6 research outputs found
ã·ã¥ãŠã㊠ã±ã€ãŸã¯ ã·ãšã³ ã ã«ã³ã¹ã« ããŠãžã·ã£ ãšã ã°ã«ãŒã ã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒ : ã·ã§ãŠã¬ã€ ã ã«ã€ãž ãã«ã€ãž ã
ãæšå¹Žãæã
ã¯å°±åŽã®çµéšããã粟ç¥é害åœäºè
6åã«å¯Ÿããå°±åŽç¶ç¶æ¯æŽãæ€èšããããã«ã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒæ³ã«ãã調æ»ãè¡ããå ±åããããã®éãé害ãé瀺ããå Žåã®å°±åŽæ¯æŽã®çµéšã«ã€ããŠæ€èšããå¿
èŠæ§ã瀺ããããããã§ãä»åãé害ãé瀺ããŠå°±åŽããçµéšããã7åã®é害åœäºè
ã«å¯Ÿããè·æ¥çµéšã«é¢ããã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒãè¡ããæšå¹Žã®çµæãšæ¯èŒæ€èšãè¡ã£ããããã®çµæãé害é瀺ã«ãããã¡ãªãããšããŠãåããã£ã³ã¹ãè·åå
容ã»ç°å¢ãžã®äžæºãå€ããããããããããã¯ãå¶åºŠã»æ¯æŽãžã®äžæºãšèŠæã®éçšåœ¢æ
ãéçšæ¯æŽå¶åºŠãè·å Žã®æ¡ä»¶ãšé¢ä¿ããŠããããšã瀺ãããæŽã«ã¯ãåœäºè
ãšæ¯æŽè
ãšã®éã§æ¯æŽã«é¢ããèªèã®ãºã¬ãããå¯èœæ§ãèãããããç¹ã«ãè·å Žå
ã§ã®ç°å¢ã»æ¥åå
容ãžã®é
æ
®ã«ãã¡ãªãããæããé害åœäºè
ããããé害åœäºè
èªèº«ã®åžæãèå³ã»é¢å¿ã«å¿ããæ¥åå
容ãéçšåœ¢æ
ãæ¯æŽã«ãªã£ãŠããªãããšãäºæž¬ãããããLast year, for the purpose of reviewing the modalities of support for continuous employment, we conducted hearing investigation through group interview with such six mentally-troubled persons who had work experiences, and we issued a report on the outcomes.ãAs a response to the above report, we got such useful feedback from others that further investigations would be necessary for us to examine the work experience of those mentally-troubled persons who disclosed their disability.ãAccordingly, this year, we conducted group interview with such seven mentally-troubled persons who had work experiences, and made a comparative review of theoutcomes of our investigation of last year and that of this year.ãFrom an analysis of the results, it is clear that these persons faced various forms of differential treatment in the chance to work, job content, work environment and others, due to disclosing their disability.ãIt is also clear that this differential treatment is associated with their disappointment with the system and support for their employment, and the difference between their request and the reality in employment status, employment support system and working conditions. Further, there may be a perception gap between these persons and their supporters in the shape of assistance.ãEspecially, some disability persons consider it disadvantageous to be given a special treatment in the working conditions and job content in the workplace. We are afraid that the reality of job content, employment status / support provided to disability persons does not meet their request which reflects their own desire and interest
ã·ã¥ãŠã㊠ã ã«ã³ã¹ã« ã·ãã³ ã ãã¬ã€ : ã·ã§ãŠã¬ã€ ããŠãžã·ã£ ã ã·ãšã³ã·ã£ ã ã°ã«ãŒã ã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒ ã ãã«ã¯ ã«ã©
ãéå»5 幎éïŒæã
ã¯ç¶ç¶çã«ã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒãå®æœãïŒé害åœäºè
ãšæ¯æŽè
ã®éã§æ¯æŽã«é¢ãããèªèã®ãºã¬ããããå¯èœæ§ã瀺ããŠããïŒãããïŒäž¡è
ãåææã«å®æœããããšãã§ããïŒç€ŸäŒçèŠå ã®éããæé€ããããšãã§ããªãã£ãïŒä»åïŒé害åœäºè
7 åãšæ¯æŽè
8 åããååãåŸãŠïŒã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒãå®æœãïŒäž¡è
ã®æ¯èŒãè¡ã£ãïŒãã®çµæïŒå
±éç¹ãšããŠïŒäž¡è
ãšããæ¯æŽãã«ãããŠããã°ã©ã ãïŒãè·å Žç°å¢ãã§ã¯äººéé¢ä¿ãéèŠããŠããïŒäžæ¹ïŒç°ãªãç¹ãšããŠã¯ïŒâ å°±åŽãžã®æºåïŒâ¡å°±åŽåã³å°±åŽåŸã®èŠç¹ïŒâ¢å°±åŽã劚ããèŠå ã®3 ç¹ã瀺ãããïŒãŸãïŒãã®èæ¯ãšããŠïŒäž¡è
ã®å°±åŽã«å¯Ÿãã䟡å€èŠ³ã®éããããïŒæ¯æŽè
ã¯é害åœäºè
ã®å°±åŽã¯æºåããå®çãŸã§ãæ¯æŽããå¿
èŠã§ãããšèãïŒäžæ¹ïŒé害åœäºè
ã¯å°±åŽã«ãä»äºã®ããããããå«ããŠãããšæãããïŒãæ¯æŽè
ãšé害åœäºè
ã®äž¡è
ãç°ãªãç«å Žã§ãã以äžïŒãèªèã®ãºã¬ããçããããšã¯åœç¶ã®ããšã§ããïŒããããå°±åŽæ¯æŽãç®æãããã§ïŒäž¡è
ã®éã«ãèªèã®ãºã¬ããååšããããšããµãŸããããã§ïŒååã§ããé¢ä¿ãã€ããããšãå¿
èŠã§ãããšèããããïŒãWe have conducted group interviews on an ongoing basis over the past five years which have indicated a possible "perception gap" related to support between persons with disabilities and their supporters. However, we have been unable to interview both persons with disabilities and their supporters at the same time and it has been impossible to eliminate the differences in social factors. In this study, we held a group interview with seven persons with disabilities and eight supporters and compared the two groups. The results indicated that, as a common point, both parties placed importance on the program and human relations in the "work environment" and in "support". However, differences between the two parties arose with respect to (1) preparation for employment, (2) perspectives on employment and postemployment, and (3) factors that interfere with employment. In addition, both parties have differing backgrounds in terms of their sense of value towards employment. Supporters believe they must support persons with disabilities in finding a job beginning with preparation for employment and continuing until they have established themselves in the job. On the other hand, persons with disabilities are thought to include "the challenge of work" in finding employment. As supporters and persons with disabilities are in different positions, it\u27s only natural for a "perception gap" to occur. It is thought thatboth parties need to build a cooperative relationship taking into account the existence of these "perception gaps" in order to facilitate better job assistance
ã·ã¥ãŠã㊠ã±ã€ãŸã¯ ã·ãšã³ ã ã«ã³ã¹ã« ããŠãžã·ã£ ãšã ã°ã«ãŒã ã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒ : ã·ãšã³ã·ã£ ã ã·ã§ãŠã¬ã€ ããŠãžã·ã£ ã ã¢ã€ã ã ã·ã§ãŠãžã« ãã³ã·ã ã ãºã¬ ã ã±ã³ããŠ
ãå°±åŽæ¯æŽã«é¢ããã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒèª¿æ»ã§ïŒé害åœäºè
ãšæ¯æŽè
ã®éã§æé»ã«çããŠããæ¯æŽãžã®èªèã®éãïŒèªèã®ãºã¬ïŒã®ååšã瀺åãããŠããïŒä»åïŒãã®ãèªèã®ãºã¬ããæ€èšããããã«ïŒå°±åŽæ¯æŽã«æºãã£ãŠããæ¯æŽè
7åã«ã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒãå®æœãïŒæ€èšããïŒããã®çµæïŒéå»ã®èª¿æ»çµæãšæ¯èŒãïŒæ¯æŽè
ãšé害åœäºè
ã®éã§3 ç¹ã®éãã瀺ãããïŒ1ïŒæ¯æŽè
ã¯é害è
èªç«æ¯æŽæ³çã®å¶åºŠã«å¯Ÿãå°±åŽæ¯æŽã«è¯å®çãªãã®ãå€ããšæããŠãããïŒé害åœäºè
ããã¯ããã£ãŠããªãã£ãïŒ2ïŒæ¯æŽã§ç®æããã®ã課é¡ã€ããŠïŒæ¯æŽè
ã¯æ¯æŽè
åŽãšé害åœäºè
åŽã«åããŠèããããšãå€ãã£ãïŒãã®èæ¯ã«æ¯æŽè
èªèº«ãæå±ããæœèšã®æ çµã¿ãæ¯æŽã«å ãïŒå°±åŽãžã®ã€ã¡ãŒãžã圱é¿ããŠãããšèããããïŒ3ïŒéå»ã®çµæåæ§ïŒæ¯æŽè
ããæ©é¢ã®é£æºã®å€§åããé害åœäºè
åŽã®èª²é¡ãšããŠã®å°±åŽãžã®æèã«é¢ããããšããããããŠãããïŒé害åœäºè
ããã¯ãªãã£ãïŒã以äžããïŒé害åœäºè
ãšæ¯æŽè
ã®ãèªèã®ãºã¬ãã¯å¶åºŠïŒå°±åŽãžã®ã€ã¡ãŒãžïŒé£æºïŒå°±åŽãžã®æèã«ãããŠçããŠããããšãèãããïŒããããèžãŸããæ¯æŽã®å¿
èŠæ§ããããšæãããïŒãIn a group interview survey regarding employment support, the existence of anâawareness gapâ, namely implied differences in awareness of support between the disabled persons concerned and the supporters, has been indicated. We have herein conducted and reviewed the group interview with 7 supporters who are involved in employment support. As a result, in comparison to past survey results, 3 differences have been indicated between the supporters and the disabled persons concerned. 1ïŒ The supporters felt that there are many positive aspects inemployment support in the Act on Support for Self-reliant Persons with Disabilities; however, the disabled persons concerned did not feel this way. 2ïŒ With regard to goals and tasks involving support, supporters often tend to make separations between the supporters and disabled persons concerned. In addition to the framework and support system of the institution to which the supporter belongs, work image also influences the thinking behind this. 3ïŒ Similar to past results, the importance of cooperation between institutions and awareness toward work as an issue for disabled persons concerned were raised; but the disabled persons concerned did not present this view. From the aforementioned, the âawareness gapâ between the disabled persons concerned and the supporters was present in the areas of system, work image, cooperation and work awareness. Providing support with these points in mind is necessary
ã·ãšã³ã·ã£ ã ããã ã ãªã«ããªãŒ : ãã³ã±ã³ ã¬ãã¥ãŒ ã«ã©
ãä»åïŒæ¥æ¬ã«ãããæ¯æŽè
èªèº«ã®ãªã«ããªãŒãæ¯æŽè
ããšãããŠãããªã«ããªãŒæŠå¿µãæããã«ããããšãç®çã«ïŒæ¯æŽè
ã®ãªã«ããªãŒã«ã€ããŠæç®ã¬ãã¥ãŒãïŒæ¥æ¬ã®çŸç¶ã§æ¯æŽè
ããªã«ããªãŒæŠå¿µã掻çšããäžã§ã®èª²é¡ã«ã€ããŠæ€èšãè¡ã£ãïŒæ¹æ³ã¯ïŒ2014 幎12 æ22 æ¥ã«å»åŠäžå€®éèªåã³CiNii ã§ãæ¯æŽè
ããªã«ããªãŒããå°é家ããªã«ããªãŒããããŒã¯ãŒãã«æç®æ€çŽ¢ãè¡ã£ãïŒæçµçã«42 æç®ãæœåºããïŒå¹Žä»£ã¯2010 幎ã20 æç®ãšæãå€ãã£ãïŒãŸãïŒå
容ã¯ïŒããªã«ããªãŒã«é¢é£ããçè«ã»ææãã14 æç®ãšæãå€ãïŒæ¯æŽè
èªèº«ã®ãªã«ããªãŒã«é¢ããæç®ã¯3 æç®ã§ãã£ãïŒãããïŒäžã€ã¯éé¢ä¿é²ã«æ¯æŽå¡ãšããŠãããã粟ç¥é害åœäºè
ã®ãªã«ããªãŒäœéšã調æ»ããåèè«æã§ããïŒæ®ã2 æç®ã¯äŒè°é²ã§ãã£ãïŒããããã®çµæããïŒæ¥æ¬ã®æ¯æŽè
ã¯é害åœäºè
ã®ãªã«ããªãŒä¿é²ãããã»ã¹ã«é¢å¿ãé«ããïŒèªåèªèº«ã®ãªã«ããªãŒã«ã€ããŠã¯é¢å¿ãäœãããšãèããããïŒåŸã£ãŠïŒé害ãç
ãçµéšããŠããªãæ¯æŽè
ãïŒæ¯æŽã®äžã§ãåœäºè
ããªã«ããªãŒãããããšããèŠç¹ã«é¥ãããã課é¡ãååšãããšæãããïŒWith the objective of clarifying the recovery of supporters themselves and the concept of recovery as perceived by the supporters in Japan, a review was made of literature dealing with the recovery of supporters and issues regarding how supporters can put into practical use the recovery concept in the present Japanese climate. The method used involved making keyword searches such as ïŒsupporters recovery,ïŒ ïŒprofessionals recoveryâ in the Igaku Chuo Zasshi and CiNii on Dec. 22, 2014. Ultimately, 33 documents were extracted, and of them, hits from the year 2010 were the greatest, with 33 documents. In addition, the most prolific content was ïŒtheory and method related to recoveryïŒ, with 14 documents, and 3 documents dealt with the recovery of the supporters themselves. However, one of such documents was the original article relating the recovery experience of a mentally disabled person with the supporter aiding in his/her discharge. The remaining 2 documents were conference minutes. From the above results, it was revealed that there is heightened interest in the recovery promotion and process on the part of supporters with regard to the disabled persons themselves, but there is low interest in the recovery of the supporters themselves. Therefore, it was thought that the task is to correct the viewpoint that the supporters who have not experienced disability or illness tend to fall into, namely to ïŒaid in the recovery of the patientâ in the process of providing support
ã»ã€ã·ã³ ã·ã§ãŠã¬ã€ ããŠãžã·ã£ ã ã¿ã€ã¹ã« ã°ã«ãŒã ã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒ : ã·ã¥ãŠã㊠ã±ã€ã±ã³ 㪠ã±ã€ãŸã¯ ã·ãšã³ ã ãã·ã ãš
ãè¿å¹Žãé害åœäºè
ã«å¯Ÿããå°±åŽæ¯æŽã®å¿
èŠæ§ã¯å¢å€§ããŠãããç¹ã«ã粟ç¥é害åœäºè
ã®ãããŒã¯ãŒã¯ã«ãããæ±äººç»é²ã¯èããå¢å ã瀺ããŠãããä»åãæã
ã¯ãå°±åŽç¶ç¶ã®æ¯æŽãç®çã«ã°ã«ãŒãã€ã³ã¿ãã¥ãŒãå®æœãããååè
ã¯å°±åŽçµéšããã粟ç¥é害åœäºè
6åã§ãããçµæãšããŠãå€å²ã«ãããå°±åŽçµéšåã³é¢è·çµéšãèªãããå°±åŽæã®é害ã®é瀺/éé瀺ã«ã€ããŠãã¡ãªããã§ãã¡ãªãããããããããããããé害ãé瀺ããŠå°±åŽããã¡ãªããã¯å°ãªããé害éé瀺ã«ããå°±åŽã®ç¶ç¶æ§ã«ã€ããŠãæèŠãåãããããŸããå°±åŽç¶ç¶ã«é¢ãã工倫ãšããŠã¯äž»ã«è¬ããããããç¹ã«å·¥å€«ããŠããªããšããæèŠãèãããããããã®ç¹ãããæ¥åžžã®äžã§æèããªã工倫ãè¡ãããŠããå¯èœæ§ãä»ã®åœäºè
ã®çµéšãäŒæ¿ãããŠããªãå¯èœæ§ãèãããããä»åŸãåœäºè
ã®çµéšã掻çšããå°±åŽæ¯æŽãå¿
èŠã§ãããšæãããããIn recent years, the need for work support for handicapped persons has increased, and particularly for job application registration at job-placement offices by persons living with mental illness. At this time, a group interview was carried out regarding support for continued work. Six people living with mental illness and with work experience were interviewed. As a result, experience working and experience losing work over a wide range, and the merits and demerits regarding disclosure / nondisclosure of disability at the time of employment, were discussed. However, merits of disclosure at the time of employment were few, and opinion was divided overcontinued work under the condition of nondisclosure. Moreover, medicine was mainly thought to be the device for continued work, but on the other hand, others did not have a specific device. From these points, the possibility of unconsciously having a device in daily life, and the possibility that experiences of others living with mental illness is not shared, were assumed. Work support, which utilizes the experiences of persons living with mental illness, is thought to be important from now