234 research outputs found
Weak MSO+U with Path Quantifiers over Infinite Trees
This paper shows that over infinite trees, satisfiability is decidable for
weak monadic second-order logic extended by the unbounding quantifier U and
quantification over infinite paths. The proof is by reduction to emptiness for
a certain automaton model, while emptiness for the automaton model is decided
using profinite trees.Comment: version of an ICALP 2014 paper with appendice
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking
problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from
sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we
deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of
Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown
decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking
problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers
(where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics;
however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation
(which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We
separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties
of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability
results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to
undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in
the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz.Comment: In Proceedings INFINITY 2011, arXiv:1111.267
Spectra of Monadic Second-Order Formulas with One Unary Function
We establish the eventual periodicity of the spectrum of any monadic
second-order formula where:
(i) all relation symbols, except equality, are unary, and
(ii) there is only one function symbol and that symbol is unary
How unprovable is Rabin's decidability theorem?
We study the strength of set-theoretic axioms needed to prove Rabin's theorem
on the decidability of the MSO theory of the infinite binary tree. We first
show that the complementation theorem for tree automata, which forms the
technical core of typical proofs of Rabin's theorem, is equivalent over the
moderately strong second-order arithmetic theory to a
determinacy principle implied by the positional determinacy of all parity games
and implying the determinacy of all Gale-Stewart games given by boolean
combinations of sets. It follows that complementation for
tree automata is provable from - but not -comprehension.
We then use results due to MedSalem-Tanaka, M\"ollerfeld and
Heinatsch-M\"ollerfeld to prove that over -comprehension, the
complementation theorem for tree automata, decidability of the MSO theory of
the infinite binary tree, positional determinacy of parity games and
determinacy of Gale-Stewart games are all
equivalent. Moreover, these statements are equivalent to the
-reflection principle for -comprehension. It follows in
particular that Rabin's decidability theorem is not provable in
-comprehension.Comment: 21 page
Monadic second order finite satisfiability and unbounded tree-width
The finite satisfiability problem of monadic second order logic is decidable
only on classes of structures of bounded tree-width by the classic result of
Seese (1991). We prove the following problem is decidable:
Input: (i) A monadic second order logic sentence , and (ii) a
sentence in the two-variable fragment of first order logic extended
with counting quantifiers. The vocabularies of and may
intersect.
Output: Is there a finite structure which satisfies such
that the restriction of the structure to the vocabulary of has bounded
tree-width? (The tree-width of the desired structure is not bounded.)
As a consequence, we prove the decidability of the satisfiability problem by
a finite structure of bounded tree-width of a logic extending monadic second
order logic with linear cardinality constraints of the form
, where the and
are monadic second order variables. We prove the decidability of a similar
extension of WS1S
Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview
Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical
languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such
logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data,
some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate
complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those
properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking
properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered
trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees
The MSO+U theory of (N, <) is undecidable
We consider the logic MSO+U, which is monadic second-order logic extended
with the unbounding quantifier. The unbounding quantifier is used to say that a
property of finite sets holds for sets of arbitrarily large size. We prove that
the logic is undecidable on infinite words, i.e. the MSO+U theory of (N,<) is
undecidable. This settles an open problem about the logic, and improves a
previous undecidability result, which used infinite trees and additional axioms
from set theory.Comment: 9 pages, with 2 figure
Strategy Logic with Imperfect Information
We introduce an extension of Strategy Logic for the imperfect-information
setting, called SLii, and study its model-checking problem. As this logic
naturally captures multi-player games with imperfect information, the problem
turns out to be undecidable. We introduce a syntactical class of "hierarchical
instances" for which, intuitively, as one goes down the syntactic tree of the
formula, strategy quantifications are concerned with finer observations of the
model. We prove that model-checking SLii restricted to hierarchical instances
is decidable. This result, because it allows for complex patterns of
existential and universal quantification on strategies, greatly generalises
previous ones, such as decidability of multi-player games with imperfect
information and hierarchical observations, and decidability of distributed
synthesis for hierarchical systems. To establish the decidability result, we
introduce and study QCTL*ii, an extension of QCTL* (itself an extension of CTL*
with second-order quantification over atomic propositions) by parameterising
its quantifiers with observations. The simple syntax of QCTL* ii allows us to
provide a conceptually neat reduction of SLii to QCTL*ii that separates
concerns, allowing one to forget about strategies and players and focus solely
on second-order quantification. While the model-checking problem of QCTL*ii is,
in general, undecidable, we identify a syntactic fragment of hierarchical
formulas and prove, using an automata-theoretic approach, that it is decidable.
The decidability result for SLii follows since the reduction maps hierarchical
instances of SLii to hierarchical formulas of QCTL*ii
- …