42,143 research outputs found
"Seed+Expand": A validated methodology for creating high quality publication oeuvres of individual researchers
The study of science at the individual micro-level frequently requires the
disambiguation of author names. The creation of author's publication oeuvres
involves matching the list of unique author names to names used in publication
databases. Despite recent progress in the development of unique author
identifiers, e.g., ORCID, VIVO, or DAI, author disambiguation remains a key
problem when it comes to large-scale bibliometric analysis using data from
multiple databases. This study introduces and validates a new methodology
called seed+expand for semi-automatic bibliographic data collection for a given
set of individual authors. Specifically, we identify the oeuvre of a set of
Dutch full professors during the period 1980-2011. In particular, we combine
author records from the National Research Information System (NARCIS) with
publication records from the Web of Science. Starting with an initial list of
8,378 names, we identify "seed publications" for each author using five
different approaches. Subsequently, we "expand" the set of publication in three
different approaches. The different approaches are compared and resulting
oeuvres are evaluated on precision and recall using a "gold standard" dataset
of authors for which verified publications in the period 2001-2010 are
available.Comment: Paper accepted for the ISSI 2013, small changes in the text due to
referee comments, one figure added (Fig 3
Towards web supported identification of top affiliations from scholarly papers
Frequent successful publications by specific institutions are indicators for identifying outstanding centres of research. This institution data are present in scholarly papers as the authors‟ affilations – often in very heterogeneous variants for the same institution across publications. Thus, matching is needed to identify the denoted real world institutions and locations. We introduce an approximate string metric that handles acronyms and abbreviations. Our URL overlap similarity measure is based on comparing the result sets of web searches. Evaluations on affiliation strings of a conference prove better results than soft tf/idf, trigram, and levenshtein. Incorporating the aligned affiliations we present top institutions and countries for the last 10 years of SIGMOD
Exploring scholarly data with Rexplore.
Despite the large number and variety of tools and services available today for exploring scholarly data, current support is still very limited in the context of sensemaking tasks, which go beyond standard search and ranking of authors and publications, and focus instead on i) understanding the dynamics of research areas, ii) relating authors ‘semantically’ (e.g., in terms of common interests or shared academic trajectories), or iii) performing fine-grained academic expert search along multiple dimensions. To address this gap we have developed a novel tool, Rexplore, which integrates statistical analysis, semantic technologies, and visual analytics to provide effective support for exploring and making sense of scholarly data. Here, we describe the main innovative elements of the tool and we present the results from a task-centric empirical evaluation, which shows that Rexplore is highly effective at providing support for the aforementioned sensemaking tasks. In addition, these results are robust both with respect to the background of the users (i.e., expert analysts vs. ‘ordinary’ users) and also with respect to whether the tasks are selected by the evaluators or proposed by the users themselves
- …