Erratum: Nodal Cooper-pair stabilized phase dynamics in granular d-wave superconductors

Recently, we discovered a mistake in our Letter on phase dynamics in granular d-wave superconductors, which we corrected in an Erratum published last week. This is an expanded version of the Erratum, containing details and supporting numerical results.Comment: 3 pages, 3 figures, detailed version of the Erratu

Erratum: Luminosity function, sizes and FR dichotomy of radio-loud AGN

This erratum corrects a number of formulae containing mistakes in the paper 'Luminosity function, sizes and FR dichotomy of radio-loud AGN', 2007, MNRAS, v. 381, p.1548. The corrections do not alter any of the conclusions in the original paper.Comment: single page, no figures, erratum to MNRAS, 2007, v. 381, p. 154

On Newton-Cartan trace anomalies

We classify the trace anomaly for parity-invariant non-relativistic Schr\"odinger theories in 2+1 dimensions coupled to background Newton-Cartan gravity. The general anomaly structure looks very different from the one in the z=2 Lifshitz theories. The type A content of the anomaly is remarkably identical to that of the relativistic 3+1 dimensional case, suggesting the conjecture that an a-theorem should exist also in the Newton-Cartan context. Erratum: due to an overcounting of the number of linearly-independent terms in the basis, the type A anomaly disappears if Frobenius condition is imposed. See appended erratum for details. This crucial mistake was pointed out to us in arXiv:1601.06795.Comment: 16 pages, V2:few equations corrected (final results unchanged), references added, typos, V3: erratum include

Erratum: Studying Links via Closed Braids IV: Composite Links and Split Links

The purpose of this erratum is to fill a gap in the proof of the `Composite Braid Theorem' in the manuscript "Studying Links Via Closed Braids IV: Composite Links and Split Links (SLVCB-IV)", Inventiones Math, \{bf 102\} Fasc. 1 (1990), 115-139. The statement of the theorem is unchanged. The gap occurs on page 135, lines $13^-$ to $11^-$, where we fail to consider the case: $V_2 = 4, V_4 > 0, V_j=0$ if $j not= 2,4,$ and all 4 vertices of valence 2 are bad. At the end of this Erratum we make some brief remarks on the literature, as it has evolved during the 14 years between the publication of SLVCB-IV and the submission of this Erratum.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures. This is an Erratum to "Studying Links Vai Closed Braids IV: Composite Links and Split Links", Inventiones Math., 102 Facs. 1 (190), 115-13