2 research outputs found
What Should/Do/Can LSTMs Learn When Parsing Auxiliary Verb Constructions?
There is a growing interest in investigating what neural NLP models learn about language. A prominent open question is the question of whether or not it is necessary to model hierarchical structure. We present a linguistic investigation of a neural parser adding insights to this question. We look at transitivity and agreement information of auxiliary verb constructions (AVCs) in comparison to finite main verbs (FMVs). This comparison is motivated by theoretical work in dependency grammar and in particular the work of Tesnière (1959), where AVCs and FMVs are both instances of a nucleus, the basic unit of syntax. An AVC is a dissociated nucleus; it consists of at least two words, and an FMV is its non-dissociated counterpart, consisting of exactly one word. We suggest that the representation of AVCs and FMVs should capture similar information. We use diagnostic classifiers to probe agreement and transitivity information in vectors learned by a transition-based neural parser in four typologically different languages. We find that the parser learns different information about AVCs and FMVs if only sequential models (BiLSTMs) are used in the architecture but similar information when a recursive layer is used. We find explanations for why this is the case by looking closely at how information is learned in the network and looking at what happens with different dependency representations of AVCs. We conclude that there may be benefits to using a recursive layer in dependency parsing and that we have not yet found the best way to integrate it in our parsers
Syntactic Nuclei in Dependency Parsing -- A Multilingual Exploration
Standard models for syntactic dependency parsing take words to be the
elementary units that enter into dependency relations. In this paper, we
investigate whether there are any benefits from enriching these models with the
more abstract notion of nucleus proposed by Tesni\`{e}re. We do this by showing
how the concept of nucleus can be defined in the framework of Universal
Dependencies and how we can use composition functions to make a
transition-based dependency parser aware of this concept. Experiments on 12
languages show that nucleus composition gives small but significant
improvements in parsing accuracy. Further analysis reveals that the improvement
mainly concerns a small number of dependency relations, including nominal
modifiers, relations of coordination, main predicates, and direct objects.Comment: Accepted at EACL-202