28 research outputs found

    Determinants of Regioselectivity and Chemoselectivity in Fosfomycin Resistance Protein FosA from QM/MM Calculations

    Get PDF
    FosA is a manganese-dependent enzyme that utilizes a Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion to catalyze the inactivation of the fosfomycin antibiotic by glutathione (GSH) addition. We report a theoretical study on the catalytic mechanism and the factors governing the regioselectivity and chemoselectivity of FosA. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the uncatalyzed reaction give high barriers and almost no regioselectivity even when adding two water molecules to assist the proton transfer. According to quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations on the full solvated protein, the enzyme-catalyzed glutathione addition reaction involves two major chemical steps that both proceed in the sextet state: proton transfer from the GSH thiol group to the Tyr39 anion and nucleophilic attack by the GSH thiolate leading to epoxide ring-opening. The second step is rate-limiting and is facilitated by the presence of the high-spin Mn<sup>2+</sup> ion that functions as a Lewis acid and stabilizes the leaving oxyanion through direct coordination. The barrier for C1 attack is computed to be 8.9 kcal/mol lower than that for C2 attack, in agreement with the experimentally observed regioselectivity of the enzyme. Further QM/MM calculations on the alternative water attack predict a concerted mechanism for this reaction, where the deprotonation of water, nucleophilic attack, and epoxide ring-opening take place via the same transition state. The calculated barrier is 8.3 kcal/mol higher than that for GSH attack, in line with the observed chemoselectivity of the enzyme, which manages to catalyze the addition of GSH in the presence of water molecules around its active site. The catalytic efficiency, regioselectivity, and chemoselectivity of FosA are rationalized in terms of the influence of the active-site protein environment and the different stabilization of the distorted substrates in the relevant transition states

    How Much Do Enzymes Really Gain by Restraining Their Reacting Fragments?

    Full text link

    How Much Do Enzymes Really Gain by Restraining Their Reacting Fragments?

    No full text
    The steric effect, exerted by enzymes on their reacting substrates, has been considered as a major factor in enzyme catalysis. In particular, it has been proposed that enzymes catalyze their reactions by pushing their reacting fragments to a catalytic configuration which is sometimes called near attack configuration (NAC). This work uses computer simulation approaches to determine the relative importance of the steric contribution to enzyme catalysis. The steric proposal is expressed in terms of well defined thermodynamic cycles that compare the reaction in the enzyme to the corresponding reaction in water. The SN2 reaction of haloalkane dehalogenase from Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10, which was used in previous studies to support the strain concept is chosen as a test case for this proposal. The empirical valence bond (EVB) method provides the reaction potential surfaces in our studies. The reliability and efficiency of this method make it possible to obtain stable results for the steric free energy. Two independent strategies are used to evaluate the actual magnitude of the steric effect. The first applies restraints on the substrate coordinates in water in a way that mimics the steric effect of the protein active site. These restraints are then released and the free energy associated with the release process provides the desired estimate of the steric effect. The second approach eliminates the electrostatic interactions between the substrate and the surrounding in the enzyme and in water, and compares the corresponding reaction profiles. The difference between the resulting profiles provides a direct estimate of the nonelectrostatic contribution to catalysis and the corresponding steric effect. It is found that the nonelectrostatic contribution is about −0.7 kcal/mol while the full “apparent steric contribution” is about −2.2 kcal/mol. The apparent steric effect includes about −1.5 kcal/mol electrostatic contribution. The total electrostatic contribution is found to account for almost all the observed catalytic effect (∼−6.1 kcal/mol of the −6.8 calculated total catalytic effect). Thus, it is concluded that the steric effect is not the major source of the catalytic power of haloalkane dehalogenase. Furthermore, it is found that the largest component of the apparent steric effect is associated with the solvent reorganization energy. This solvent-induced effect is quite different from the traditional picture of balance between the repulsive interaction of the reactive fragments and the steric force of the protein

    How important are entropic contributions to enzyme catalysis?

    Full text link
    The idea that enzymes accelerate their reactions by entropic effects has played a major role in many prominent proposals about the origin of enzyme catalysis. This idea implies that the binding to an enzyme active site freezes the motion of the reacting fragments and eliminates their entropic contributions, (Δ S cat ‡ )′, to the activation energy. It is also implied that the binding entropy is equal to the activation entropy, (Δ S w ‡ )′, of the corresponding solution reaction. It is, however, difficult to examine this idea by experimental approaches. The present paper defines the entropic proposal in a rigorous way and develops a computer simulation approach that determines (Δ S ‡ )′. This approach allows us to evaluate the differences between (Δ S ‡ )′ of an enzymatic reaction and of the corresponding reference reaction in solution. Our approach is used in a study of the entropic contribution to the catalytic reaction of subtilisin. It is found that this contribution is much smaller than previously thought. This result is due to the following: ( i ) Many of the motions that are free in the reactants state of the reference solution reaction are also free at the transition state. ( ii ) The binding to the enzyme does not completely freeze the motion of the reacting fragments so that (Δ S ‡ )′ in the enzymes is not zero. ( iii ) The binding entropy is not necessarily equal to (Δ S w ‡ )′. </jats:p
    corecore