Specification and Verification of Synchronous Hardware using LOTOS

This paper investigates specification and verification of synchronous circuits using DILL (Digital Logic in LOTOS). After an overview of the DILL approach, the paper focuses on the characteristics of synchronous circuits. A more constrained model is presented for specifying digital components and verifying them. Two standard benchmark circuits are specified using this new model, and analysed by the CADP toolset (Cæsar/Aldébaran Development Package)

Formally-Based Design Evaluation (extended version)

This paper investigates specification, verification and test generation for synchronous and asynchronous circuits. The approach is called DILL (Digital Logic in LOTOS). DILL models are discussed for synchronous and asynchronous circuits. Relations for (strong) conformance are defined for verifying a design specification against a high-level specification. An algorithm is also outlined for generating and applying implementation tests based on a specification. Tools have been developed for automated test generation and verification of conformance between an implementation and its specification. The approach is illustrated with various benchmark circuits as case studies

Arbiters: an exercise in specifying and decomposing asynchronously communicating components

AbstractA method is presented for the formal specification and decomposition of asynchronously communicating components. The method is demonstrated by the design of some arbiters. An arbiter is a hardware primitive that realizes the mutual exclusive access of processes to their critical sections. It is shown how large arbiters can be decomposed into small ones, and how the communication behaviour of arbiters can be specified concisely and conveniently in a simple program notation. Furthermore, it is shown that the syntax of a program may guide the designer in the verification, and even derivation, of possible decompositions in a calculational style

MPF: A portable message passing facility for shared memory multiprocessors

The design, implementation, and performance evaluation of a message passing facility (MPF) for shared memory multiprocessors are presented. The MPF is based on a message passing model conceptually similar to conversations. Participants (parallel processors) can enter or leave a conversation at any time. The message passing primitives for this model are implemented as a portable library of C function calls. The MPF is currently operational on a Sequent Balance 21000, and several parallel applications were developed and tested. Several simple benchmark programs are presented to establish interprocess communication performance for common patterns of interprocess communication. Finally, performance figures are presented for two parallel applications, linear systems solution, and iterative solution of partial differential equations

A micropower centroiding vision processor

Published versio

Hierarchical gate-level verification of speed-independent circuits

This paper presents a method for the verification of speed-independent circuits. The main contribution is the reduction of the circuit to a set of complex gates that makes the verification time complexity depend only on the number of state signals (C elements, RS flip-flops) of the circuit. Despite the reduction to complex gates, verification is kept exact. The specification of the environment only requires to describe the transitions of the input/output signals of the circuit and is allowed to express choice and non-determinism. Experimental results obtained from circuits with more than 500 gates show that the computational cost can be drastically reduced when using hierarchical verification.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

PUF authentication and key-exchange by substring matching

Mechanisms for operating a prover device and a verifier device so that the verifier device can verify the authenticity of the prover device. The prover device generates a data string by: (a) submitting a challenge to a physical unclonable function (PUF) to obtain a response string, (b) selecting a substring from the response string, (c) injecting the selected substring into the data string, and (d) injecting random bits into bit positions of the data string not assigned to the selected substring. The verifier: (e) generates an estimated response string by evaluating a computational model of the PUF based on the challenge; (f) performs a search process to identify the selected substring within the data string using the estimated response string; and (g) determines whether the prover device is authentic based on a measure of similarity between the identified substring and a corresponding substring of the estimated response string

Open computation tree logic for formal verification of modules

Modules of large VLSI circuits are often designed by different designers spread across the globe. One of the main challenges of the designer is to guarantee that the module he/she designs will work correctly in the global design, the details of which, is often unknown to him/her. Modules are open systems whose behavior is subject to the inputs it receives from its environment. It has been shown that verification of open systems (modules) is computationally very hard (EXPTIME complete, 1996) when we consider all possible environments. On the other hand we show that integrating the specification of the properties to be verified with the specification of only the valid input patterns (under which the module is expected to function correctly) gives us a powerful syntax which can be verified in polynomial time. We call the proposed logic Open-CTL (CTL for open systems). The convenience of being able to specify the property and the environment in a unified way in Open-CTL is demonstrated through a study of the PCI Bus properties. We present a symbolic BDD-based verification scheme for checking Open-CTL formulas, and present experimental results on modules from the Texas-97 Verification Benchmark circuits