14 research outputs found
On the relation between Differential Privacy and Quantitative Information Flow
Differential privacy is a notion that has emerged in the community of
statistical databases, as a response to the problem of protecting the privacy
of the database's participants when performing statistical queries. The idea is
that a randomized query satisfies differential privacy if the likelihood of
obtaining a certain answer for a database is not too different from the
likelihood of obtaining the same answer on adjacent databases, i.e. databases
which differ from for only one individual. Information flow is an area of
Security concerned with the problem of controlling the leakage of confidential
information in programs and protocols. Nowadays, one of the most established
approaches to quantify and to reason about leakage is based on the R\'enyi min
entropy version of information theory. In this paper, we analyze critically the
notion of differential privacy in light of the conceptual framework provided by
the R\'enyi min information theory. We show that there is a close relation
between differential privacy and leakage, due to the graph symmetries induced
by the adjacency relation. Furthermore, we consider the utility of the
randomized answer, which measures its expected degree of accuracy. We focus on
certain kinds of utility functions called "binary", which have a close
correspondence with the R\'enyi min mutual information. Again, it turns out
that there can be a tight correspondence between differential privacy and
utility, depending on the symmetries induced by the adjacency relation and by
the query. Depending on these symmetries we can also build an optimal-utility
randomization mechanism while preserving the required level of differential
privacy. Our main contribution is a study of the kind of structures that can be
induced by the adjacency relation and the query, and how to use them to derive
bounds on the leakage and achieve the optimal utility
Quantitative Information Flow as Safety and Liveness Hyperproperties
We employ Clarkson and Schneider's "hyperproperties" to classify various
verification problems of quantitative information flow. The results of this
paper unify and extend the previous results on the hardness of checking and
inferring quantitative information flow. In particular, we identify a subclass
of liveness hyperproperties, which we call "k-observable hyperproperties", that
can be checked relative to a reachability oracle via self composition.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2012, arXiv:1207.055
Quantitative information flow, with a view
We put forward a general model intended for assessment of system security against passive eavesdroppers, both quantitatively ( how much information is leaked) and qualitatively ( what properties are leaked). To this purpose, we extend information hiding systems ( ihs ), a model where the secret-observable relation is represented as a noisy channel, with views : basically, partitions of the state-space. Given a view W and n independent observations of the system, one is interested in the probability that a Bayesian adversary wrongly predicts the class of W the underlying secret belongs to. We offer results that allow one to easily characterise the behaviour of this error probability as a function of the number of observations, in terms of the channel matrices defining the ihs and the view W . In particular, we provide expressions for the limit value as n → ∞, show by tight bounds that convergence is exponential, and also characterise the rate of convergence to predefined error thresholds. We then show a few instances of statistical attacks that can be assessed by a direct application of our model: attacks against modular exponentiation that exploit timing leaks, against anonymity in mix-nets and against privacy in sparse datasets
Asymptotic information leakage under one-try attacks
We study the asymptotic behaviour of (a) information leakage and (b) adversary’s error probability in information hiding systems modelled as noisy channels. Specifically, we assume the attacker can make a single guess after observing n independent executions of the system, throughout which the secret information is kept fixed. We show that the asymptotic behaviour of quantities (a) and (b) can be determined in a simple way from the channel matrix. Moreover, simple and tight bounds on them as functions of n show that the convergence is exponential. We also discuss feasible methods to evaluate the rate of convergence. Our results cover both the Bayesian case, where a prior probability distribution on the secrets is assumed known to the attacker, and the maximum-likelihood case, where the attacker does not know such distribution. In the Bayesian case, we identify the distributions that maximize the leakage. We consider both the min-entropy setting studied by Smith and the additive form recently proposed by Braun et al., and show the two forms do agree asymptotically. Next, we extend these results to a more sophisticated eavesdropping scenario, where the attacker can perform a (noisy) observation at each state of the computation and the systems are modelled as hidden Markov models
Suppressing the Oblivious RAM timing channel while making information leakage and program efficiency trade-offs
Oblivious RAM (ORAM) is an established cryptographic technique to hide a program's address pattern to an untrusted storage system. More recently, ORAM schemes have been proposed to replace conventional memory controllers in secure processor settings to protect against information leakage in external memory and the processor I/O bus. A serious problem in current secure processor ORAM proposals is that they don't obfuscate when ORAM accesses are made, or do so in a very conservative manner. Since secure processors make ORAM accesses on last-level cache misses, ORAM access timing strongly correlates to program access pattern (e.g., locality). This brings ORAM's purpose in secure processors into question. This paper makes two contributions. First, we show how a secure processor can bound ORAM timing channel leakage to a user-controllable leakage limit. The secure processor is allowed to dynamically optimize ORAM access rate for power/performance, subject to the constraint that the leakage limit is not violated. Second, we show how changing the leakage limit impacts program efficiency. We present a dynamic scheme that leaks at most 32 bits through the ORAM timing channel and introduces only 20% performance overhead and 12% power overhead relative to a baseline ORAM that has no timing channel protection. By reducing leakage to 16 bits, our scheme degrades in performance by 5% but gains in power efficiency by 3%. We show that a static (zero leakage) scheme imposes a 34% power overhead for equivalent performance (or a 30% performance overhead for equivalent power) relative to our dynamic scheme.United States. Dept. of Defense (National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship)United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Clean-slate Design of Resilient, Adaptive, Secure Hosts (CRASH) Program (Contract N66001-10-2-4089
Quantitative information flow under generic leakage functions and adaptive adversaries
We put forward a model of action-based randomization mechanisms to analyse
quantitative information flow (QIF) under generic leakage functions, and under
possibly adaptive adversaries. This model subsumes many of the QIF models
proposed so far. Our main contributions include the following: (1) we identify
mild general conditions on the leakage function under which it is possible to
derive general and significant results on adaptive QIF; (2) we contrast the
efficiency of adaptive and non-adaptive strategies, showing that the latter are
as efficient as the former in terms of length up to an expansion factor bounded
by the number of available actions; (3) we show that the maximum information
leakage over strategies, given a finite time horizon, can be expressed in terms
of a Bellman equation. This can be used to compute an optimal finite strategy
recursively, by resorting to standard methods like backward induction.Comment: Revised and extended version of conference paper with the same title
appeared in Proc. of FORTE 2014, LNC