9 research outputs found

    Which groups are amenable to proving exponent two for matrix multiplication?

    Get PDF
    The Cohn-Umans group-theoretic approach to matrix multiplication suggests embedding matrix multiplication into group algebra multiplication, and bounding ω\omega in terms of the representation theory of the host group. This framework is general enough to capture the best known upper bounds on ω\omega and is conjectured to be powerful enough to prove ω=2\omega = 2, although finding a suitable group and constructing such an embedding has remained elusive. Recently it was shown, by a generalization of the proof of the Cap Set Conjecture, that abelian groups of bounded exponent cannot prove ω=2\omega = 2 in this framework, which ruled out a family of potential constructions in the literature. In this paper we study nonabelian groups as potential hosts for an embedding. We prove two main results: (1) We show that a large class of nonabelian groups---nilpotent groups of bounded exponent satisfying a mild additional condition---cannot prove ω=2\omega = 2 in this framework. We do this by showing that the shrinkage rate of powers of the augmentation ideal is similar to the shrinkage rate of the number of functions over (Z/pZ)n(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^n that are degree dd polynomials; our proof technique can be seen as a generalization of the polynomial method used to resolve the Cap Set Conjecture. (2) We show that symmetric groups SnS_n cannot prove nontrivial bounds on ω\omega when the embedding is via three Young subgroups---subgroups of the form Sk1×Sk2××SkS_{k_1} \times S_{k_2} \times \dotsb \times S_{k_\ell}---which is a natural strategy that includes all known constructions in SnS_n. By developing techniques for negative results in this paper, we hope to catalyze a fruitful interplay between the search for constructions proving bounds on ω\omega and methods for ruling them out.Comment: 23 pages, 1 figur

    Improved Bounds for Progression-Free Sets in C^n₈

    Get PDF
    Let G be a finite group, and let r₃(G) represent the size of the largest subset of G without non-trivial three-term progressions. In a recent breakthrough, Croot, Lev and Pach proved that r₃(C₄^n) ≤ (3.611)^n, where C_m denotes the cyclic group of order m. For finite abelian groups G≅∏^n_(i=1), where m₁,…,m_n denote positive integers such that m₁ |…|m_n, this also yields a bound of the form r₃(G)⩽(0.903)^(rk₄(G))|G|, with rk₄(G) representing the number of indices i ∈ {1,…, n} with 4 |m_i. In particular, r₃(Cn₈) ≤ (7.222)^n. In this paper, we provide an exponential improvement for this bound, namely r₃(Cn₈) ≤ (7.0899)^n

    The asymptotic induced matching number of hypergraphs: balanced binary strings

    Get PDF
    We compute the asymptotic induced matching number of the kk-partite kk-uniform hypergraphs whose edges are the kk-bit strings of Hamming weight k/2k/2, for any large enough even number kk. Our lower bound relies on the higher-order extension of the well-known Coppersmith-Winograd method from algebraic complexity theory, which was proven by Christandl, Vrana and Zuiddam. Our result is motivated by the study of the power of this method as well as of the power of the Strassen support functionals (which provide upper bounds on the asymptotic induced matching number), and the connections to questions in tensor theory, quantum information theory and theoretical computer science. Phrased in the language of tensors, as a direct consequence of our result, we determine the asymptotic subrank of any tensor with support given by the aforementioned hypergraphs. In the context of quantum information theory, our result amounts to an asymptotically optimal kk-party stochastic local operations and classical communication (slocc) protocol for the problem of distilling GHZ-type entanglement from a subfamily of Dicke-type entanglement

    Barriers for fast matrix multiplication from irreversibility

    Get PDF
    Determining the asymptotic algebraic complexity of matrix multiplication, succinctly represented by the matrix multiplication exponent ω\omega, is a central problem in algebraic complexity theory. The best upper bounds on ω\omega, leading to the state-of-the-art ω2.37..\omega \leq 2.37.., have been obtained via the laser method of Strassen and its generalization by Coppersmith and Winograd. Recent barrier results show limitations for these and related approaches to improve the upper bound on ω\omega. We introduce a new and more general barrier, providing stronger limitations than in previous work. Concretely, we introduce the notion of "irreversibility" of a tensor and we prove (in some precise sense) that any approach that uses an irreversible tensor in an intermediate step (e.g., as a starting tensor in the laser method) cannot give ω=2\omega = 2. In quantitative terms, we prove that the best upper bound achievable is lower bounded by two times the irreversibility of the intermediate tensor. The quantum functionals and Strassen support functionals give (so far, the best) lower bounds on irreversibility. We provide lower bounds on the irreversibility of key intermediate tensors, including the small and big Coppersmith--Winograd tensors, that improve limitations shown in previous work. Finally, we discuss barriers on the group-theoretic approach in terms of "monomial" irreversibility

    Matrix multiplication via matrix groups

    Get PDF
    In 2003, Cohn and Umans proposed a group-theoretic approach to bounding the exponent of matrix multiplication. Previous work within this approach ruled out certain families of groups as a route to obtaining ω=2\omega = 2, while other families of groups remain potentially viable. In this paper we turn our attention to matrix groups, whose usefulness within this framework was relatively unexplored. We first show that groups of Lie type cannot prove ω=2\omega=2 within the group-theoretic approach. This is based on a representation-theoretic argument that identifies the second-smallest dimension of an irreducible representation of a group as a key parameter that determines its viability in this framework. Our proof builds on Gowers' result concerning product-free sets in quasirandom groups. We then give another barrier that rules out certain natural matrix group constructions that make use of subgroups that are far from being self-normalizing. Our barrier results leave open several natural paths to obtain ω=2\omega = 2 via matrix groups. To explore these routes we propose working in the continuous setting of Lie groups, in which we develop an analogous theory. Obtaining the analogue of ω=2\omega=2 in this potentially easier setting is a key challenge that represents an intermediate goal short of actually proving ω=2\omega = 2. We give two constructions in the continuous setting, each of which evades one of our two barriers.Comment: 15 page

    Slice rank of block tensors and irreversibility of structure tensors of algebras

    Get PDF

    On Matrix Multiplication and Polynomial Identity Testing

    Full text link
    We show that lower bounds on the border rank of matrix multiplication can be used to non-trivially derandomize polynomial identity testing for small algebraic circuits. Letting R(n)\underline{R}(n) denote the border rank of n×n×nn \times n \times n matrix multiplication, we construct a hitting set generator with seed length O(nR1(s))O(\sqrt{n} \cdot \underline{R}^{-1}(s)) that hits nn-variate circuits of multiplicative complexity ss. If the matrix multiplication exponent ω\omega is not 2, our generator has seed length O(n1ε)O(n^{1 - \varepsilon}) and hits circuits of size O(n1+δ)O(n^{1 + \delta}) for sufficiently small ε,δ>0\varepsilon, \delta > 0. Surprisingly, the fact that R(n)n2\underline{R}(n) \ge n^2 already yields new, non-trivial hitting set generators for circuits of sublinear multiplicative complexity
    corecore