 것이 더 μ€‘μš”ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 2) 정책적 μš”μΈμ€ 이주 ν›„ 정착에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ  뿐, 이주 μ‹œμ μ—μ„œ 지역을 μ„ νƒν•˜λŠ” μ‹œμ μ—μ„œλŠ” μ–΄λ– ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ”μ§€κ°€ λΆˆλΆ„λͺ…ν•˜λ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ μ§€μ—­κ°œλ°œ 정책은 λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  이도ν–₯촌 μ΄λ™μ—λŠ” λΆ€(-)의 효과λ₯Ό λ―ΈμΉœλ‹€. 3) μƒν™œν™˜κ²½μ€ 지역에 주택이 λ§Žμ€ 것이 였히렀 μ—­νš¨κ³Όλ₯Ό λ‚΄κ³  있으며, κ΅μœ‘μ‹œμ„€μ΄λ‚˜ λ„λ‘œμ™€ 같은 λ„μ‹œμ  ν™˜κ²½μ€ 뢀정적 영ν–₯을 미치고 μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜, λ„μ‹œ μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ 이동 κΈ°μ œμ™€λŠ” λ‹€λ₯Έ 양상을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. λ‹€λ§Œ μΈκ΅¬λ°€λ„λŠ” μ€‘μš”ν•œ λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— 이주 지역에 적정 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 인ꡬ가 μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜λŠ” 것이 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 점을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 4) μžμ—°ν™˜κ²½μ€ μΈμœ„μ μ΄μ§€ μ•Šμ€ μžμ—°κ²½κ΄€κ³Ό κ΄€κ΄‘κ²½κ΄€, λ†μ—…κ²½κ΄€μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜μ—¬ νŒŒμ•…ν•  수 μžˆλŠ”λ°, 이 μ€‘μ—μ„œ κ΄€κ΄‘κ²½κ΄€λ§Œμ΄ μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ’…ν•©ν•˜λ©΄ 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 μ΄μ£Όμ—μ„œ 도착 μ§€μ—­μ˜ 쑰건은 λ„μ‹œλ‘œμ˜ μ΄λ™κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯Έ 기제둜 μž‘λ™ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ 확인할 수 μžˆλ‹€. κ·Έλ ‡λ‹€λ©΄ 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 λ…νŠΉν•œ κΈ°μ œκ°€ λ―Έμ‹œμ  ν–‰μœ„μžμ˜ κ²½ν—˜ μ†μ—μ„œλŠ” μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μž‘λ™ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”κ°€? 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 이에 λŒ€ν•΄ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 κ²½ν—˜μ„ λ°°κ²½-κ²°μ •-선택-μ‹€μ²œμ˜ 단계적 κ³Όμ •μœΌλ‘œ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ³ , 각 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œ μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ²Œ μž‘μš©ν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈκ³Ό 좔동λ ₯을 λͺ¨λΉŒλ¦¬ν‹° 이둠적 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ μ°Ύμ•„λ‚΄κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό 톡해 기쑴의 κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ λ…Όμ˜μ—μ„œ μ‘°λͺ…λ˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ˜, 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ˜λ―ΈλŠ” 무엇인지, 이 μ΄λ™μ˜ 닀쒅닀기함이 λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” λ§₯락은 무엇인가λ₯Ό λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같이 μ„€λͺ…ν•˜κ³ μž ν–ˆλ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬μ°Έμ—¬μžλ“€μ˜ κ²½ν—˜ μ†μ—μ„œ 이도ν–₯촌 μ΄μ£ΌλŠ” 이미 ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ 생애 속에 λͺ¨λΉŒλ¦¬ν‹°μ˜ 감각, 문화적 κ°€μΉ˜μ™€ νƒœλ„, λ„μ‹œ μƒν™œμ— λŒ€ν•œ 평가, 촌 지역에 λŒ€ν•œ μ „λ§μ΄λΌλŠ” μš”μΈμ„ 배경으둜 λ‚΄ν¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μš”μΈλ“€μ€ 2010λ…„λŒ€ λ“€μ–΄ μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μ‹¬ν™”λ˜μ–΄ 온 μš°λ¦¬μ‚¬νšŒμ˜ 이동성과 μœ λ™μ„± 증가, 그리고 κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ λ‹΄λ‘ μ˜ 증가, λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ‚Άκ³Ό μƒνƒœμ  κ°€μΉ˜μ˜ ν™•μ‚° λ“±κ³Ό 맞물렀 ν˜•μ„±λœ 것듀이닀. 이 μš”μΈλ“€μ€ ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ 생애 속에 μž λ³΅λ˜μ–΄μžˆλ‹€κ°€, ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ΄ 생애 μ‚¬κ±΄μ΄λ‚˜ 일자리 μƒν™©μœΌλ‘œ 인해 μ‚Άμ˜ μ „ν™˜μ˜ μ••λ ₯을 λ°›κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆμ„ λ•Œ, λ„μ‹œμ—μ„œμ˜ μ‚Άμ˜ μœ λ™μ„±κ³Ό 맞물렀 이도ν–₯촌 이주λ₯Ό μΆ”λ™ν•˜κ³  μ΄‰λ°œν–ˆλ‹€. 그리고 μ΄λ ‡κ²Œ μ΄‰λ°œλœ 이주 결정은 μ‚¬νšŒμ—°κ²°λ§, SNS, λ―Έλ””μ–΄, κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ μ •μ±… 등을 톡해 지역에 μ—°κ²°λ˜λŠ” 경둜λ₯Ό μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³  μ§€μ—­μ˜ μžμ—° ν™˜κ²½, μƒν™œ 방편, μ§€μ—­μ£Όλ―Όμ˜ ν™˜λŒ€ μš”μΈμ— 따라 μ΅œμ’… λͺ©μ μ§€λ₯Ό μ •ν•˜λŠ” 과정을 거쳐 μ‹€μ œ 이주둜 μ‹€μ²œλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 이 κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ λ†μ΄Œ 곡간은 전톡적인 λ†μ΄Œ μ§€μ—­μ˜ ν‘œμƒκ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯΄κ²Œ μ „λ§λ˜κ³  있음이 λ°œκ²¬λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 μ΄μ£Όμ—μ„œ 촌 지역은 λ„μ‹œ λŒ€ λ†μ΄Œμ˜ 이뢄법적 곡간이라기 λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” λ„μ‹œμ™€ λ†μ΄Œ, λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 지역을 μ—°κ²°ν•˜λŠ” μ •κ±°μž₯이자 이주 ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 전망을 μ‹€μ²œν•˜λŠ” ν…ƒλ°­κ³Ό 같은 κ³΅κ°„μœΌλ‘œ ν˜•μ„±λ˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 그리고 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ „λ§μ˜ 근거둜 촌 μ§€μ—­μ˜ λΉ„μ–΄μžˆμŒ, 즉 μ‚¬λžŒμ΄ μ—†λŠ” λ°μ„œ μ˜€λŠ” 경쟁, 미리 정해진 κ·œμΉ™, 타인듀이 λ§Œλ“€μ–΄λ†“μ€ ν‹€μ˜ λΆ€μž¬κ°€ μž‘λ™ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ‚°μ—…ν™” μ‹œκΈ°, μ„±μž₯κ³Ό λ°œμ „μ„ ν–₯ν•œ 인ꡬ이동이 λ„μ‹œ 곡간과 λ„μ‹œ 문제λ₯Ό νƒ„μƒμ‹œμΌ°λ“―μ΄ 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 흐름 μ—­μ‹œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λ†μ΄Œ κ³΅κ°„μ˜ κ°€λŠ₯μ„±, 그리고 문제λ₯Ό ν•¨μΆ•ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 것이닀. 이상과 같이 λ³Έ 논문은 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주가 μ΄λ™μ˜ λ°©ν–₯이 λ„μ‹œμ—μ„œ 촌으둜 μ„€μ •λ˜μ–΄μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μƒˆλ‘­κ³ , 이동을 μΆ”λ™ν•˜λŠ” κΈ°μ œκ°€ λ„μ‹œλ‘œμ˜ 이동과 λ‹€λ₯΄λ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μƒˆλ‘œμš°λ©°, 이동과 λ†μ΄Œ 곡간에 λΆ€μ—¬λ˜λŠ” μ˜λ―Έμ™€ 전망이 이전 μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ λ‹€λ₯΄λ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μƒˆλ‘­λ‹€λŠ” 것을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. κ·Έλ™μ•ˆ κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ 담둠은 농업, 반(反)λ„μ‹œμ  κ°€μΉ˜, μ€ν‡΄λΌλŠ” ν‚€μ›Œλ“œλ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ μ„€λͺ…λ˜μ–΄ μ™”κ³ , 지역 인ꡬ문제의 담둠은 경제, 개발, 생산인ꡬ(μ²­λ…„)λΌλŠ” ν‚€μ›Œλ“œλ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ μ„€λͺ…λ˜μ–΄ μ™”λ‹€. 이듀 담둠에 μ „μ œλœ 관점은 λ†μ΄Œ 곡간은 λ„μ‹œμ— λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€λ¦½ν•­μ˜ κ³΅κ°„μ΄λΌλŠ” 것, 그리고 이동은 λΉ„μš©μ΄λΌλŠ” 것, 지역 문제의 해법은 생산인ꡬλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ μ„±μž₯μ΄λΌλŠ” 것이닀. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 이 μ„Έ 가지 관점 λͺ¨λ‘ 2010λ…„λŒ€ ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ ν˜•μ„±λ˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 이도ν–₯촌 이주 흐름을 μ œλŒ€λ‘œ ν¬μ°©ν•΄μ„œ μ„€λͺ…ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ λ…Όμ˜ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ ν•΄μ„μ˜ κ°€λŠ₯성을 μ œμ‹œν•˜κ³ μž ν–ˆλ‹€. 그리고 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μΈκ΅¬μ΄λ™μœΌλ‘œ 읽어낸 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 ν˜„μƒμ€ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λͺ¨λΉŒλ¦¬ν‹°κ°€ μž‘λ™ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” νλ¦„μœΌλ‘œμ„œ, λ†μ΄Œκ³΅κ°„μ„ μƒˆλ‘­κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  ꡬ성해 λ‚˜κ°ˆ 수 μžˆλŠ” κ°€λŠ₯성을 λ‹΄κ³  μžˆμŒμ„ λ°œκ²¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.제1μž₯. μ„œ λ‘  1 1절. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½κ³Ό λ¬Έμ œμ˜μ‹ 1 2절. 선행연ꡬ κ²€ν†  5 1. κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ κ°œλ…κ³Ό ν˜„ν™© 6 2. κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ ν˜„μƒμ˜ 규λͺ…: λ―Έμ‹œμ  μ ‘κ·Όκ³Ό κ±°μ‹œμ  μ ‘κ·Ό 14 3. κ·€λ†κ·€μ΄Œ λ‹΄λ‘ μ˜ 성격과 ν•œκ³„ 24 3절. 이둠적 μžμ› 29 1. 인ꡬ이동 이둠: 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 ꡬ성 30 2. λͺ¨λΉŒλ¦¬ν‹° 이둠: 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 해석 48 4절. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ꡬ성 55 1. 연ꡬ 질문 55 2. 연ꡬ 방법 59 3. λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ ꡬ성 66 제2μž₯. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 μœ„μΉ˜μ™€ 성격 69 1절. 전체 인ꡬ이동 흐름 속 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 μœ„μΉ˜ 69 1. μ „κ΅­μ˜ μž₯기적 μΈκ΅¬μœ μž… μƒνƒœ 뢄석 70 2. μ§€μ†μœ μΆœν˜•, λΆˆκ·œμΉ™μœ μΆœν˜•, μˆœμœ μž…μ „ν™˜ν˜•, μ§€μ†μœ μž…ν˜•μ˜ λ„μΆœ 76 3. 이도ν–₯촌 이주 ν˜„μƒμ˜ μ‹œκ°„μ  지속성과 곡간적 ν™•μž₯μ„± 81 2절. 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 λ‹€μ’…λ‹€κΈ°μ„± 83 1. 촌 μ§€μ—­μ˜ μœ μž…μΈκ΅¬ 성격 뢄석 84 2. λΉ„λ„μ‹œν˜•, κ΅μ™Έν™”ν˜•, ν˜Όν•©ν˜•μ˜ λ„μΆœ 86 3. 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 λ‹€μ–‘μ„±: λ„μ‹œμ„±κ³Ό λΉ„(非)λ„μ‹œμ„± 94 3절.λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  μˆœμœ μž… μ „ν™˜ μ§€μ—­μ˜ 발견 96 1. μΈκ΅¬μœ μž… μƒνƒœμ™€ (λΉ„)λ„μ‹œμ  이동 κ°„μ˜ 관계 96 2. λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  이도ν–₯촌 이주 μ§€μ—­μ˜ 전ꡭ적 뢄포 100 3. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 λ‹€μ–‘μ„±κ³Ό λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  μ΄λ™μ˜ ν™•μž₯μ„± 107 4절. μ†Œκ²° 108 제3μž₯. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 λ°œμƒμ˜ 110 1절. 인ꡬ이동 κΈ°μ œμ™€ 지역 μš”μΈ 112 1. μ§€μ—­μœΌλ‘œ μœ μž…λ˜λŠ” 이도ν–₯촌 인ꡬ 112 2. μΈκ΅¬μœ μž…μ˜ 쑰건: 경제적 μš”μΈ, μ •μ±… μš”μΈ, μƒν™œν™˜κ²½, μžμ—°ν™˜κ²½ 115 2절. λΉ„λ„μ‹œμ  이동을 μΆ”λ™ν•˜λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 지역 μš”μΈ 128 1. 지역 μš”μΈμ˜ 닀측적 ꡬ성 129 2. 경제 μš”μΈ μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ μ΄λ™μ—μ„œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μš”μΈμ΄ μž‘μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ΄λ™μœΌλ‘œ 133 3절. μ†Œκ²° 146 제4μž₯. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 149 1절. 이도ν–₯촌 이주 κ²½ν—˜μ˜ λ―Έμ‹œμ  νŠΉμ„±κ³Ό κ±°μ‹œμ  λ§₯락 151 1. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 κ²½ν—˜μ˜ λ―Έμ‹œμ  νŠΉμ„± 151 2. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 κ²½ν—˜μ˜ κ±°μ‹œμ  뢄석 μ „λž΅ 157 2절. 이도ν–₯촌 이주의 μ „κ°œ κ³Όμ • 160 1. λ°°κ²½: μ΄λ™μ˜ 의미 ν˜•μ„± 160 2. κ²°μ •: μ΄λ™μ˜ μ΄‰λ°œ 180 3. 선택: μ΄λ™μ˜ 경둜 μ„€μ • 192 4. μ‹€μ²œ: μ΄λ™μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 무게 207 3절. μ†Œκ²° 215 제5μž₯. 2010λ…„λŒ€ 이도ν–₯촌 이주 μ†μ—μ„œ 219 1절. 이도ν–₯촌 이주와 λ†μ΄Œ 곡간 220 2절. 촌 지역이 이주 κ³΅κ°„μœΌλ‘œ μ „λ§λ˜κ³  κ²½ν—˜λ˜λŠ” μ„Έ 가지 방식 221 1. 곡백: λΉ„μ–΄μžˆκΈ°μ— μ±„μšΈ 수 μžˆλŠ” 곡간 222 (1) 경쟁이 μ—†μŒ 224 (2) μ—°κ³ (관계)κ°€ μ—†μŒ 227 2. ν…ƒλ°­: μ¦‰μ‹œμ  μ‹€μ²œκ³Ό μ²΄ν—˜μ΄ κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ 곡간 239 3. μ •κ±°μž₯: λ„μ°©ν•˜κ³ , μΆœλ°œν•˜κ³ , μ—°κ²°ν•˜λŠ” 곡간 251 3절. μ†Œκ²° 263 제6μž₯. κ²° λ‘  265 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 269 285 286Docto

    Clinical and histopathologic characteristics of trichrome vitiligo

    No full text
    μ˜ν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€] 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ¦μ€ 백반증의 νƒˆμƒ‰λ°˜κ³Ό μ£Όλ³€μ˜ 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€ 사이에 쀑간 μ •λ„μ˜ 색을 κ°–λŠ” ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰μ˜ 띠λ₯Ό μ΄λ£¨λŠ” 병변을 λ³΄μ΄λŠ” κ²½μš°μ΄λ‹€. ν˜„μž¬κΉŒμ§€ κ·Έ λ³‘μΈμ΄λ‚˜ 병리쑰직학적 μ†Œκ²¬μ— λŒ€ν•œ ꡬ체적인 μ—°κ΅¬λ³΄κ³ λŠ” μ—†λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 삼색성 백반증 ν™˜μž 21λͺ…μ—μ„œ ν†΅μƒμ˜ 백반증 양상을 λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 흰색 병변과 ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변, νƒˆμƒ‰λ°˜μ— μΈμ ‘ν•œ 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€, 그리고 λ³‘λ³€μ—μ„œ 5 cm 이상 떨어진 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ 쑰직 검사λ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ—¬ 각 병변 λΆ€μœ„μ˜ 색깔에 λ”°λ₯Έ ν‘œν”Όμ™€ μ§„ν”Όμ˜ μ „λ°˜μ μΈ 병리쑰직학적 변화와 ν‘œν”Όλ‚΄ λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬μ™€ λž‘κ²Œλ₯΄ν•œμŠ€ μ„Έν¬μ˜ 뢄포 양상 그리고 μ—Όμ¦μ˜ 정도λ₯Ό κ΄€μ°°ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° ν™˜μžμ˜ μž„μƒ μ†Œκ²¬ 및 치료 κ²½κ³Όλ₯Ό μΆ”μ ν•˜μ—¬ 삼색성 백반증의 μž„μƒ 및 쑰직학적 νŠΉμ„±μ„ μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κ³  삼색성 백반증의 병인을 μΆ”μ •ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€. 1. 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ¦μ€ μ„œμ„œνžˆ μ§„ν–‰ν•˜λŠ” ν™œλ™μ„± 심상성 백반증의 μΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λ©° 주둜 체간에 ν˜Έλ°œν•˜λŠ” 양상을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. 2. 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ€‘μ˜ 쑰직 μ†Œκ²¬μƒ 흰색 λ³‘λ³€μ΄λ‚˜ 정상 피뢀에 λΉ„ν•΄ ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변과 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ ν‘œν”Όμ™€ 진피내 μ—Όμ¦μ„Έν¬μ˜ 침윀과 ν‘œν”Ό κΈ°μ €μΈ΅μ˜ 곡포성 변성이 μ‹¬ν•˜κ²Œ κ΄€μ°°λ˜λ©° 특히 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ 높은 λΉˆλ„λ‘œ κ΄€μ°°λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 3. 삼색성 백반증의 쑰직 μ†Œκ²¬μƒ 흰색 λ³‘λ³€μ΄λ‚˜ 정상 피뢀에 λΉ„ν•΄ ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변과 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ 진피내 λ©œλΌλ‹Œ νƒμ‹μ„Έν¬μ˜ μˆ˜κ°€ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 4. 삼색성 백반증의 정상 피뢀와 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬μ˜ μˆ˜λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό 보이지 μ•Šμ•˜μœΌλ©° 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변, 흰색 λ³‘λ³€μœΌλ‘œ 갈수둝 λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬μ˜ μˆ˜λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ€‘μ˜ 흰색 병변에 λŠ” 적은 μˆ˜μ΄μ§€λ§Œ λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬κ°€ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜κ³ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 5. 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ€‘μ˜ 흰색 병변과 정상 피뢀에 λΉ„ν•΄ ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변과 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€μ—μ„œ ν‘œν”Όλ‚΄ λž‘κ²Œλ₯΄ν•œμŠ€ μ„Έν¬μ˜ μˆ˜κ°€ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 6. 삼색성 백반증의 흰색 λ³‘λ³€μ΄λ‚˜ 인접 정상 피뢀에 λΉ„ν•΄ ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ λ³‘λ³€μ—μ„œμ˜ ICAM-1 λ°œν˜„μ΄ λ†’κ²Œ κ΄€μ°°λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 7. 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ¦μ€ μ „μ‹  κ΄‘ν™”ν•™ μš”λ²•μ— 잘 λ°˜μ‘ν•˜μ—¬ 쒋은 치료 효과λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ κ²°κ³Όμ—μ„œ 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ¦μ€ ν™œλ™μ„± 심상성 백반증의 일뢀 λ³‘λ³€μ—μ„œ κ΄€μ°°λ˜λŠ” μ„œμ„œνžˆ μ§„ν–‰ν•˜λŠ” 백반증 λ³‘λ³€μœΌλ‘œ λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ ν‘œν”Ό μ „λ°˜μ— 걸친 병리쑰직학적 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μœ λ°œν•˜λ©° ν™©κ°ˆμƒ‰ 병변과 인접 정상 ν”ΌλΆ€λŠ” μž„μƒμ μœΌλ‘œ 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ‘°μ§ν•™μ μœΌλ‘œλ„ ν™œλ™μ„± λ°±λ°˜μ€‘μ˜ μ†Œκ²¬μ„ 보인닀. 삼색성 λ°±λ°˜μ¦μ€ ν‘œν”Όλ‚΄ λ©œλΌλ‹Œμ„Έν¬μ™€ λž‘κ²Œλ₯΄ν•œμŠ€ 세포, κ°μ§ˆν˜•μ„±μ„Έν¬κ°€ ν•¨κ»˜ κ΄€κ³„λ˜λŠ” μ„Έν¬λ§€κ°œλ©΄μ—­λ°˜μ‘μ΄ 병인에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ μ€‘μš”ν•œ 역할을 ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μƒκ°λœλ‹€. [영문] The term "trichrome vitiligo" was first suggested in 1964 by Fitzpatrick. There is a tan zone of varing width between the normal and the totally depigmented skin and this exhibits the intermediate hue. The etiopathogenesis and the histopathologic characteristics of trichrome vitiligo are unknown. To investigate the clinical and histopathological characteristics and the pathogenesis of trichrome vitiligo, four punch biopsies were taken from twenty-one patients with trichrome vitiligo; from vitiliginous skin, light brown skin, perilesional normal skin and normal skin as far as 5cm from the nearest vitiligo spot. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining; S-100 protein, CDla and ICAM-1. The results are as follows. 1. Trichrome vitiligo occurred mostly on the trunk in active vitiligo vulgaris. 2. Vacuolar degeneration of basal cell layer in epidermis and mild inflammatory cell infiltration in epidermis and dermis were more prominent in light brown skin and perilesional normal skin than vitiliginoln skin and normal skin of trichrome vitiligo. 3. The number of melanocytes was decreased in light brown skin compaired with perilesional normal skin(p<0.05), and in vitiligonous skin compaired with light brown skin(p<0.05). 4. A few melanocytes were also observed in vitiliginous skin of trichrome vitiligo. 5. The number of Langerhans' cells was increased in epidermis of light brown skin and perilesional normal skin compared with vitiliginous skin and normal skin(P<O.05). 6. The intensity of ICAM-1 staining was most prominent in light brown skin of trichrome vitiligo. 7. In the trichrome vitiligo, the result of treatment was excellent in cases of systemic PUVA therapy. In conclusion, melanocytes, keratinocytes, and Langerhans' cells may be involved in the genesis of depigmentation in trichrome vitiligo, which means cell-mediated immunity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of trichrome vitiligo.restrictio
    corecore