11 research outputs found
Additive sparsification of CSPs
Multiplicative cut sparsifiers, introduced by Bencz´ur and Karger [STOC’96], have proved extremely influential and found various applications. Precise characterisations were established for sparsifiability of graphs with other 2-variable predicates on Boolean domains by Filtser and Krauthgamer [SIDMA’17] and non-Boolean domains by Butti and Zivn´y [SIDMA’20]. ˇ Bansal, Svensson and Trevisan [FOCS’19] introduced a weaker notion of sparsification termed “additive sparsification”, which does not require weights on the edges of the graph. In particular, Bansal et al. designed algorithms for additive sparsifiers for cuts in graphs and hypergraphs. As our main result, we establish that all Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) admit an additive sparsifier; that is, for every Boolean predicate P : {0, 1} k → {0, 1} of a fixed arity k, we show that CSP(P) admits an additive sparsifier. Under our newly introduced notion of all-but-one sparsification for non-Boolean predicates, we show that CSP(P) admits an additive sparsifier for any predicate P : Dk → {0, 1} of a fixed arity k on an arbitrary finite domain D
Vertex Sparsifiers for Hyperedge Connectivity
Recently, Chalermsook et al. [SODA'21(arXiv:2007.07862)] introduces a notion
of vertex sparsifiers for -edge connectivity, which has found applications
in parameterized algorithms for network design and also led to exciting dynamic
algorithms for -edge st-connectivity [Jin and Sun
FOCS'21(arXiv:2004.07650)]. We study a natural extension called vertex
sparsifiers for -hyperedge connectivity and construct a sparsifier whose
size matches the state-of-the-art for normal graphs. More specifically, we show
that, given a hypergraph with vertices and hyperedges with
terminal vertices and a parameter , there exists a hypergraph
containing only hyperedges that preserves all minimum cuts (up to
value ) between all subset of terminals. This matches the best bound of
edges for normal graphs by [Liu'20(arXiv:2011.15101)]. Moreover,
can be constructed in almost-linear time where is the rank of and
is the total size of , or in time if we slightly relax
the size to hyperedges.Comment: submitted to ESA 202
Maintaining Expander Decompositions via Sparse Cuts
In this article, we show that the algorithm of maintaining expander
decompositions in graphs undergoing edge deletions directly by removing sparse
cuts repeatedly can be made efficient. Formally, for an -edge undirected
graph , we say a cut is -sparse if . A
-expander decomposition of is a partition of into sets such that each cluster contains no -sparse cut
(meaning it is a -expander) with edges crossing
between clusters. A natural way to compute a -expander decomposition is
to decompose clusters by -sparse cuts until no such cut is contained in
any cluster. We show that even in graphs undergoing edge deletions, a slight
relaxation of this meta-algorithm can be implemented efficiently with amortized
update time . Our approach naturally extends to maintaining
directed -expander decompositions and -expander hierarchies and
thus gives a unifying framework while having simpler proofs than previous
state-of-the-art work. In all settings, our algorithm matches the run-times of
previous algorithms up to subpolynomial factors. Moreover, our algorithm
provides stronger guarantees for -expander decompositions. For example,
for graphs undergoing edge deletions, our approach is the first to maintain a
dynamic expander decomposition where each updated decomposition is a refinement
of the previous decomposition, and our approach is the first to guarantee a
sublinear bound on the total number of edges that cross
between clusters across the entire sequence of dynamic updates
Fully Dynamic Min-Cut of Superconstant Size in Subpolynomial Time
We present a deterministic fully dynamic algorithm with subpolynomial
worst-case time per graph update such that after processing each update of the
graph, the algorithm outputs a minimum cut of the graph if the graph has a cut
of size at most for some . Previously, the best update
time was for any and [Thorup,
Combinatorica'07].Comment: SODA 202
LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volum
LIPIcs, Volume 244, ESA 2022, Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 244, ESA 2022, Complete Volum