38 research outputs found

    Convolutional neural networks applied to high-frequency market microstructure forecasting

    Get PDF
    Highly sophisticated artificial neural networks have achieved unprecedented performance across a variety of complex real-world problems over the past years, driven by the ability to detect significant patterns autonomously. Modern electronic stock markets produce large volumes of data, which are very suitable for use with these algorithms. This research explores new scientific ground by designing and evaluating a convolutional neural network in predicting future financial outcomes. A visually inspired transformation process translates high-frequency market microstructure data from the London Stock Exchange into four market-event based input channels, which are used to train six deep networks. Primary results indicate that con-volutional networks behave reasonably well on this task and extract interesting microstructure patterns, which are in line with previous theoretical findings. Furthermore, it demonstrates a new approach using modern deep-learning techniques for exploiting and analysing market microstructure behaviour

    Evolutionary data selection for enhancing models of intraday forex time series

    Get PDF
    The hypothesis in this paper is that a significant amount of intraday market data is either noise or redundant, and that if it is eliminated, then predictive models built using the remaining intraday data will be more accurate. To test this hypothesis, we use an evolutionary method (called Evolutionary Data Selection, EDS) to selectively remove out portions of training data that is to be made available to an intraday market predictor. After performing experiments in which data-selected and non-data-selected versions of the same predictive models are compared, it is shown that EDS is effective and does indeed boost predictor accuracy. It is also shown in the paper that building multiple models using EDS and placing them into an ensemble further increases performance. The datasets for evaluation are large intraday forex time series, specifically series from the EUR/USD, the USD/JPY and the EUR/JPY markets, and predictive models for two primary tasks per market are built: intraday return prediction and intraday volatility prediction

    Modeling dynamic volatility under uncertain environment with fuzziness and randomness

    Full text link
    The problem related to predicting dynamic volatility in financial market plays a crucial role in many contexts. We build a new generalized Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (BN-S) model suitable for uncertain environment with fuzziness and randomness. This new model considers the delay phenomenon between price fluctuation and volatility changes, solves the problem of the lack of long-range dependence of classic models. Through the experiment of Dow Jones futures price, we find that compared with the classical model, this method effectively combines the uncertain environmental characteristics, which makes the prediction of dynamic volatility has more ideal performance

    Recurrent Neural Networks with more flexible memory: better predictions than rough volatility

    Full text link
    We extend recurrent neural networks to include several flexible timescales for each dimension of their output, which mechanically improves their abilities to account for processes with long memory or with highly disparate time scales. We compare the ability of vanilla and extended long short term memory networks (LSTMs) to predict asset price volatility, known to have a long memory. Generally, the number of epochs needed to train extended LSTMs is divided by two, while the variation of validation and test losses among models with the same hyperparameters is much smaller. We also show that the model with the smallest validation loss systemically outperforms rough volatility predictions by about 20% when trained and tested on a dataset with multiple time series.Comment: 9 page

    Markov Models on Share Price Movements in Nigeria Stock Market Capitalization

    Get PDF
    The stock markets trends can impact companies in different ways. The rise and fall of share price values affect a company?s market capitalization and therefore its market value, and are exposed to market risk. This study assumed share volatility as a stochastic process with Markov property. Thus proposed a first order, time homogenuous Markov chain model for trend prediction of two banks; that is Fidelity bank and Access bank closing share prices from 1-4-2016 to 23 -03-2022. The prediction was done by establishing three states that exist in stock price change which are share prices increase, decline (decrease) or steady. The transition matrix was generated. The powers of transition matrices and probability vectors were also generated for some years and equilibrium was attained

    Impact of Network Connectedness

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2022. 8. ์ด์žฌ์šฑ.๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์€ ์–ธ์ œ๋‚˜ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€, ๊ฐ ์ž์‚ฐ์ด ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋ณด์ƒ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜• (asset pricing model)์€ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์™€ ๊ทธ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ ค ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ค‘ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•ด์„œ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์€ ๊ฑฐ์‹œ ๊ธˆ์œต ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์—… ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ๋•Œ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์€ ์„œ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ค์ฆ์  ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋จผ์ € ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (GNN)์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๋งŒํผ์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ธ๊ฐ€๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. GNN์€ ๊ทธ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ์„œ ์ž˜ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ”ผ์–ด์Šจ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํŠน์ • ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 0๊ณผ 1๋กœ ์ด์ง„ํ™” ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„๊ณผ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰˜์–ด์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์—… ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€, ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด์„œ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. 1957๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์— ์ƒ์žฅ๋œ ์ฃผ์‹๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์„ค๋ช…๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ด์™ธ์—๋„ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฉด์—์„œ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ํ™•๋ฅ ์  ํ• ์ธ์š”์†Œ (stochastic discount factor)๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์  ์—ญ์‹œ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์„ฑ์งˆ์ด๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋“ฏ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด์—๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—์„œ๋„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ (spillover)๋ผ ๋ถ€๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ์ธ์ ‘ํ–‰๋ ฌ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (spatial-temporal GNN)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‹จ๊ธฐ์™€ ์ค‘๊ธฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—์„œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ , ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์— ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜• ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•„์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜• ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ž”์ฐจ์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ๋กœ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์†์‹คํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ์ƒ์žฅ ์ฃผ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ณ€๋™์„œ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํฐ ํญ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์Šนํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ƒํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์—๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์‹คํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ์ž์‚ฐ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์ƒ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฐ๋“ค์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์œ„์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ž์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์ด ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ธก์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ณตํ†ต๋œ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ ์ž ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์ƒ์˜ ํ† ํฐ๋“ค๋กœ ์ œํ•œํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, EIP-1559 ์ ์šฉ ์ดํ›„์— ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด ์‹œ์žฅ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ† ํฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋กœ์„œ ์ž‘์šฉํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์€ ํ† ํฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋กœ, ํ† ํฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—๋„ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ์ž„์„ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นจ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธˆ์œต ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ์žˆ์–ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•จ์˜์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.Financial assets are always exposed to risks. It is important to evaluate the risk properly and figure out how much each asset is compensated for its risk. Asset pricing model explains the behavior of financial asset return by evaluating the risk and risk exposure of asset return. We focused on factor model structure among asset pricing models, which explains excess return through factor and beta coefficients. While conventional factor models estimate factor or beta through various macroeconomic variables or firm-specific variables, there exist fewer studies considering the connectedness between assets. Since financial assets have connected dynamics, asset returns should be priced simultaneously considering the graph structure of assets. In this dissertation, we proposed the AI-based empirical asset pricing model to reflect the connected structure between assets in the factor model. We first proposed the graph neural network-based multi-factor asset pricing model. As important as the structure of the model in constructing an asset pricing model that reflects the structure of the connection between assets is, how to define the connectivity. Graph neural network requires a well-defined graph structure. We defined the connectedness between assets as the binary converted Pearson correlation coefficients of asset returns by the cutoff value. The proposed model consists of a beta estimation part and a factor estimation part, where each part is estimated with firm characteristics and excess returns, respectively. The empirical analysis of U.S equities reveals that the proposed model has more explanatory power and prediction ability than benchmark models. In addition, the most efficient stochastic discount factor can be estimated from the estimated factors. While return is the main object of asset pricing, volatility is also important property for explaining the behavior of financial assets. Volatility can be the factor in explaining return since many studies point out that return and volatility are correlated. As with the asset pricing model, considering the connected structure between assets in volatility prediction can be of great help in explaining the dynamics of assets. In the volatility analysis, what affects between volatility is called spillover. In this aspect, we proposed the volatility prediction model that can directly reflect this spillover effect. We estimated the graph structure between asset volatility using the volatility spillover index and utilized the spatial-temporal graph neural network structure for model construction. From the empirical analysis of global market indices, we confirm that the proposed model shows the best performance in short- and mid-term volatility forecasting. To include volatility in the asset pricing discussion, it is necessary to focus on how volatility is defined in the asset pricing model. In the asset pricing model, volatility can be interpreted as the variance of the residual of the model. However, asset pricing models with time-series estimation mostly have time-unvarying volatility constraints. We constructed an asset pricing model with time-varying volatility by estimating variability using the prediction model and reflecting it in the training loss of the asset pricing model. We identify that the proposed model can improve the statistical performance during the low volatility period through an empirical study of U.S equities. Currently, there are clearly structurally connected assets in the cryptocurrency market, which has grown to a scale that cannot be ignored. All of the same blockchain-based tokens are issued and traded on that blockchain, so they have strong structural connectivity. We tried to identify that an observable factor for explaining excess return exists in such connected tokens as an application of previous studies. We limited the analysis target to Ethereum-based tokens and showed that the Ethereum gas price became a factor for the macroeconomic factor model after the application of EIP-1559. Furthermore, we applied the volatility spillover index-based volatility prediction model using gas return and showed that gas return can increase the prediction performance of certain tokens' volatility.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation of the Dissertation 1 1.2 Aims of the Dissertation 10 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 13 Chapter 2 Graph-based multi-factor asset pricing model 14 2.1 Chapter Overview 14 2.2 Preliminaries 17 2.2.1 Graph Neural Network 17 2.2.2 Graph Convolutional Network 18 2.3 Methodology 19 2.3.1 Multi-factor asset pricing model 19 2.3.2 Proposed method 21 2.3.3 Forward stagewise additive factor modeling 23 2.4 Empirical Studies 24 2.4.1 Data 24 2.4.2 Benchmark models 24 2.4.3 Empirical results 28 2.5 Chapter Summary 33 Chapter 3 Volatility prediction with volatility spillover index 37 3.1 Chapter Overview 37 3.2 Preliminaries 41 3.2.1 Realized Volatility 41 3.2.2 Volatility Spillover Measurements 42 3.2.3 Benchmark Models 45 3.3 Empirical Studies 50 3.3.1 Data 50 3.3.2 Descriptive Statistics 51 3.3.3 Proposed Method 52 3.3.4 Empirical Results 54 3.4 Chapter Summary 61 Chapter 4 Graph-based multi-factor model with time-varying volatility 64 4.1 Chapter overview 64 4.2 Preliminaries 67 4.2.1 Local-linear regression for time-varying parameter estimation 67 4.3 Methodology 68 4.3.1 Time-varying volatility implied loss function 68 4.3.2 Proposed model architecture 70 4.4 Empirical Studies 72 4.4.1 Data 72 4.4.2 Benchmark Models 72 4.4.3 Empirical Results 73 4.5 Chapter Summary 79 Chapter 5 Macroeconomic factor model and spillover-based volatility prediction for ERC-20 tokens 82 5.1 Chapter Overview 82 5.2 Preliminaries 85 5.3 Methodology 86 5.3.1 Relation analysis 86 5.3.2 Factor model analysis 89 5.3.3 Volatility prediction with volatility spillover index 90 5.4 Empirical Studies 90 5.4.1 Data 90 5.4.2 Empirical Results 98 5.5 Chapter Summary 102 Chapter 6 Conclusion 105 6.1 Contributions 105 6.2 Future Work 108 Bibliography 109 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 130๋ฐ•

    Volatility Indexes seem to point to the Past

    Get PDF
    In theory, by institutional trading options (wholesale), professional market participants asses and set future volatilities that can be identified for the retail using the Black-Scholes-formula in reverse. In reality, as regression analysis suggests, it is historical market data which instead are used to determine future values. Further analysis shows that historical volatilities are insufficient predictors. Yet this questionable practice is considered by international accounting standards (IAS/IFRS) to allow "historical data and implied volatilities" for "reasonable estimations". In a kind of short-circuit, historical volatilities are introduced into option trading and returned as implied volatility-indexes. In reality, both differ significantly from future values. Comparing the volatility of the past nine weeks with that of the following nine weeks, estimation error ranges from four to over ten percentage points. (No paper found in the net challenging the implied hypothesis of IAS 39/AG82(f)

    Modelling returns volatility: mixed-frequency model based on momentum of predictability

    Get PDF
    The estimation and prediction of financial asset volatility are important in terms of theoretical and practical applications. Considering that low-frequency and high-frequency information plays an important role in volatility prediction, this article proposes a mixed-frequency model based on the momentum of predictability (MF-MoP). To illustrate the advantages of the proposed model, comparative research is conducted on the prediction accuracy of volatility among the GARCH model, the Realized GARCH model and the MF-MoP model, by the loss function and MCS test. The empirical results show that the MF-MoP model has higher prediction accuracy than the other two models; especially based on skewed-t distribution, the MF-MoP significantly outperforms the competing models. Moreover, the MF-MoP model can improve the forecasting of volatility, regardless of different lookback periods (including 1, 3, 6 and 9 days), different data (including the CSI 300 index, the N225 index and the KS11 index), and realized measures (including RV, RRV and MedRV), indicating that the model is robust

    Long-term effects of the asymmetry and persistence of the prediction of volatility: Evidence for the equity markets of Latin America

    Get PDF
    Este artรญculo analiza el comportamiento de la volatilidad en los mercados accionarios de Amรฉrica Latina.This article proposes an extension to the CGARCH model in order to capture the characteristics ofshort-run and long-run asymmetry and persistence, and examine their effects in modeling and forecastingthe conditional volatility of the stock markets from the region of Latin America during the period from 2January 1992 to 31 December 2014. In the sample analysis, the estimation results of the CGARCH-classmodel family reveal the presence of short-run and long-run significant asymmetric effects and long-runpersistency in the structure of stock price return volatility. The empirical results also show that the use ofsymmetric and asymmetric loss functions and the statistical test of Hansen (2005) are sound alternativesfor evaluating the predictive ability of the asymmetric CGARCH models. In addition, the inclusion of long-run asymmetry and long-run persistency in the variance equation improves significantly the out of samplevolatility forecasts for emerging stock markets of Argentina and Mexico

    A sentiment analysis approach to the prediction of market volatility

    Get PDF
    Prediction and quantification of future volatility and returns play an important role in financial modeling, both in portfolio optimisation and risk management. Natural language processing today allows one to process news and social media comments to detect signals of investors' confidence. We have explored the relationship between sentiment extracted from financial news and tweets and FTSE100 movements. We investigated the strength of the correlation between sentiment measures on a given day and market volatility and returns observed the next day. We found that there is evidence of correlation between sentiment and stock market movements. Moreover, the sentiment captured from news headlines could be used as a signal to predict market returns; we also found that the same does not apply for volatility. However, for the sentiment found in Twitter comments we obtained, in a surprising finding, a correlation coefficient of -0.7 (p < 0.05), which indicates a strong negative correlation between negative sentiment captured from the tweets on a given day and the volatility observed the next day. It is important to keep in mind that stock volatility rises greatly when the market collapses but not symmetrically so when it goes up (the so-called leverage effect). We developed an accurate classifier for the prediction of market volatility in response to the arrival of new information by deploying topic modeling, based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation, in order to extract feature vectors from a collection of tweets and financial news. The obtained features were used as additional input to the classifier. Thanks to the combination of sentiment and topic modeling even on modest (essentially personal) architecture our classifier achieved a directional prediction accuracy for volatility of 63%
    corecore