6 research outputs found
Verifying the Interplay of Authorization Policies and Workflow in Service-Oriented Architectures (Full version)
A widespread design approach in distributed applications based on the
service-oriented paradigm, such as web-services, consists of clearly separating
the enforcement of authorization policies and the workflow of the applications,
so that the interplay between the policy level and the workflow level is
abstracted away. While such an approach is attractive because it is quite
simple and permits one to reason about crucial properties of the policies under
consideration, it does not provide the right level of abstraction to specify
and reason about the way the workflow may interfere with the policies, and vice
versa. For example, the creation of a certificate as a side effect of a
workflow operation may enable a policy rule to fire and grant access to a
certain resource; without executing the operation, the policy rule should
remain inactive. Similarly, policy queries may be used as guards for workflow
transitions.
In this paper, we present a two-level formal verification framework to
overcome these problems and formally reason about the interplay of
authorization policies and workflow in service-oriented architectures. This
allows us to define and investigate some verification problems for SO
applications and give sufficient conditions for their decidability.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures, full version of paper at Symposium on Secure
Computing (SecureCom09
Verifying the Interplay of Authorization Policies and Workflow in Service-Oriented Architectures
A widespread design approach in distributed applications based on the service-oriented paradigm, such as Web-services, consists of clearly separating the enforcement of authorization policies and the workflow of the applications, so that the interplay between the policy level and the workflow level is abstracted away. While such an approach is attractive because it is quite simple and permits one to reason about crucial properties of the policies under consideration, it does not provide the right level of abstraction to specify and reason about the way the workflow may interfere with the policies, and vice versa. In this paper, we present a two-level formal verification framework to overcome these problems and formally reason about the interplay of authorization policies and workflow in service-oriented architectures. This allows us to define and investigate some verification problems for SO applications and give sufficient conditions for their decidability
Verifying the Interplay of Authorization Policies and Workflow in Service-Oriented Architectures
A widespread design approach in distributed applications based on the service-oriented paradigm, such as Web-services, consists of clearly separating the enforcement of authorization policies and the workflow of the applications, so that the interplay between the policy level and the workflow level is abstracted away. While such an approach is attractive because it is quite simple and permits one to reason about crucial properties of the policies under consideration, it does not provide the right level of abstraction to specify and reason about the way the workflow may interfere with the policies, and vice versa. In this paper, we present a two-level formal verification framework to overcome these problems and formally reason about the interplay of authorization policies and workflow in service-oriented architectures. This allows us to define and investigate some verification problems for SO applications and give sufficient conditions for their decidability
Tools and techniques for analysing the impact of information security
PhD ThesisThe discipline of information security is employed by organisations to protect the confidentiality,
integrity and availability of information, often communicated in the form of
information security policies. A policy expresses rules, constraints and procedures to guard
against adversarial threats and reduce risk by instigating desired and secure behaviour of
those people interacting with information legitimately. To keep aligned with a dynamic threat
landscape, evolving business requirements, regulation updates, and new technologies a policy
must undergo periodic review and change. Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) are
the main decision makers on information security policies within an organisation. Making
informed policy modifications involves analysing and therefore predicting the impact of those
changes on the success rate of business processes often expressed as workflows. Security
brings an added burden to completing a workflow. Adding a new security constraint may
reduce success rate or even eliminate it if a workflow is always forced to terminate early. This
can increase the chances of employees bypassing or violating a security policy. Removing an
existing security constraint may increase success rate but may may also increase the risk to
security. A lack of suitably aimed impact analysis tools and methodologies for CISOs means
impact analysis is currently a somewhat manual and ambiguous procedure. Analysis can
be overwhelming, time consuming, error prone, and yield unclear results, especially when
workflows are complex, have a large workforce, and diverse security requirements. This
thesis considers the provision of tools and more formal techniques specific to CISOs to help
them analyse the impact modifying a security policy has on the success rate of a workflow.
More precisely, these tools and techniques have been designed to efficiently compare the
impact between two versions of a security policy applied to the same workflow, one before,
the other after a policy modification.
This work focuses on two specific types of security impact analysis. The first is quantitative
in nature, providing a measure of success rate for a security constrained workflow
which must be executed by employees who may be absent at runtime. This work considers
quantifying workflow resiliency which indicates a workflow’s expected success rate assuming
the availability of employees to be probabilistic. New aspects of quantitative resiliency are introduced in the form of workflow metrics, and risk management techniques to manage
workflows that must work with a resiliency below acceptable levels. Defining these risk
management techniques has led to exploring the reduction of resiliency computation time and
analysing resiliency in workflows with choice. The second area of focus is more qualitative,
in terms of facilitating analysis of how people are likely to behave in response to security
and how that behaviour can impact the success rate of a workflow at a task level. Large
amounts of information from disparate sources exists on human behavioural factors in a
security setting which can be aligned with security standards and structured within a single
ontology to form a knowledge base. Consultations with two CISOs have been conducted,
whose responses have driven the implementation of two new tools, one graphical, the other
Web-oriented allowing CISOs and human factors experts to record and incorporate their
knowledge directly within an ontology. The ontology can be used by CISOs to assess the
potential impact of changes made to a security policy and help devise behavioural controls
to manage that impact. The two consulted CISOs have also carried out an evaluation of the
Web-oriented tool.
vii