Is Boston questionnaire an alternative to electromyography for evaluation of the surgical outcome for carpal tunnel syndrome?

Objectives: This study aims to identify the optimal follow-up method for evaluation of the surgical outcome for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and methods: Between January 2006 and December 2010, 61 hands of a total of 46 patients (7 males, 39 females; mean age 56.0 +/- 10.4 years; range, 20 to 71 years) with a diagnosis of CTS were retrospectively analyzed. All operations were performed by a single surgeon with a mini-incision distal to the transverse carpal ligament. At a mean follow-up of seven years after surgery, electromyography (EMG) was repeated for all patients. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), Boston Symptom Severity Scale, Boston Functional Status Scale, palmar pinch strength, grip strength, and EMG of the patients were compared before and after surgery. Results: The mean follow-up was 84410 (range, 72 to 104) months. There were significant improvements in the Boston Symptom and Functional Scale scores postoperatively, as well as in the grip and pinch strength. After surgery, EMG findings improved in 83.6% of the patients. However, there was no significant correlation between pre- and postoperative Boston Symptom Severity Scale scores, functional status, pinch and grip strengths, and pre- and postoperative EMG results. Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that the symptom severity and functional status scores of the BCTQ are favorable, and this tool is reliable and easy-to-apply for the diagnosis and follow-up of CTS surgeries

COVID-19 in pediatric nephrology centers in Turkey

Background/aim: There is limited data on COVID-19 disease in children with kidney disease. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of COVID-19 in pediatric nephrology patients in Turkey. Materials and methods: This was a national, multicenter, retrospective cohort study based on an online survey evaluating the data between 11th March 2020 and 11th March 2021 as an initial step of a detailed pediatric nephrology COVID-19 registry. Results: Two hundred and three patients (89 girls and 114 boys) were diagnosed with COVID-19. One-third of these patients (36.9%) were between 10–15 years old. Half of the patients were on kidney replacement therapy: kidney transplant (KTx) recipients (n = 56, 27.5%), patients receiving chronic hemodialysis (n = 33, 16.3%) and those on peritoneal dialysis (PD) (n = 18, 8.9%). Fifty-four (26.6%) children were asymptomatic. Eighty-two (40.3%) patients were hospitalized and 23 (28%) needed intensive care unit admission. Fifty-five percent of the patients were not treated, while the remaining was given favipiravir (20.7%), steroid (16.3%), and hydroxychloroquine (11.3%). Acute kidney injury developed in 19.5% of hospitalized patients. Five (2.4%) had MIS-C. Eighty-three percent of the patients were discharged without any apparent sequelae, while 7 (3.4%) died. One hundred and eight health care staff were infected during the study period. Conclusion: COVID-19 was most commonly seen in patients who underwent KTx and received HD. The combined immunosuppressive therapy and frequent exposure to the hospital setting may increase these patients’ susceptibility. Staff infections before vaccination era were alarming, various precautions should be taken for infection control, particularly optimal vaccination coverage

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries