Arts Education of Pupils with Special Educational Needs: Objectives and Principles

Nepriklausomybės laikotarpiu prasidėjusią neįgaliųjų integraciją Lietuvoje keičia įtraukiojo (inkliuzinio) ugdymo poreikis. Atliekami moksliniai tyrimai, analizuojantys, kaip keičiasi visuomenės požiūris į negalią turinčius žmones, tiriama meno įtaka neįgaliųjų socializacijai, stiprinama juridinė šių asmenų ugdymo bazė. Meninio ugdymo dalykai (muzika, dailė, šokis, teatras) taip pat padeda ugdyti mokinių kompetencijas, reikalingas mokymuisi ir bendravimui, kūrybingai saviraiškai, komunikacijai ir individo vidinei darnai. Straipsnio tikslas – pasitelkiant mokslinės literatūros analizės metodą išryškinti specialiųjų ugdymosi poreikių turinčių mokinių meninio ugdymo tikslus ir principus.Changes in society, democratisation of education enable to shift towards persons with disabilities, in order to integrate them into society without causing discomfort neither the person, nor those around him. Categorization of disabilities and disorders according to medical criteria does not meet the educational objectives of pupils with special educational needs, as both developmental disorders and learning difficulties create the variety of abilities, needs and interests of pupils in the class. Such variety refers to school for all pupils, to involving (inclusive) education. According to the results of surveys, although the pupils with special educational needs are involved in general education, the teacher still remains alone with his philosophy and methods, without being offered an opportunity for cooperation, consultancy support, which is one of conditions for success in the involving (inclusive) education. Lack of systematic research is still observed, which brings out the didactics issues of art education of pupils with special educational needs, therefore, the analysed scientific problem is relevant. The objectives of special art education are focused not only on the pupils having special educational needs, but also to the surrounding people – teachers, classmates, family, society, and even more, to their mutual interactions. Such change of didactic goals reveals the new art education principles. The subjects of the article are the didactic goals and principles, educating the pupils with special needs by art. Applying the method of analysis of the scientific literature, the article reveals the research of the world and Lithuanian scientists in the field of special art pedagogy and theoretically justifies six principles of art education: art education focused on the emotionally positive interaction between the learner and teacher, directed to the learner’s family and society; art education is of moral aspect; content of art education is integral and perceived; educational methods are applied in complex; in the process of art education the verbal and nonverbal reflections predominate; art education is personally and socially meaningful for the pupils with special educational needs

Are the Requirements for Teacher’s Competence set by University Administration and Students Similar?

Kintant edukacinei paradigmai, kyla nauji iššūkiai ir aukštosios mokyklos dėstytojo veiklai bei kompetencijai. Tirta, kokie yra universitetų administracijos ir studentų reikalavimai dėstytojo kompetencijai ir ar tie reikalavimai panašūs. Atliktas tyrimas parodė, kad vis dėlto išlieka takoskyra tarp universitetų studentų ir universiteto administracijos keliamų reikalavimų dėstytojų kompetencijai. Pažymėtina, kad universiteto administracija kelia reikalavimus, kurie yra reglamentuoti Lietuvos Respublikos nacionaliniu lygiu, t. y. Aukštojo mokslo įstatymo nuostatomis, o mokslininkų išskirtos kompetencijų apibrėžtys išlieka kaip teorinis konstruktas, mokslo rezultatas. Studentų reikalavimuose išskiriamos tokios dėstytojų kompetencijos (pedagoginė, metamokymosi, techninė ir kt.), kurios sąveikauja su mokymo proceso rezultatyvumu ir kokybe.As the educational paradigm undergoes changes, new challenges for performance and competence of higher education institution teachers arise. The article deals with the requirements for teacher’s competence set by university administration and students, and whether these requirements are similar. In the beginning, definitions of teacher’s competence dealt with in scientists’ papers are reviewed, the structure of teacher’s competence is discussed. The article explores the requirements for teacher’s competence set by university administration and students. The research carried out shows that nevertheless there is a divide between requirements for teachers’ competence set by university students and university administration. It should be noted that university administration pose requirements which are regulated on the national level of the Republic of Lithuania, i.e. provisions of the Law on Higher Education and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania; whereas the definitions of competences investigated by scientists remain as a theoretical construct, a scientific outcome. The requirements set by students include these teachers’ competences (pedagogical, meta-learning, technical, etc.) which interact with the efficiency and quality of the teaching process