Possition of Legal Service Agreement Between Advocates and Clients in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection

The legal services agreement established between the Advocate and the Client is bent in submission to the provisions set forth in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The rights and obligations arising between the Advocate and the Client under legal service agreement shall be protected by Law Number 8 of 1999. In the event of a dispute between the Client and the Advocate, the execution of the legal services agreement may use dispute resolution as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Advocates can be regarded as business actors as referred to Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, in addition to performing professional duties that adhered to the professional code of ethics and legislation as mandated by Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates, an Advocate through a legal services agreement conducting business activities in various economic fields.IntisariPerjanjian pemberian jasa hukum yang dibuat antara Advokat dan klien tunduk pada ketentuan yang diatur dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Berkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban yang timbul antara Advokat dan klien berdasarkan perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum mendapat perlindungan dalam undang-undang tersebut. Apabila terjadi sengketa antara klien dan Advokat dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum dapat menggunakan payung hukum penyelesaian sengketa sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Advokat dapat dikatakan sebagai pelaku USAha sebagaimana dimaksud dalam UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, karena selain menjalankan tugas profesi yang berpegang pada kode etik profesi dan peraturan Perundang-undangan sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UU No. 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat, seorang Advokat melalui perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum menyelenggarakan kegiatan USAha dalam berbagai bidang ekonomi

Possition of Legal Service Agreement Between Advocates and Clients in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection

Abstract The legal services agreement established between the Advocate and the Client is bent in submission to the provisions set forth in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The rights and obligations arising between the Advocate and the Client under legal service agreement shall be protected by Law Number 8 of 1999. In the event of a dispute between the Client and the Advocate, the execution of the legal services agreement may use dispute resolution as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Advocates can be regarded as business actors as referred to Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, in addition to performing professional duties that adhered to the professional code of ethics and legislation as mandated by Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates, an Advocate through a legal services agreement conducting business activities in various economic fields. Intisari Perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum yang dibuat antara Advokat dan klien tunduk pada ketentuan yang diatur dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Berkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban yang timbul antara Advokat dan klien berdasarkan perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum mendapat perlindungan dalam undang-undang tersebut. Apabila terjadi sengketa antara klien dan Advokat dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum dapat menggunakan payung hukum penyelesaian sengketa sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Advokat dapat dikatakan sebagai pelaku usaha sebagaimana dimaksud dalam UU No. 8 tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, karena selain menjalankan tugas profesi yang berpegang pada kode etik profesi dan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UU No. 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat, seorang Advokat melalui perjanjian pemberian jasa hukum menyelenggarakan kegiatan usaha dalam berbagai bidang ekonomi

HUBUNGAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK PADA SAAT PRA KONTRAKTUAL DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN INDONESIA

The purpose of this research is to assess whether the principle of objective good faith as defined in Article 1338 Paragraph (3) Civil Code could be applied at the pre-contractual time. This research also has aim to determine the form of restrictions on entry into force of the freedom of contract principle, especially if linked with the principle of good faith during the pre-contractual. In addition to examining how the correlation between these two principles are related to the balance principle in the agreement. It is a normative juridical research where the author examines the principles and doctrines relating to the subject matter in depth. The research was done by studying the documents to obtain secondary data. Data obtained from the research literature were then analyzed qualitatively with a descriptive presentation. The results showed that the principle of objective good faith as defined in Article 1338 Paragraph (3) Civil Code could be applied at the time of precontractual. Form of restrictions on entry into force of the freedom of contract principle, especially if linked with the good faith principle at the moment is in the form of pre-contractual agreements or forms that require certain formalities, restrictions include clauses that are contrary to the fairness or propriety and government intervention through legal tools made. Correlation of the freedom of contract principle relating to the balance principle in the agreement that is against the application of the freedom of contract principle which are positive will be able to create a balance position of the parties at the time of pre-contractual, otherwise the application of the freedom of contract principle which could cause unsteady negative balance in the pre-contractual. Application of the good faith principle could reduce the influence of an imbalance in the parties' bargaining positions at the time of pre contractual so that it could towards achieving a balanced agreement