90 research outputs found

    Development of fluorescence lifetime biosensors using mTurquoise2-based platform

    Get PDF
    金沢大学博士(ナノ科学)博士論文 要旨Abstract/要約Outline【本文Full非公開】以下に掲載:Cell Reports Methods 4(11) pp.100902.1-100902.13 2024. Elsevier Inc.. 共著者:Chongxia Zhong, Satoshi Arai, Yasushi Okadadoctoral thesi

    爱的现象学:对马里翁沉思的解读与反思

    Get PDF
    爱成就了哲学的起源,却又在西方哲学史中被逐渐遗忘,马里翁意欲重构爱的现象学。爱具有优先性地位,它先于思与存在,是更伟大的理性。爱不能被对象化,给予性是研究爱的可行性道路,爱成为自由被给予的礼物,喜欢去爱的决定将自我标志为爱洛斯者。爱赋予他者以优先性,他者的凝视对其自身不可见,它呼唤我的凝视,在相互凝视的平衡中勾勒出爱的定义,爱成为不可见凝视的交错。最终爱是肉的相遇。我从他者那里接受我的肉,这是自身给予性的彻底化。我现象化他者的肉,使他者作为面容成为可见,这是他者之肉的现象化。爱甚至无需自我而自动开启爱洛斯化进程,这是对形而上学自我概念的修正。不过马里翁的爱的现象学在开拓之余,也面临无法解决的困境,需要对其加以分析批判

    历史与解释——沃尔什与伽达默尔之比较

    Get PDF
    沃尔什与伽达默尔都是西方近现代著名的哲学家,沃尔什分析的历史哲学是对历史学的二级反思,伽达默尔的哲学诠释学根植于时间性或历史性。就两位哲学家作比较,可以透过不同而发现两种理论的一些共同的光辉

    Research on Gadamer's Game

    Get PDF
    游戏概念是现代哲学的一个重要概念。本文首先回顾了历史上一些哲学家对游戏的阐述,将伽达默尔之前游戏的观点大致列为两类,一类是游戏与艺术自由,代表人物有康德和席勒;另一类是游戏与语言,代表人物有维特根斯坦和米德。文本的第二章重点阐明了伽达默尔存在论游戏概念的主要特征。游戏具有本真严肃性,游戏是艺术的存在方式。在游戏中,他者的存在得到了承认,游戏中各方他者,包括观赏者与游戏者、观众与表演者等通过参与游戏获得了和谐的统一。在境域的转换与意义的连续中游戏的偶缘性凸现出来,它是与共通感以及趣味相连的。游戏的时间性表明了历史与现实的中介功能。而游戏的对话性来自古希腊柏拉图的智慧。效果历史概念阐明了游戏的弱化...Game is a vital concept of modern philosophy. In this paper, the writer first looks back on the elaboration of game by some philosophers in the history. The theories can be divided into two categories. One is game and the freedom of art, which was represented by Kant and Schiller. The other is game and language, which was represented by Wittgenstein and Mead. The second chapter analyses the main f...学位:哲学硕士院系专业:人文学院哲学系_外国哲学学号:20030501

    米德“自我”思想研究

    Get PDF
    米德在其著作《心灵、自我与社会》中,勾勒出自己有别于传统观点的社会行为主义心理学的基本轮廓,主张从行动、社会交往出发研究心理现象。在此从该著作出发,就米德的“自我“概念进行分析,重点说明了自我的产生、发展阶段以及结构层次,并指出其对当代哲学的影响

    中西审美现象学的时空结构差异

    Get PDF
    一、审美现象学的时空维

    本体论的消弭与重建

    Get PDF
    本体论是哲学的基础,哲学史是对此基础的数次拆解与重塑。古希腊哲学是实体本体论,实体是存在的第一范畴。中世纪哲学是以上帝为最大实体的实体本体论。近代哲学分化为两股力量,一方面是唯理论者以及早期经验论者对实体本体论的坚持,另一方面是其他经验论者以及康德对实体本体论的逐步解构。现代欧陆哲学抛弃了实体本体论,建立了实存本体论,但因为实存的现实性,缺乏超越性存在的依据,无法解决存在的意义问题。以往哲学本体论的缺陷并非本体论自身的问题,后现代哲学完全抛弃本体论,走向另一个极端。当代哲学应该在新的基础之上重构新的本体论,重新定义存在的概念,进而建立新的现代形而上学

    An Analysis of Some Basic Issues of the Translation Theory from the Perspective of Philosophy of Art

    Get PDF
    从艺术哲学的模仿、创新说与诠释学视角出发,探讨翻译的对等性、译作与原作关系以及译者的作用这些基本的翻译问题,是构建翻译学元理论的一种初步尝试。原语和目的语诸层面的差异以及文本的开放性使得翻译的完全对等性是不可能的。译者在翻译中的作用如同艺术家在艺术创作中一样,必须充分发挥主体能动性和创造力;译者的作用是画师而不是摄影师。译作与原作之关系,犹如艺术作品与自然作品之关系一样。To create a meta-theory of the translation studies,it is necessary to discuss such basic translation issues as translational equivalence,the relationship between translation work and original work,and the role of a translator from the perspective of theories of interpretation,imitation and creativity.Translational equivalence is impossible due to the differences between the source-language and target-language,as well as to the openness of the text.Translation works to original works is what works of art to works of nature.The role of a translator is a painter rather than a photographer.厦门理工学院引进人才科研启动基金(90010626

    An Analysis of Some Basic Issues of the Translation Theory From the Perspective of Philosophy of Art

    Get PDF
    原语与目的语诸层面的差异以及文本的开放性使得翻译的完全对等性是不可能的。译者在翻译中的作用如同艺术家在艺术创作中一样,必须充分发挥主体能动性和创造力;译者的作用是画师而不是摄影师。译作与原作之关系,犹如艺术作品与自然作品之关系一样。The differences between the source language and target language in translation,as well as the openness of the text,make the full equivalent translation impossible.The translators have to be creative as artists do.The translator's role is a painter rather than a photographer.The relation between the translation and the source text is more like the artistic work and its counterpart in the natural world.厦门理工学院高层次人才项目;项目编号:RSK11006

    インドネシアにおける伝統的アグロフォレストリーに関する調査研究 -Banten州Baduy共同体を事例として-

    Get PDF
    Agroforestry is an integrated approach of combining agriculture and forestry technologies, preserving the natural environment, producing food in a sustainable way and providing the local residents with stable food supply. It has gathered attention in the tropics recent years. This study focuses on status quo of traditional agroforestry in Baduy community, which is still little known. It further discusses the land use, vegetation composition, distribution of plants, and forest uses. There are two types of agroforestry in Baduy communty: Kebon and Huma-Jami-Reuma. In a Kebon, without slash and burn, there is an upstorey of fruit trees and woods, and a low storey of useful herbaceous plants for food, medicine and ritual. Useful plants could be continuously harvested. A Huma-Jami-Reuma is a kind of shifting cultivation after slash and burn. Huma, Jami, and Reuma refer to the different stages of shifting cultivation. During the first year of Huma, swidden rice (Oryza sativa L.) is majorly planted. One to three years after rice harvest, vegetables are usually planted when the trees are naturally regenerated. This stage is called Jami (vegetable stage). During the following 3 to 4 years, it is the stage of secondary forest, called Reuma. The fruits and wild plants are produced without maintenance during' Reuma. Thus, the land might be reused as shifting cultivation after 8 years. In Jami, there are numerous useful plants in the understorey. Thus, soil has been preserved with understorey vegetation and the dried straws of harvested rice. Vegetation in Reuma consists of Paraserianthes falcataria and fruit trees in the upstorey, banana plants, Noni in the middle storey and vegetables and wild useful plants in the understorey. Vegetation has been regenerated from the under storey to the up storey; a multilayered structure has been maintained under such a system. Traditional agroforestry in Baduy community consists of various types of land use and the cycling uses of ecosystem of the soil have been accomplished, which result in the soil preservation and the productive agricultural and forestry production.アグロフォレストリーは林業と農業を組み合わせることで、自然環境を保全しながら、多様な食料を持続的に生産し、地域住民の生活の安定に寄与できる手段として、近年、熱帯地域で注目されている。本研究は、これまであまりよく知られていないBaduy共同体の伝統的なアグロフォレストリーの実態について、土地利用形態、植物の空間利用、栽培植物の分布、森林利用などの面から検討したものである。Baduy共同体の土地利用にはKebon型とHuma-Jami-Reuma型の2つがある。Kebon型には、焼畑はなく、上層でフルーツや用材林を育成し、下層で有用草本(食用、薬用、祭祀)を栽培する。ここでは持続的に有用植物が収穫できる。Huma-Jami-Reuma型は焼畑移動耕作の各時期の名称である。Humaは焼畑後、主に陸稲を植える1年間のこと。Jamiは陸稲収穫後、野菜を栽培すること。Reumaは二次林化した状態のこと。ここではフルーツや野生植物を採取する。そのサイクルは約8年である。Jamiでは下層での有用草本の植栽が多い。そこでの土壌は下層植生や前作陸稲の枯れ草で保全されていた。Reumaでは上層はモルッカネムと果樹、中層にバナナとノニ、下層は野菜と野生有用種で構成され、植生は下層から上層へと段階的に更新される仕組みになっていた。このシステムが植生の多層構造を維持している。Baduy共同体の伝統的なアグロフォレストリーは、それぞれの土地利用タイプが組み合わさって、土地の生態的循環利用を完結させており、そのことが土壌保全と持続的な農林業の多様な生産につながっていると考えられる。紀要論文http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_650
    corecore